| 1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\section{Additional Information for Model Testing}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{sec:outreach}
|
| 3 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 4 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
Other models of new physics in the dilepton final state can be confronted in an approximate way by simple
|
| 5 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
generator-level studies that compare the expected number of events in \lumifinal\
|
| 6 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
with the upper limits from Section~\ref{sec:limit}.
|
| 7 |
|
|
The key ingredients of such studies are the kinematic requirements described
|
| 8 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
in this note, the lepton efficiencies, and the detector responses for \HT\ and \MET.
|
| 9 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
%
|
| 10 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
The muon identification efficiency is $\approx 96\%$;
|
| 11 |
|
|
the electron identification efficiency varies approximately linearly from $\approx$ 60\% at
|
| 12 |
|
|
$\pt = 10\GeVc$ to 90\% for $\pt > 30\GeVc$.
|
| 13 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
%
|
| 14 |
|
|
The lepton isolation efficiency depends on the lepton momentum, as well as on the jet activity in the
|
| 15 |
|
|
event.
|
| 16 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
In $t\bar{t}$ events, it varies approximately linearly from $\approx 73\%$ (muons)
|
| 17 |
|
|
and $\approx 82\%$ (electrons) at $\pt=10\GeVc$ to $\approx 97\%$ for $\pt>60\GeVc$.
|
| 18 |
|
|
In LM1 (LM3) events, this efficiency is decreased by $\approx$5--10\% ($\approx$10\%)over the whole momentum spectrum.
|
| 19 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
%
|
| 20 |
|
|
The average detector responses (the reconstructed quantity divided by the generated quantity)
|
| 21 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
for \HT\ and \MET\ are consistent with 1 within the 5\% jet energy scale uncertainty.
|
| 22 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
The experimental resolutions on these quantities are 9\% and 12\%, respectively.
|
| 23 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
