| 1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
%\section{Properties of data passing the preselection}
|
| 2 |
|
|
%\label{sec:bulk}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
Figure~\ref{fig:bulk} compares several kinematic distributions in data and SM MC for events passing the preselection.
|
| 5 |
|
|
As an illustration, we also show the MC distributions for the LM1 benchmark point. We find that the SM MC reproduces
|
| 6 |
nmohr |
1.3 |
the properties of the bulk of data.
|
| 7 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
%We therefore turn our attention to the tails of the \MET\ and \HT\
|
| 8 |
|
|
%distributions of the $t\bar{t}$ sample.
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[tbh]
|
| 12 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 13 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots_final/datamc_LM1_349pb.pdf}
|
| 14 |
|
|
\caption{\label{fig:bulk}\protect
|
| 15 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Distributions of (top left) missing tranverse energy \MET, (top right) scalar sum of jet transverse energies (\HT),
|
| 16 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
(bottom left) dilepton invariant mass $M(\ell\ell)$, and (bottom right) dilepton transverse momentum $\pt(\ell\ell)$
|
| 17 |
|
|
for SM MC and data after preselection. The last bin contains the overflow.
|
| 18 |
|
|
The MC has been normalized to match the data by applying a scale factor of 1.12.
|
| 19 |
|
|
Here $VV$ indicates the sum of $WW$, $WZ$, and $ZZ$.
|
| 20 |
|
|
The MC distributions for the LM1 benchmark point are also shown.
|
| 21 |
|
|
}
|
| 22 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 23 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
