1 |
\section{Conclusion}
|
2 |
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
3 |
|
4 |
We have performed a search for BSM physics in the Z plus jets plus MET final state.
|
5 |
Backgrounds from SM \Z production were estimated using the data-driven
|
6 |
MET templates method, and backgrounds from $t\bar{t}$ were estimated using
|
7 |
the data-driven opposite-flavor subtraction technique. We found no evidence
|
8 |
for anomalous yield beyond SM expectations and placed \statistics\ 95\% CL upper limits
|
9 |
on the non SM yields in the loose (MET$>$\signalmetl~GeV) and tight signal regions (MET$>$\signalmett~GeV)
|
10 |
of \ulloose~and \ultight~events, respectively.
|
11 |
%We also quoted expected yields for the
|
12 |
We also quote upper limits on the quantity
|
13 |
%$\sigma \times BF \times A$,
|
14 |
\sta\ for the
|
15 |
%assuming efficiencies and uncertainties from the
|
16 |
benchmark SUSY processes LM4 and LM8
|
17 |
including estimated signal efficiencies and systematics,
|
18 |
and conclude that LM4 is not compatible with the data and therefore ruled out.
|