| 54 |
|
We have studied the possibility but we obtain a better significance by |
| 55 |
|
applying a cut on transverse mass of W candidate ($>$50 GeV). In the |
| 56 |
|
analysis we are now considering such cuts. The studies of the |
| 57 |
< |
different angle proposed have been also performed but the transverse |
| 58 |
< |
mass remain the best variable. DO YOU HAVE PLOTS? |
| 57 |
> |
different angle proposed have been also performed, see figures~\ref{fig:dphiWlMET_noWTM}, |
| 58 |
> |
\ref{fig:metcos}, \ref{fig:metsin} and \ref{fig:sig_metcos}, but the transverse |
| 59 |
> |
mass remain the best variable. |
| 60 |
> |
|
| 61 |
> |
|
| 62 |
> |
\begin{figure}[p] |
| 63 |
> |
\begin{center} |
| 64 |
> |
\scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/dphiWlMET_noWTM.eps}} |
| 65 |
> |
\caption{ |
| 66 |
> |
Azimuthal angle between the MET and the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
| 67 |
> |
All selection cuts are applied, except the cut on $M_T^W$. |
| 68 |
> |
} |
| 69 |
> |
\label{fig:dphiWlMET_noWTM} |
| 70 |
> |
\scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/dphiWlMET.eps}} |
| 71 |
> |
\caption{ |
| 72 |
> |
Azimuthal angle between the MET and the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
| 73 |
> |
All selection cuts are applied, including the cut on $M_T^W$. |
| 74 |
> |
} |
| 75 |
> |
\label{fig:dphiWlMET} |
| 76 |
> |
\end{center} |
| 77 |
> |
\end{figure} |
| 78 |
> |
|
| 79 |
> |
|
| 80 |
> |
\begin{figure}[!bp] |
| 81 |
> |
\begin{center} |
| 82 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metcos.eps}} |
| 83 |
> |
\caption{ |
| 84 |
> |
Longitudinal component of the MET vector with respect to the direction of the |
| 85 |
> |
lepton associated to the W-decay. |
| 86 |
> |
} |
| 87 |
> |
\label{fig:metcos} |
| 88 |
> |
\end{center} |
| 89 |
> |
\end{figure} |
| 90 |
> |
|
| 91 |
> |
|
| 92 |
> |
\begin{figure}[p] |
| 93 |
> |
\begin{center} |
| 94 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metsin.eps}} |
| 95 |
> |
\caption{ |
| 96 |
> |
Transverse component of the MET vector with respect to the direction of the |
| 97 |
> |
lepton associated to the W-decay. |
| 98 |
> |
} |
| 99 |
> |
\label{fig:metsin} |
| 100 |
> |
|
| 101 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/sig_metsin.eps}} |
| 102 |
> |
\caption{ |
| 103 |
> |
Signal significance as a function of a cut on the transverse component of the MET |
| 104 |
> |
vector with respect to the direction of the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
| 105 |
> |
} |
| 106 |
> |
\label{fig:sig_metsin} |
| 107 |
> |
\end{center} |
| 108 |
> |
\end{figure} |
| 109 |
> |
|
| 110 |
> |
|
| 111 |
|
|
| 112 |
|
\item \textbf{Produce Event yield table and mass plot with MET$>$20}\\ |
| 113 |
|
We have updated the note but with a transverse mass cut at 50 GeV. |
