3 |
|
|
4 |
|
Figure~\ref{fig:bulk} compares several kinematic distributions in data and SM MC for events passing the preselection. |
5 |
|
As an illustration, we also show the MC distributions for the LM1 benchmark point. We find that the SM MC reproduces |
6 |
< |
the properties of the bulk of dilepton $t\bar{t}$ events. |
6 |
> |
the properties of the bulk of data. |
7 |
|
%We therefore turn our attention to the tails of the \MET\ and \HT\ |
8 |
|
%distributions of the $t\bar{t}$ sample. |
9 |
|
|
12 |
|
\begin{center} |
13 |
|
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots_final/datamc_LM1_349pb.pdf} |
14 |
|
\caption{\label{fig:bulk}\protect |
15 |
< |
Distributions of (top left) scalar sum of jet transverse energies (\HT), (top right) missing tranverse energy \MET, |
15 |
> |
Distributions of (top left) missing tranverse energy \MET, (top right) scalar sum of jet transverse energies (\HT), |
16 |
|
(bottom left) dilepton invariant mass $M(\ell\ell)$, and (bottom right) dilepton transverse momentum $\pt(\ell\ell)$ |
17 |
|
for SM MC and data after preselection. The last bin contains the overflow. |
18 |
|
The MC has been normalized to match the data by applying a scale factor of 1.12. |