54 |
|
We have studied the possibility but we obtain a better significance by |
55 |
|
applying a cut on transverse mass of W candidate ($>$50 GeV). In the |
56 |
|
analysis we are now considering such cuts. The studies of the |
57 |
< |
different angle proposed have been also performed but the transverse |
58 |
< |
mass remain the best variable. DO YOU HAVE PLOTS? |
57 |
> |
different angle proposed have been also performed, see figures~\ref{fig:metcos}, |
58 |
> |
\ref{fig:metsin} and \ref{fig:sig_metcos}, but the transverse |
59 |
> |
mass remain the best variable. |
60 |
> |
|
61 |
> |
\begin{figure}[!bp] |
62 |
> |
\begin{center} |
63 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metcos.eps}} |
64 |
> |
\caption{ |
65 |
> |
Longitudinal component of the MET vector with respect to the direction of the |
66 |
> |
lepton associated to the W-decay. |
67 |
> |
} |
68 |
> |
\label{fig:metcos} |
69 |
> |
\end{center} |
70 |
> |
\end{figure} |
71 |
> |
|
72 |
> |
\begin{figure}[p] |
73 |
> |
\begin{center} |
74 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/metsin.eps}} |
75 |
> |
\caption{ |
76 |
> |
Transverse component of the MET vector with respect to the direction of the |
77 |
> |
lepton associated to the W-decay. |
78 |
> |
} |
79 |
> |
\label{fig:metcos} |
80 |
> |
|
81 |
> |
\scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{backupfigs/sig_metsin.eps}} |
82 |
> |
\caption{ |
83 |
> |
Signal significance as a function of a cut on the transverse component of the MET |
84 |
> |
vector with respect to the direction of the lepton associated to the W-decay. |
85 |
> |
} |
86 |
> |
\label{fig:sig_metsin} |
87 |
> |
\end{center} |
88 |
> |
\end{figure} |
89 |
> |
|
90 |
> |
|
91 |
|
|
92 |
|
\item \textbf{Produce Event yield table and mass plot with MET$>$20}\\ |
93 |
|
We have updated the note but with a transverse mass cut at 50 GeV. |