| 1 |
friis |
1.1 |
Tau candidates in all CMS tau identification algorithms are seeded by
|
| 2 |
|
|
reconstructed jets. After particle-flow reconstruction, particle candidates
|
| 3 |
friis |
1.3 |
are clustered into collections by the iterativeCone5 jet algorithm. The
|
| 4 |
|
|
efficiencies for jet seed reconstruction are described in~\cite{PFT08001} and are near
|
| 5 |
friis |
1.1 |
unity for both signal and background. Quality cuts (see
|
| 6 |
|
|
~\ref{table:pftau_q_cuts} are are then applied to the constituents in the jets.
|
| 7 |
|
|
The remaining particles are then considered a ``tau candidate.''
|
| 8 |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
\begin{table}
|
| 10 |
|
|
\centering
|
| 11 |
|
|
\caption{Quality cuts on tau seed jet constituents}
|
| 12 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l r}
|
| 13 |
|
|
Particle flow charged hadron candidates & \\
|
| 14 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 15 |
|
|
Minimum transverse momentum & 0.5 GeV/$c$ \\
|
| 16 |
|
|
Minimum tracker hits & 3 \\
|
| 17 |
|
|
Maximum tracker $\chi^2$ & 100 \\
|
| 18 |
friis |
1.4 |
Maximum track transverse impact parameter & 0.03cm \\
|
| 19 |
friis |
1.1 |
\hline \hline
|
| 20 |
|
|
Particle flow gamma candidates & \\
|
| 21 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 22 |
|
|
Minimum transverse energy & 0.5 GeV \\
|
| 23 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 24 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
The constituents of tau candidate seed jets are then divided into two
|
| 27 |
|
|
collections, called ``signal'' and ``isolation'' collections as the method at
|
| 28 |
|
|
this stage is identical to the process for defining the isolation annulus.
|
