| 1 |
khahn |
1.1 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
| 2 |
|
|
\section{Data \& Simulation}\label{section:Samples}
|
| 3 |
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
| 4 |
khahn |
1.3 |
We analyze $4.7\rm~fb^{-1}$ of 2011 data in this analysis. We select events from the \verb|DoubleElectron| and \verb|DoubleMuon| datasets that pass the lowest-threshold, unprescaled double-lepton trigger available in a given run. The triggers used and the run ranges we consider are listed in Tables~\ref{tab:dataele} and~\ref{tab:datamu}.
|
| 5 |
khahn |
1.2 |
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 6 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 7 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 8 |
khahn |
1.3 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 9 |
|
|
{\bf Era } & {\bf Runs } & {\bf Trigger} \\
|
| 10 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 11 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-10May2011-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb|Ele17_CaloIdL_CaloIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdL_CaloIsoVL|}\\
|
| 12 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-PromptReco-v4|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb|Ele17_CaloIdL_CaloIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdL_CaloIsoVL|}\\
|
| 13 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb|Ele17_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL|}\\
|
| 14 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-03Oct2011-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb|Ele17_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL|}\\
|
| 15 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011B-PromptReco-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb|Ele17_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL_Ele8_CaloIdT_TrkIdVL_CaloIsoVL_TrkIsoVL|}\\
|
| 16 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\hline
|
| 17 |
khahn |
1.3 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 18 |
|
|
\caption{ DoubleElectron Data Samples \& Triggers.}}\label{tab:dataele}
|
| 19 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 20 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 21 |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 23 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 24 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 25 |
|
|
{\bf Era } & {\bf Runs } & {\bf Trigger} \\
|
| 26 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\hline
|
| 27 |
khahn |
1.3 |
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-10May2011-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb| trigger |} \\
|
| 28 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-PromptReco-v4|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb| trigger |} \\
|
| 29 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-05Aug2011-v1|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb| trigger |} \\
|
| 30 |
|
|
\tiny{\verb|Run2011A-PromptReco-v6|} & $x-x$ & \tiny{\verb| trigger |} \\
|
| 31 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\hline
|
| 32 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 33 |
khahn |
1.3 |
\caption{ DoubleMuon Data Samples \& Trigger.}}\label{tab:datamu}
|
| 34 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\end{center}
|
| 35 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 36 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 37 |
|
|
|
| 38 |
khahn |
1.3 |
The first and second rows of Table~\ref{tab:MC} list samples of Monte Carlo (MC) events used for signal extraction and background estimation. We employ $17$ sets of simulated Higgs samples corresponding to mass hypotheses between $115\rm~GeV/c^{2}$ and $600\rm~GeV/c^{2}$. Higgs cross sections, branching ratios and their uncertainties are taken from the CERN Yellow Report~\cite{Yello}. The last row of Table~\ref{tab:MC} lists MC samples that we use to cross-check data-driven background estimates and to estaimte shapes when sufficient data is lacking. All samples in Table~\ref{tab:MC} were produced with \verb|S4_START42_V11| conditions as part of the \verb|Summer11| campaign. We reweight events from all samples to the vertex multiplicity distribution measured in data.
|
| 39 |
khahn |
1.2 |
|
| 40 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 41 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 42 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 43 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 44 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 45 |
khahn |
1.3 |
{\bf Process} & {\bf Sample Name} & {\bf $\sigma\rm~(pb)$ } \\
|
| 46 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\hline
|
| 47 |
khahn |
1.3 |
$gg\rightarrow H$ & \verb|GluGluToHToZZTo4L_M-(*)_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $X-Y$ \\
|
| 48 |
|
|
$VV\rightarrow H$ & \verb|VBF_ToHToZZTo4L_M-(*)_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $X-Y$ \\
|
| 49 |
|
|
$WH, ZH, t\bar{t}H$ & \verb|WH_ZH_TTH_HToZZTo4L_M-120_7TeV-pythia6| & $X-Y$ \\
|
| 50 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 51 |
|
|
$q\bar{q}\rightarrow ZZ^{*}\rightarrow 2e2\mu$ & \verb|ZZTo2e2mu_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $0.02442$ \\
|
| 52 |
|
|
$q\bar{q}\rightarrow ZZ^{*}\rightarrow 4e$ & \verb|ZZTo4e_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $0.01105$ \\
|
| 53 |
|
|
$q\bar{q}\rightarrow ZZ^{*}\rightarrow 4\mu$ & \verb|ZZTo4mu_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $0.01105$ \\
|
| 54 |
|
|
$gg\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 4e(4\mu)$ & \verb|GluGluToZZTo4L_7TeV-gg2zz-pythia6| & $0.00465$ \\
|
| 55 |
|
|
$gg\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 2e2\mu$ & \verb|GluGluToZZTo2L2L_7TeV-gg2zz-pythia6| & $0.00929$ \\
|
| 56 |
|
|
$WZ\rightarrow 3\ell$ & \verb|WZJetsTo3LNu_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph-tauola| & $0.59558$ \\
|
| 57 |
|
|
$Z\gamma\rightarrow ee\gamma$ & \verb|ZGToEEG_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph| & $42.7$ \\
|
| 58 |
|
|
$Z\gamma\rightarrow \mu\mu\gamma$ & \verb|ZGToMuMuG_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph| & $42.0$ \\
|
| 59 |
|
|
$Z\gamma\rightarrow \tau\tau\gamma$ & \verb|ZGToTauTauG_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph-tauola| & $42.7$ \\
|
| 60 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 61 |
|
|
$t\bar{t}\rightarrow 2\ell 2\nu 2b$ & \verb|TTTo2L2Nu2B_7TeV-powheg-pythia6| & $16.5$ \\
|
| 62 |
|
|
$Zb\bar{b}\rightarrow 2\ell 2b$ & \verb|ZbbToLL_M-50_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph-pythia6_tauola| & $23.5$ \\
|
| 63 |
|
|
$Z + jets$ & \verb|DYJetsToLL_TuneZ2_M-50_7TeV-madgraph-tauola| & $3048$ \\
|
| 64 |
|
|
$W + jets$ & \verb|WJetsToLNu_TuneZ2_7TeV-madgraph-tauola| & $31314$ \\
|
| 65 |
khahn |
1.2 |
\hline
|
| 66 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 67 |
|
|
\caption{{\bf MC Samples \& Cross Sections.}\label{tab:MC}}
|
| 68 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 69 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 70 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------------------
|
| 71 |
khahn |
1.1 |
|
| 72 |
|
|
|
