ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/Vuko/Notes/WZCSA07/AppendixFitTest.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/Vuko/Notes/WZCSA07/AppendixFitTest.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.5 by beaucero, Mon Jul 28 13:38:36 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.6 by beaucero, Mon Jul 28 14:30:36 2008 UTC

# Line 37 | Line 37 | The comparison can be seen in table~\ref
37                      & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Background with genuine \Z} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Background without
38                      genuine \Z boson} \\
39   Channel    & $\Z+jets$ & $\Z b\bar{b}$ &   $t\bar{t}$ & $\W+jets$ & $t\bar{t}$ + $\W+jets$ & Fit result \\ \hline
40 < $3e$ Loose &7.08067 & 2.86817 & 1.12287 & 0.357018 & 1.47989 & 1.45557$ \pm $2.9589 \\\hline
41 < $3e$ Tight &1.95631 & 1.20063 & 0.623349 & 0.357018 & 0.980367 & 1.11349$ \pm $2.83365 \\\hline
42 < $2e1mu$ Loose &3.97174 & 4.73581 & 6.17639 & 0 & 6.17639 & 6.0224$ \pm $4.0679 \\\hline
43 < $2e1mu$ Tight &0 & 0.0889355 & 0.734362 & 0 & 0.734362 & 0.97086$ \pm $2.80976 \\\hline  
44 < $2mu1e$ Loose &10.1004 & 2.93487 & 0.79839 & 0 & 0.79839 & 1.55994$ \pm $3.1279 \\\hline
45 < $2mu1e$ Tight &1.81221 & 1.28956 & 0.648954 & 0 & 0.648954 & 0.979719$ \pm $2.67068 \\\hline
46 < $3mu$ Loose &4.54662 & 4.17997 & 5.87059 & 0 & 5.87059 & 3.07779$ \pm $3.50566 \\\hline
47 < $3mu$ Tight &0.144028 & 0.28904 & 0.324477 & 0 & 0.324477 & 0.470637$ \pm $2.46181 \\\hline
40 > $3e$ Loose &7.1 & 2.9 & 1.1 & 0.4 & 1.5 & 1.5$ \pm $3.0 \\\hline
41 > $3e$ Tight &2.0 & 1.2 & 0.6 & 0.4 & 1.0 & 1.1$ \pm $2.8 \\\hline
42 > $2e1mu$ Loose &4.0 & 4.7 & 6.2 & 0.0 & 6.2 & 6.0$ \pm $4.1 \\\hline
43 > $2e1mu$ Tight &0.0 & 0.1 & 0.7 & 0.0 & 0.7 & 1.0$ \pm $2.8 \\\hline  
44 > $2mu1e$ Loose &10.1 & 2.9 & 0.8 & 0.0 & 0.8 & 1.6$ \pm $3.1 \\\hline
45 > $2mu1e$ Tight &1.8 & 1.3 & 0.6 & 0.0 & 0.6 & 1.0$ \pm $2.7 \\\hline
46 > $3mu$ Loose &4.5 & 4.2 & 5.9 & 0.0 & 5.9 & 3.1$ \pm $3.5 \\\hline
47 > $3mu$ Tight &0.1 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 0.0 & 0.3 & 0.5$ \pm $2.5 \\\hline
48   \end{tabular}
49   \end{center}
50   \caption{Comparison between Monte Carlo truth information and the results of the fit for the background without genuine \Z boson. Number of events are obtained in the invariant mass range between 81 and 101 GeV. The ``Loose'' and ``Tight'' selection criteria applied for third lepton considered.
# Line 62 | Line 62 | for $3e$, $2e1\mu$, $2\mu1e$ and $3\mu$
62    \begin{center}
63   \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
64   & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
65 < $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &12.4437$\pm$0.992046 &8.69811$\pm$0&13.1255$\pm$0.937399&10.5715$\pm$0\\ \hline
66 < $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&1.11349$\pm$2.83365&0.97086$\pm$2.80976&0.979719$\pm$2.67068&0.470637$\pm$2.46181\\ \hline
67 < $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&3.21939 $\pm$1.78953&0.948261 $\pm$1.05074&4.63515 $\pm$2.11436&0.945652 $\pm$1.13388\\ \hline
68 < $N^{WZ}$ & 8.23222 $\pm$3.53155&7.74985 $\pm$3.15299 &7.55297 $\pm$3.54442&9.62584 $\pm$2.75094\\ \hline
65 > $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &12.4$\pm$1.0 &8.7$\pm$0.0&13.1$\pm$0.9&10.6$\pm$0.0\\ \hline
66 > $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&1.1$\pm$2.8&1.0$\pm$2.8&1.0$\pm$2.7&0.5$\pm$2.5\\ \hline
67 > $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&3.2 $\pm$1.8&0.9 $\pm$1.1&4.6 $\pm$2.1&0.9 $\pm$1.1\\ \hline
68 > $N^{WZ}$ & 8.2$\pm$3.5&7.7 $\pm$3.2 &7.6$\pm$3.5&9.6 $\pm$2.8\\ \hline
69   \WZ from MC &7.9&8.1& 9.0 &10.1\\
70  
71   \hline
# Line 82 | Line 82 | $N^{WZ}$ & 8.23222 $\pm$3.53155&7.74985
82    \begin{center}
83   \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
84   & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
85 < $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &19.9098$\pm$1.00886&23.5941$\pm$0.00420358&23.3592$\pm$0.95001&25.5227$\pm$0.00420358\\ \hline
86 < $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&1.45557$\pm$2.9589&6.0224$\pm$4.0679&1.55994$\pm$3.1279&3.07779$\pm$3.50566\\ \hline
87 < $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&10.0606 $\pm$6.75575&15.8043 $\pm$8.41727)&14.4848 $\pm$6.80421&15.7609 $\pm$5.70923\\ \hline
88 < $N^{WZ}$ & 8.84029 $\pm$7.51757&7.78552 $\pm$11.1206&7.92435 $\pm$7.64947&9.75762 $\pm$7.37277\\ \hline
85 > $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &19.9$\pm$1.0&23.6$\pm$0.0&23.4$\pm$1.0&25.5$\pm$0.0\\ \hline
86 > $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&1.5$\pm$3.0&6.0$\pm$4.1&1.6$\pm$3.1&3.1$\pm$3.5\\ \hline
87 > $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&10.1 $\pm$6.8&15.8 $\pm$8.4&14.5 $\pm$6.8&15.8 $\pm$5.7\\ \hline
88 > $N^{WZ}$ & 8.8$\pm$7.5&7.8$\pm$11.1&7.9$\pm$7.6&9.8 $\pm$7.4\\ \hline
89   \WZ from MC &8.1&9.0& 9.2 &11.3\\
90  
91   \hline
# Line 138 | Line 138 | Check on Without MWtCut Samples~\ref{tab
138                      & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Background with genuine \Z} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Background without
139                      genuine \Z boson} \\
140   Channel    & $\Z+jets$ & $\Z b\bar{b}$ &   $t\bar{t}$ & $\W+jets$ & $t\bar{t}$ + $\W+jets$ & Fit result \\ \hline
141 < $3e$ Loose &44.5748 & 12.6511 & 1.62239 & 0.357018 & 1.9794 & 6.81271$ \pm $5.60783 \\\hline
142 < $3e$ Tight &13.8877 & 5.04709 & 0.79839 & 0.357018 & 1.15541 & 3.76484$ \pm $7.74145 \\\hline
143 < $2e1mu$ Loose &41.5198 & 78.9304 & 12.6155 & 0 & 12.6155 & 16.1879$ \pm $5.12531 \\\hline
144 < $2e1mu$ Tight &0.993801 & 1.97881 & 0.883798 & 0 & 0.883798 & 1.63388$ \pm $2.94792 \\\hline
145 < $2mu1e$ Loose &56.2794 & 15.3858 & 1.89565 & 0 & 1.89565 & 7.24906$ \pm $5.77249 \\\hline
146 < $2mu1e$ Tight &17.2942 & 5.55847 & 0.79839 & 0 & 0.79839 & 4.53933$ \pm $7.00846 \\\hline
147 < $3mu$ Loose &43.6972 & 84.8891 & 11.9976 & 0 & 11.9976 & 11.1603$ \pm $3.36046 \\\hline
148 < $3mu$ Tight &0.806562 & 2.31232 & 0.324477 & 0 & 0.324477 & 0.836361$ \pm $2.47575 \\\hline
141 > $3e$ Loose &44.6 & 12.7 & 1.6 & 0.4 & 2.0 & 6.6$\pm$4.2 \\\hline
142 > $3e$ Tight &13.9 & 5.0 & 0.8 & 0.4 & 1.2 & 3.8$\pm$3.5 \\\hline
143 > $2e1mu$ Loose &41.5 & 78.9 & 12.6 & 0 & 12.6 & 16.9$\pm$5.5 \\\hline
144 > $2e1mu$ Tight &1.0 & 2.0 & 0.9 & 0 & 0.9 & 1.5$\pm$3.2 \\\hline
145 > $2mu1e$ Loose &56.3 & 15.4 & 1.9 & 0 & 1.9 & 6.9$\pm$4.4 \\\hline
146 > $2mu1e$ Tight &17.3 & 5.6 & 0.8 & 0 & 0.8 & 4.1$\pm$2.5 \\\hline
147 > $3mu$ Loose &43.7 & 84.9 & 12.0 & 0 & 12.0 & 11.0$\pm$5.0 \\\hline
148 > $3mu$ Tight &0.8 & 2.3 & 0.3 & 0 & 0.3 & 0.8$\pm$2.8 \\\hline
149   \end{tabular}
150   \end{center}
151   \caption{Comparison between Monte Carlo truth information and the results of the fit for the background without genuine \Z boson. Number of events are obtained in the invariant mass range between 81 and 101 GeV. The ``Loose'' and ``Tight'' selection criteria applied for third lepton considered.
