2 |
|
\label{sec:eventReconstruction} |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
The four possible final states of \WZ |
5 |
< |
production with electrons and muons are studied, $\rm e^\pm \epem$, $\mu^\pm \epem$, $\rm e^\pm \mu^+\mu^-$ |
5 |
> |
production with electrons and muons in the final state are studied, $\rm e^\pm \epem$, $\mu^\pm \epem$, $\rm e^\pm \mu^+\mu^-$ |
6 |
|
and $\mu^\pm \mu^+\mu^-$. They are associated to four possible classes, |
7 |
|
denoted as follows: |
8 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
115 |
|
the range that maximises the significance as shown in |
116 |
|
Figure~\ref{fig:s_vs_wlpt}. |
117 |
|
|
118 |
+ |
An additional requirement on the isolation between electron and muons is applied |
119 |
+ |
for the $2\mu 1e$ channel, by demanding $\Delta R$ between the electron associated |
120 |
+ |
to the \W-decay and any of the two muons associated to the \Z-decay be greater than |
121 |
+ |
0.1. This requirement allows to suppress the contributions of $\Z \to \mu\mu$ |
122 |
+ |
decays, where one of the two muons radiates a photon which is reconstructed |
123 |
+ |
as electrons, possibly after conversion, which shows up as a peak at around 60 GeV |
124 |
+ |
in the Z mass distribution, as shown in figure~\ref{fig:Z2mu1e_60GeVPeak}. |
125 |
+ |
|
126 |
|
The expected number of events passing the various steps of the selection |
127 |
|
is listed in Tables~\ref{tab:sel-effA} and~\ref{tab:sel-effB}. |
128 |
|
Table~\ref{tab:wz-effimatrix} lists the final selection efficiency for |
216 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
218 |
|
\subsection{Signal extraction} |
219 |
+ |
|
220 |
|
\input D0Matrix |
221 |
+ |
\input zjetbackground |
222 |
|
|
223 |
|
|
224 |
|
\subsection{Systematic uncertainties} |