| 1 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
|
| 2 |
|
|
\subsection{Single Lepton Top MC Modelling Validation from CR2}
|
| 3 |
|
|
\label{sec:cr2}
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
IS THIS GOING TO BE DONE WITH A BVETO OR NOT. IF SO, IS IT GOING TO
|
| 6 |
|
|
BE CSVL OR CSVM? NEED TO DISCUSS THIS.
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
The \mt\ tail for single-lepton top events (\ttsl\ and single top) is dominated by jet resolution effects. The \W\ cannot be far off-shell because $\mW < \mtop$.
|
| 9 |
|
|
The modeling of the \mt\ tail from jet resolution effects is studied using \zjets\ data and MC samples.
|
| 10 |
|
|
\Z\ events are selection by requiring 2 good leptons (satisfying ID and isolation requirements) and requiring the \mll\ to be in the range $81-101$ GeV.
|
| 11 |
|
|
The negative lepton is treated as a neutrino and so is added to the MET: \met\ $\rightarrow$ \pt(\Lepm) + \met,
|
| 12 |
|
|
and the \mt\ is recalculated with the positive lepton \mt(\Lepp, \met).
|
| 13 |
|
|
The resulting ``pseudo-\mt'' is dominated by jet resolution effects, since no off-shell
|
| 14 |
|
|
\Z\ production enters the sample due to the \mll\ requirement.
|
| 15 |
|
|
This section describes how well the MC predicts the tail of ``pseudo-\mt''.
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
The underlying distributions are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cr2met}
|
| 18 |
|
|
and~\ref{fig:cr2mtrest}. The comparison of data and MC event counts
|
| 19 |
|
|
is shown in Table~\ref{tab:cr2yields}. From this table we extract
|
| 20 |
|
|
the data to MC scale factors $SFR^{e}_{top}$ and $SFR^{\mu}_{top}$.
|
| 21 |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
|
\begin{table}[!h]
|
| 24 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 25 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
{\footnotesize
|
| 26 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c||c|c|c|c|c}
|
| 27 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 28 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
Sample & CR2PRESEL0 &CR2PRESEL1 & CR2A & CR2B & CR2C &
|
| 29 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
CR2D & CR2E \\
|
| 30 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 31 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 32 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
MC & $36 \pm 2$ & $30 \pm 2$ & $18 \pm 1$ & $30 \pm 2$ & $13 \pm 1$ & $5 \pm 0$ & $2 \pm 0$ \\
|
| 33 |
|
|
Data & $56$ & $43$ & $32$ & $40$ & $21$ & $12$ & $2$ \\
|
| 34 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 35 |
|
|
Data/MC & $1.56 \pm 0.23$ & $1.44 \pm 0.24$ & $1.77 \pm 0.34$ & $1.32 \pm 0.22$ & $1.65 \pm 0.37$ & $2.65 \pm 0.79$ & $0.99 \pm 0.71$ \\
|
| 36 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 37 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 38 |
vimartin |
1.3 |
\hline
|
| 39 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
DY MC & $27 \pm 2$ & $23 \pm 2$ & $14 \pm 2$ & $25 \pm 3$ & $11 \pm 2$ & $3 \pm 1$ & $1 \pm 1$ \\
|
| 40 |
|
|
DY Data & $47 \pm 8$ & $36 \pm 7$ & $28 \pm 6$ & $35 \pm 6$ & $19 \pm 5$ & $11 \pm 3$ & $1 \pm 1$ \\
|
| 41 |
vimartin |
1.3 |
\hline
|
| 42 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
DY Data/MC & $1.75 \pm 0.31$ & $1.58 \pm 0.32$ & $2.00 \pm 0.47$ & $1.38 \pm 0.31$ & $1.78 \pm 0.56$ & $3.29 \pm 1.73$ & $0.98 \pm 1.20$ \\
|
| 43 |
vimartin |
1.3 |
\hline
|
| 44 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 45 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 46 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
$SFR_{top}$ & $1.66 \pm 0.23$ & $1.51 \pm 0.24$ & $1.89 \pm
|
| 47 |
|
|
0.34$ & $1.35 \pm 0.22$ & $1.71 \pm 0.37$ & $2.97 \pm 0.79$ & $0.98
|
| 48 |
|
|
\pm 0.71$ \\
|
| 49 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 50 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
\end{tabular}}
|
| 51 |
vimartin |
1.4 |
\caption{ Yields in \mt\ tail comparing the \zjets\ MC prediction (after
|
| 52 |
|
|
applying SFs) to data after subtracting the non-\zjets\ components.
|
| 53 |
|
|
CR2PRESEL refers to a sample with $\met>50$ GeV and $\mt>150$ GeV.
|
| 54 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
The uncertainties are statistical only. NEED TO ADD THE SYMBOLS
|
| 55 |
|
|
DEFINED IN THE TEXT FOR THESE SCALE FACTORS. IS THIS GOING TO BE
|
| 56 |
|
|
DONE SEPARATELY FOR MUONS AND ELECTRONS???
|
| 57 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
MAYBE WANT TO REMOVE LAST ENTRIES WHERE STATS ARE VERY LOW
|
| 58 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\label{tab:cr2yields}}
|
| 59 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 60 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 61 |
|
|
|
| 62 |
vimartin |
1.3 |
|
| 63 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 64 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 65 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/met_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 66 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/met_lepcor_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 67 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
| 68 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met50_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 69 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met100_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
| 70 |
|
|
|
| 71 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
| 72 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
Comparison of the pseudo\-\met\ (top, left), pseudo\-\mt\ (top,
|
| 73 |
|
|
right and bottom) distributions in data vs. MC for events
|
| 74 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
satisfying the requirements of CR2, combining both the muon and
|
| 75 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
electron channels. The pseudo\-\mt\ distributions are shown
|
| 76 |
|
|
before any additional requirements (top, right) and after
|
| 77 |
|
|
requiring pseudo\-\met>50 GeV (bottom, left) and pseudo\-\met>100 GeV (bottom, right) .
|
| 78 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\label{fig:cr2met}
|
| 79 |
|
|
}
|
| 80 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 81 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 82 |
|
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 84 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 85 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met150_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 86 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met200_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
| 87 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met250_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 88 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met300_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
| 89 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
| 90 |
|
|
Comparison of the \mt\ distribution in data vs. MC for events
|
| 91 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR2, combining both the muon and
|
| 92 |
|
|
electron channels. The pseudo-\met\ requirements used are
|
| 93 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
150 GeV (top, left), 200 GeV (top, right), 250 GeV (bottom,
|
| 94 |
|
|
left) and 300 GeV (bottom, right).
|
| 95 |
claudioc |
1.1 |
\label{fig:cr2mtrest}
|
| 96 |
|
|
}
|
| 97 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 98 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 99 |
|
|
\clearpage |
