| 65 |
|
\hline |
| 66 |
|
variable & requirement & variable & requirement \\ |
| 67 |
|
\hline |
| 68 |
< |
~ & ~ & $p_{T}$ & $> 5\rm~GeV$ \\ |
| 69 |
< |
~ & ~ & type & $\rm Global~||~Tracker$ \\ |
| 70 |
< |
~ & ~ & $|d_{0}|$ & $< 2\rm~mm$ \\ |
| 71 |
< |
~ & ~ & $Iso^{pf}_{0.3}$ & $< 3\times p_{T}$ \\ |
| 68 |
> |
$E_{T}$ & $> 7\rm~GeV$ & $p_{T}$ & $> 5\rm~GeV$ \\ |
| 69 |
> |
$|dz|$ & $< 0.1\rm~cm$ & type & $\rm Global~||~Tracker$ \\ |
| 70 |
> |
$|\eta|$ & $< 2.5\rm~GeV$ & $|d_{0}|$ & $< 2\rm~mm$ \\ |
| 71 |
> |
$H/E$ & $< 0.12(0.1) EB(EE)$ & $Iso^{pf}_{0.3}$ & $< 3\times p_{T}$ \\ |
| 72 |
> |
$iso_{trk}$ & $<0.3$ & ~ & ~ \\ |
| 73 |
> |
$iso_{em}$ & $<0.3$ & ~ & ~ \\ |
| 74 |
> |
$iso_{had}$ & $<0.3$ & ~ & ~ \\ |
| 75 |
|
\hline |
| 76 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 77 |
|
\caption{Denominator Object Definitions}\label{tab:fo} |
| 84 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
| 85 |
|
\begin{figure}[tbp] |
| 86 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 87 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/frMu.png} |
| 87 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/bdt-medium-frpt.png} |
| 88 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/frMu.png} |
| 89 |
|
\caption{ {\bf Muon and Electron Fake Rates.}\label{fig:FR} } |
| 90 |
|
\end{center} |
| 117 |
|
\end{table} |
| 118 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
| 119 |
|
|
| 120 |
< |
It is difficult to predict shapes for the $m(4\ell)$ distributions of $\ell\ell jj$ background with the limited number of events containing a good $Z1$ and two failing denominator objects. We increase sample size by loosening the denominator and $Z2$ selections. For the muon-channel, we relax the isolation requirement in the denominator definition and remove the opposite-sign requirement in the $Z2$ selection. For electrons we ... {\bf XXX}. With these modifications we obtain the $m(4\ell)$ distributions shown Figure~\ref{fig:fakeshapes}. We fit the observed shapes with Landau distributions and obtain an acceptable goodness-of-fit. Consequently, we use Landau distributions to model the $m(4l)$ distribution of our $\ell\ell jj$ predictions, also shown in Figure~\ref{fig:fakeshapes}. |
| 120 |
> |
It is difficult to predict shapes for the $m(4\ell)$ distributions of $\ell\ell jj$ background with the limited number of events containing a good $Z1$ and two failing denominator objects. We increase sample size by loosening the denominator and $Z2$ selections. For the muon-channel, we relax the isolation requirement in the denominator definition and remove the opposite-sign requirement in the $Z2$ selection. For electrons we ... {\bf XXX}. With these modifications we obtain the $m(4\ell)$ distributions shown Figure~\ref{fig:mufakeshapes}. We fit the observed shapes with Landau distributions and obtain an acceptable goodness-of-fit. Consequently, we use Landau distributions to model the $m(4l)$ distribution of our $\ell\ell jj$ predictions, also shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mufakeshapes}. |
| 121 |
|
|
| 122 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
| 123 |
|
\begin{figure}[tbp] |
| 125 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/muFakeShape-4m.png} |
| 126 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/muFakeShape-2m.png} |
| 127 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/muFakeShape-4m.png} |
| 128 |
< |
\caption{ Predicted $m(4\ell)$ Distributions for $\ell\ell jj$ Events.\label{fig:fakeshapes} } |
| 128 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/eleFakeShape-inclusive.png} |
| 129 |
> |
\caption{ Predicted $m(4\ell)$ Distributions for $\ell\ell jj$ Events.\label{fig:mufakeshapes} } |
| 130 |
|
\end{center} |
| 131 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 132 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
| 158 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
| 159 |
|
\begin{figure}[htb] |
| 160 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 161 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssMuMET} |
| 162 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssMuMZ1} |
| 163 |
< |
\caption{ Fakerate Predictions for Same-sign Electron Events. Plots are currently for muons ... }\label{fig:ssEle} |
| 161 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssEleMET.png} |
| 162 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{figs/ssEleMZ1.png} |
| 163 |
> |
\caption{ Fakerate Predictions for Same-sign Electron Events.}\label{fig:ssEle} |
| 164 |
|
\end{center} |
| 165 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 166 |
|
%------------------------------------------------- |
