| 1 |
khahn |
1.1 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
| 2 |
|
|
\section{Data \& Simulation}\label{section:Samples}
|
| 3 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
| 4 |
khahn |
1.2 |
This analysis uses the same data and Monte Carlo (MC) samples used in~\cite{baseline}. Table~\ref{tab:data} summarizes relevant details of the combined $2.1\rm~fb^{-1}$ dataset we analyze. {\bf need to replace PR's with oct3,and jul5, add the 2010 data back in}. We model processes that contribute to our signal region with the MC samples listed in Table~\ref{tab:mc}. The first and second rows of this table list samples used directly for signal extraction or background estimation. The cross sections and branching ratios used for Higgs signal processes are taken from the CERN Yellow Report~\cite{Yello}. Samples given in the last row of Table~\ref{tab:mc} are not used for direct yield estimation. Instead, we use these samples in cross-checks of data-driven background estimates and for shape studies when we lack sufficient data.
|
| 5 |
khahn |
1.1 |
|
| 6 |
khahn |
1.2 |
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 7 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 8 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 9 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
|
| 10 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 11 |
|
|
{\bf Dataset} & {\bf Era } & {\bf Runs } & {\bf Trigger} \\
|
| 12 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 13 |
|
|
\multirow{3}{*}{DoubleElectron} & Run2011A-105May2011-v1 & $X-X$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 14 |
|
|
& Run2011A-PromptReco-v4 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 15 |
|
|
& Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 16 |
|
|
& Run2011A-PromptReco-v6 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 17 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 18 |
|
|
\multirow{3}{*}{DoubleMuon} & Run2011A-10May2011-v1 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 19 |
|
|
& Run2011A-PromptReco-v4 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 20 |
|
|
& Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 21 |
|
|
& Run2011A-PromptReco-v6 & $x-x$ & \verb| trigger | \\
|
| 22 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 23 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 24 |
|
|
\caption{{\bf Data Samples \& Trigger.}\label{tab:data}}
|
| 25 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 26 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 27 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 28 |
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 31 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 32 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 33 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 34 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 35 |
|
|
{\bf Process} & {\bf $\sigma_{(N)NLO}\rm~(pb)$ } & {\bf Sample Name} \\
|
| 36 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 37 |
|
|
$gg\rightarrow H$ & $X-X$ & blah \\
|
| 38 |
|
|
$VV\rightarrow H$ & $X-X$ & blah \\
|
| 39 |
|
|
$WH, ZH, t\bar{t}H$ & $X-X$ & blah \\
|
| 40 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 41 |
|
|
$q\bar{q}\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 4e(4\mu)$ & $0.01105$ & blah \\
|
| 42 |
|
|
$q\bar{q}\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 2e2\mu$ & $0.02442$ & blah \\
|
| 43 |
|
|
$gg\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 4e(4\mu)$ & $0.00465$ & blah \\
|
| 44 |
|
|
$gg\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 2e2\mu$ & $0.00929$ & blah \\
|
| 45 |
|
|
$WZ\rightarrow 3\ell$ & $0.59558$ & blah \\
|
| 46 |
|
|
$Z\gamma\rightarrow ee\gamma$ & $42.7$ & blah \\
|
| 47 |
|
|
$Z\gamma\rightarrow \mu\mu\gamma$ & $42.0$ & blah \\
|
| 48 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 49 |
|
|
$t\bar{t}\rightarrow 2\ell 2\nu 2b$ & $16.5$ & blah \\
|
| 50 |
|
|
$Zb\bar{b}\rightarrow 2\ell 2b$ & $23.5$ & blah \\
|
| 51 |
|
|
$Z + jets$ & $3048$ & blah \\
|
| 52 |
|
|
$W + jets$ & $31314$ & blah \\
|
| 53 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 54 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 55 |
|
|
\caption{{\bf MC Samples \& Cross Sections.}\label{tab:MC}}
|
| 56 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 57 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 58 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 59 |
khahn |
1.1 |
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
