| 1 |
vimartin |
1.1 |
\section{Additional CR Data and MC Comparisons}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{app:ttdlnj}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
This appendix shows some additional comparisons of the data and MC background samples
|
| 5 |
|
|
for various CRs. Figure~\ref{fig:cr1lepptdphi} shows some
|
| 6 |
|
|
additional components of the \mt, the lepton \pt\ and the
|
| 7 |
|
|
azimuthal angle between the lepton and the \met\ for CR1
|
| 8 |
|
|
(Section~\ref{sec:cr1}). Figure~\ref{fig:cr2lepptdphi} shows the
|
| 9 |
|
|
equivalent distributions for CR2 (Section~\ref{sec:cr2}), the positive lepton \pt\ and the
|
| 10 |
|
|
angle between this lepton and the
|
| 11 |
|
|
pseudo-\met. Similarly, figure~\ref{fig:cr5lepptdphi100} shows the lepton
|
| 12 |
|
|
\pt\ and and the azimuthal angle between the lepton and the \met\ for CR5
|
| 13 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
(Section~\ref{sec:CR5}). Figures~\ref{fig:cr4lepptdphi100}
|
| 14 |
vimartin |
1.1 |
and~\ref{fig:cr4dphidR100} provide some data and MC comparisons of the
|
| 15 |
|
|
\ttdl\ control sample CR4 (Section~\ref{sec:cr4}) for various
|
| 16 |
|
|
kinematic distributions: leading lepton \pt\ and eta, as well as the
|
| 17 |
|
|
angles between the two leptons and between the leading lepton and the
|
| 18 |
|
|
\met. These distributions show quite good agreement between data and
|
| 19 |
|
|
MC. More quantitative information is included in the section discussing each
|
| 20 |
|
|
control region.
|
| 21 |
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 23 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 24 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/leppt_met50_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 25 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/leppt_met50_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 26 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/dphi_metlep_met50_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 27 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/dphi_metlep_met50_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 28 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 29 |
|
|
Comparison of the lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the \met\ and the lepton (bottom) for
|
| 30 |
|
|
data vs. MC for events with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
| 31 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR1.
|
| 32 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr1lepptdphi}
|
| 33 |
|
|
}
|
| 34 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 35 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 36 |
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 38 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 39 |
|
|
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/met_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 40 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/leppt_scaled_met50_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
| 41 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/dphi_metl_scaled_met50_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
| 42 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 43 |
|
|
Comparison of the positive lepton \pt\ (left) and the azimuthal angle between this lepton and the pseudo-\met\ (right)
|
| 44 |
|
|
distributions in data vs. MC for events satisfying the requirements of CR2, combining both the muon and
|
| 45 |
|
|
electron channels.
|
| 46 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr2lepptdphi}
|
| 47 |
|
|
}
|
| 48 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 49 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 50 |
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 53 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 54 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/leppt_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 55 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/leppt_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 56 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 57 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 58 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 59 |
|
|
Comparison of the leading lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the leading lepton and the \met\
|
| 60 |
|
|
for $\met>100$ GeV distributions in data vs. MC for events
|
| 61 |
|
|
with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
| 62 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR4.
|
| 63 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr4lepptdphi100}
|
| 64 |
|
|
}
|
| 65 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 66 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 69 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 70 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/lepeta_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 71 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/lepeta_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 72 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_dilep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 73 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_dilep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 74 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dR_dilep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 75 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dR_dilep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 76 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 77 |
|
|
Comparison of the leading lepton eta (top), difference in the azimuthal
|
| 78 |
|
|
angle (center) and $\Delta R$ separation (bottom) between the two leptons
|
| 79 |
|
|
for $\met>100$ GeV distributions in data vs. MC for events
|
| 80 |
|
|
with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
| 81 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR4.
|
| 82 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr4dphidR100}
|
| 83 |
|
|
}
|
| 84 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 85 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 86 |
|
|
|
| 87 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 88 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 89 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/leppt_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 90 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/leppt_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 91 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
| 92 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
| 93 |
|
|
\caption{
|
| 94 |
|
|
Comparison of the lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the \met\ and the lepton (bottom) for
|
| 95 |
|
|
data vs. MC for $\met>100$ GeV for events with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
| 96 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR5.
|
| 97 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr5lepptdphi100}
|
| 98 |
|
|
}
|
| 99 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 100 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 101 |
|
|
|
| 102 |
|
|
\clearpage |
