1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\section{Search in the Same-sign Dilepton Final State}
|
2 |
|
|
\label{sec:ss}
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{figure*}[!ht]
|
5 |
|
|
\centering
|
6 |
|
|
%\begin{center}
|
7 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
8 |
|
|
\subfloat[] {\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{HCPPlots/SS_B1.pdf}} &
|
9 |
|
|
\subfloat[] {\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{HCPPlots/T2bb_interpretation.pdf}} \\
|
10 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
11 |
|
|
\caption{
|
12 |
|
|
Interpretation of the results of the search in (a) the same-sign dilepton final state for
|
13 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to t\chim$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d), and (b)
|
14 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
the all-hadronic final state for bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to b\lsp$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(c).
|
15 |
|
|
\label{fig:ss_interpretation}
|
16 |
|
|
}
|
17 |
|
|
%\end{center}
|
18 |
|
|
\end{figure*}
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
This section presents a search in the same-sign (SS) dilepton final state, based on 10.5 fb$^{-1}$.
|
21 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
A wide variety of new physics scenarios may produce events with SS leptons, which provide a very clean
|
22 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
final state due to low SM background expectations. In particular, this final state is sensitive to
|
23 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
direct pair production of bottom squarks with $\tilde{b}\to t \chim \to t W \lsp$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d),
|
24 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
as well as to gluino-mediated production of top and bottom squarks.
|
25 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
26 |
|
|
We select events with two leptons (e or $\mu$) with \pt\ $>$ 20 GeV and dilepton invariant mass $m_{\ell\ell}>8$ GeV.
|
27 |
|
|
We reject events with a third lepton with \pt\ $>$ 10 GeV that forms an opposite-sign
|
28 |
|
|
same-flavor pair with $76 < m_{\ell\ell} < 106$ GeV with either selected lepton, to suppress
|
29 |
|
|
the background from WZ and ZZ. We require the presence of at least two jets with \pt\ $>$ 40 GeV.
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
This analysis is an extension of a previous search in the same-sign dilepton final state~\cite{ref:ss_inclusive}.
|
32 |
|
|
In that analysis, the background is dominated by \ttljets\ where one lepton is from the W decay and the other
|
33 |
|
|
lepton is produced in the decay of one of the b-jets. In this analysis we require the presence of at least two
|
34 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
b-tagged jets (using CSVM). The requirement that both b-jets are identified and well-separated from the selected leptons
|
35 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
reduces the \ttljets\ background by an order of magnitude.
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
38 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
There are three sources of SM background passing the above preselection.
|
39 |
|
|
The first background source is referred to as ``fake leptons'' and includes leptons from heavy-flavor decay,
|
40 |
|
|
misidentified hadrons, muons from meson decay in flight, or electrons from unidentified photon conversions.
|
41 |
|
|
This background is estimated from a sample of events with at least one lepton that passes a loose selection
|
42 |
|
|
but fails the full analysis identification and isolation requirements. This sample is weighted by the probability
|
43 |
|
|
for a fake lepton satisfying the loose selection to also pass the analysis selection, which is determined based
|
44 |
|
|
on studies of fake
|
45 |
|
|
leptons in jet events. The second background, estimated from MC, consists of rare SM processes and is dominated
|
46 |
|
|
by $t\bar{t}$W and $t\bar{t}$Z. The systematic uncertainty on both the fake lepton and rare backgrounds is 50\%.
|
47 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
A third, small background contribution is from ``charge flips'' and consists of events with opposite-sign leptons
|
48 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
where one of the leptons is an electron whose charge is misreconstructed.
|
49 |
|
|
This background is estimated using the electron charge misreconstruction probability, which is extracted from studies of Z$\to e^+e^-$ events in data.
|
50 |
|
|
%This background is based on MC predictions, which are validated using a sample of Z$\to e^+e^-$ events.
|
51 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
52 |
|
|
Signal regions are defined by placing additional requirements on the jet multiplicity, b-tagged jet multiplicity,
|
53 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\met, and $H_T$, defined as the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of selected jets.
|
54 |
|
|
The observed data yields in all signal regions are in good agreement with the SM background expectations;
|
55 |
|
|
see Ref.~\cite{ref:ss} for the full quantitative results. The signal region that is most sensitive to
|
56 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
bottom squark pair production with $\tilde{b}\to t \chim$ depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(d)
|
57 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
has at least four jets, \met\ $>$ 120 GeV and
|
58 |
|
|
$H_T$ $>$ 200 GeV. In this region we observe 1 event in data and predict 2.22 $\pm$ 0.96 events.
|
59 |
|
|
The results are used to exclude a region of the model parameter space in Fig.~\ref{fig:ss_interpretation}(a),
|
60 |
|
|
which demonstrates that our search probes bottom squarks with masses up to 450 GeV.
|
61 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
Naturalness considerations suggest a bottom squark with mass not exceeding 500--700 GeV, similar to the constraint
|
62 |
|
|
on the top squark mass.
|
63 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
Several additional interpretations for models with gluino-mediated top and
|
64 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
bottom squark production are presented in Ref.~\cite{ref:ss}.
|
65 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
66 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
%\input{ss_table.tex}
|
67 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
%compared to the SM background expectations in
|
69 |
|
|
%Table~\ref{tab:ss}. Good agreement is observed between the data and the expected background in all signal regions.
|
70 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
71 |
|
|
%\begin{table}
|
72 |
|
|
%\centering
|
73 |
|
|
%\caption{Please write your table caption here}
|
74 |
|
|
%\label{tab-1} % Give a unique label
|
75 |
|
|
%% For LaTeX tables you can use
|
76 |
|
|
%\begin{tabular}{lll}
|
77 |
|
|
%\hline
|
78 |
|
|
%first & second & third \\\hline
|
79 |
|
|
%number & number & number \\
|
80 |
|
|
%number & number & number \\\hline
|
81 |
|
|
%\end{tabular}
|
82 |
|
|
%% Or use
|
83 |
|
|
%\vspace*{5cm} % with the correct table height
|
84 |
|
|
%\end{table}
|
85 |
|
|
|