ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/StopSearch/CR4.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/StopSearch/CR4.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.7 by vimartin, Wed Oct 10 17:43:08 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.8 by linacre, Wed Oct 10 21:04:19 2012 UTC

# Line 9 | Line 9 | NUMBERS IN THE TABLE]
9  
10   Dilepton \ttbar\ events have 2 jets from the top decays, so additional
11   jets from radiation or higher order contributions are required to
12 < enter the signal sample. The modeling of addtional jets in \ttbar\
12 > enter the signal sample. The modeling of additional jets in \ttbar\
13   events is checked in a \ttll\ control sample,
14   selected by requiring
15   \begin{itemize}
16   \item exactly 2 selected electrons or muons with \pt $>$ 20 GeV
17 < \item \met\ $>$ 100 GeV
17 > \item \met\ $>$ 50 GeV
18   \item $\geq1$ b-tagged jet
19   \item Z-veto ($|m_{\ell\ell} - 91| > 15$ GeV)
20   \end{itemize}
# Line 35 | Line 35 | $\ttbar+\ge2$ jet events.
35  
36   \begin{figure}[hbt]
37    \begin{center}
38 <        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met100_mueg.pdf}
39 <        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met100_diel.pdf}%
40 <        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met100_dimu.pdf}
38 >        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met50_mueg.pdf}
39 >        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met50_diel.pdf}%
40 >        \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/njets_all_met50_dimu.pdf}
41          \caption{
42            \label{fig:dileptonnjets}%\protect
43            Comparison of the jet multiplicity distribution in data and MC for dilepton events in the \E-\M\
# Line 131 | Line 131 | as follows:
131   \noindent This insures that $K_3 M_3/(M_2 + K_3 M_3 + K_4 M_4) = N_3 /
132   (N_2+N_3+N_4)$ and similarly for the $\geq 4$ jet bin.
133  
134 + Table~\ref{tab:njetskfactors} also shows the values of $K_3$ and $K_4$ when the \met\ cut in the control sample definition is changed from 50 GeV to 100 GeV and 150 GeV.
135 + These values of $K_3$ and $K_4$ are not used in the analysis, but demonstrate that there is no statistically significant dependence of $K_3$ and $K_4$ on the \met\ cut.
136  
137 < The factors $K_3$ and $K_4$ are applied to the \ttll\ MC throughout the
137 >
138 > The factors $K_3$ and $K_4$ (derived with the 50 GeV \met\ cut) are applied to the \ttll\ MC throughout the
139   entire analysis, i.e.
140   whenever \ttll\ MC is used to estimate or subtract
141   a yield or distribution.
# Line 147 | Line 150 | while those that only need one radiation
150  
151   \begin{table}[!ht]
152   \begin{center}
153 < \begin{tabular}{l|c}
153 > \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c}
154 > \cline{2-4}
155 >                        & \multicolumn{3}{c}{ \met\ cut for Data/MC Scale Factor} \\
156   \hline
157 <            Jet Multiplicity Sample
153 <            &                Data/MC Scale Factor \\
157 > Jet Multiplicity Sample &  50 GeV & 100 GeV & 150 GeV  \\
158   \hline
159   \hline
160 < N jets $= 3$ (sensitive to $\ttbar+1$ extra jet from radiation)   &
161 < $K_3 = 1.01 \pm 0.03$\\
160 > N jets $= 3$ (sensitive to $\ttbar+1$ extra jet from radiation)
161 > & $K_3 = 0.98 \pm 0.02$ & $K_3 = 1.01 \pm 0.03$ & $K_3 = 1.00 \pm 0.08$ \\
162   N jets $\ge4$ (sensitive to $\ttbar+\ge2$ extra jets from radiation)
163 < &       $K_4 = 0.93 \pm 0.04$\\
163 > & $K_4 = 0.94 \pm 0.02$ & $K_4 = 0.93 \pm 0.04$ & $K_4 = 1.00 \pm 0.08$ \\
164   \hline
165   \end{tabular}
166   \caption{Data/MC scale factors used to account for differences in the
167    fraction of events with additional hard jets from radiation in
168 <  \ttll\ events. \label{tab:njetskfactors}}
168 >  \ttll\ events. The values derived with the 50 GeV \met\ cut are applied
169 >  to the \ttll\ MC throughout the analysis. \label{tab:njetskfactors}}
170   \end{center}
171   \end{table}
172  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines