ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/StopSearch/CR1.tex
Revision: 1.8
Committed: Wed Oct 10 04:51:53 2012 UTC (12 years, 7 months ago) by vimartin
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
Changes since 1.7: +1 -1 lines
Log Message:
updating sf uncertainties

File Contents

# Content
1 \subsection{W+Jets MC Modelling Validation from CR1}
2 \label{sec:cr1}
3
4
5 The estimate of the uncertainty on this background is based on CR1,
6 defined by applying the full signal selection, including the isolated track veto, but requiring 0 b-tags
7 (CSV medium working point as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:selection}).
8 The sample is dominanted by \wjets\ and is thus used to validate the MC modelling of this background.
9
10 In Table~\ref{tab:cr1mtsf} we show the amount that we need to scale the Wjets MC
11 by in order to have agreement between data and Monte Carlo in the $M_T$ peak
12 region, defined as $60 < M_T < 100$ GeV. These scale factors are not terribly
13 important, but it is reassuring that they are not too different from
14 1. [UPDATE WITH TRIGGER EFFICIENCIES]
15
16
17 \begin{table}[!h]
18 \begin{center}
19 {\footnotesize
20 \begin{tabular}{l||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
21 \hline
22 Sample & CR1PRESEL & CR1A & CR1B & CR1C & CR1D & CR1E &
23 CR1F & CR1G\\
24 \hline
25 \hline
26 $\mu$ \mt-SF & $0.92 \pm 0.02$ & $0.97 \pm 0.03$ & $0.90 \pm 0.04$ & $0.91 \pm 0.06$ & $0.93 \pm 0.09$ & $0.98 \pm 0.13$ & $0.94 \pm 0.18$ & $0.96 \pm 0.25$ \\
27 \hline
28 \hline
29 e \mt-SF & $0.94 \pm 0.02$ & $0.90 \pm 0.04$ & $0.84 \pm 0.05$ & $0.80 \pm 0.07$ & $0.83 \pm 0.10$ & $0.77 \pm 0.13$ & $0.86 \pm 0.20$ & $0.87 \pm 0.29$ \\
30 \hline
31 \end{tabular}}
32 \caption{ \mt\ peak Data/MC scale factors applied to the single lepton
33 samples and \ttdl. The raw MC is used for backgrounds from rare
34 processes. CR1PRESEL refers to a sample with $\met>50$ GeV.
35 The uncertainties are statistical only.
36 \label{tab:cr1mtsf}}
37 \end{center}
38 \end{table}
39
40
41 In Table~\ref{tab:cr1yields} we compare the data and MC yields in the four $M_T$ signal regions
42 and in a looser control region. We also derive the data/MC scale factors
43 $SFR^{e}_{wjet}$ and $SFR^{\mu}_{wjet}$. The underlying \met\ and $M_T$ distributions
44 are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cr1met} and~\ref{fig:cr1mtrest}
45
46
47 \begin{table}[!h]
48 \begin{center}
49 {\footnotesize
50 \begin{tabular}{l||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
51 \hline
52 Sample & CR1PRESEL & CR1A & CR1B & CR1C & CR1D & CR1E &
53 CR1F & CR1G\\
54 \hline
55 \hline
56 $\mu$ MC & $480 \pm 22$ & $173 \pm 5$ & $114 \pm 4$ & $40 \pm 2$ & $16 \pm 1$ & $8 \pm 1$ & $4 \pm 1$ & $2 \pm 1$ \\
57 $\mu$ Data & $629$ & $238$ & $139$ & $45$ & $12$ & $8$ & $3$ & $2$ \\
58 \hline
59 $\mu$ Data/MC & $1.31 \pm 0.08$ & $1.37 \pm 0.10$ & $1.22 \pm 0.11$ & $1.12 \pm 0.18$ & $0.75 \pm 0.23$ & $0.99 \pm 0.37$ & $0.75 \pm 0.45$ & $0.96 \pm 0.72$ \\
60 \hline
61 \hline
62 e MC & $330 \pm 8$ & $118 \pm 4$ & $79 \pm 3$ & $29 \pm 2$ & $13 \pm 1$ & $5 \pm 1$ & $3 \pm 1$ & $2 \pm 0$ \\
63 e Data & $473$ & $174$ & $100$ & $36$ & $16$ & $5$ & $5$ & $2$ \\
64 \hline
65 e Data/MC & $1.43 \pm 0.07$ & $1.47 \pm 0.12$ & $1.27 \pm 0.14$ & $1.23 \pm 0.22$ & $1.26 \pm 0.34$ & $1.07 \pm 0.51$ & $1.80 \pm 0.91$ & $1.26 \pm 0.97$ \\
66 \hline
67 \hline
68 $\mu$+e MC & $810 \pm 23$ & $291 \pm 7$ & $192 \pm 5$ & $69 \pm 3$ & $29 \pm 2$ & $13 \pm 1$ & $7 \pm 1$ & $4 \pm 1$ \\
69 $\mu$+e Data & $1102$ & $412$ & $239$ & $81$ & $28$ & $13$ & $8$ & $4$ \\
70 \hline
71 $\mu$+e Data/MC & $1.36 \pm 0.08$ & $1.42 \pm 0.13$ & $1.24 \pm 0.15$ & $1.17 \pm 0.23$ & $0.97 \pm 0.31$ & $1.02 \pm 0.51$ & $1.18 \pm 0.69$ & $1.09 \pm 0.96$ \\
72 \hline
73 \hline
74 \hline
75 $\mu$ W MC & $300 \pm 23$ & $84 \pm 5$ & $52 \pm 4$ & $20 \pm 2$ & $9 \pm 2$ & $5 \pm 1$ & $3 \pm 1$ & $1 \pm 1$ \\
76 $\mu$ W Data & $449 \pm 26$ & $149 \pm 16$ & $78 \pm 12$ & $25 \pm 7$ & $5 \pm 4$ & $5 \pm 3$ & $2 \pm 2$ & $1 \pm 1$ \\
77 \hline
78 $\mu$ W Data/MC & $1.50 \pm 0.14$ & $1.77 \pm 0.21$ & $1.49 \pm 0.26$ & $1.25 \pm 0.38$ & $0.56 \pm 0.39$ & $0.98 \pm 0.62$ & $0.60 \pm 0.73$ & $0.94 \pm 1.14$ \\
79 \hline
80 \hline
81 e W MC & $192 \pm 8$ & $55 \pm 4$ & $36 \pm 3$ & $14 \pm 2$ & $6 \pm 1$ & $3 \pm 1$ & $2 \pm 1$ & $1 \pm 0$ \\
82 e W Data & $335 \pm 22$ & $111 \pm 13$ & $58 \pm 10$ & $20 \pm 6$ & $10 \pm 4$ & $3 \pm 2$ & $4 \pm 2$ & $1 \pm 1$ \\
83 \hline
84 e W Data/MC & $1.74 \pm 0.14$ & $2.02 \pm 0.29$ & $1.58 \pm 0.32$ & $1.49 \pm 0.50$ & $1.50 \pm 0.70$ & $1.10 \pm 0.80$ & $2.27 \pm 1.55$ & $1.51 \pm 1.96$ \\
85 \hline
86 \hline
87 $\mu$+e W MC & $493 \pm 24$ & $139 \pm 6$ & $89 \pm 5$ & $33 \pm 3$ & $16 \pm 2$ & $8 \pm 1$ & $4 \pm 1$ & $2 \pm 1$ \\
88 $\mu$+e W Data & $785 \pm 59$ & $260 \pm 37$ & $135 \pm 28$ & $45 \pm 16$ & $15 \pm 9$ & $8 \pm 7$ & $6 \pm 5$ & $3 \pm 3$ \\
89 \hline
90 $\mu$+e W Data/MC & $1.59 \pm 0.14$ & $1.87 \pm 0.28$ & $1.53 \pm 0.33$ & $1.35 \pm 0.50$ & $0.95 \pm 0.58$ & $1.03 \pm 0.83$ & $1.29 \pm 1.13$ & $1.16 \pm 1.65$ \\
91 \hline
92 \hline
93 \hline
94 $SFR_{wjet}$ & $1.48 \pm 0.26$ & $1.64 \pm 0.38$ & $1.38 \pm 0.30$ & $1.26 \pm 0.39$ & $0.96 \pm 0.45$ & $1.02 \pm 0.67$ & $1.23 \pm 0.92$ & $1.12 \pm 1.31$ \\
95 \hline
96 \end{tabular}}
97 \caption{ Yields in \mt\ tail comparing the MC prediction (after
98 applying SFs) to data. CR1PRESEL refers to a sample with $\met>50$
99 GeV and $\mt>150$ GeV.
100 The uncertainties are statistical only.
101 \label{tab:cr1yields}}
102 \end{center}
103 \end{table}
104
105
106 \begin{figure}[hbt]
107 \begin{center}
108 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/met_met50_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
109 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/met_met50_leadele_nj4.pdf}
110 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
111 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
112 \caption{
113 Comparison of the \met\ (top) and \mt\ for $\met>100$ (bottom) distributions in data vs. MC for events
114 with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
115 satisfying the requirements of CR1.
116 \label{fig:cr1met}
117 }
118 \end{center}
119 \end{figure}
120
121
122 \begin{figure}[hbt]
123 \begin{center}
124 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met150_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
125 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met150_leadele_nj4.pdf}
126 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met200_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
127 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met200_leadele_nj4.pdf}
128 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met250_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
129 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met250_leadele_nj4.pdf}
130 \caption{
131 Comparison of the \mt\ distribution in data vs. MC for events
132 with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
133 satisfying the requirements of CR1. The \met\ requirements used are
134 150 GeV (top), 200 GeV (middle) and 250 GeV (bottom).
135 \label{fig:cr1mtrest}
136 }
137 \end{center}
138 \end{figure}
139
140 \begin{figure}[hbt]
141 \begin{center}
142 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met300_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
143 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met300_leadele_nj4.pdf}
144 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met350_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
145 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met350_leadele_nj4.pdf}
146 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met400_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
147 \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/mt_met400_leadele_nj4.pdf}
148 \caption{
149 Comparison of the \mt\ distribution in data vs. MC for events
150 with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
151 satisfying the requirements of CR1. The \met\ requirements used are
152 300 GeV (top), 350 GeV (middle) and 400 GeV (bottom).
153 \label{fig:cr1mtrest2}
154 }
155 \end{center}
156 \end{figure}
157
158
159 \clearpage