| 1 |
|
\section{Event reconstruction} |
| 2 |
|
\label{sec:eventReconstruction} |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
+ |
The four possible final states of \WZ |
| 5 |
+ |
production with electrons and muons in the final state are studied, $\rm e^\pm \epem$, $\mu^\pm \epem$, $\rm e^\pm \mu^+\mu^-$ |
| 6 |
+ |
and $\mu^\pm \mu^+\mu^-$. They are associated to four possible classes, |
| 7 |
+ |
denoted as follows: |
| 8 |
+ |
\begin{itemize} |
| 9 |
+ |
\item $3e$: for \WZ events with $\W \to e \nu$ and $\Z\to \epem$. |
| 10 |
+ |
\item $2e1\mu$: for \WZ events with $\W \to \mu \nu$ and $\Z\to \epem$. |
| 11 |
+ |
\item $2\mu 1e$: for \WZ events with $\W \to e \nu$ and $\Z\to \mumu$. |
| 12 |
+ |
\item $3\mu$: for \WZ events with $\W \to \mu \nu$ and $\Z\to \mumu$. |
| 13 |
+ |
\end{itemize} |
| 14 |
+ |
|
| 15 |
+ |
|
| 16 |
|
\subsection{Trigger selection and efficiencies} |
| 17 |
|
|
| 18 |
+ |
Events stemming from the three-lepton final states of $\WZ$ production |
| 19 |
+ |
are collected by the electron and/or muon triggers. For each channel, |
| 20 |
+ |
a minimun number of HLT requirements is chosen while keeping |
| 21 |
+ |
the HLT efficiency for selected events close to 100\%. The same |
| 22 |
+ |
HLT requirements are used for channels with the same Z decay mode: |
| 23 |
+ |
\begin{itemize} |
| 24 |
+ |
\item for $3e$ and $2e1\mu$: HLTSingleElectron or HLTDoubleElectronRelaxed |
| 25 |
+ |
\item for $2\mu1e$ and $3\mu$: HLTSingleMuonIso |
| 26 |
+ |
\end{itemize} |
| 27 |
+ |
The HLT efficiencies for all modes for events passing the full |
| 28 |
+ |
selection described in this section are given in table~\ref{tab:hlteff}. |
| 29 |
+ |
|
| 30 |
+ |
|
| 31 |
+ |
\begin{table}[tbph] |
| 32 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 33 |
+ |
|
| 34 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{llc} \hline \hline |
| 35 |
+ |
Channel & HLT selection & HLT efficiency \\ \hline |
| 36 |
+ |
$3e$ & HLTSingleElectron or HLTDoubleElectronRelaxed & 0.996 \\ |
| 37 |
+ |
$2e1\mu$ & HLTSingleElectron or HLTDoubleElectronRelaxed & 0.969 \\ |
| 38 |
+ |
$2\mu 1e$ & HLTSingleMuonIso & 0.966 \\ |
| 39 |
+ |
$3\mu$ & HLTSingleMuonIso & 0.994 \\ \hline \hline |
| 40 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
| 41 |
+ |
|
| 42 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 43 |
+ |
\caption{HLT Efficiencies, in percent, for all |
| 44 |
+ |
the events in the generated phase space for events retained by |
| 45 |
+ |
the complete event selection.} |
| 46 |
+ |
\label{tab:hlteff} |
| 47 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 48 |
|
|
| 49 |
|
\subsection{Lepton identification} |
| 50 |
+ |
\label{sec:leptonId} |
| 51 |
|
|
| 52 |
+ |
The requirements used for electron identification in this analysis are described |
| 53 |
+ |
in~\cite{noteElectronID}. |
| 54 |
|
|
| 55 |
+ |
Muon candidates are selected from global muons, which are reconstructed |
| 56 |
+ |
combining measurements in the muon chambers and the central tracker. |
| 57 |
+ |
An additional isolation criterion requires that the energy |
| 58 |
