| 10 |
|
In Table~\ref{tab:cr1mtsf} we show the amount that we need to scale the Wjets MC |
| 11 |
|
by in order to have agreement between data and Monte Carlo in the $M_T$ peak |
| 12 |
|
region, defined as $60 < M_T < 100$ GeV. These scale factors are not terribly |
| 13 |
< |
important, but it is reassuring that they are not too different from 1. (ARE THESE |
| 14 |
< |
SCALED FOR TRIGGER EFFICIENCY???) |
| 13 |
> |
important, but it is reassuring that they are not too different from |
| 14 |
> |
1. [UPDATE WITH TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES] |
| 15 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 21 |
|
Sample & CR1PRESEL & CR1A & CR1B & CR1C & CR1D & CR1E\\ |
| 22 |
|
\hline |
| 23 |
|
\hline |
| 24 |
< |
Muon \mt-SF & $0.75 \pm 0.01$ & $0.77 \pm 0.02$ & $0.78 \pm 0.03$ & $0.79 \pm 0.05$ & $0.88 \pm 0.08$ & $0.91 \pm 0.12$ \\ |
| 24 |
> |
Muon \mt-SF & $0.90 \pm 0.02$ & $0.93 \pm 0.02$ & $0.93 \pm 0.04$ & $0.93 \pm 0.06$ & $1.03 \pm 0.09$ & $1.04 \pm 0.13$ \\ |
| 25 |
|
\hline |
| 26 |
|
\hline |
| 27 |
< |
Electron \mt-SF & $0.84 \pm 0.02$ & $0.83 \pm 0.03$ & $0.80 \pm 0.04$ & $0.78 \pm 0.06$ & $0.76 \pm 0.09$ & $0.73 \pm 0.12$ \\ |
| 27 |
> |
Electron \mt-SF & $0.93 \pm 0.02$ & $0.91 \pm 0.03$ & $0.87 \pm 0.05$ & $0.85 \pm 0.07$ & $0.82 \pm 0.09$ & $0.78 \pm 0.13$ \\ |
| 28 |
|
\hline |
| 29 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 30 |
|
\caption{ \mt\ peak Data/MC scale factors applied to the single lepton |
| 49 |
|
Sample & CR1PRESEL & CR1A & CR1B & CR1C & CR1D & CR1E\\ |
| 50 |
|
\hline |
| 51 |
|
\hline |
| 52 |
< |
Muon MC & $481 \pm 20$ & $176 \pm 5$ & $121 \pm 4$ & $42 \pm 2$ & $18 \pm 2$ & $9 \pm 1$ \\ |
| 52 |
> |
Muon MC & $473 \pm 22$ & $169 \pm 5$ & $116 \pm 4$ & $41 \pm 2$ & $17 \pm 2$ & $8 \pm 1$ \\ |
| 53 |
|
Muon Data & $629$ & $238$ & $139$ & $45$ & $12$ & $8$ \\ |
| 54 |
|
\hline |
| 55 |
< |
Muon Data/MC SF: ($SFR^{\mu}_{wjet}$) & $1.31 \pm 0.08$ & $1.35 \pm 0.10$ & $1.15 \pm 0.11$ & $1.06 \pm 0.17$ & $0.68 \pm 0.21$ & $0.92 \pm 0.35$ \\ |
| 55 |
> |
Muon Data/MC SF: ($SFR^{\mu}_{wjet}$) & $1.33 \pm 0.08$ & $1.41 \pm 0.10$ & $1.20 \pm 0.11$ & $1.11 \pm 0.18$ & $0.71 \pm 0.21$ & $0.95 \pm 0.36$ \\ |
| 56 |
|
\hline |
| 57 |
|
\hline |
| 58 |
< |
Electron MC & $322 \pm 7$ & $119 \pm 4$ & $81 \pm 3$ & $30 \pm 2$ & $13 \pm 1$ & $5 \pm 1$ \\ |
| 58 |
> |
Electron MC & $327 \pm 8$ & $119 \pm 4$ & $80 \pm 3$ & $30 \pm 2$ & $13 \pm 1$ & $5 \pm 1$ \\ |
| 59 |
|
Electron Data & $487$ & $181$ & $103$ & $38$ & $16$ & $6$ \\ |
| 60 |
|
\hline |
| 61 |
< |
Electron Data/MC SF: ($SFR^e_{wjet}$) & $1.51 \pm 0.08$ & $1.53 \pm 0.13$ & $1.28 \pm 0.14$ & $1.25 \pm 0.22$ & $1.25 \pm 0.34$ & $1.26 \pm 0.56$ \\ |
| 61 |
> |
Electron Data/MC SF: ($SFR^e_{wjet}$) & $1.49 \pm 0.08$ & $1.53 \pm 0.13$ & $1.29 \pm 0.14$ & $1.27 \pm 0.22$ & $1.26 \pm 0.35$ & $1.27 \pm 0.56$ \\ |
| 62 |
|
\hline |
| 63 |
|
\end{tabular}} |
| 64 |
|
\caption{ Yields in \mt\ tail comparing the MC prediction (after |