# Line 166 | Line 166 | for $3e$, $2e1\mu$, $2\mu1e$ and $3\mu$
166    \begin{center}
167   \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
168   & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
169 < %$N_{Loose}$ - ZZ -Zgamma &19.7$\pm$1.1 &22.9$\pm$0.7 &22.9$\pm$1.1 &25.6$\pm$0.8 \\
170 < %$N_{Loose} ^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit) &1.0$\pm$1.5  &11.2$\pm$5.5 &3.1$\pm$2.4 &  4.8$\pm$3.7\\
171 < $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &21.9$\pm$5.4 &15.2$\pm$1.0 &24.9$\pm$4.4 &17.8$\pm$1.3\\
172 < $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&1.7$\pm$2.9 &1.0$\pm$2.8 &1.7$\pm$3.0 &0.7$\pm$2.8\\
173 < $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)& 8.4$\pm$3.5 &5.7$\pm$4.7 &11.2$\pm$4.3 &6.4$\pm$5.3\\\hline
174 < $N^{WZ}$ & 11.8$\pm$7.0 &8.5$\pm$5.6 &12.0$\pm$6.8 &10.7$\pm$6.1\\\hline
175 < \WZ from MC &11.6&12.3& 13.1 &14.9\\
169 > $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &35.9505$\pm$7.12087&15.9252$\pm$0.00840717&40.1673$\pm$5.70847&17.967$\pm$0.00420358\\ \hline
170 > $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&3.76001$\pm$3.52367&1.45461$\pm$3.15729&4.10686$\pm$2.52845&0.750563$\pm$2.77128\\ \hline
171 > $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&18.7345 $\pm$6.09299&8.35304 $\pm$6.61818&23.4279 $\pm$7.47204& 8.86174 $\pm$7.06819\\ \hline
172 > $N^{WZ}$ &10.0951 $\pm$7.97988&7.56371 $\pm$7.47561&11.031 $\pm$8.8933& 9.10106 $\pm$7.62906\\ \hline
173 > \WZ from MC &11.6&12.3& 13.3 &14.9\\
174  
175   \hline
176   \end{tabular}
# Line 183 | Line 181 | $N^{WZ}$ & 11.8$\pm$7.0 &8.5$\pm$5.6 &12
181   \end{center}
182   \end{table}
183  
184 + \begin{table}[h]
185 +  \begin{center}
186 + \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
187 + & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
188 + $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma  &75.3302$\pm$7.2764&146.642$\pm$0.0336287&90.4007$\pm$5.87661&156.943$\pm$0.0252215\\ \hline
189 + $N^{non genuine Z}$ (Fit)&6.58354$\pm$4.18822&16.9415$\pm$5.45238&6.90489$\pm$4.44438&10.9672$\pm$4.95535\\ \hline
190 + $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&58.5455 $\pm$14.4155&139.217 $\pm$20.2565&73.2121 $\pm$14.8922& 147.696 $\pm$14.674\\ \hline
191 + $N^{WZ}$  &9.50837 $\pm$16.3918&7.39079 $\pm$26.9642&11.312 $\pm$17.0061&  9.22217 $\pm$18.977\\\hline
192 + \WZ from MC &12.0&14.2& 13.6 &17.2\\
193 +
194 + \hline
195 + \end{tabular}
196 +
197 + \caption{Loose Sample: Expected number of selected events for an integrated luminosity of 300
198 + pb$^{-1}$ for the signal and estimated background with 81 GeV $< M_Z < $ 101 GeV.}
199 + \label{tab:FinalNoMWtCutLoose}
200 + \end{center}
201 + \end{table}
202 +
203   \begin{figure}[hbt]
204    \begin{center}
205    \scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{figs/MatrixMethod3eLooseTightZmassNoCutMWt.eps}}
# Line 216 | Line 233 | $N^{WZ}$ & 11.8$\pm$7.0 &8.5$\pm$5.6 &12
233   \end{figure}
234  
235  
236 < TO BE REMOVE??? ONLY USEFUL FOR MUONS PART???
