| 1 |
In this note we tried to summarize extensive studies of em-jet
|
| 2 |
discriminating variables. We come to conclusion that variables
|
| 3 |
that are utilized in the official ``Robust'' and ``Loose'' criteria
|
| 4 |
are very effective to discriminate against misidentified jets,
|
| 5 |
except for $E/p$ variable that we find less powerful than $E_{seed}/p_{out}$.
|
| 6 |
We also indicate that complexity of ``Loose'' criteria can be
|
| 7 |
substituted by a slight tightening of the thresholds, and similarly
|
| 8 |
``Tight'' criteria's performance can be achieved by introducing
|
| 9 |
a simple $H/E$ + ECAL isolation requirement that we refer to as $EMHAD$.
|
| 10 |
This result in five-variable criteria compared with seven variables + isolation
|
| 11 |
+ six categorization criteria.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We also study the performance of various track, ECAL, and HCAL
|
| 14 |
isolation requirements and come up with a few choices with optimal
|
| 15 |
values of cone sizes.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
To summarize, a simple cut-based criteria is developed, mostly
|
| 18 |
based on variables used in the official selection criteria that
|
| 19 |
allows to achieve a significance of 3.7$\sigma$ in 1 fb$^{-1}$ of
|
| 20 |
integrated luminosity in $WZ \rightarrow e \nu_e \mu^+\mu^-$
|
| 21 |
channel alone.
|
