54 |
|
We have studied the possibility but we obtain a better significance by |
55 |
|
applying a cut on transverse mass of W candidate ($>$50 GeV). In the |
56 |
|
analysis we are now considering such cuts. The studies of the |
57 |
< |
different angle proposed have been also performed, see figures~\ref{fig:metcos}, |
58 |
< |
\ref{fig:metsin} and \ref{fig:sig_metcos}, but the transverse |
57 |
> |
different angle proposed have been also performed, see figures~\ref{fig:dphiWlMET_noWTM}, |
58 |
> |
\ref{fig:metcos}, \ref{fig:metsin} and \ref{fig:sig_metcos}, but the transverse |
59 |
|
mass remain the best variable. |
60 |
|
|
61 |
+ |
|
62 |
+ |
\begin{figure}[p] |
63 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
64 |
+ |
\scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/dphiWlMET_noWTM.eps}} |
65 |
+ |
\caption{ |
66 |
+ |
Azimuthal angle between the MET and the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
67 |
+ |
All selection cuts are applied, except the cut on $M_T^W$. |
68 |
+ |
} |
69 |
+ |
\label{fig:dphiWlMET_noWTM} |
70 |
+ |
\scalebox{0.55}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/dphiWlMET.eps}} |
71 |
+ |
\caption{ |
72 |
+ |
Azimuthal angle between the MET and the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
73 |
+ |
All selection cuts are applied, including the cut on $M_T^W$. |
74 |
+ |
} |
75 |
+ |
\label{fig:dphiWlMET} |
76 |
+ |
\end{center} |
77 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
78 |
+ |
|
79 |
+ |
|
80 |
|
\begin{figure}[!bp] |
81 |
|
\begin{center} |
82 |
|
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metcos.eps}} |
88 |
|
\end{center} |
89 |
|
\end{figure} |
90 |
|
|
91 |
+ |
|
92 |
|
\begin{figure}[p] |
93 |
|
\begin{center} |
94 |
|
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metsin.eps}} |
96 |
|
Transverse component of the MET vector with respect to the direction of the |
97 |
|
lepton associated to the W-decay. |
98 |
|
} |
99 |
< |
\label{fig:metcos} |
99 |
> |
\label{fig:metsin} |
100 |
|
|
101 |
|
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/sig_metsin.eps}} |
102 |
|
\caption{ |