ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/OSPAS2011/yields.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/OSPAS2011/yields.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.2 by benhoob, Wed Jun 15 08:26:17 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 1.7 by nmohr, Mon Jun 20 13:00:23 2011 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4
4   The data yields and corresponding MC predictions after this event preselection
5   are given in Table~\ref{tab:yields}. The MC yields are normalized to~\lumifinal\ using
6   next-to-leading order (NLO) cross sections. At the current LHC luminosity, the mean
7 < number of expected pile-up interactions is approximately 5. In the MC, pile-up interactions
7 > number of interactions in a single beam crossing is approximately 5. In the MC, multiple interactions
8   are superimposed on the hard collision, and the MC is reweighted such that the distribution
9   of reconstructed primary vertices matches that in data. As expected, the MC predicts that the
10   sample passing the preselection is dominated by dilepton $t\bar{t}$. The data yield is in
11 < reasonable agreement with the prediction. We also quote the yields for
11 > reasonable agreement~\footnote{The luminosity is currently underestimated by approximately 10\%,
12 > which explains the observed excess in data. The estimate will be updated before EPS.}
13 > with the prediction. We also quote the yields for
14   the LM1 and LM3 benchmark scenarios.
15  
16   \begin{table}[htb]
# Line 19 | Line 21 | $t \to W \to \tau \to \ell$; \ttfake\ in
21   The samples of MC $t\bar{t}$, $W^{\pm}$ + jets, and single-top events were
22   generated with \MADGRAPH. The Drell--Yan sample (which includes events with
23   invariant masses as low as 10\GeVcc) was generated using a mixture of \MADGRAPH\ and
24 < \PYTHIA  and contains decays to the $\tau^+\tau^-$ final state. All other samples were generated with \PYTHIA.
25 < The LM0 and LM1 benchmark scenarios are defined in the text; the quoted $\sigma$ values refer to the total production
24 > \PYTHIA  and includes decays to the $\tau^+\tau^-$ final state. All other samples were generated with \PYTHIA.
25 > The LM1 and LM3 benchmark scenarios are defined in the text; the quoted $\sigma$ values refer to the total production
26   cross section for SUSY particles in these scenarios. Uncertainties are statistical only.
27   }
28   \vspace{2 mm}
29   \begin{tabular}{lr|cccc}
30   \hline
31 <         Sample   & $\sigma$  &            $ee$   &       $\mu\mu$   &         $e\mu$   &       total  \\
31 >         Sample     & $\sigma$ [pb]  &            $ee$   &       $\mu\mu$   &         $e\mu$   &       total  \\
32   \hline
33 <          \ttll   &   16.9 & 147.6 $\pm$ 3.2   &166.4 $\pm$ 3.2   &391.7 $\pm$ 5.1   &705.8 $\pm$ 6.8  \\
34 <        \ttfake   &  140.6 &   4.5 $\pm$ 0.6   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.3   &  8.1 $\pm$ 0.7   & 13.9 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
35 <             DY   &  18417 &   6.6 $\pm$ 1.8   &  9.5 $\pm$ 2.1   & 13.4 $\pm$ 2.6   & 29.6 $\pm$ 3.8  \\
36 <            \WW   &    2.9 &   1.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &  1.5 $\pm$ 0.2   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &  6.3 $\pm$ 0.3  \\
37 <            \WZ   &    0.3 &   0.3 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.7 $\pm$ 0.1   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
38 <            \ZZ   &    4.3 &   0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
39 <     single top   &     33 &   4.5 $\pm$ 0.2   &  5.0 $\pm$ 0.2   & 11.9 $\pm$ 0.3   & 21.4 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
40 <         \wjets   &  28049 &   4.5 $\pm$ 1.9   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  2.8 $\pm$ 1.7   &  7.3 $\pm$ 2.6  \\
33 >          \ttll     &     17 & 147.6 $\pm$ 3.2   &166.4 $\pm$ 3.2   &391.7 $\pm$ 5.1   &705.8 $\pm$ 6.8  \\
34 >        \ttfake     &    141 &   4.5 $\pm$ 0.6   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.3   &  8.1 $\pm$ 0.7   & 13.9 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
35 > DY$\to\ell^+\ell^-$ &  16677 &   6.6 $\pm$ 1.8   &  9.5 $\pm$ 2.1   & 13.4 $\pm$ 2.6   & 29.6 $\pm$ 3.8  \\
36 >            \WW     &     43 &   1.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &  1.5 $\pm$ 0.2   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &  6.3 $\pm$ 0.3  \\
37 >            \WZ     &     18 &   0.3 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.7 $\pm$ 0.1   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
38 >            \ZZ     &    5.9 &   0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
39 >     single top     &    102 &   4.5 $\pm$ 0.2   &  5.0 $\pm$ 0.2   & 11.9 $\pm$ 0.3   & 21.4 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
40 >         \wjets     &  96648 &   4.5 $\pm$ 1.9   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  2.8 $\pm$ 1.7   &  7.3 $\pm$ 2.6  \\
41   \hline
42 <    total SM MC   &        & 169.7 $\pm$ 4.2   &184.3 $\pm$ 3.9   &432.2 $\pm$ 6.0   &786.1 $\pm$ 8.3  \\
42 >    total SM MC     &        & 169.7 $\pm$ 4.2   &184.3 $\pm$ 3.9   &432.2 $\pm$ 6.0   &786.1 $\pm$ 8.3  \\
43   \hline
44 <           data   &        &             193   &            201   &            485   &            879  \\
44 >           data     &        &             193   &            201   &            485   &            879  \\
45   \hline
46 <            LM1   &    6.7 &  22.3 $\pm$ 0.6   & 24.8 $\pm$ 0.6   & 12.8 $\pm$ 0.4   & 59.9 $\pm$ 0.9  \\
47 <            LM3   &    5.3 &   7.9 $\pm$ 0.3   &  9.6 $\pm$ 0.3   & 14.2 $\pm$ 0.4   & 31.7 $\pm$ 0.6  \\
46 >            LM1     &    6.7 &  22.3 $\pm$ 0.6   & 24.8 $\pm$ 0.6   & 12.8 $\pm$ 0.4   & 59.9 $\pm$ 0.9  \\
47 >            LM3     &    5.3 &   7.9 $\pm$ 0.3   &  9.6 $\pm$ 0.3   & 14.2 $\pm$ 0.4   & 31.7 $\pm$ 0.6  \\
48   \hline
49   \end{tabular}
50   \end{center}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines