ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/HCP2012/ss.tex
Revision: 1.7
Committed: Thu Mar 7 10:41:42 2013 UTC (12 years, 2 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.6: +3 -2 lines
Log Message:
golf comments

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 benhoob 1.1 \section{Search in the Same-sign Dilepton Final State}
2     \label{sec:ss}
3    
4 benhoob 1.4 \begin{figure*}[!ht]
5     \centering
6     %\begin{center}
7     \begin{tabular}{cc}
8     \subfloat[] {\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{HCPPlots/SS_B1.pdf}} &
9     \subfloat[] {\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{HCPPlots/T2bb_interpretation.pdf}} \\
10     \end{tabular}
11     \caption{
12     Interpretation of the results of the search in (a) the same-sign dilepton final state for
13 benhoob 1.6 bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to t\chim$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d), and (b)
14 benhoob 1.4 the all-hadronic final state for bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to b\lsp$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(c).
15     \label{fig:ss_interpretation}
16     }
17     %\end{center}
18     \end{figure*}
19    
20 benhoob 1.2 This section presents a search in the same-sign (SS) dilepton final state, based on 10.5 fb$^{-1}$.
21 benhoob 1.6 A wide variety of new physics scenarios may produce events with SS leptons, which provide a very clean
22 benhoob 1.2 final state due to low SM background expectations. In particular, this final state is sensitive to
23 benhoob 1.6 direct pair production of bottom squarks with $\tilde{b}\to t \chim \to t W \lsp$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d),
24 benhoob 1.2 as well as to gluino-mediated production of top and bottom squarks.
25 benhoob 1.1
26     We select events with two leptons (e or $\mu$) with \pt\ $>$ 20 GeV and dilepton invariant mass $m_{\ell\ell}>8$ GeV.
27     We reject events with a third lepton with \pt\ $>$ 10 GeV that forms an opposite-sign
28     same-flavor pair with $76 < m_{\ell\ell} < 106$ GeV with either selected lepton, to suppress
29     the background from WZ and ZZ. We require the presence of at least two jets with \pt\ $>$ 40 GeV.
30    
31     This analysis is an extension of a previous search in the same-sign dilepton final state~\cite{ref:ss_inclusive}.
32     In that analysis, the background is dominated by \ttljets\ where one lepton is from the W decay and the other
33     lepton is produced in the decay of one of the b-jets. In this analysis we require the presence of at least two
34 benhoob 1.2 b-tagged jets (using CSVM). The requirement that both b-jets are identified and well-separated from the selected leptons
35 benhoob 1.1 reduces the \ttljets\ background by an order of magnitude.
36    
37 benhoob 1.4
38 benhoob 1.2 There are three sources of SM background passing the above preselection.
39     The first background source is referred to as ``fake leptons'' and includes leptons from heavy-flavor decay,
40     misidentified hadrons, muons from meson decay in flight, or electrons from unidentified photon conversions.
41     This background is estimated from a sample of events with at least one lepton that passes a loose selection
42     but fails the full analysis identification and isolation requirements. This sample is weighted by the probability
43     for a fake lepton satisfying the loose selection to also pass the analysis selection, which is determined based
44     on studies of fake
45     leptons in jet events. The second background, estimated from MC, consists of rare SM processes and is dominated
46     by $t\bar{t}$W and $t\bar{t}$Z. The systematic uncertainty on both the fake lepton and rare backgrounds is 50\%.
47 benhoob 1.5 A third, small background contribution is from ``charge flips'' and consists of events with opposite-sign leptons
48 benhoob 1.7 where one of the leptons is an electron whose charge is misreconstructed.
49     This background is estimated using the electron charge misreconstruction probability, which is extracted from studies of Z$\to e^+e^-$ events in data.
50     %This background is based on MC predictions, which are validated using a sample of Z$\to e^+e^-$ events.
51 benhoob 1.2
52     Signal regions are defined by placing additional requirements on the jet multiplicity, b-tagged jet multiplicity,
53 benhoob 1.4 \met, and $H_T$, defined as the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of selected jets.
54     The observed data yields in all signal regions are in good agreement with the SM background expectations;
55     see Ref.~\cite{ref:ss} for the full quantitative results. The signal region that is most sensitive to
56 benhoob 1.6 bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to t \chim$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d)
57 benhoob 1.4 has at least four jets, \met\ $>$ 120 GeV and
58     $H_T$ $>$ 200 GeV. In this region we observe 1 event in data and predict 2.22 $\pm$ 0.96 events.
59     The results are used to exclude a region of the model parameter space in Fig.~\ref{fig:ss_interpretation}(a),
60     which demonstrates that our search probes bottom squarks with masses up to 450 GeV.
61 benhoob 1.6 Naturalness considerations suggest a bottom squark with mass not exceeding 500--700 GeV, similar to the constraint
62     on the top squark mass.
63 benhoob 1.5 Several additional interpretations for models with gluino-mediated top and
64 benhoob 1.2 bottom squark production are presented in Ref.~\cite{ref:ss}.
65 benhoob 1.1
66 benhoob 1.4 %\input{ss_table.tex}
67    
68     %compared to the SM background expectations in
69     %Table~\ref{tab:ss}. Good agreement is observed between the data and the expected background in all signal regions.
70 benhoob 1.1
71     %\begin{table}
72     %\centering
73     %\caption{Please write your table caption here}
74     %\label{tab-1} % Give a unique label
75     %% For LaTeX tables you can use
76     %\begin{tabular}{lll}
77     %\hline
78     %first & second & third \\\hline
79     %number & number & number \\
80     %number & number & number \\\hline
81     %\end{tabular}
82     %% Or use
83     %\vspace*{5cm} % with the correct table height
84     %\end{table}
85