1 |
vimartin |
1.1 |
\section{Additional CR Data and MC Comparisons}
|
2 |
|
|
\label{app:ttdlnj}
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
This appendix shows some additional comparisons of the data and MC background samples
|
5 |
|
|
for various CRs. Figure~\ref{fig:cr1lepptdphi} shows some
|
6 |
|
|
additional components of the \mt, the lepton \pt\ and the
|
7 |
|
|
azimuthal angle between the lepton and the \met\ for CR1
|
8 |
|
|
(Section~\ref{sec:cr1}). Figure~\ref{fig:cr2lepptdphi} shows the
|
9 |
|
|
equivalent distributions for CR2 (Section~\ref{sec:cr2}), the positive lepton \pt\ and the
|
10 |
|
|
angle between this lepton and the
|
11 |
|
|
pseudo-\met. Similarly, figure~\ref{fig:cr5lepptdphi100} shows the lepton
|
12 |
|
|
\pt\ and and the azimuthal angle between the lepton and the \met\ for CR5
|
13 |
vimartin |
1.2 |
(Section~\ref{sec:CR5}). Figures~\ref{fig:cr4lepptdphi100}
|
14 |
vimartin |
1.1 |
and~\ref{fig:cr4dphidR100} provide some data and MC comparisons of the
|
15 |
|
|
\ttdl\ control sample CR4 (Section~\ref{sec:cr4}) for various
|
16 |
|
|
kinematic distributions: leading lepton \pt\ and eta, as well as the
|
17 |
|
|
angles between the two leptons and between the leading lepton and the
|
18 |
|
|
\met. These distributions show quite good agreement between data and
|
19 |
|
|
MC. More quantitative information is included in the section discussing each
|
20 |
|
|
control region.
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
23 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
24 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/leppt_met50_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
25 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/leppt_met50_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
26 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/dphi_metlep_met50_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
27 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR1plots/dphi_metlep_met50_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
28 |
|
|
\caption{
|
29 |
|
|
Comparison of the lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the \met\ and the lepton (bottom) for
|
30 |
|
|
data vs. MC for events with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
31 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR1.
|
32 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr1lepptdphi}
|
33 |
|
|
}
|
34 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
35 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
38 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
39 |
|
|
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/met_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
40 |
vimartin |
1.3 |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/leppt_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
41 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/dphi_metl_scaled_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
42 |
|
|
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/leppt_scaled_met50_nj4_emucomb.pdf}%
|
43 |
|
|
% \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR2plots/dphi_metl_scaled_met50_nj4_emucomb.pdf}
|
44 |
vimartin |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
45 |
|
|
Comparison of the positive lepton \pt\ (left) and the azimuthal angle between this lepton and the pseudo-\met\ (right)
|
46 |
|
|
distributions in data vs. MC for events satisfying the requirements of CR2, combining both the muon and
|
47 |
|
|
electron channels.
|
48 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr2lepptdphi}
|
49 |
|
|
}
|
50 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
51 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
55 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
56 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/leppt_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
57 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/leppt_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
58 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
59 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
60 |
|
|
\caption{
|
61 |
|
|
Comparison of the leading lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the leading lepton and the \met\
|
62 |
|
|
for $\met>100$ GeV distributions in data vs. MC for events
|
63 |
|
|
with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
64 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR4.
|
65 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr4lepptdphi100}
|
66 |
|
|
}
|
67 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
68 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
69 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
71 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
72 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/lepeta_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
73 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/lepeta_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
74 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_dilep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
75 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dphi_dilep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
76 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dR_dilep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
77 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR4plots/dR_dilep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
78 |
|
|
\caption{
|
79 |
|
|
Comparison of the leading lepton eta (top), difference in the azimuthal
|
80 |
|
|
angle (center) and $\Delta R$ separation (bottom) between the two leptons
|
81 |
|
|
for $\met>100$ GeV distributions in data vs. MC for events
|
82 |
|
|
with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
83 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR4.
|
84 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr4dphidR100}
|
85 |
|
|
}
|
86 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
87 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
90 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
91 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/leppt_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
92 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/leppt_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
93 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadmuo_nj4.pdf}%
|
94 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/CR5plots/dphi_metlep_met100_leadele_nj4.pdf}
|
95 |
|
|
\caption{
|
96 |
|
|
Comparison of the lepton \pt\ (top) and azimuthal angle between the \met\ and the lepton (bottom) for
|
97 |
|
|
data vs. MC for $\met>100$ GeV for events with a leading muon (left) and leading electron (right)
|
98 |
|
|
satisfying the requirements of CR5.
|
99 |
|
|
\label{fig:cr5lepptdphi100}
|
100 |
|
|
}
|
101 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
102 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
\clearpage |