1 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\section{Combining cross section measurements for all channels}
|
2 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\label{sec:xsec}
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
In this section we calculate the cross section for each channel and
|
5 |
|
|
provide the method to combine four measurements taking into account the correlation.
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$\WZ$ cross section is calculated as follows
|
8 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
9 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
10 |
|
|
\label{eq:xsec}
|
11 |
|
|
\sigma = \frac{N_{obs}-N_{MC}-N_{Z}}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}},
|
12 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
where $N_{obs}$ is the number of observed events, $N_{MC}$
|
15 |
|
|
is the number of background events estimated from Monte Carlo simulation,
|
16 |
|
|
$i.e.$ events from $\Z\gamma$, $\ZZ$, and processes without genuine $\Z$ boson
|
17 |
|
|
in final state. $N_Z$ is the number of instrumental background events from
|
18 |
|
|
processes with genuine $\Z$ boson. These numbers are given in
|
19 |
|
|
Tables~\ref{tab:yields}~and~\ref{tab:yieldsEstimate} for each channel.
|
20 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
21 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
The uncertainty on measured cross section is calculated as given in equation below
|
22 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
%Eq.~\ref{eq:xsecErr}
|
23 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
24 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
25 |
|
|
\label{eq:xsecErr}
|
26 |
|
|
\left(\Delta\sigma\right)^2 = \left(\frac{\Delta N_{obs}}{\epsilon\mathcal{L}}\right)^2
|
27 |
|
|
+ \left(\frac{\Delta N_{MC}}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}}\right)^2
|
28 |
|
|
+ \left(\frac{\Delta N_{Z}}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}}\right)^2
|
29 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
+ \left(\frac{\Delta (\epsilon \mathcal{L})}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}} \frac{N_{WE}}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}}\right)^2 ,
|
30 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\end{equation}
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
where $\frac{\Delta(\epsilon \mathcal{L})}{\epsilon \mathcal{L}}$ is
|
33 |
|
|
modeling uncertainty for each channel, given in Table~\ref{tab:FullSys}.
|
34 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
35 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
We normalize cross section to the theoretical cross section, calculated from
|
36 |
|
|
Monte Carlo simulation. The normalized $\WZ$ cross section, $\sigma_n$, is given as
|
37 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
38 |
|
|
%\begin{equation}
|
39 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\begin{eqnarray}
|
40 |
|
|
\label{eq:normSigma}
|
41 |
|
|
\sigma_n &=&\frac{N_{obs}-N_{MC}-N_{\Z}}{\epsilon\mathcal{L}} \frac{1}{\sigma_{theory}} \nonumber \\
|
42 |
|
|
&=& \frac{N_{obs}-N_{MC}-N_{\Z}}{\epsilon\mathcal{L}} \frac{\epsilon \mathcal{L}}{N_{\WZ}} \nonumber \\
|
43 |
|
|
&=& \frac{N_{obs}-N_{MC}-N_{\Z}}{N_{\WZ}}
|
44 |
|
|
\end{eqnarray}
|
45 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
%\end{equation}
|
46 |
|
|
|
47 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
%\sigma_{n} = \frac{N_{obs}-N_{MC}-N_{\Z}}{N_{\WZ}}
|
48 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
49 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
where $N_{\WZ}$ is the expected number of signal events, corresponding to a sample of 300 $pb^{-1}$
|
50 |
|
|
integrated luminosity, which is given in the first line of Table~\ref{tab:yields}.
|
51 |
|
|
%Thus, the normalization factors are 7.9, 8.0, 8.9, and 10.1 for $3e$, $2e1\mu$,
|
52 |
|
|
%$2\mu1e$, and $3\mu$, respectively.
