| 1 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\section{Search for Top Squark Pair Production in the Single Lepton Final State}
|
| 2 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\label{sec:stop}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
This section presents the results of a dedicated search for the direct pair production of top squarks, based on an integrated luminosity of 9.7~fb$^{-1}$.
|
| 5 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
The decay of the top squark depends on the difference between its mass and that of the \lsp\ LSP,
|
| 6 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
$\Delta m = m_{\tilde{t}}-m_{\lsp}$. If $\Delta m > m_{t}$, the decay $\tilde{t}\to t\lsp$ is expected
|
| 7 |
|
|
to have a large branching fraction. If there is a light chargino \chip, the decay
|
| 8 |
|
|
$\tilde{t}\to b\chip\to b W \lsp$ is expected to be significant, especially in the $\Delta m < m_{t}$ region.
|
| 9 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The pair production of top squarks decaying to either of these channels leads to events with two b-jets, two W bosons,
|
| 10 |
|
|
and \met\ from the invisible LSPs. Our signal thus resembles SM $t\bar{t}$ production but with larger \met\ from
|
| 11 |
|
|
the invisible LSPs.
|
| 12 |
|
|
We focus on the single lepton final state, which has a significant branching fraction due to the two W bosons,
|
| 13 |
|
|
and smaller SM backgrounds than the all-hadronic final state.
|
| 14 |
|
|
We thus select events with a single lepton and jets and discriminate between
|
| 15 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
signal and background using \met\ and the transverse mass \mt, discussed below.
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
| 17 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
%\subsection{Event Selection}
|
| 18 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 19 |
|
|
We require the presence of exactly one well-identified and isolated lepton (e or $\mu$) with transverse
|
| 20 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
momentum \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV.
|
| 21 |
|
|
We select events with at least four jets with \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV,
|
| 22 |
|
|
which must be well-separated from the selected leptons.
|
| 23 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
At least one of these jets is required to be consistent with coming from the decay of heavy flavor hadrons, as
|
| 24 |
|
|
identified by the Combined Secondary Vertex Medium Point (CSVM) b-tagging algorithm~\cite{ref:btag}.
|
| 25 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The jet requirements suppress SM backgrounds from W bosons produced in association with jets from initial state
|
| 26 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
radiation (ISR), referred to as the \wjets\ background.
|
| 27 |
|
|
The \met\ is required to exceed 50 GeV, suppressing the background from QCD multijet production.
|
| 28 |
|
|
|
| 29 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
%\subsection{Backgrounds and Estimation Strategy}
|
| 30 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 31 |
|
|
The SM background satisfying the above requirements is dominated by $t\bar{t}$ production where
|
| 32 |
|
|
one W boson decays hadronically and the other leptonically (\ttljets), or where both W bosons decay leptonically (\ttll).
|
| 33 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
There is a small contribution from \wjets, as well as a variety of rare SM
|
| 34 |
|
|
processes, dominated by $t\bar{t}$ produced in association with a vector boson
|
| 35 |
|
|
($t\bar{t}W$ and $t\bar{t}Z$).
|
| 36 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 37 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
To define signal regions, we require the events to have large transverse mass, defined as:
|
| 38 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 39 |
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
| 40 |
|
|
M_T = \sqrt{ 2 p_{T}^{\ell} \met ( 1-cos(\Delta\phi))},
|
| 41 |
|
|
\end{equation}
|
| 42 |
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
|
where $p_{T}^{\ell}$ is the lepton transverse momentum and $\Delta\phi$ is the difference in azimuthal angles between the lepton
|
| 44 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
and \met. This requirement strongly suppresses the background from \ttljets\ and \wjets, which have a kinematic endpoint
|
| 45 |
|
|
at \mt\ $=$ $M_W$ since the lepton and neutrino (which produces the \met) are produced together in the decay of the W.
|
| 46 |
|
|
For signal events, as well as the \ttll\ background, the presence of more than one invisible
|
| 47 |
|
|
particle in the final state leads to events with \mt\ $>>$ $M_W$.
|
| 48 |
|
|
In addition to the \mt\ requirement, we make several
|
| 49 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\met\ requirements to achieve sensitivity to signals with different mass spectra.
|
| 50 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Signal regions with large (small) \met\ requirements are more sensitive to signals with large (small) values of $\Delta m$.
|
| 51 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 52 |
|
|
The dominant background in our signal regions is \ttll, which may produce events with large \met\ and \mt\ due to the presence of
|
| 53 |
|
|
two invisible neutrinos. In order for \ttll\ events to pass the signal region selection, one of the two W leptons must not be identified,
|
| 54 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
which occurs if it is outside the acceptance, is a hadronic $\tau$ decaying to three charged particles (3-prong decay),
|
| 55 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
is a hadronic $\tau$ decaying to a single charged particle (1-prong decay), or is an electron or muon that fails the lepton identification
|
| 56 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
requirements. The latter two categories are suppressed by vetoing events that contain, in addition to the selected lepton,
|
| 57 |
|
|
a charged particle with \pt\ $>$ 10 GeV that is isolated in space from other energetic charged particles. Furthermore, additional jets
|
| 58 |
|
|
from initial state or final state radiation (ISR/FSR) are required to satisfy the jet multiplicity requirement $n_{jets}\geq4$.
|
| 59 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
To validate and correct the MC modeling of jets from radiation, the MC is compared to data in a dilepton control region dominated by \ttll. The MC distribution of $n_{jets}$ is reweighted to
|
| 60 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
match the corresponding data distribution, resulting in corrections of (1--7)\%.
|
| 61 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 62 |
|
|
The SM backgrounds are estimated from events simulated with Monte Carlo (MC) techniques, which are validated and
|
| 63 |
|
|
(if necessary) corrected using comparisons to data in control regions. The MC expectation is normalized to data in the \mt\ peak region,
|
| 64 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
in order to remove systematic uncertainties from integrated luminosity and $t\bar{t}$ cross section, and then extrapolated to the
|
| 65 |
|
|
large \mt\ region. Correction factors and corresponding systematic uncertainties on the MC extrapolation factors are evaluated by
|
| 66 |
|
|
comparing MC to data in dedicated control regions dominated by \wjets\ (obtained by vetoing events with b-jets), \ttll\
|
| 67 |
|
|
(obtained by requiring two selected leptons), and a mixture of \ttll\ and \ttljets\ (obtained by requiring a selected lepton and
|
| 68 |
|
|
an isolated track). The dominant systematic uncertainty in the background prediction is due to the limited statistical precision in
|
| 69 |
|
|
the data control samples used for these tests.
|
| 70 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 71 |
|
|
\input{results_table.tex}
|
| 72 |
|
|
|
| 73 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
%\subsection{Results}
|
| 74 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 75 |
|
|
The results of the search are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:stop}, which displays the SM background expectations and the observed data yields
|
| 76 |
|
|
in the signal regions. The distribution of \met\ after the requirement \mt\ $>$ 120 GeV for the SM background expectations is compared to
|
| 77 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
data in Fig.~\ref{fig:stop}. Good agreement between the data and the expected background is observed. We find no evidence
|
| 78 |
|
|
for the pair production of top squarks.
|
| 79 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 80 |
|
|
\begin{figure}
|
| 81 |
|
|
% Use the relevant command for your figure-insertion program
|
| 82 |
|
|
% to insert the figure file.
|
| 83 |
|
|
\centering
|
| 84 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{HCPPlots/stopmet.pdf}
|
| 85 |
|
|
%\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{HCPPlots/stopmet.pdf}
|
| 86 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\caption{The \met\ distribution in data, compared to the sum of expected backgrounds, for the top squark pair search.
