| 2 |
|
\subsection{Single Lepton Top MC Modelling Validation from CR2} |
| 3 |
|
\label{sec:cr2} |
| 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
– |
IS THIS GOING TO BE DONE WITH A BVETO OR NOT. IF SO, IS IT GOING TO |
| 6 |
– |
BE CSVL OR CSVM? NEED TO DISCUSS THIS. |
| 5 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
The \mt\ tail for single-lepton top events (\ttsl\ and single top) is dominated by jet resolution effects. The \W\ cannot be far off-shell because $\mW < \mtop$. |
| 7 |
< |
The modeling of the \mt\ tail from jet resolution effects is studied using \zjets\ data and MC samples. |
| 8 |
< |
\Z\ events are selection by requiring 2 good leptons (satisfying ID and isolation requirements) and requiring the \mll\ to be in the range $81-101$ GeV. |
| 7 |
> |
The modeling of the \mt\ tail from jet resolution effects is studied |
| 8 |
> |
using \zjets\ data and MC samples. |
| 9 |
> |
|
| 10 |
> |
\Z\ events are selected by requiring exactly 2 good leptons (satisfying ID |
| 11 |
> |
and isolation requirements) and requiring the \mll\ to be in the range |
| 12 |
> |
$81-101$ GeV. |
| 13 |
> |
Events with additional isolated tracks are vetoed, as in Section~\ref{sec:tkveto}. |
| 14 |
> |
To reduce \ttbar\ backgrounds, events with a CSVM tag %H |
| 15 |
> |
are removed. |
| 16 |
|
The negative lepton is treated as a neutrino and so is added to the MET: \met\ $\rightarrow$ \pt(\Lepm) + \met, |
| 17 |
|
and the \mt\ is recalculated with the positive lepton \mt(\Lepp, \met). |
| 18 |
|
The resulting ``pseudo-\mt'' is dominated by jet resolution effects, since no off-shell |
| 20 |
|
This section describes how well the MC predicts the tail of ``pseudo-\mt''. |
| 21 |
|
|
| 22 |
|
The underlying distributions are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cr2met} |
| 23 |
< |
and~\ref{fig:cr2mtrest}. The comparison of data and MC event counts |
| 24 |
< |
is shown in Table~\ref{tab:cr2yields}. From this table we extract |
| 25 |
< |
the data to MC scale factors $SFR^{e}_{top}$ and $SFR^{\mu}_{top}$. |
| 23 |
> |
and~\ref{fig:cr2mtrest}. Just as in CR1, there is an excess in the |
| 24 |
> |
tails, but there are insufficient events to derive scale factors. |
| 25 |
> |
% for $\met\ > 150$~GeV. |
| 26 |
> |
|
| 27 |
> |
|
| 28 |
> |
%We then perform the exact same type of Data/MC comparison and analysis as |
| 29 |
> |
%described for CR1 in Section~\ref{sec:cr1}. For CR1 we collected |
| 30 |
> |
%the data/MC tail information in |
| 31 |
> |
%Table~\ref{tab:cr1yields} ; the equivalent for CR2 is |
| 32 |
> |
%Table~\ref{tab:cr2yields} |
| 33 |
> |
%(for CR2 the statistics are not sufficient to split electrons and muons). |
| 34 |
> |
%The last line of Table~\ref{tab:cr2yields} gives the data/MC scale factor |
| 35 |
> |
%for the \ttbar\ lepton $+$ jets $M_T$ tail ($SFR_{top}$). This is |
| 36 |
> |
%calculated in the same way as $SFR_{wjets}$ of Table~\ref{tab:cr1yields}. |
| 37 |
|
|
| 38 |
|
|
| 39 |
|
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 63 |
|
\hline |
| 64 |
|
\end{tabular}} |
| 65 |
|
\caption{ Yields in \mt\ tail comparing the \zjets\ MC prediction (after |
| 66 |
< |
applying SFs) to data after subtracting the non-\zjets\ components. |
| 66 |
> |
applying SFs) to data without subtracting the non-\zjets\ components (top table) and with subtracting the non-\zjets\ components (bottom table). |
| 67 |
|
CR2PRESEL refers to a sample with $\met>50$ GeV and $\mt>150$ GeV. |
| 52 |
– |
The uncertainties are statistical only. NEED TO ADD THE SYMBOLS |
| 53 |
– |
DEFINED IN THE TEXT FOR THESE SCALE FACTORS. IS THIS GOING TO BE |
| 54 |
– |
DONE SEPARATELY FOR MUONS AND ELECTRONS??? |
| 55 |
– |
MAYBE WANT TO REMOVE LAST ENTRIES WHERE STATS ARE VERY LOW |
| 68 |
|
\label{tab:cr2yields}} |
| 69 |
|
\end{center} |
| 70 |
|
\end{table} |
| 79 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/mt_lepcor_scaled_met100_nj4_emucomb.pdf} |
| 80 |
|
|
| 81 |
|
\caption{ |
| 82 |
< |
Comparison of the pseudo\-\met\ (top, left), pseudo\-\mt\ (top, |
| 82 |
> |
Comparison of the pseudo-\met\ (top, left), pseudo-\mt\ (top, |
| 83 |
|
right and bottom) distributions in data vs. MC for events |
| 84 |
|
satisfying the requirements of CR2, combining both the muon and |
| 85 |
< |
electron channels. The pseudo\-\mt\ distributions are shown |
| 85 |
> |
electron channels. The pseudo-\mt\ distributions are shown |
| 86 |
|
before any additional requirements (top, right) and after |
| 87 |
< |
requiring pseudo\-\met>50 GeV (bottom, left) and pseudo\-\met>100 GeV (bottom, right) . |
| 87 |
> |
requiring pseudo-\met $>$50 GeV (bottom, left) and pseudo-\met |
| 88 |
> |
$>$ 100 GeV (bottom, right) . |
| 89 |
|
\label{fig:cr2met} |
| 90 |
|
} |
| 91 |
|
\end{center} |
| 107 |
|
} |
| 108 |
|
\end{center} |
| 109 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 110 |
< |
\clearpage |
| 110 |
> |
\clearpage |