|
53 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
54 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Normalized cross section for each channel is given in
|
55 |
|
|
Table below %~\ref{tab:fourXsections}
|
56 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
57 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\begin{table}[h]
|
58 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
59 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline
|
60 |
|
|
Channels & normalized cross section \\ \hline
|
61 |
|
|
$3e$ & 1.00$\pm$0.58 \\
|
62 |
|
|
$2e 1\mu$ & 0.95$\pm$0.45 \\
|
63 |
|
|
$2\mu 1e$ & 0.82$\pm$0.52 \\
|
64 |
|
|
$3\mu$ & 0.98$\pm$0.39 \\ \hline
|
65 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
66 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\caption{Normalized cross section measured for each channel and corresponding uncertainties.}
|
67 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\label{tab:fourXsections}
|
68 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\end{center}
|
69 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
70 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
71 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
In order to combine the results for four different channels we use BLUE
|
72 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
($i.e.$ Best Linear Unbiased Estimate) method~\cite{BLUE}.
|
73 |
|
|
According to this method, final estimation of the cross section is a linear combination
|
74 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
of cross-sections, measured for each channel separately
|
75 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
76 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
77 |
|
|
\label{eq:sumXsec}
|
78 |
|
|
\sigma = \sum_{i} \alpha_i\sigma_i
|
79 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
80 |
|
|
|
81 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
where $\alpha_{i}$ are weighting factors for each measurement, which needs to be determined.
|
82 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
83 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
In the experiment we measure cross section for each channel and calculate uncertainty matrix,
|
84 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
$\mathbb{E}$. As we consider four channels, $\mathbb{E}$ will be $4 \times $4 symmetric matrix.
|
85 |
|
|
|
86 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\begin{equation}
|
87 |
|
|
\label{eq:uncertMatrix}
|
88 |
|
|
\mathbb{E} =\left( \begin{array}{cccc}
|
89 |
|
|
\sigma_1^2 & \sigma_{12} & \sigma_{13} & \sigma_{14} \\
|
90 |
|
|
\sigma_{21} & \sigma_2^2 & \sigma_{23} & \sigma_{24} \\
|
91 |
|
|
\sigma_{31} & \sigma_{32} & \sigma_3^2 & \sigma_{34} \\
|
92 |
|
|
\sigma_{41} & \sigma_{42} & \sigma_{43} & \sigma_4^2 \end{array} \right),
|
93 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
94 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
95 |
|
|
%where the diagonal elements correspond to variances of cross-section measurements for channels
|
96 |
|
|
where diagonal elements are the full uncertainties for individual channel squared and
|
97 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
the off-diagonal elements represent uncertainties of the respective channels from sources of
|
98 |
|
|
correlation, $e.g.$, $\sigma_{12}$ describes uncertainty due to the common sources between the channels $3e$
|
99 |
|
|
and $2e1\mu$ and equals to $\sigma_{1}^{corr} \sigma_{2}^{corr}$, where $\sigma_{1}^{corr}$
|
100 |
|
|
and $\sigma_{2}^{corr}$ are uncertainties on first ($3e$) and second ($2e1\mu$) channels, respectively.
|
101 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
102 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
%==================================================================
|
104 |
|
|
|
105 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
As an example, calculation of $\sigma_{12}=\sigma_1^{corr} \sigma_2^{corr}$ is described below.
|
106 |
|
|
At first we estimate the uncertainty due to modeling sources, common between all channels, which are
|
107 |
|
|
listed in Table~\ref{tab:sys}. These are luminosity, trigger, lepton reconstruction, lepton energy scale,
|
108 |
|
|
PDF, and W transverse mass requirement. Adding these uncertainties together results in 16.2\%.
|
109 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
110 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Then we list the sources of uncertainty which are common between $3e$ and $2e1\mu$ channels:
|
111 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
112 |
|
|
\[ \begin{array}{lc}
|
113 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\mbox{Electron charge determination} & 2\%+2\% = 4\% \\
|
114 |
|
|
\mbox{Electron identification} & 4\%+4\% = 8\% \\
|
115 |
|
|
\mbox{Fully correlated modeling} & 16.2\% \\
|
116 |
|
|
\mbox{Background estimated from MC} & \\
|
117 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\end{array}\]
|
118 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
and add these uncertainties as from uncorrelated sources.
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Uncertainty due to electron charge determination, electron identification, and
|
122 |
|
|
fully correlated modeling is
|
123 |
|
|
$$\sqrt{4\%^2+8\%^2+16.2\%^2} 1.00 = 0.185$$
|
124 |
|
|
for $3e$ channel and
|
125 |
|
|
$$\sqrt{4\%^2+8\%^2+16.2\%^2} 0.95 = 0.176$$
|
126 |
|
|
for $2e1\mu$ channel. Hence, the uncertainties for $3e$ and $2e1\mu$ channels due to all
|
127 |
|
|
sources of correlations are
|
128 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
129 |
|
|
\begin{subequations}
|
130 |
|
|
\label{eq:covTerms}
|
131 |
|
|
\begin{align}
|
132 |
|
|
\sigma_0^{corr}& = \sqrt{0.185^2 + (\frac{1.3}{7.9})^2} = 0.248 \label{first}\\
|
133 |
|
|
\sigma_1^{corr}& = \sqrt{0.176^2 + (\frac{0.9}{8.0})^2} = 0.209 \label{second}
|
134 |
|
|
\end{align}
|
135 |
|
|
\end{subequations}
|
136 |
|
|
Thus,
|
137 |
|
|
\begin{equation}\label{eq:covTermFin}
|
138 |
|
|
\sigma_{01} = 0.248 * 0.209 = 0.052
|
139 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
140 |
|
|
|
141 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Calculating other terms using previously described procedure result in
|
142 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
143 |
|
|
\[ \mathbb{E} = \left( \begin{array}{cccc}
|
144 |
|
|
0.335 & 0.052 & 0.095 & 0.041 \\
|
145 |
|
|
0.052 & 0.202 & 0.037 & 0.043 \\
|
146 |
|
|
0.095 & 0.037 & 0.267 & 0.036 \\
|
147 |
|
|
0.041 & 0.043 & 0.036 & 0.155 \end{array} \right) .\]
|
148 |
|
|
|
149 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
In order to determine $\alpha_i$ weighting factors following
|
150 |
|
|
procedure described in paper~\cite{BLUE}
|
151 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
152 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
153 |
|
|
\label{eq:weights}
|
154 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
\alpha = \mathbb{E}^{-1}U/(\tilde{U}\mathbb{E}^{-1}U) ,
|
155 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
\end{equation}
|
156 |
|
|
|
157 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
where $U$ is a four-dimensional vector whose all components are unity.
|
158 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Obtained weights are 0.112, 0.281, 0.194, and 0.413 for $3e$, $2e1\mu$, $2\mu1e$, and $3\mu$ channels, respectively.
|
159 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
Total uncertainty on combined measurement squared is calculated as
|
160 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
162 |
|
|
\label{eq:sigmaSquared}
|
163 |
|
|
\sigma^2 = \tilde{\alpha}\mathbb{E}\alpha
|
164 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
165 |
|
|
|
166 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
Thus, normalized combined cross section is $0.96\pm0.3$.
|
167 |
|
|
Cross sections measured for each channel separately and result of BLUE method is
|
168 |
|
|
shown on Fig.~\ref{fig:xsections}
|
169 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
|
170 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[bt]
|
171 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
172 |
|
|
\scalebox{0.8}{\includegraphics{figs/combined_xsections.eps}}
|
173 |
kkaadze |
1.3 |
\caption{The normalized cross section measured for each channel and corresponding uncertainties. }
|
174 |
kkaadze |
1.2 |
\label{fig:xsections}
|
175 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
176 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
177 |
|
|
|
178 |
kkaadze |
1.1 |
|
179 |
|
|
\end{document}
|
180 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|