+ |
measured in the calorimeters within a $\Delta R = 0.3$ cone around the |
| 59 |
+ |
muon must be smaller than 3 GeV and the sum of the $p_t$ of tracks |
| 60 |
+ |
within a $\Delta R = 0.25$ cone around the muon must be smaller than 2 |
| 61 |
+ |
GeV. These cuts reduce the background from muons originated in |
| 62 |
+ |
\b-quark decays of the $\Zbbbar$ background, which are close to tracks |
| 63 |
+ |
and clusters from the other \b-quark decay products. |
| 64 |
+ |
|
| 65 |
+ |
%Figures~\ref{fig:muonisol} and ~\ref{fig:muonisoleffi} show the |
| 66 |
+ |
%performance of the isolation cut. The distribution of the isolation |
| 67 |
+ |
%variables for the $\Z\b\bbar(\epem\b\bbar)$ is particularly |
| 68 |
+ |
%interesting, since muons only stem from \b-quark decays. |
| 69 |
+ |
|
| 70 |
+ |
The significance of the muon impact parameter in the plane |
| 71 |
+ |
transverse to the beam, $S_{IP}$, discriminates against leptons from |
| 72 |
+ |
heavy-quark decays in all Standard Model background processes. This |
| 73 |
+ |
variable is defined as the ratio between the measured impact parameter |
| 74 |
+ |
and its uncertainty: $S_{IP}=IP/\sigma_{IP}$, and is required to |
| 75 |
+ |
satisfy $S_{IP}<3$. This requirement is applied only for muons |
| 76 |
+ |
and not for electrons. For electrons, the dominant background |
| 77 |
+ |
comes from fake electrons and not from heavy quark decays. |
| 78 |
|
|
| 11 |
– |
\subsection{\WZ candidate selection} |
| 79 |
|
|
| 80 |
|
|
| 81 |
< |
\subsection{Signal extraction} |
| 81 |
> |
\subsection{\WZ candidate selection} |
| 82 |
> |
|
| 83 |
> |
Events are accepted if they contain at least three charged leptons, |
| 84 |
> |
either electrons or muons, with $p_t > 15\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $| \eta | < 2.5$ for |
| 85 |
> |
electrons,$| \eta | < 2.4$ for muons. |
| 86 |
> |
as discussed in~\ref{sec:leptonId}. |
| 87 |
> |
|
| 88 |
> |
The \WZ candidate selection proceeds from building all possible |
| 89 |
> |
\Z-boson candidates from same-flavour opposite-charge lepton pairs. |
| 90 |
> |
For $\Z \to ee$ decays, electrons have to fullfil the loose requirements |
| 91 |
> |
defined in~\cite{noteElectronID}. |
| 92 |
> |
|
| 93 |
> |
Events are retained if the mass of this \Z-boson candidate is |
| 94 |
> |
within 20 GeV of the Z-boson mass,$m_Z$. The event is |
| 95 |
> |
rejected if a second Z candidate is found. This second Z candidate is done |
| 96 |
> |
with all possible same-flavour opposite-charge combinations which are left |
| 97 |
> |
after removing the two leptons already used for the first Z candidate. This |
| 98 |
> |
veto on the presence of a second Z helps to suppress $ZZ$ events. The invariant |
| 99 |
> |
mass distribution for accepted \Z candidates is shown in |
| 100 |
> |
Figure~\ref{fig:zcandidates}. |
| 101 |
> |
|
| 102 |
> |
% and the \Z mass resolution is shown in |
| 103 |
> |
%Figure~\ref{fig:dzmass}. |
| 104 |
> |
|
| 105 |
> |
After the \Z-boson candidate is identified, the lepton associated |
| 106 |
> |
to the \W-boson decay is chosen from the remaining electrons and muons |
| 107 |
> |
in the event that have not been used for reconstructing the \Z-boson. |
| 108 |
> |
Electrons are required to pass the tight criteria described in |
| 109 |
> |
\cite{noteElectronID}. If the event contains more than three leptons, |
| 110 |
> |
the highest $p_t$ is chosen as the one from the \W-boson decay, and |
| 111 |
> |
the additional leptons are not considered further. |
| 112 |
> |
The transverse momentum of this lepton is required to be larger |
| 113 |
> |
than 20 GeV. This last requirement is effective in rejecting |
| 114 |
> |
the \Zbbbar and \Zjets backgrounds, and the cut value is chosen in |
| 115 |
> |
the range that maximises the significance as shown in |
| 116 |
> |
Figure~\ref{fig:s_vs_wlpt}. |
| 117 |
> |
|
| 118 |
> |
The expected number of events passing the various steps of the selection |
| 119 |
> |
is listed in Tables~\ref{tab:sel-effA} and~\ref{tab:sel-effB}. |
| 120 |
> |
Table~\ref{tab:wz-effimatrix} lists the final selection efficiency for |
| 121 |
> |
the different generated \W and \Z decays. It can be seen there that \WZ\ |
| 122 |
> |
events with both the \W and the \Z boson decaying into electrons or muons |
| 123 |
> |
almost always get reconstructed with the correct flavour. It is to be |
| 124 |
> |
noted in addition that each of our four selection channels gets a small |
| 125 |
> |
contribution from $W \to \tau \to e/\mu$ decays as one would expect. The |
| 126 |
> |
selection efficiency for these events is however smaller which is mostly due |
| 127 |
> |
to the \pt cut on the third lepton, since the \pt spectrum of electrons or |
| 128 |
> |
muons from $W \to \tau \to e/\mu$ decays is softer. |
| 129 |
> |
|
| 130 |
> |
\begin{table}[p] |
| 131 |
> |
\begin{center} |
| 132 |
> |
|
| 133 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline |
| 134 |
> |
Step & WZ & Z+jets & TTbar+jets & bbll\\ \hline |
| 135 |
> |
All events & 546 & 1.2679e+06 & 17556.1 & 72770.4 \\ |
| 136 |
> |
Found $Z \to ee$ & 219.517 (40.2045 \%) & 520695 (41.0674 \%) & 3474.61 (19.7914 \%) & 29563.3 (40.6254 \%) \\ |
| 137 |
> |
Z loose electron ID & 219.517 (100 \%) & 520695 (100 \%) & 3474.61 (100 \%) & 29563.3 (100 \%) \\ |
| 138 |
> |
Z Lepton Pt cut & 216.371 (98.5671 \%) & 515556 (99.0131 \%) & 3289.22 (94.6645 \%) & 29109.9 (98.4665 \%) \\ |
| 139 |
> |
Z Lepton $eta$ cut & 216.371 (100 \%) & 515556 (100 \%) & 3289.22 (100 \%) & 29109.9 (100 \%) \\ |
| 140 |
> |
Z Lepton IP cut & 206.797 (95.5751 \%) & 492205 (95.4707 \%) & 3011.11 (91.5448 \%) & 27833.5 (95.6153 \%) \\ |
| 141 |
> |
Found $W \to e$ & 42.8968 (20.7434 \%) & 301.116 (0.061177 \%) & 14.8797 (0.494158 \%) & 173.054 (0.621745 \%) \\ |
| 142 |
> |
W Lepton $\eta$ cut & 42.8968 (100 \%) & 301.116 (100 \%) & 14.8797 (100 \%) & 173.054 (100 \%) \\ |
| 143 |
> |
W Lepton Pt cut & 35.6425 (83.0889 \%) & 86.9864 (28.8879 \%) & 9.30549 (62.5383 \%) & 23.9385 (13.833 \%) \\ |
| 144 |
> |
W tight electron ID & 35.6425 (100 \%) & 86.9864 (100 \%) & 9.30549 (100 \%) & 23.9385 (100 \%) \\ |
| 145 |
> |
Passes HLT & 35.4852 (99.5587 \%) & 85.9427 (98.8002 \%) & 9.30549 (100 \%) & 23.4938 (98.1424 \%) \\ |
