| 1 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\subsubsection{Selection of W$\rightarrow \mu \nu$ events}
|
| 2 |
acosta |
1.5 |
Different Monte Carlo data samples with different signal compositions were analyzed to study
|
| 3 |
|
|
the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ preselection yield. The goal of the skimming is to reduce
|
| 4 |
|
|
the disk space for the data storage and physics analysis at Tier-2
|
| 5 |
|
|
whilst preserving the signal and suppressing
|
| 6 |
|
|
the backgrounds. As an example of a simple analysis performed at Tier-2 on skimmed data, the efficiency and resolution
|
| 7 |
|
|
of the muon reconstruction obtained with the CMSSW software were studied as a function of $p_T$ and $\eta$,
|
| 8 |
acosta |
1.3 |
the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ signal was selected with isolation cuts and the transverse mass was
|
| 9 |
acosta |
1.2 |
compared with the same distribution obtained from the background.
|
| 10 |
|
|
The following data samples were considered:
|
| 11 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
| 12 |
acosta |
1.4 |
\item the electroweak soup (3.4M events, 50\% $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ and 50\% DY)
|
| 13 |
acosta |
1.5 |
\item the soft muons (1.8M events, 50\% minimum bias and 50\% $J/\Psi$, $p_T > 4$ GeV)
|
| 14 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 15 |
acosta |
1.4 |
The skim jobs were running at the PIC and CNAF Tier-1 over FEVT (full events). The output was sent at the LNL Tier-2
|
| 16 |
acosta |
1.5 |
in AODSIM format (Analysis Object format). For the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ channel the skim consists of the selection
|
| 17 |
|
|
of events having at least one muon (StandAlone muon reconstructed object) with $ p_T > 10$ GeV.
|
| 18 |
|
|
Table~\ref{tab:wmunu_datareduction} summarizes the reduction of the disk space for the data storage due to the skimming.
|
| 19 |
acosta |
1.4 |
The efficiency of the electroweak soup data skimming results to be 16\% (0.55M events / 3.4M events).
|
| 20 |
acosta |
1.2 |
%
|
| 21 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 22 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 23 |
acosta |
1.4 |
\caption{Data reduction due to the skimming in term of number of events and disk space}
|
| 24 |
|
|
\label{tab:wmunu_datareduction}
|
| 25 |
|
|
\vspace{3mm}
|
| 26 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
|
| 27 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 28 |
|
|
& Input & Output \\
|
| 29 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 30 |
|
|
EWK soup & FEVT , 3.4 Mevts , 5.1 TB & AODSIM , 0.55 Mevts , 0.82 GB \\
|
| 31 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 32 |
|
|
Soft muons & FEVT , 1.8 Mevts , 2.7 TB & AODSIM , 0.94 Mevts , 1.4 GB \\
|
| 33 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 34 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 35 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 36 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
The selection efficiency for the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu$ skimming of the soft muon sample
|
| 39 |
acosta |
1.4 |
was 50\% (0.94M events / 1.8M events). The ``Soft Muon soup'' consisted
|
| 40 |
|
|
of the mixing of approximately 1M events of $J/\Psi$ inclusively
|
| 41 |
acosta |
1.5 |
produced in pp collision with 1M events
|
| 42 |
acosta |
1.4 |
of $pp \rightarrow \mu+X$ events from a minimum bias sample, preselected with a requirement
|
| 43 |
acosta |
1.5 |
of $p_{T}(m)> 4 $GeV/c at the generator level. The analysis was performed with a sample of 0.12M events.
|
| 44 |
|
|
Figure~\ref{fig:wmunu_ptnorm} shows the transverse momentum of muons for the different electroweak
|
| 45 |
|
|
and soft muon soup components with cross section normalization.
|
| 46 |
|
|
Figure~\ref{fig:wmunu_mtnorm} shows the transverse mass for the W boson candidate
|
| 47 |
acosta |
1.2 |
(reconstructed with the missing $E_T$ estimation).
|
| 48 |
acosta |
1.5 |
Figures~\ref{fig:wmunu_ptnormiso} and ~\ref{fig:wmunu_mtnormiso} show the muon $p_T$ and
|
| 49 |
acosta |
1.2 |
W boson $E_T$ distributions after muon isolation cuts.
|
| 50 |
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
|
\begin{2figures}{hbt}
|
| 53 |
|
|
\centering
|
| 54 |
|
|
\includegraphics[angle=90, width=1 \linewidth]{figs/norma_pt} &
|
| 55 |
|
|
\includegraphics[angle=90, width=1 \linewidth]{figs/norma_mt} \\
|
| 56 |
|
|
\caption[]{Transverse momentum of muons after the skimming
|
| 57 |
acosta |
1.3 |
selection for the different electroweak soup and soft muons components with the cross section normalization.}
|
| 58 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\label{fig:wmunu_ptnorm} &
|
| 59 |
acosta |
1.3 |
\caption{Transverse mass of W bosons candidate after the skimming selection.}
|
| 60 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\label{fig:wmunu_mtnorm}
|
| 61 |
|
|
\end{2figures}
|
| 62 |
|
|
|
| 63 |
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
|
\begin{2figures}{hbt}
|
| 65 |
|
|
\centering
|
| 66 |
|
|
\includegraphics[angle=90, width=1 \linewidth]{figs/norma_pt_isol} &
|
| 67 |
|
|
\includegraphics[angle=90, width=1 \linewidth]{figs/norma_mt_isol} \\
|
| 68 |
|
|
\caption[]{Transverse momentum of muons after the isolation cuts.}
|
| 69 |
|
|
\label{fig:wmunu_ptnormiso} &
|
| 70 |
acosta |
1.3 |
\caption{Transverse mass of W bosons candidate after the isolation cuts.}
|
| 71 |
acosta |
1.2 |
\label{fig:wmunu_mtnormiso}
|
| 72 |
|
|
\end{2figures}
|
| 73 |
|
|
|
| 74 |
|
|
|