|
| 87 |
|
|
Two example signal models are also indicated.}
|
| 88 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\label{fig:stop} % Give a unique label
|
| 89 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 90 |
|
|
|
| 91 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
%\subsection{Interpretation}
|
| 92 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 93 |
|
|
%To interpret the results of our search, we consider two signal scenarios of top squark pair production, followed by the decays
|
| 94 |
|
|
%$\tilde{t}\to t\lsp$ and $\tilde{t}\to b\chip\to b W \lsp$. In the first scenario, the only SUSY particles which participate
|
| 95 |
|
|
%are the top squark and \lsp, and the model can thus be parameterized by the masses of these two particles. In the second case
|
| 96 |
|
|
%the chargino mass is also relevant, and we introduce a third parameter $x$, defined as $m_{\chip} = x m_{\lsp} + (1-x) m_{\tilde{t}}$.
|
| 97 |
|
|
%We consider $x=0.5$ and $x=0.75$ (we do not have sensitivity to the $x=0.25$ scenario).
|
| 98 |
|
|
|
| 99 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
To interpret the results of our search, we consider top squark pair production where both top squarks decay according to
|
| 100 |
|
|
$\tilde{t}\to t\lsp$ as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(a).
|
| 101 |
|
|
The model is parameterized by the masses of the top squark and \lsp. We place upper limits on the signal
|
| 102 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
production cross section using, for each model point in the 2-dimensional parameter space, the signal region with the best expected
|
| 103 |
|
|
sensitivity. A region of the parameter space is excluded by comparing these cross section upper limits with the theoretical predictions
|
| 104 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
for the signal cross section.
|
| 105 |
|
|
%, computed at next-to-leading order including the resummation of soft gluon emission at
|
| 106 |
|
|
%next-to-leading-logarithmic
|
| 107 |
|
|
%accuracy (NLO+NLL)~\cite{ref:nlonll}.
|
| 108 |
|
|
Our results probe top squarks with masses up to 430 GeV. For comparison, the requirement that SUSY
|
| 109 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
provides a natural solution to the hierarchy problem suggests top squarks with masses not exceeding 500--700 GeV~\cite{ref:naturalsusy}.
|
| 110 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
We also interpret our results assuming the top squark decays according to $\tilde{t}\to b\chip\to b W \lsp$,
|
| 111 |
|
|
as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(b)~\cite{ref:stop}.
|
| 112 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 113 |
|
|
The ATLAS experiment has presented a similar search for top squark pairs in the single lepton final state~\cite{ref:atlasstop}.
|
| 114 |
|
|
The constraints from ATLAS on the top squark mass are more stringent than those presented here. The ATLAS model assumes large
|
| 115 |
|
|
right-handed top quark polarization, while we take the top quark in the $\tilde{t}\to t\lsp$ decay to be unpolarized,
|
| 116 |
|
|
resulting in a lower signal selection efficiency in our analysis.
|
| 117 |
|
|
|
| 118 |
|
|
\begin{figure}
|
| 119 |
|
|
% Use the relevant command for your figure-insertion program
|
| 120 |
|
|
% to insert the figure file.
|
| 121 |
|
|
\centering
|
| 122 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{HCPPlots/stop_interpretation.pdf}
|
| 123 |
|
|
%\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{HCPPlots/stop_interpretation.pdf}
|
| 124 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\caption{Interpretation of the results of the top squark pair search in the $\tilde{t}\to t\lsp$ scenario of
|
| 125 |
|
|
Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}(a). The color scale indicates the cross section upper limits. The solid black contour
|
| 126 |
|
|
and dashed black contours indicate the observed excluded region and variation in this
|
| 127 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
excluded region due to the $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainties in the theoretical prediction of the signal cross section. The dashed blue
|
| 128 |
|
|
and dotted blue contours indicate the median and $\pm1\sigma$ expected excluded regions. }
|
| 129 |
|
|
\label{fig:stop_interpretation} % Give a unique label
|
| 130 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