| 146 |
> |
Z mass window & 31.7106 (5.8078 \%) & 54.1554 (0.00427126 \%) & 3.2585 (0.0185605 \%) & 17.046 (0.0234243\%) \\ |
| 147 |
> |
\hline |
| 148 |
> |
\end{tabular} |
| 149 |
> |
|
| 150 |
> |
|
| 151 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline |
| 152 |
> |
Step & WZ & Z+jets & TTbar+jets & bbll\\ \hline |
| 153 |
> |
All events & 546 & 1.2679e+06 & 17556.1 & 72770.4 \\ |
| 154 |
> |
Found $Z \to ee$ & 219.517 (40.2045 \%) & 520695 (41.0674 \%) & 3474.61 (19.7914 \%) & 29563.3 (40.6254 \%) \\ |
| 155 |
> |
Z electron ID loose & 219.517 (100 \%) & 520695 (100 \%) & 3474.61 (100 \%) & 29563.3 (100 \%) \\ |
| 156 |
> |
Z Lepton Pt cut & 216.371 (98.5671 \%) & 515556 (99.0131 \%) & 3289.22 (94.6645 \%) & 29109.9 (98.4665 \%) \\ |
| 157 |
> |
Z Lepton $eta$ cut & 216.371 (100 \%) & 515556 (100 \%) & 3289.22 (100 \%) & 29109.9 (100 \%) \\ |
| 158 |
> |
Z Lepton IP cut & 206.797 (95.5751 \%) & 492205 (95.4707 \%) & 3011.11 (91.5448 \%) & 27833.5 (95.6153 \%) \\ |
| 159 |
> |
Found $W \to \mu$ & 57.1892 (27.6547 \%) & 5982.86 (1.21552 \%) & 815.122 (27.0705 \%) & 3808.22 (13.6821 \%) \\ |
| 160 |
> |
W Lepton $\eta$ cut & 57.1695 (99.9656 \%) & 5964.1 (99.6865 \%) & 815.122 (100 \%) & 3805.62 (99.9319 \%) \\ |
| 161 |
> |
W $\mu$ isolation & 52.1367 (91.1967 \%) & 2754.29 (46.1811 \%) & 85.5097 (10.4904 \%) & 1328.18 (34.9004 \%) \\ |
| 162 |
> |
W muon isolation & 39.8889 (76.5083 \%) & 22.2149 (0.806557 \%) & 18.8521 (22.0468 \%) & 16.6013 (1.24993 \%) \\ |
| 163 |
> |
Passes HLT & 38.7683 (97.1907 \%) & 21.2077 (95.466 \%) & 16.5627 (87.8556 \%) & 16.1566 (97.3214 \%) \\ |
| 164 |
> |
Z mass window & 34.6399 (6.34429 \%) & 17.3805 (0.00137081 \%) & 5.4405 (0.0309891 \%) & 14.0814 (0.0193505 \%) \\ |
| 165 |
> |
\hline |
| 166 |
> |
\end{tabular} |
| 167 |
> |
|
| 168 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline |
| 169 |
> |
Step & WZ & Z+jets & TTbar+jets & bbll\\ \hline |
| 170 |
> |
All events & 546 & 1.2679e+06 & 17556.1 & 72770.4 \\ |
| 171 |
> |
Found $Z \to \mu\mu$ & 326.484 (59.7955 \%) & 748256 (59.0152 \%) & 14081.6 (80.2087 \%) & 43207.1 (59.3746 \%) \\ |
| 172 |
> |
Z muon isolation & 282.27 (86.4575 \%) & 669556 (89.4822 \%) & 4201.52 (29.837 \%) & 37959.1 (87.8538 \%) \\ |
| 173 |
> |
Z Lepton $eta$ cut & 282.27 (100 \%) & 669547 (99.9987 \%) & 4200.47 (99.975 \%) & 37959.1 (99.9998 \%) \\ |
| 174 |
> |
Z Lepton Pt cut & 274.249 (97.1584 \%) & 657267 (98.1659 \%) & 3626.81 (86.3429 \%) & 36945.8 (97.3306 \%) \\ |
| 175 |
> |
Z Lepton IP cut & 249.792 (91.0824 \%) & 603257 (91.7827 \%) & 3125.35 (86.1737 \%) & 33937.7 (91.8581 \%) \\ |
| 176 |
> |
Found $W \to e$ & 51.9401 (20.7933 \%) & 797.766 (0.132243 \%) & 20.4415 (0.654055 \%) & 228.342 (0.672826 \%) \\ |
| 177 |
> |
W Lepton $\eta$ cut & 51.9401 (100 \%) & 797.766 (100 \%) & 20.4415 (100 \%) & 228.342 (100 \%) \\ |
| 178 |
> |
W tight electron ID & 51.9401 (100 \%) & 797.766 (100 \%) & 20.4415 (100 \%) & 228.342 (100 \%) \\ |
| 179 |
> |
W Lepton Pt cut & 43.2703 (83.3081 \%) & 519.647 (65.1378 \%) & 15.0823 (73.7829 \%) & 55.14 (24.148 \%)\\ |
