| 93 |
|
satisfy ``tight'' requirements. |
| 94 |
|
|
| 95 |
|
We summarize full systematic uncertainties in Table~\ref{tab:FullSys} for each |
| 96 |
< |
individual signature. The systematic uncertainty is smaller than statistical uncertainty |
| 97 |
< |
which is roughly 30\% for each channel. Improvement in understanding of the MET, |
| 98 |
< |
better measurement of the $p_{fake}$ allow to decrease the overall systematic uncertainty |
| 99 |
< |
with larger data sample. |
| 96 |
> |
individual signature. The systematic uncertainty is comparable to the statistical |
| 97 |
> |
uncertainty which is roughly 30\% for each channel. Improvement in understanding |
| 98 |
> |
of the physics and instrumental backgrounds without genuine \Z bosons, that are |
| 99 |
> |
currently subtracted with overly conservative 100\%, as well as |
| 100 |
> |
understanding of the MET, better measurement of the $p_{fake}$ will |
| 101 |
> |
allow to decrease the overall systematic uncertainty with real data. |
| 102 |
|
|
| 103 |
|
\begin{table}[!tb] |
| 104 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 105 |
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline |
| 106 |
|
Channels & Modeling, \% & Background estimation, \% & Total, \% \\ \hline |
| 107 |
< |
$3e$ & 17 & 13 & 21 \\ |
| 108 |
< |
$2e1\mu$ & 17 & 11 & 20 \\ |
| 109 |
< |
$2\mu1e$ & 16 & 15 & 22 \\ |
| 110 |
< |
$3\mu$ & 16 & 10 & 19 \\ \hline |
| 107 |
> |
$3e$ & 21 & 27 & 34 \\ |
| 108 |
> |
$2e1\mu$ & 19 & 16 & 25 \\ |
| 109 |
> |
$2\mu1e$ & 17 & 31 & 35 \\ |
| 110 |
> |
$3\mu$ & 17 & 12 & 21 \\ \hline |
| 111 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 112 |
|
|
| 113 |
|
\end{center} |
