1 |
< |
|
2 |
< |
[UPDATE] |
1 |
> |
%HOOBERMAN: I think this is updated already... |
2 |
> |
%[UPDATE] |
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
The datasets used for this analysis are summarized in |
5 |
|
Tables~\ref{tab:DatasetsData} (data) and~\ref{tab:DatasetsMC} (MC). |
6 |
< |
The total integrated luminosity is \lumi after |
7 |
< |
applying the official good run list. The main Monte Carlo |
8 |
< |
samples are generated with Madgraph, though samples with |
9 |
< |
alternative generators such as Powheg and MC@NLO are also used for |
6 |
> |
The total integrated luminosity is \lumi\ after |
7 |
> |
applying the official good run list. |
8 |
> |
The main \ttbar\ Monte Carlo |
9 |
> |
sample is generated with Powheg since this sample has the largest number of events, |
10 |
> |
though samples with alternative generators such as Madgraph %and MC@NLO |
11 |
> |
are also used for |
12 |
|
the derivation of systematic uncertainties in the \ttbar~background prediction. |
13 |
|
The triggers used to select both the signal and control samples are |
14 |
< |
also summarized in Table.~\ref{tab:TrigData}. |
14 |
> |
also summarized in Table~\ref{tab:TrigData}. |
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
\begin{table}[!ht] |
17 |
|
\begin{center} |
26 |
|
/SingleMu/Run2012A-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
27 |
|
/SingleElectron/Run2012B-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
28 |
|
/SingleMu/Run2012B-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
29 |
< |
/SingleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v*/AOD \\ |
30 |
< |
/SingleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v*/AOD \\ |
29 |
> |
/SingleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v1/AOD \\ |
30 |
> |
/SingleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v1/AOD \\ |
31 |
> |
/SingleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v2/AOD \\ |
32 |
> |
/SingleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v2/AOD \\ |
33 |
|
\hline |
34 |
|
\hline |
35 |
|
Dilepton Samples (only used for dilepton control region)\\ |
40 |
|
/DoubleElectron/Run2012B-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
41 |
|
/DoubleMu/Run2012B-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
42 |
|
/MuEG/Run2012B-13Jul2012-v1/AOD \\ |
43 |
< |
/DoubleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v*/AOD \\ |
44 |
< |
/DoubleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v*/AOD \\ |
45 |
< |
/MuEG/Run2012C-PromptReco-v*/AOD \\ |
43 |
> |
/DoubleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v1/AOD \\ |
44 |
> |
/DoubleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v1/AOD \\ |
45 |
> |
/MuEG/Run2012C-PromptReco-v1/AOD \\ |
46 |
> |
/DoubleElectron/Run2012C-PromptReco-v2/AOD \\ |
47 |
> |
/DoubleMu/Run2012C-PromptReco-v2/AOD \\ |
48 |
> |
/MuEG/Run2012C-PromptReco-v2/AOD \\ |
49 |
|
\hline |
50 |
|
\end{tabular} |
51 |
|
\caption{Summary of data datasets used.\label{tab:DatasetsData}} |
84 |
|
$\ttbar W$ & /TTW\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.23 \\ |
85 |
|
$\ttbar Z$ & /TTZ\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.21 \\ |
86 |
|
$\ttbar \gamma$ & /TTGJets\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.65 \\ |
87 |
< |
WWW & /WWW\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.08 \\ |
88 |
< |
WWZ & /WWZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.06\\ |
89 |
< |
WZZ & /WZZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.01 \\ |
90 |
< |
ZZZ & /ZZZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.02 \\ |
87 |
> |
WWW & /WWW\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.082 \\ |
88 |
> |
WWZ & /WWZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.063 \\ |
89 |
> |
WZZ & /WZZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.019 \\ |
90 |
> |
ZZZ & /ZZZNoGstar\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph (53) & 0.019 \\ |
91 |
|
$\tilde{t}\bar{\tilde{t}}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\chi^0_1\chi^0_1$ & /SMS-T2tt\_FineBin\_Mstop-225to1200\_mLSP-0to1000\_8TeV-Pythia6Z (52) & scan\\ |
92 |
|
$\tilde{t}\bar{\tilde{t}}\rightarrow b\bar{b}\chi^+_1\chi^-_1$ & /SMS-T2bw\_FineBin\_Mstop-100to600\_mLSP-0to500\_8TeV-Pythia6Z (52) & scan \\ |
93 |
|
\hline |
105 |
|
\hline |
106 |
|
\end{tabular} |
107 |
|
} |
108 |
< |
\caption{Summary of Monte Carlo datasets used. CHECK TRIBOSON XSEC |
108 |
> |
\caption{Summary of Monte Carlo datasets used. %CHECK TRIBOSON XSEC |
109 |
> |
%HOOBERMAN: updated VVV cross sections. Clearly there is a bug somewhere because the xsec in cms2 ntuples is the same for WZZ and ZZZ... |
110 |
|
\label{tab:DatasetsMC}} |
111 |
|
\end{center} |
112 |
|
\end{table} |
113 |
|
|
114 |
+ |
|
115 |
+ |
|
116 |
+ |
|
117 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!ht] |
118 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
119 |
+ |
{\footnotesize |
120 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l|l|c} |
121 |
+ |
\hline |
122 |
+ |
\multicolumn{3}{c}{With Pileup: Processed dataset name is} \\ |
123 |
+ |
\multicolumn{3}{c}{X = Summer12\_DR53X-PU\_S10\_START53\_V7A} \\ |
124 |
+ |
\multicolumn{3}{c}{Y = Summer12\_DR53X-PU\_S10\_START53\_V7C} \\ |
125 |
+ |
\multicolumn{3}{c}{(52) Summer12-START52\_V9\_FSIM-v*/AODSIM} \\ |
126 |
+ |
\hline |
127 |
+ |
Description & Primary Dataset Name & cross-section [pb]\\ |
128 |
+ |
\hline |
129 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ & /TTJets\_MassiveBinDECAY\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
130 |
+ |
$\ttbar \to$ single lepton & /TTJets\_FullLeptMGDecays\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v2 & \\ |
131 |
+ |
$\ttbar \to$ dileptons & /TTJets\_SemiLeptMGDecays\_8TeV-madgraph/X\_ext-v1 & \\ |
132 |
+ |
W $\rightarrow$ $\ell\nu$ & /WJetsToLNu\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph-tarball/X-v1 & 37509 \\ |
133 |
+ |
W $\rightarrow$ $\ell\nu$+1 jet & /W1JetsToLNu\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & \\ |
134 |
+ |
W $\rightarrow$ $\ell\nu$+2 jets & /W2JetsToLNu\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & \\ |
135 |
+ |
W $\rightarrow$ $\ell\nu$+3 jets & /W3JetsToLNu\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 640 \\ |
136 |
+ |
W $\rightarrow$ $\ell\nu$+$\geq 4$ jets & /W4JetsToLNu\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 264 \\ |
137 |
+ |
$tW$ & /T\_tW-channel-DR\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 11.2 \\ |
138 |
+ |
$\bar{t} W$ & /Tbar\_tW-channel-DR\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 11.2 \\ |
139 |
+ |
$\bar{t}$ ($s$-chan) & /Tbar\_s-channel\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 1.8 \\ |
140 |
+ |
$t$ ($s$-chan) & /T\_s-channel\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 3.9 \\ |
141 |
+ |
$\bar{t}$ ($t$-chan) & /Tbar\_t-channel\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 30.0 \\ |
142 |
+ |
$t$ ($t$-chan) & /T\_t-channel\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v1 & 55.5 \\ |
143 |
+ |
$\dy \To \ell \ell$ & /DYJetsToLL\_M-50\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph-tarball/X-v1 & 3532.8 \\ |
144 |
+ |
$\dy \To \ell \ell$+$\geq 4$ jets & /DY4JetsToLL\_M-50\_TuneZ2Star\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 27.6 \\ |
145 |
+ |
WW & /WWJetsTo2L2Nu\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 5.8 \\ |
146 |
+ |
WZ & /WZJetsTo3LNu\_TuneZ2\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 1.1 \\ |
147 |
+ |
& /WZJetsTo2L2Q\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 1.1 \\ |
148 |
+ |
ZZ & /ZZJetsTo2L2Nu\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v3 & 0.4 \\ |
149 |
+ |
& /ZZJetsTo4L\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 0.2 \\ |
150 |
+ |
& /ZZJetsTo2L2Q\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 2.4 \\ |
151 |
+ |
W$\gamma^{*}$ & /WGstarToLNu2E\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & \\ |
152 |
+ |
W$\gamma^{*}$ & /WGstarToLNu2Mu\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & \\ |
153 |
+ |
W$\gamma^{*}$ & /WGstarToLNu2Tau\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & \\ |
154 |
+ |
WWW & /WWWJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.082 \\ |
155 |
+ |
WWZ & /WWZNoGstarJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.063 \\ |
156 |
+ |
WZZ & /WZZNoGstarJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.019 \\ |
157 |
+ |
ZZZ & /ZZZNoGstarJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.019 \\ |
158 |
+ |
WW$\gamma$ & /WWGJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & \\ |
159 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ W & /TTWJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.23 \\ |
160 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ Z & /TTZJets\_8TeV-madgraph\_v2/X-v1 & 0.21 \\ |
161 |
+ |
$\ttbar \gamma$ & /TTGJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & 0.65 \\ |
162 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ WW & /TTWWJets\_8TeV-madgraph/X-v1 & \\ |
163 |
+ |
TBZ & /TBZToLL\_4F\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/Y-v1 & \\ |
164 |
+ |
$\tilde{t}\bar{\tilde{t}}\rightarrow t\bar{t}\chi^0_1\chi^0_1$ & /SMS-T2tt\_FineBin\_Mstop-225to1200\_mLSP-0to1000\_8TeV-Pythia6Z (52) & scan\\ |
165 |
+ |
$\tilde{t}\bar{\tilde{t}}\rightarrow b\bar{b}\chi^+_1\chi^-_1$ & /SMS-T2bw\_FineBin\_Mstop-100to600\_mLSP-0to500\_8TeV-Pythia6Z (52) & scan \\ |
166 |
+ |
\hline |
167 |
+ |
\hline |
168 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ (alternative) & /TT\_CT10\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-powheg-tauola/X-v2 & 225.2 \\ |
169 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($m_{\mathrm{top}} = 178.5~\GeV$) & /TTJets\_mass178\_5\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
170 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($m_{\mathrm{top}} = 166.5~\GeV$) & /TTJets\_mass166\_5\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
171 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($x_q>40~\GeV$) & /TTJets\_matchingup\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
172 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($x_q>10~\GeV$) & /TTJets\_matchingdown\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
173 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($Q^2 \times 2$) & /TTJets\_scaleup\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
174 |
+ |
$\ttbar$ ($Q^2 \times 0.5$) & /TTJets\_scaledown\_TuneZ2star\_8TeV-madgraph-tauola/X-v1 & 225.2 \\ |
175 |
+ |
\hline |
176 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
177 |
+ |
} |
178 |
+ |
\caption{Summary of Monte Carlo datasets used. %CHECK TRIBOSON XSEC |
179 |
+ |
%HOOBERMAN: updated VVV cross sections. Clearly there is a bug somewhere because the xsec in cms2 ntuples is the same for WZZ and ZZZ... |
180 |
+ |
%the cross-sections are copied from the old table, so the same notes apply |
181 |
+ |
\label{tab:DatasetsMC_new}} |
182 |
+ |
\end{center} |
183 |
+ |
\end{table} |
184 |
+ |
|
185 |
+ |
|
186 |
+ |
|
187 |
+ |
|
188 |
+ |
|
189 |
+ |
|
190 |
+ |
|
191 |
|
\begin{table}[!ht] |
192 |
|
\begin{center} |
193 |
|
\begin{tabular}{l} |
197 |
|
\hline |
198 |
|
\hline |
199 |
|
Single Muon Sample\\ |
200 |
+ |
\hline |
201 |
|
\footnotesize{\verb=HLT_IsoMu24_v*=}\\ |
202 |
|
\footnotesize{\verb=HLT_IsoMu24_eta2p1_v*=}\\ |
203 |
|
\hline |