1 |
friis |
1.1 |
The tau identification strategies used in previously published CMS analyses are
|
2 |
|
|
fully described in~\ref{PFT08001}. A summary of the basic methods and
|
3 |
|
|
strategies is given here. There are two primary methods for selecting objects
|
4 |
|
|
used to reconstruct tau leptons. The CaloTau algorithm uses tracks
|
5 |
|
|
reconstructed by the tracker and clusters of hits in the electromagnetic and
|
6 |
|
|
hadronic calorimeter. The other method (PFTau) uses objects reconstructed by
|
7 |
|
|
the CMS particle flow algorithm, which is described in~\ref{PFT09}. The
|
8 |
|
|
particle flow algorithm provides a global and unique description of every
|
9 |
|
|
particle (charged hadron, photon, electron, etc.) in the event; measurements
|
10 |
|
|
from subdetectors are combined according to their measured resolutions to
|
11 |
|
|
improve energy and angular resolution and reduce double counting. The
|
12 |
|
|
strategies described in this paper use the particle flow objects.
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
\fixme{Talk about lead track}
|
15 |
|
|
Both methods use an isolation criteria to reject quark and gluon jet background.
|
16 |
|
|
Quark and gluon jets are less collimated and have a higher constituent
|
17 |
|
|
multiplicity and softer constituent $p_T$ spectrum than a kinematically
|
18 |
|
|
comparable hadronic tau decays. Isolation algorithms exploit this feature by
|
19 |
|
|
defining an isolation annulus about the kinematic center of the jet and
|
20 |
|
|
requiring no detector activity about a threshold in that annulus. This approach
|
21 |
|
|
rejects QCD backgrounds by a factor of $\mathcal O(100)$ while a maintaing hadronic
|
22 |
|
|
tau identification of approximately 50\%.
|