ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/MitHzz4l/Documentation/Backgrounds.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/MitHzz4l/Documentation/Backgrounds.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.4 by dkralph, Tue Nov 8 20:25:07 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 1.6 by dkralph, Tue Nov 8 21:17:19 2011 UTC

# Line 86 | Line 86 | We calculate the fakerates ($\epsilon_{F
86   \begin{center}
87   \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/bdt-medium-frpt.png}
88   \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/frMu.png}
89 \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/frMu.png}
89   \caption{ Muon and Electron Fake Rates.}
90   \label{fig:FR}
91   \end{center}
# Line 105 | Line 104 | Table~\ref{tab:fakes} presents $\ell\ell
104   \multicolumn{2}{c}{Z1-Inclusive $\ell\ell jj$ Yields} \\
105   \hline
106   $Z1 + \mu\mu$      & $0.057 \pm X$ \\
107 < $Z1 + ee$          & $X \pm Y$     \\
107 > $Z1 + ee$          & $1.8   \pm 1$     \\
108   \hline
109   \multicolumn{2}{c}{Per-Channel $\ell\ell jj$ Yields} \\
110   \hline
111   $4\mu$      & $0.044 \pm X$ \\
112 < $4e$        & $X \pm Y$     \\
113 < $2e2\mu$    & $(0.013 + Z) \pm Y$     \\
112 > $4e$        & $0.4 \pm 0.3$     \\
113 > $2e2\mu$    & $(0.013 + 1.4) \pm 0.9$     \\
114   \hline
115   \end{tabular}
116   \caption{Expected $\ell\ell jj$ Events.}
# Line 153 | Line 152 | Next, we attempt to predict the number o
152  
153   %This difference can be understood as a result of differences in the composition of the prediction sample (mainly light flavor) and that used to measure the fakerate (a mix of light and heavy flavor).  
154  
155 < {\bf For electrons ...}
155 > For electrons, in order to isolate a pure sample of W+jets where the jet fakes an electron, a cross-flavor same-sign sample was chosen with a well-identified muon satisfying $iso_{PF}/P_{T} < 0.025$ and $p_{T}>30$. This region also contains Z+jets and dijet backgrounds. The W+jets and Z+jets components are represented by templates from Monte Carlo while the dijet is modelled by a Rayleigh distribution. The three are fitted to the observed same-sign events on the left of Figure~\ref{fig:ssEle}. The region with $MET>30~GeV$ is enriched in W+jets, so is chosen to test closure in the mass spectrum. The right of the same figure shows this observation compared to the fake prediction computed in the same way as in the muon case, and shows an under-prediction of $15\%$.
156   %For electrons, charge misidentification is significant enough to result in a noticible Z-peak.  The jet background is however easily estimated from a fit with a same-sign MC Z template and an exponential background PDF.  Events selected in data are shown in Figures~\ref{fig:ssMuon} and (\ref{fig:ssEle}) as points.  Table~\ref{tab:ssfakes} lists the total number of observed events in the muon-channel and the electron-channel background determined from the fit.
157  
158   %-------------------------------------------------
# Line 161 | Line 160 | Next, we attempt to predict the number o
160   \begin{center}
161   \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssEleMET.png}
162   \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssEleMZ1.png}
163 < \caption{ Fakerate Predictions for Same-sign Electron Events. {\bf Plots are currently for muons ... }}
164 < \label{fig:ssEle}
163 > \caption{ Fakerate Predictions for Same-sign Electron Events.}
164 > \label{fig:ssEle}
165   \end{center}
166   \end{figure}
167   %-------------------------------------------------
168  
169 < Table summarizes the results of this section.  We take $47.2\%$ ($X\%$) as the systematic uncertainty on the muon (electron) fakerate to account for potential biases in our prediction due to differences in light flavor composition.
169 > Table summarizes the results of this section.  We take $47.2\%$ ($15\%$) as the systematic uncertainty on the muon (electron) fakerate to account for potential biases in our prediction due to differences in light flavor composition.
170  
171   %-------------------------------------------------
172   \begin{table}[tbh]
# Line 177 | Line 176 | Table summarizes the results of this sec
176   channel                 & observed & predicted  & systematic     \\
177   \hline
178   ${\rm same~sign} \mu\mu$      & $159$    & $108.04$  & $47.2\%$\\
179 < ${\rm same~sign} ee$          & $X$      & $Y$       &  $Z\%$ \\
179 > ${\rm same~sign} ee$          & $400$      & $346$       &  $15\%$ \\
180   \hline
181   \end{tabular}
182   \caption{Same-sign Control Yields and Systematic}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines