1 |
ymaravin |
1.2 |
In this note we tried to summarize extensive studies of em-jet
|
2 |
|
|
discriminating variables. We come to conclusion that variables
|
3 |
|
|
that are utilized in the official ``Robust'' and ``Loose'' criteria
|
4 |
|
|
are very effective to discriminate against misidentified jets,
|
5 |
|
|
except for $E/p$ variable that we find less powerful than $E_{seed}/p_{out}$.
|
6 |
|
|
We also indicate that complexity of ``Loose'' criteria can be
|
7 |
|
|
substituted by a slight tightening of the thresholds, and similarly
|
8 |
|
|
``Tight'' criteria's performance can be achieved by introducing
|
9 |
|
|
a simple $H/E$ + ECAL isolation requirement that we refer to as $EMHAD$.
|
10 |
|
|
This result in five-variable criteria compared with seven variables + isolation
|
11 |
|
|
+ six categorization criteria.
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
We also study the performance of various track, ECAL, and HCAL
|
14 |
|
|
isolation requirements and come up with a few choices with optimal
|
15 |
|
|
values of cone sizes.
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
To summarize, a simple cut-based criteria is developed, mostly
|
18 |
|
|
based on variables used in the official selection criteria that
|
19 |
|
|
allows to achieve a significance of 3.7$\sigma$ in 1 fb$^{-1}$ of
|
20 |
|
|
integrated luminosity in $WZ \rightarrow e \nu_e \mu^+\mu^-$
|
21 |
|
|
channel alone.
|