| 180 |
> |
Passes HLT & 41.8745 (96.7742 \%) & 490.859 (94.46 \%) & 13.533 (89.7275 \%) & 54.2506 (98.3871 \%) \\ |
| 181 |
> |
Z mass window & 37.5298 (6.87358 \%) & 63.522 (0.00501 \%) & 5.02282 (0.02861 \%) & 20.0105 (0.0274981 \%) \\ |
| 182 |
> |
\hline |
| 183 |
> |
\end{tabular} |
| 184 |
> |
|
| 185 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{lcccc} \hline |
| 186 |
> |
Step & WZ & Z+jets & TTbar+jets & bbll\\ \hline |
| 187 |
> |
All events & 546 & 1.2679e+06 & 17556.1 & 72770.4 \\ |
| 188 |
> |
Found $Z \to \mu\mu$ & 326.484 (59.7955 \%) & 748256 (59.0152 \%) & 14081.6 (80.2087 \%) & 43207.1 (59.3746 \%) \\ |
| 189 |
> |
Z muon isolation & 282.27 (86.4575 \%) & 669556 (89.4822 \%) & 4201.52 (29.837 \%) & 37959.1 (87.8538 \%) \\ |
| 190 |
> |
Z Lepton $eta$ cut & 282.27 (100 \%) & 669547 (99.9987 \%) & 4200.47 (99.975 \%) & 37959.1 (99.9998 \%) \\ |
| 191 |
> |
Z Lepton Pt cut & 274.249 (97.1584 \%) & 657267 (98.1659 \%) & 3626.81 (86.3429 \%) & 36945.8 (97.3306 \%) \\ |
| 192 |
> |
Z Lepton IP cut & 249.792 (91.0824 \%) & 603257 (91.7827 \%) & 3125.35 (86.1737 \%) & 33937.7 (91.8581 \%) \\ |
| 193 |
> |
Found $W \to \mu$ & 73.015 (29.2303 \%) & 7135.7 (1.18286 \%) & 774.076 (24.7677 \%) & 4435.51 (13.0696 \%) \\ |
| 194 |
> |
W Lepton $\eta$ cut & 72.956 (99.9192 \%) & 7110.07 (99.6409 \%) & 774.076 (100 \%) & 4432.32 (99.9282 \%) \\ |
| 195 |
> |
W $\mu$ isolation & 66.724 (91.4578 \%) & 3382.99 (47.5803 \%) & 78.3017 (10.1155 \%) & 1560.97 (35.2178 \%) \\ |
| 196 |
> |
W muon isolation & 50.1118 (75.1031 \%) & 6.25174 (0.184799 \%) & 5.8096 (7.41951 \%) & 20.6775 (1.32466 \%) \\ |
| 197 |
> |
Passes HLT & 49.7972 (99.3723 \%) & 6.25174 (100 \%) & 5.8096 (100 \%) & 20.6034 (99.6416 \%) \\ |
| 198 |
> |
Z mass window & 45.1576 (8.27062 \%) & 4.9976 (0.000394162 \%) & 1.683 (0.00958638 \%) & 18.3059 (0.0251557 \%) \\ |
| 199 |
> |
\hline |
| 200 |
> |
\end{tabular} |
| 201 |
> |
\caption{Expected number of signal and background events passing the different |
| 202 |
> |
selections steps in the \WZ, \ttbar and \Zbbbar samples for an integrated luminosity |
| 203 |
> |
of 1 \invfb.} |
| 204 |
> |
\label{tab:sel-effA} |
| 205 |
> |
\end{center} |
| 206 |
> |
\end{table} |
| 207 |
|
|
| 208 |
|
|
| 17 |
– |
\subsection{Systematic uncertainties} |
| 209 |
|
|
| 210 |
+ |
\subsection{Signal extraction} |
| 211 |
|
|
| 212 |
+ |
%\input D0Matrix |
| 213 |
+ |
\input zjetbackground |
| 214 |
|
|
| 215 |
|
|
| 216 |
+ |
\subsection{Systematic uncertainties} |
| 217 |
+ |
\input Sys |
| 218 |
|
|
| 219 |
|
|
| 220 |
+ |
\begin{figure}[bt] |
| 221 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 222 |
+ |
\scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{figs/mtw_by_channel.eps}} |
| 223 |
+ |
\caption{W transverse mass for the four signal categories. |
| 224 |
+ |
The distributions show the number of expected events |
| 225 |
+ |
for $1 fb^{-1}$. Only events with 81.1 GeV $< M_Z < $ 101.1 GeV are shown.} |
| 226 |
+ |
\label{fig:mtw} |
| 227 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 228 |
+ |
\end{figure} |
