| 1 |
friis |
1.1 |
\fixme{need to summarize decay mode}
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
The Tau Neural classifier algorithm significantly improves tau identification
|
| 4 |
|
|
performance compared to isolation--based strategies~\cite{PFT08001} used in
|
| 5 |
|
|
previous CMS strategies. Figure~\ref{fig:finalPerfCurve} compares the
|
| 6 |
|
|
performance of the ``shrinking cone'' isolation tau--identification
|
| 7 |
|
|
algorithm~\cite{PFT08001} to the performance of the TaNC for a scan of
|
| 8 |
|
|
requirements on the transformed neural network output. For tau--candidates with
|
| 9 |
|
|
transverse momentum between 20 and 50 GeV/c, the TaNC operating cut can be
|
| 10 |
|
|
chosen such that the two methods have identical signal efficiency; at this point the TaNC
|
| 11 |
|
|
algorithm reduces the background fake rate by an additional factor of
|
| 12 |
|
|
\fixme{get exact}.
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
The discriminator output of the TaNC algorithm is a continuous quantity,
|
| 15 |
|
|
enabling analysis specific optimization of the selection to maximize
|
| 16 |
|
|
sensitivity. For the convenience of the user, four operating point benchmark
|
| 17 |
|
|
selections are provided in addition to the continuous output. The four operating
|
| 18 |
|
|
points are chosen such that for tau--candidates with transverse momentum between
|
| 19 |
|
|
20 and 50 GeV/c, the expected QCD di--jet fake rate will be 0.1\%, 0.25\%,
|
| 20 |
|
|
0.50\% and 1.0\%, respectively. The signal efficiency and QCD di--jet fake rate
|
| 21 |
|
|
versus tau--candidate transverse momentum and pseudo--rapidity for the four
|
| 22 |
|
|
benchmark points and the isolation based tau identification are show in
|
| 23 |
|
|
figure~\ref{fig:kinematicPerformance}.
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
\fixme{needs a zippy end}
|
| 26 |
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[t]
|
| 28 |
|
|
\setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
|
| 29 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 30 |
|
|
\begin{picture}(150, 150)(0,0)
|
| 31 |
|
|
\put(0.5, 0.5)
|
| 32 |
|
|
{\mbox{\includegraphics*[height=150mm]{figures/20_pt_50_perf_curve_from_5_pt_200_transform_plain_test_wrt_classic.pdf}}}
|
| 33 |
|
|
\end{picture}
|
| 34 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 35 |
|
|
Performance curve (red) of the TaNC tau identification for various
|
| 36 |
|
|
requirements on the output transformed according to
|
| 37 |
|
|
equation~\ref{eq:tancTransform}. The horizontal axis is the efficiency for
|
| 38 |
|
|
true taus with transverse momentum between 20 and 50 GeV/c to satisfy the tau
|
| 39 |
|
|
identification requirements. The vertical axis gives the rate at which QCD
|
| 40 |
|
|
di--jets with generator--level transverse momentum between 20 and 50 GeV/c are incorrectly
|
| 41 |
|
|
identified as taus. The performance point for the same tau--candidates using
|
| 42 |
|
|
the isolation based tau--identification~\cite{PFT08001} used in many previous
|
| 43 |
|
|
CMS analyses is indicated by the black star in the figure.
|
| 44 |
|
|
}
|
| 45 |
|
|
\label{fig:finalPerfCurve}
|
| 46 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 47 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
|
| 50 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[t]
|
| 51 |
|
|
\setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
|
| 52 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 53 |
|
|
\begin{picture}(150, 150)(0,0)
|
| 54 |
|
|
\put(2.5, 75)
|
| 55 |
|
|
{\mbox{\includegraphics*[height=70mm]{figures/eff_background_pt.pdf}}}
|
| 56 |
|
|
\put(75, 75)
|
| 57 |
|
|
{\mbox{\includegraphics*[height=70mm]{figures/eff_background_eta.pdf}}}
|
| 58 |
|
|
\put(2.5, 0)
|
| 59 |
|
|
{\mbox{\includegraphics*[height=70mm]{figures/eff_signal_pt.pdf}}}
|
| 60 |
|
|
\put(75, 0)
|
| 61 |
|
|
{\mbox{\includegraphics*[height=70mm]{figures/eff_signal_pt.pdf}}}
|
| 62 |
|
|
\end{picture}
|
| 63 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 64 |
|
|
\fixme{add caption and legend, isolation+1 or 3 prong is the black trend,
|
| 65 |
|
|
pt greater than 20 cut applied on eta plots}
|
| 66 |
|
|
}
|
| 67 |
|
|
\label{fig:kinematicPerformance}
|
| 68 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 69 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 70 |
|
|
|