220 < Check on Loosy Samples~\ref{tab:FitLoosy} (Linear Fit):
236 > WIHTOUT FITTING:
237   \begin{table}[h]
238 < \begin{center}
239 < \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
240 <                    & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Background with genuine \Z} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Background without
241 <                    genuine \Z boson} \\
242 < Channel    & $\Z+jets$ & $\Z b\bar{b}$ &   $t\bar{t}$ & $\W+jets$ & $t\bar{t}$ + $\W+jets$ & Fit result \\ \hline
243 < $3e$ Loose &17.4 & 14.1 & 1.2 & 0.1 & 1.3 & 4.0$ \pm $3.6 \\\hline
244 < $3e$ Tight &5.3 & 5.8 & 0.7 & 0.1 & 0.8 & 2.7$ \pm $3.2 \\\hline
245 < $2e1\mu$ Loose &16.5 & 83.1 & 10.0 & 0 & 10.0 & 13.1$ \pm $5.0 \\\hline
246 < $2e1\mu$ Tight &0.3 & 2.0 & 1.0 & 0 & 1.0 & 1.3$ \pm $3.0 \\\hline
231 < $2\mu1e$ Loose &27.5 & 20.1 & 15.0 & 0.2 & 15.3 & 23.7$ \pm $5.5 \\ \hline
232 < $2\mu1e$ Tight &7.7 & 6.9 & 13.2 & 0.1 & 13.3 & 19.7$ \pm $5.2 \\ \hline
233 < $3\mu$ Loose &33.4 & 138.2 & 45.8 & 0.7 & 46.4 & 48.7$ \pm $6.7 \\\hline
234 < $3\mu$ Tight &8.9 & 25.2 & 19.7 & 0.2 & 19.9 & 23.5$ \pm $5.5 \\\hline
238 >  \begin{center}
239 > \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
240 > & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
241 > $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma &12.4437$\pm$0.992046 &8.69811$\pm$0&13.1255$\pm$0.937399&10.5715$\pm$0\\ \hline
242 > $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&3.21939 $\pm$1.56769&15.8043 $\pm$0.691583&4.63515 $\pm$1.91862&0.945652 $\pm$1.12544\\ \hline
243 > $N^{WZ}$ &8.23222 $\pm$1.56769&7.78552 $\pm$0.691583&7.55297 $\pm$1.91862&9.62584 $\pm$1.12544\\ \hline
244 > \WZ from MC &7.9&8.1& 9.0 &10.1\\
245 >
246 > \hline
247   \end{tabular}
248 +
249 + \caption{Expected number of selected events for an integrated luminosity of 300
250 + pb$^{-1}$ for the signal and estimated background with 81 GeV $< M_Z < $ 101 GeV.}
251 + \label{tab:FinalNoFit}
252 + \end{center}
253 + \end{table}
254 +
255 + \begin{table}[h]
256 +  \begin{center}
257 + \begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline \hline
258 + & 3e &2e1$\mu$ &2$\mu$1e &3$\mu$\\ \hline
259 + $N$ - ZZ -Zgamma  &19.9098$\pm$1.00886&23.5941$\pm$0.00420358&23.3592$\pm$0.95001&25.5227$\pm$0.00420358\\ \hline
260 + $N^{genuine Z}$ (matrix method)&10.0606 $\pm$0.621487&0.948261 $\pm$1.03651&14.4848 $\pm$0.885223&15.7609 $\pm$0.692575\\ \hline
261 + $N^{WZ}$  &8.84029 $\pm$0.62148&7.74985 $\pm$1.03651&7.92435 $\pm$0.885223&9.75762 $\pm$0.692575\\ \hline
262 + \WZ from MC &8.1&9.0& 9.2 &11.3\\
263 +
264 + \hline
265 + \end{tabular}
266 +
267 + \caption{Loose Sample: Expected number of selected events for an integrated luminosity of 300
268 + pb$^{-1}$ for the signal and estimated background with 81 GeV $< M_Z < $ 101 GeV.}
269 + \label{tab:FinalNoFitLoose}
270   \end{center}
237 \caption{Comparison between Monte Carlo truth information and the results of the fit for the background without genuine \Z boson. Number of events are obtained in the invariant mass range between 81 and 101 GeV. The ``Loose'' and ``Tight'' selection criteria applied for third lepton considered.
238 %I AM NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT IS WRITTEN HERE
239 % One has to consider that this study as been perform on a smaller sample than the other part of the analysis a 10\% statistics error as to be counted until the study is performed on the whole samples.
240 }
241 \label{tab:FitLoosy}
271   \end{table}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines