| 1 |
Here we define the selections of leptons, jets, and \met.
|
| 2 |
We also describe our measurements of the lepton and trigger efficiency.
|
| 3 |
The analysis uses several different Control Regions (CRs) in addition
|
| 4 |
to the Signal
|
| 5 |
Regions (SRs).
|
| 6 |
All of these different regions are defined in this section.
|
| 7 |
This section also includes some information on the basic MC
|
| 8 |
corrections that we apply.
|
| 9 |
%Figure~\ref{fig:venndiagram} illustrates the relationship between these regions.
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
\subsection{Single Lepton Selection}
|
| 12 |
\label{sec:singlelepselection}
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The single lepton selection is based on the following criteria, starting from the requirements described
|
| 15 |
on \url{https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/CMS/SUSYstop#SINGLE_LEPTON_CHANNEL} (revision r20)
|
| 16 |
\begin{itemize}
|
| 17 |
\item satisfy the trigger requirement (see
|
| 18 |
Table~\ref{tab:TrigData}).
|
| 19 |
Note that the analysis triggers are inclusive single lepton triggers.
|
| 20 |
Dilepton triggers are used only for the dilepton control region.
|
| 21 |
\item select events with one high \pt\ electron or muon, requiring
|
| 22 |
\begin{itemize}
|
| 23 |
\item $\pt>30~\GeVc$ and $|\eta|<1.4442 (2.1)$ for electrons (muons). The restriction to the barrel for electrons
|
| 24 |
is motivated by an observed excess of events with large \mt\ with endcap electrons in the b-veto control region,
|
| 25 |
and does not significantly reduce the signal acceptance since the leptons tend to be central.
|
| 26 |
\item muon ID criteria is based on the 2012 POG recommended tight working point
|
| 27 |
\item electron ID critera is based on the 2012 POG recommended medium working point
|
| 28 |
\item PF-based isolation ($\Delta R < 0.3$) relative isolation $<$ 0.15 and absolute isolation $<$ 5~GeV. PU corrections
|
| 29 |
are performed with the $\Delta\beta$ scheme for muons and effective-area fastjet rho scheme for electrons (as recommended by the relevant POGs).
|
| 30 |
\item $|\pt(\rm{PF}_{lep}) - \pt(\rm{RECO}_{lep})| < 10~\GeV$
|
| 31 |
\item $E/p_{\rm{in}} < 4$ (electrons only)
|
| 32 |
\item We remove electron events with $\met > 50$ GeV and $M_T > 100$
|
| 33 |
GeV with at least one crystal in the supercluster with laser
|
| 34 |
correction $>$2.\footnote{This is an ad-hoc removal based on
|
| 35 |
run-event numbers, since the
|
| 36 |
problem was found very recently and the filter was not available
|
| 37 |
when we processed the events.}
|
| 38 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 39 |
\item require at least 4 PF jets in the event with $\pt>30~\GeV$
|
| 40 |
within $|\eta|<2.5$ out of which at least 1 satisfies the CSV
|
| 41 |
medium working point b-tagging requirement
|
| 42 |
\item require moderate $\met>50~\GeV$ (type1-corrected pfmet with $\phi$ corrections applied as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:JetMet}).
|
| 43 |
\item Isolated track veto, see Section~\ref{sec:tkveto}
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
%Table~\ref{tab:preselectionyield} shows the yields in data and MC without any corrections for this preselection region.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
%\begin{table}[!h]
|
| 50 |
%\begin{center}
|
| 51 |
%\begin{tabular}{c|c}
|
| 52 |
%\hline
|
| 53 |
%\hline
|
| 54 |
%\end{tabular}
|
| 55 |
%\caption{ Raw Data and MC predictions without any corrections are shown after preselection. \label{tab:preselectionyield}}
|
| 56 |
%\end{center}
|
| 57 |
%\end{table}
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
\subsection{Isolated track veto}
|
| 60 |
\label{sec:tkveto}
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
The isolated track veto is intended to remove top dilepton events.
|
| 63 |
Looking for an isolated track is an effective way of identifying $W
|
| 64 |
\to e$, $W \to \mu$, $W \to \tau \to \ell$, and $W \to \tau \to
|
| 65 |
h^{\pm} + n\pi^{0}$. The requirements on the track are
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
\begin{itemize}
|
| 68 |
\item $P_T > 10$ GeV
|
| 69 |
\item Relative track isolation $< 10\%$ computed from charged PF
|
| 70 |
candidates with $d_Z<$ 0.05 cm from the primary vertex.
|
| 71 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
\subsection{Signal Region Selection}
|
| 75 |
\label{sec:SR}
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
The signal regions (SRs) are selected to improve the sensitivity for the
|
| 78 |
single lepton requirements and cover a range of scalar top
|
| 79 |
scenarios. The \mt\ and \met\ variables are used to define the signal
|
| 80 |
regions and the requirements are listed in Table~\ref{tab:srdef}.
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
\begin{table}[!h]
|
| 83 |
\begin{center}
|
| 84 |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c}
|
| 85 |
\hline
|
| 86 |
Signal Region & Minimum \mt\ [GeV] & Minimum \met\ [GeV] \\
|
| 87 |
\hline
|
| 88 |
\hline
|
| 89 |
SRA & 150 & 100 \\
|
| 90 |
SRB & 120 & 150 \\
|
| 91 |
SRC & 120 & 200 \\
|
| 92 |
SRD & 120 & 250 \\
|
| 93 |
SRE & 120 & 300 \\
|
| 94 |
SRF & 120 & 350 \\
|
| 95 |
SRG & 120 & 400 \\
|
| 96 |
\hline
|
| 97 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 98 |
\caption{ Signal region definitions based on \mt\ and \met\
|
| 99 |
requirements. These requirements are applied in addition to the
|
| 100 |
baseline single lepton selection.
|
| 101 |
\label{tab:srdef}}
|
| 102 |
\end{center}
|
| 103 |
\end{table}
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
Table~\ref{tab:srrawmcyields} shows the expected number of SM
|
| 106 |
background yields for the SRs. A few stop signal yields for four
|
| 107 |
values of the parameters are also shown for comparison. The signal
|
| 108 |
regions with looser requirements are sensitive to lower stop masses
|
| 109 |
M(\sctop), while those with tighter requirements are more sensitive to
|
| 110 |
higher M(\sctop). Kinematic distributions for a few sample signal
|
| 111 |
points can be found in Appendix~\ref{app:sigkin}.
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
\begin{table}[!h]
|
| 114 |
\begin{center}
|
| 115 |
\footnotesize
|
| 116 |
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
|
| 117 |
\hline
|
| 118 |
Sample & SRA & SRB & SRC & SRD & SRE & SRF & SRG\\
|
| 119 |
\hline
|
| 120 |
\hline
|
| 121 |
\ttdl\ & $619 \pm 9$& $366 \pm 7$& $127 \pm 4$& $44 \pm 2$& $17 \pm 1$& $7 \pm 1$& $4 \pm 1$ \\
|
| 122 |
\ttsl\ \& single top (1\Lep) & $95 \pm 3$& $67 \pm 3$& $15 \pm 1$& $6 \pm 1$& $2 \pm 1$& $1 \pm 1$& $1 \pm 0$ \\
|
| 123 |
\wjets\ & $29 \pm 2$& $15 \pm 2$& $6 \pm 1$& $3 \pm 1$& $1 \pm 0$& $0 \pm 0$& $0 \pm 0$ \\
|
| 124 |
Rare & $59 \pm 3$& $38 \pm 3$& $16 \pm 2$& $8 \pm 1$& $4 \pm 1$& $2 \pm 0$& $1 \pm 0$ \\
|
| 125 |
\hline
|
| 126 |
Total & $802 \pm 10$& $486 \pm 8$& $164 \pm 5$& $62 \pm 3$& $23 \pm 2$& $10 \pm 1$& $6 \pm 1$ \\
|
| 127 |
\hline
|
| 128 |
Yield UL (optimistic) & 147 (10\%) & 94 (10\%) & 47 (15\%) & 25 (20\%) & 14 (25\%) & 8.6 (30\%) & 7.5 (50\%) \\
|
| 129 |
Yield UL (pessimistic) & 200 (15\%) & 152 (20\%) & 64 (25\%) & 30 (30\%) & 15 (35\%) & 9.7 (50\%) & 8.2 (100\%) \\
|
| 130 |
\hline
|
| 131 |
T2tt m(stop) = 250 m($\chi^0$) = 0 & $315 \pm 18$& $193 \pm 14$& $53 \pm 8$& $13 \pm 4$& $2 \pm 2$& $0 \pm 0$& $0 \pm 0$ \\ \hline
|
| 132 |
T2tt m(stop) = 300 m($\chi^0$) = 50 & $296 \pm 11$& $236 \pm 10$& $88 \pm 6$& $28 \pm 3$& $10 \pm 2$& $2 \pm 1$& $0 \pm 0$ \\ \hline
|
| 133 |
T2tt m(stop) = 300 m($\chi^0$) = 100 & $128 \pm 7$& $93 \pm 6$& $29 \pm 3$& $10 \pm 2$& $5 \pm 1$& $2 \pm 1$& $1 \pm 1$ \\ \hline
|
| 134 |
T2tt m(stop) = 350 m($\chi^0$) = 0 & $224 \pm 6$& $206 \pm 6$& $119 \pm 4$& $52 \pm 3$& $20 \pm 2$& $8 \pm 1$& $3 \pm 1$ \\ \hline
|
| 135 |
T2tt m(stop) = 450 m($\chi^0$) = 0 & $71 \pm 2$& $71 \pm 2$& $53 \pm 1$& $36 \pm 1$& $21 \pm 1$& $11 \pm 1$& $5 \pm 0$ \\
|
| 136 |
\hline
|
| 137 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 138 |
\caption{ Expected SM background contributions and signal yields for a few sample points,
|
| 139 |
including both muon and electron channels. This is ``dead reckoning'' MC with no
|
| 140 |
correction. It is meant only as a general guide. The uncertainties are statistical only.
|
| 141 |
The signal yield expected upper limits are also shown for two values of the total background systematic uncertainty, indicated in parentheses.
|
| 142 |
%[{\bf VERENA} THESE SIGNAL YIELDS NEED TO BE UPDATED. Do you have a point with larger stop mass to illustrate why we use SRF and SRG? ].
|
| 143 |
%HOOBERMAN
|
| 144 |
\label{tab:srrawmcyields}}
|
| 145 |
\end{center}
|
| 146 |
\end{table}
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
\subsection{Control Region Selection}
|
| 149 |
\label{sec:CRsel}
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
Control regions (CRs) are used to validate the background estimation
|
| 152 |
procedure and derive systematic uncertainties for some
|
| 153 |
contributions. The CRs are selected to have similar
|
| 154 |
kinematics to the SRs, but have a different requirement in terms of
|
| 155 |
number of b-tags and number of leptons, thus enhancing them in
|
| 156 |
different SM contributions. The four CRs used in this analysis are
|
| 157 |
summarized in Table~\ref{tab:crdef}.
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
\begin{table}
|
| 160 |
\begin{center}
|
| 161 |
{\small
|
| 162 |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c}
|
| 163 |
\hline
|
| 164 |
Selection & \multirow{2}{*}{exactly 1 lepton} & \multirow{2}{*}{exactly 2
|
| 165 |
leptons} & \multirow{2}{*}{1 lepton + isolated
|
| 166 |
track}\\
|
| 167 |
Criteria & & & \\
|
| 168 |
\hline
|
| 169 |
\hline
|
| 170 |
\multirow{4}{*}{0 b-tags}
|
| 171 |
& CR1) W+Jets dominated:
|
| 172 |
& CR2) apply \Z-mass constraint
|
| 173 |
& CR3) not used \\
|
| 174 |
&
|
| 175 |
& $\rightarrow$ Z+Jets dominated: Validate
|
| 176 |
& \\
|
| 177 |
& Validate W+Jets \mt\ tail
|
| 178 |
& \ttsl\ \mt\ tail comparing
|
| 179 |
& \\
|
| 180 |
&
|
| 181 |
& data vs. MC ``pseudo-\mt ''
|
| 182 |
& \\
|
| 183 |
\hline
|
| 184 |
\multirow{4}{*}{$\ge$ 1 b-tags}
|
| 185 |
&
|
| 186 |
& CR4) Apply \Z-mass veto
|
| 187 |
& CR5) \ttdl, \ttlt\ and \\
|
| 188 |
& SIGNAL
|
| 189 |
& $\rightarrow$ \ttdl\ dominated: Validate
|
| 190 |
& \ttlf\ dominated: Validate \\
|
| 191 |
& REGION
|
| 192 |
& ``physics'' modelling of \ttdl\
|
| 193 |
& \Tau\ and fake lepton modeling/\\
|
| 194 |
&
|
| 195 |
&
|
| 196 |
& detector effects in \ttdl\ \\
|
| 197 |
\hline
|
| 198 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 199 |
}
|
| 200 |
\caption{Summary of signal and control regions.
|
| 201 |
\label{tab:crdef}%\protect
|
| 202 |
}
|
| 203 |
\end{center}
|
| 204 |
\end{table}
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
\subsection{Definition of $M_T$ peak region}
|
| 207 |
\label{sec:mtpeakdef}
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
This region is defined as $50 < M_T < 80$ GeV.
|
| 210 |
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
\subsection{Default \ttbar\ MC sample}
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
Our default \ttbar\ MC sample is Powheg.
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
\subsection{MC Corrections}
|
| 217 |
\label{sec:MCCorr}
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
All MC samples are corrected for trigger efficiency. In the case of
|
| 220 |
single lepton selections, we apply the $\pt$ and $\eta$-dependent
|
| 221 |
scale factors that we measure ourselves, see Section~\ref{sec:trg}.
|
| 222 |
In the case of dilepton selections that require the dilepton triggers,
|
| 223 |
we apply overall scale factors of 0.95, 0.88, and 0.92 for $ee$,
|
| 224 |
$\mu\mu$,
|
| 225 |
and $e\mu$ respectively~\cite{didar}.
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
The leptonic branching fraction used in some of the \ttbar\ MC samples
|
| 228 |
differs from the value listed in the PDG $(10.80 \pm 0.09)\%$.
|
| 229 |
Table~\ref{tab:wlepbf} summarizes the branching fractions used in
|
| 230 |
the generation of the various \ttbar\ MC samples.
|
| 231 |
For \ttbar\ samples with the incorrect leptonic branching fraction, event
|
| 232 |
weights are applied based on the number of true leptons and the ratio
|
| 233 |
of the corrected and incorrect branching fractions.
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 |
\begin{table}[!h]
|
| 236 |
\begin{center}
|
| 237 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c}
|
| 238 |
\hline
|
| 239 |
\ttbar\ Sample - Event Generator & Leptonic Branching Fraction\\
|
| 240 |
\hline
|
| 241 |
\hline
|
| 242 |
Madgraph & 0.111\\
|
| 243 |
MC@NLO & 0.111\\
|
| 244 |
Pythia & 0.108\\
|
| 245 |
Powheg & 0.108\\
|
| 246 |
\hline
|
| 247 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 248 |
\caption{Leptonic branching fractions for the various \ttbar\ samples
|
| 249 |
used in the analysis. The \ttbar\ MC samples produced with
|
| 250 |
Madgraph and MC@NLO has a branching fraction that is almost $3\%$ higher than
|
| 251 |
the PDG value. \label{tab:wlepbf}}
|
| 252 |
\end{center}
|
| 253 |
\end{table}
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 |
All \ttbar\ dilepton samples are corrected (when needed and
|
| 256 |
appropriate)
|
| 257 |
in order to have the correct jet multiplicity distribution. This
|
| 258 |
correction procedure is described in Section~\ref{sec:jetmultiplicity}.
|
| 259 |
|
| 260 |
|
| 261 |
\subsubsection{Corrections to Jets and \met}
|
| 262 |
\label{sec:JetMet}
|
| 263 |
|
| 264 |
The official recommendations from the Jet/MET group are used for
|
| 265 |
the data and MC samples. In particular, the jet
|
| 266 |
energy corrections (JEC) are updated using the official recipe.
|
| 267 |
L1FastL2L3Residual (L1FastL2L3) corrections are applied for data (MC),
|
| 268 |
based on the global tags GR\_R\_52\_V9 (START52\_V9B) for
|
| 269 |
data (MC). In addition, these jet energy corrections are propagated to
|
| 270 |
the \met\ calculation, following the official prescription for
|
| 271 |
deriving the Type I corrections.
|
| 272 |
|
| 273 |
Events with anomalous ``rho'' pile-up corrections are excluded from the sample since these
|
| 274 |
can correspond to events with unphysically large \met\ and \mt.
|
| 275 |
%tail signal region.
|
| 276 |
In addition, the recommended MET filters are applied.
|
| 277 |
A correction to remove the $\phi$ modulation in \met\ is also applied
|
| 278 |
to the data.
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
|
| 281 |
\subsection{Lepton Selection Efficiency Measurements}
|
| 282 |
\label{sec:lepEff}
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
In this section we measure the identification and isolation efficiencies for muons and electrons in data and MC using tag-and-probe studies.
|
| 285 |
The tag is required to pass the full offline analysis selection and have \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV, $|\eta|<2.1$, and be matched to the single
|
| 286 |
lepton trigger, HLT\_IsoMu24(\_eta2p1) for muons and HLT\_Ele27\_WP80 for electrons.
|
| 287 |
The probe is required to have $|\eta|<2.1$ and \pt\ $>$ 20 GeV. To measure the identification efficiency we require the probe to pass the isolation requirement,
|
| 288 |
to measure the isolation efficiency we require the probe to pass the
|
| 289 |
identification requirement.
|
| 290 |
|
| 291 |
The tag-probe pair is required to have opposite-sign and an invariant mass in the range 76--106 GeV.
|
| 292 |
In order to suppress lepton pairs from sources other than Z boson
|
| 293 |
decays, we require the event to have \met\ $<$ 30 GeV and no b-tagged
|
| 294 |
jets (CSV loose working point).
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
The muon efficiencies are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:mutnpeff} for inclusive events (i.e. no jet requirements). These efficiencies are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:mutnpeff} for
|
| 297 |
several different jet multiplicity requirements.
|
| 298 |
We currently observe good agreement for muons with \pt\ up to about 300 GeV.
|
| 299 |
For high \pt\ muons we observe a source of background in the data, which we suppress by only considering probes which satisfy the impact parameter requirements $d_0<0.02$~cm and $d_Z<0.5$~cm, and the probe is required to be reconstructed as a tracker muon.
|
| 300 |
%For muons with \pt\ $>$ 200 GeV the data efficiency
|
| 301 |
%begins to drop, and the effect is especially pronounced for muons with \pt\ $>$ 300 GeV.
|
| 302 |
%We are currently investigating the source of this inefficiency.
|
| 303 |
The electron efficiencies are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:eltnpeff} for inclusive events (i.e. no jet requirements). These efficiencies are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:eltnpeff}
|
| 304 |
for several different jet multiplicity requirements. In general we observe good agreement between the data and MC identification and isolation efficiencies.
|
| 305 |
|
| 306 |
% Pending a better understanding of the very high \pt\ muon efficiency,
|
| 307 |
We
|
| 308 |
do not correct the MC for differences in lepton efficiency. In the
|
| 309 |
background calculation, we do not take any systematics due to lepton
|
| 310 |
selection
|
| 311 |
efficiency uncertainties. This is because all backgrounds except the
|
| 312 |
rare MC background are normalized to the $M_T$ peak, thus the lepton
|
| 313 |
identification uncertainty cancels out. For the rare MC these
|
| 314 |
uncertainties
|
| 315 |
are negligible compared to the assumed cross-section uncertainty
|
| 316 |
(Section~\ref{sec:bkg_other}).
|
| 317 |
|
| 318 |
|
| 319 |
|
| 320 |
|
| 321 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 322 |
\begin{center}
|
| 323 |
\scriptsize
|
| 324 |
\caption{\label{tab:mutnpeff}
|
| 325 |
Summary of the data and MC muon identification and isolation efficiencies measured with tag-and-probe studies.}
|
| 326 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
|
| 327 |
|
| 328 |
|
| 329 |
%-------------------
|
| 330 |
%Doing muons
|
| 331 |
%-------------------
|
| 332 |
%DOING MUON ETA BINS
|
| 333 |
%Selection : (((((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(met<30))&&(nbl==0))&&(abs(tag->eta())<2.1))&&(abs(probe->eta())<2.1))&&(mutrk==1))&&(mud0 < 0.02))&&(mudz < 0.5))&&((eventSelection&2)==2))&&(HLT_IsoMu24_tag > 0)
|
| 334 |
%Ndata : 7053268
|
| 335 |
%NMC : 4406913
|
| 336 |
%ID cut : ((leptonSelection&65536)==65536)&&(abs(probepfpt - probe->pt()) < 10.0)
|
| 337 |
%iso cut : ((leptonSelection&131072)==131072)&&(probeiso * probe->pt() < 5.0)
|
| 338 |
|
| 339 |
|
| 340 |
|
| 341 |
\hline
|
| 342 |
\hline
|
| 343 |
MC ID& & & \\
|
| 344 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 345 |
\hline
|
| 346 |
20 - 30 & 0.9672 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9639 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.9466 $\pm$ 0.0007 \\
|
| 347 |
30 - 40 & 0.9684 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9658 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9446 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
|
| 348 |
40 - 50 & 0.9704 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9685 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9432 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
|
| 349 |
50 - 60 & 0.9685 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9640 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.9419 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 350 |
60 - 80 & 0.9682 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9628 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.9364 $\pm$ 0.0017 \\
|
| 351 |
80 - 100 & 0.9710 $\pm$ 0.0021 & 0.9633 $\pm$ 0.0027 & 0.9255 $\pm$ 0.0049 \\
|
| 352 |
100 - 150 & 0.9658 $\pm$ 0.0029 & 0.9623 $\pm$ 0.0036 & 0.9205 $\pm$ 0.0069 \\
|
| 353 |
150 - 200 & 0.9592 $\pm$ 0.0072 & 0.9392 $\pm$ 0.0103 & 0.9110 $\pm$ 0.0185 \\
|
| 354 |
200 - 300 & 0.9373 $\pm$ 0.0147 & 0.8889 $\pm$ 0.0218 & 0.8525 $\pm$ 0.0454 \\
|
| 355 |
300 - 10000 & 0.8923 $\pm$ 0.0384 & 0.7143 $\pm$ 0.0764 & 0.3333 $\pm$ 0.1925 \\
|
| 356 |
|
| 357 |
|
| 358 |
\hline
|
| 359 |
\hline
|
| 360 |
MC ISO& & & \\
|
| 361 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 362 |
\hline
|
| 363 |
20 - 30 & 0.8966 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.9152 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9301 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 364 |
30 - 40 & 0.9562 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9589 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9674 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 365 |
40 - 50 & 0.9764 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9809 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9836 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\
|
| 366 |
50 - 60 & 0.9766 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9810 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9830 $\pm$ 0.0005 \\
|
| 367 |
60 - 80 & 0.9720 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9777 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9791 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
|
| 368 |
80 - 100 & 0.9645 $\pm$ 0.0023 & 0.9658 $\pm$ 0.0026 & 0.9697 $\pm$ 0.0033 \\
|
| 369 |
100 - 150 & 0.9583 $\pm$ 0.0032 & 0.9603 $\pm$ 0.0037 & 0.9752 $\pm$ 0.0041 \\
|
| 370 |
150 - 200 & 0.9580 $\pm$ 0.0073 & 0.9392 $\pm$ 0.0103 & 0.9954 $\pm$ 0.0046 \\
|
| 371 |
200 - 300 & 0.9585 $\pm$ 0.0123 & 0.9583 $\pm$ 0.0144 & 0.9455 $\pm$ 0.0306 \\
|
| 372 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9667 $\pm$ 0.0232 & 0.9615 $\pm$ 0.0377 & 1.0000 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\
|
| 373 |
|
| 374 |
|
| 375 |
\hline
|
| 376 |
\hline
|
| 377 |
DATA ID& & & \\
|
| 378 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 379 |
\hline
|
| 380 |
20 - 30 & 0.9516 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9495 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.9349 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 381 |
30 - 40 & 0.9539 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9509 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9342 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
|
| 382 |
40 - 50 & 0.9573 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9556 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9339 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 383 |
50 - 60 & 0.9520 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9480 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.9291 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 384 |
60 - 80 & 0.9522 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9453 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.9279 $\pm$ 0.0015 \\
|
| 385 |
80 - 100 & 0.9501 $\pm$ 0.0022 & 0.9443 $\pm$ 0.0027 & 0.9250 $\pm$ 0.0042 \\
|
| 386 |
100 - 150 & 0.9510 $\pm$ 0.0029 & 0.9397 $\pm$ 0.0038 & 0.9099 $\pm$ 0.0064 \\
|
| 387 |
150 - 200 & 0.9552 $\pm$ 0.0066 & 0.9452 $\pm$ 0.0089 & 0.8758 $\pm$ 0.0182 \\
|
| 388 |
200 - 300 & 0.9313 $\pm$ 0.0138 & 0.8770 $\pm$ 0.0210 & 0.8228 $\pm$ 0.0430 \\
|
| 389 |
300 - 10000 & 0.8704 $\pm$ 0.0457 & 0.7391 $\pm$ 0.0916 & 0.1429 $\pm$ 0.1323 \\
|
| 390 |
|
| 391 |
|
| 392 |
\hline
|
| 393 |
\hline
|
| 394 |
DATA ISO& & & \\
|
| 395 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 396 |
\hline
|
| 397 |
20 - 30 & 0.8907 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9128 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9364 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 398 |
30 - 40 & 0.9532 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9594 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9712 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\
|
| 399 |
40 - 50 & 0.9744 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.9810 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.9858 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\
|
| 400 |
50 - 60 & 0.9751 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9817 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9871 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 401 |
60 - 80 & 0.9710 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9774 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.9836 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 402 |
80 - 100 & 0.9645 $\pm$ 0.0019 & 0.9731 $\pm$ 0.0019 & 0.9781 $\pm$ 0.0024 \\
|
| 403 |
100 - 150 & 0.9597 $\pm$ 0.0027 & 0.9657 $\pm$ 0.0029 & 0.9821 $\pm$ 0.0031 \\
|
| 404 |
150 - 200 & 0.9389 $\pm$ 0.0076 & 0.9583 $\pm$ 0.0078 & 0.9538 $\pm$ 0.0121 \\
|
| 405 |
200 - 300 & 0.9600 $\pm$ 0.0109 & 0.9640 $\pm$ 0.0125 & 0.9701 $\pm$ 0.0208 \\
|
| 406 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9592 $\pm$ 0.0283 & 0.9444 $\pm$ 0.0540 & 1.0000 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\
|
| 407 |
|
| 408 |
|
| 409 |
\hline
|
| 410 |
\hline
|
| 411 |
Scale Factor ID& & & \\
|
| 412 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 413 |
\hline
|
| 414 |
20 - 30 & 0.9839 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9850 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9876 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
|
| 415 |
30 - 40 & 0.9850 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9846 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9890 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 416 |
40 - 50 & 0.9865 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9866 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9902 $\pm$ 0.0005 \\
|
| 417 |
50 - 60 & 0.9829 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9834 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.9864 $\pm$ 0.0012 \\
|
| 418 |
60 - 80 & 0.9835 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.9818 $\pm$ 0.0015 & 0.9909 $\pm$ 0.0024 \\
|
| 419 |
80 - 100 & 0.9785 $\pm$ 0.0031 & 0.9803 $\pm$ 0.0039 & 0.9995 $\pm$ 0.0070 \\
|
| 420 |
100 - 150 & 0.9847 $\pm$ 0.0042 & 0.9765 $\pm$ 0.0054 & 0.9884 $\pm$ 0.0102 \\
|
| 421 |
150 - 200 & 0.9958 $\pm$ 0.0101 & 1.0064 $\pm$ 0.0145 & 0.9613 $\pm$ 0.0279 \\
|
| 422 |
200 - 300 & 0.9937 $\pm$ 0.0215 & 0.9867 $\pm$ 0.0339 & 0.9652 $\pm$ 0.0720 \\
|
| 423 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9754 $\pm$ 0.0663 & 1.0348 $\pm$ 0.1693 & 0.4286 $\pm$ 0.4676 \\
|
| 424 |
|
| 425 |
|
| 426 |
\hline
|
| 427 |
\hline
|
| 428 |
Scale Factor ISO& & & \\
|
| 429 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 430 |
\hline
|
| 431 |
20 - 30 & 0.9934 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.9974 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 1.0068 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\
|
| 432 |
30 - 40 & 0.9969 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 1.0004 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 1.0039 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
|
| 433 |
40 - 50 & 0.9979 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 1.0001 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 1.0023 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 434 |
50 - 60 & 0.9985 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 1.0007 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 1.0042 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 435 |
60 - 80 & 0.9989 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.9997 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 1.0046 $\pm$ 0.0013 \\
|
| 436 |
80 - 100 & 0.9999 $\pm$ 0.0031 & 1.0075 $\pm$ 0.0034 & 1.0086 $\pm$ 0.0042 \\
|
| 437 |
100 - 150 & 1.0014 $\pm$ 0.0043 & 1.0056 $\pm$ 0.0049 & 1.0071 $\pm$ 0.0053 \\
|
| 438 |
150 - 200 & 0.9802 $\pm$ 0.0109 & 1.0203 $\pm$ 0.0139 & 0.9582 $\pm$ 0.0129 \\
|
| 439 |
200 - 300 & 1.0016 $\pm$ 0.0171 & 1.0059 $\pm$ 0.0200 & 1.0261 $\pm$ 0.0398 \\
|
| 440 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9923 $\pm$ 0.0377 & 0.9822 $\pm$ 0.0681 & 1.0000 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\
|
| 441 |
\hline
|
| 442 |
\hline
|
| 443 |
|
| 444 |
%Using xmax 350
|
| 445 |
%data all 2.21882e+06
|
| 446 |
%data pass 2.1274e+06
|
| 447 |
%data eff 0.958794
|
| 448 |
%data eff2 0.958794
|
| 449 |
%MC all 1.38687e+06
|
| 450 |
%MC pass 1.33047e+06
|
| 451 |
%MC eff 0.959338
|
| 452 |
%MC eff2 0.959338
|
| 453 |
|
| 454 |
|
| 455 |
|
| 456 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 457 |
\end{center}
|
| 458 |
\end{table}
|
| 459 |
|
| 460 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 461 |
\begin{center}
|
| 462 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_id_njets0.pdf}%
|
| 463 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_iso_njets0.pdf}
|
| 464 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_id_njets1.pdf}%
|
| 465 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_iso_njets1.pdf}
|
| 466 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_id_njets2.pdf}%
|
| 467 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_iso_njets2.pdf}
|
| 468 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_id_njets3.pdf}%
|
| 469 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_iso_njets3.pdf}
|
| 470 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_id_njets4.pdf}%
|
| 471 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_iso_njets4.pdf}
|
| 472 |
\caption{
|
| 473 |
\label{fig:mutnpeff} Comparison of the muon identification and isolation efficiencies in data and MC for various jet multiplicity requirements. }
|
| 474 |
\end{center}
|
| 475 |
\end{figure}
|
| 476 |
|
| 477 |
\clearpage
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 480 |
\begin{center}
|
| 481 |
\scriptsize
|
| 482 |
\caption{\label{tab:eltnpeff}
|
| 483 |
Summary of the data and MC electron identification and isolation efficiencies measured with tag-and-probe studies.}
|
| 484 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 485 |
|
| 486 |
%-------------------
|
| 487 |
%Doing electrons: FULL 2012 SAMPLE
|
| 488 |
%-------------------
|
| 489 |
%DOING ELECTRON ETA BINS
|
| 490 |
%Selection : ((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(met<30))&&(nbl==0))&&(abs(tag->eta())<1.4442))&&(abs(probe->eta())<1.4442))&&((eventSelection&1)==1))&&(HLT_Ele27_WP80_tag > 0)
|
| 491 |
%Ndata : 3962010
|
| 492 |
%NMC : 2276057
|
| 493 |
%ID cut : (((leptonSelection&8)==8)&&(abs(probepfpt - probe->pt()) < 10.0))&&(probe_eoverpin < 4.0)
|
| 494 |
%iso cut : ((leptonSelection&16)==16)&&(probeiso * probe->pt() < 5.0)
|
| 495 |
|
| 496 |
|
| 497 |
\hline
|
| 498 |
\hline
|
| 499 |
MC ID & & \\
|
| 500 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 501 |
\hline
|
| 502 |
20 - 30 & 0.8206 $\pm$ 0.0014 & 0.7846 $\pm$ 0.0014 \\
|
| 503 |
30 - 40 & 0.8602 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.8494 $\pm$ 0.0007 \\
|
| 504 |
40 - 50 & 0.8775 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.8849 $\pm$ 0.0005 \\
|
| 505 |
50 - 60 & 0.8842 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 0.8917 $\pm$ 0.0012 \\
|
| 506 |
60 - 80 & 0.8877 $\pm$ 0.0016 & 0.8951 $\pm$ 0.0022 \\
|
| 507 |
80 - 100 & 0.8876 $\pm$ 0.0043 & 0.9035 $\pm$ 0.0055 \\
|
| 508 |
100 - 150 & 0.8898 $\pm$ 0.0055 & 0.8962 $\pm$ 0.0075 \\
|
| 509 |
150 - 200 & 0.8746 $\pm$ 0.0129 & 0.8683 $\pm$ 0.0189 \\
|
| 510 |
200 - 300 & 0.8760 $\pm$ 0.0205 & 0.9160 $\pm$ 0.0242 \\
|
| 511 |
300 - 10000 & 0.8444 $\pm$ 0.0540 & 0.7778 $\pm$ 0.0980 \\
|
| 512 |
|
| 513 |
|
| 514 |
\hline
|
| 515 |
\hline
|
| 516 |
MC ISO & & \\
|
| 517 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 518 |
\hline
|
| 519 |
20 - 30 & 0.9198 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.9405 $\pm$ 0.0009 \\
|
| 520 |
30 - 40 & 0.9667 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.9699 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 521 |
40 - 50 & 0.9809 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9796 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 522 |
50 - 60 & 0.9788 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9774 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 523 |
60 - 80 & 0.9729 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 0.9702 $\pm$ 0.0013 \\
|
| 524 |
80 - 100 & 0.9633 $\pm$ 0.0027 & 0.9528 $\pm$ 0.0041 \\
|
| 525 |
100 - 150 & 0.9548 $\pm$ 0.0038 & 0.9510 $\pm$ 0.0054 \\
|
| 526 |
150 - 200 & 0.9581 $\pm$ 0.0082 & 0.9358 $\pm$ 0.0142 \\
|
| 527 |
200 - 300 & 0.9187 $\pm$ 0.0174 & 0.9231 $\pm$ 0.0234 \\
|
| 528 |
300 - 10000 & 0.8085 $\pm$ 0.0574 & 0.9333 $\pm$ 0.0644 \\
|
| 529 |
|
| 530 |
|
| 531 |
\hline
|
| 532 |
\hline
|
| 533 |
DATA ID & & \\
|
| 534 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 535 |
\hline
|
| 536 |
20 - 30 & 0.8143 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.7557 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\
|
| 537 |
30 - 40 & 0.8502 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.8245 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\
|
| 538 |
40 - 50 & 0.8687 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.8632 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\
|
| 539 |
50 - 60 & 0.8736 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.8718 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
|
| 540 |
60 - 80 & 0.8741 $\pm$ 0.0014 & 0.8770 $\pm$ 0.0019 \\
|
| 541 |
80 - 100 & 0.8809 $\pm$ 0.0035 & 0.8751 $\pm$ 0.0049 \\
|
| 542 |
100 - 150 & 0.8802 $\pm$ 0.0047 & 0.8795 $\pm$ 0.0066 \\
|
| 543 |
150 - 200 & 0.8935 $\pm$ 0.0102 & 0.8631 $\pm$ 0.0161 \\
|
| 544 |
200 - 300 & 0.8645 $\pm$ 0.0194 & 0.8110 $\pm$ 0.0306 \\
|
| 545 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9111 $\pm$ 0.0424 & 0.8000 $\pm$ 0.0894 \\
|
| 546 |
|
| 547 |
|
| 548 |
\hline
|
| 549 |
\hline
|
| 550 |
DATA ISO & & \\
|
| 551 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 552 |
\hline
|
| 553 |
20 - 30 & 0.9141 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9348 $\pm$ 0.0007 \\
|
| 554 |
30 - 40 & 0.9636 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9663 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 555 |
40 - 50 & 0.9783 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.9762 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\
|
| 556 |
50 - 60 & 0.9746 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9738 $\pm$ 0.0005 \\
|
| 557 |
60 - 80 & 0.9692 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9656 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\
|
| 558 |
80 - 100 & 0.9625 $\pm$ 0.0021 & 0.9541 $\pm$ 0.0033 \\
|
| 559 |
100 - 150 & 0.9514 $\pm$ 0.0033 & 0.9398 $\pm$ 0.0050 \\
|
| 560 |
150 - 200 & 0.9448 $\pm$ 0.0077 & 0.9422 $\pm$ 0.0115 \\
|
| 561 |
200 - 300 & 0.9210 $\pm$ 0.0158 & 0.9301 $\pm$ 0.0213 \\
|
| 562 |
300 - 10000 & 0.9318 $\pm$ 0.0380 & 0.9412 $\pm$ 0.0571 \\
|
| 563 |
|
| 564 |
|
| 565 |
\hline
|
| 566 |
\hline
|
| 567 |
Scale Factor ID & & \\
|
| 568 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 569 |
\hline
|
| 570 |
20 - 30 & 0.9923 $\pm$ 0.0022 & 0.9632 $\pm$ 0.0022 \\
|
| 571 |
30 - 40 & 0.9883 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.9707 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\
|
| 572 |
40 - 50 & 0.9900 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.9755 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 573 |
50 - 60 & 0.9880 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.9777 $\pm$ 0.0017 \\
|
| 574 |
60 - 80 & 0.9847 $\pm$ 0.0024 & 0.9797 $\pm$ 0.0032 \\
|
| 575 |
80 - 100 & 0.9924 $\pm$ 0.0062 & 0.9687 $\pm$ 0.0081 \\
|
| 576 |
100 - 150 & 0.9892 $\pm$ 0.0081 & 0.9813 $\pm$ 0.0110 \\
|
| 577 |
150 - 200 & 1.0216 $\pm$ 0.0191 & 0.9940 $\pm$ 0.0286 \\
|
| 578 |
200 - 300 & 0.9869 $\pm$ 0.0320 & 0.8853 $\pm$ 0.0408 \\
|
| 579 |
300 - 10000 & 1.0789 $\pm$ 0.0854 & 1.0286 $\pm$ 0.1733 \\
|
| 580 |
|
| 581 |
|
| 582 |
\hline
|
| 583 |
\hline
|
| 584 |
Scale Factor ISO & & \\
|
| 585 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.4442$ \\
|
| 586 |
\hline
|
| 587 |
20 - 30 & 0.9938 $\pm$ 0.0015 & 0.9939 $\pm$ 0.0012 \\
|
| 588 |
30 - 40 & 0.9968 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.9963 $\pm$ 0.0005 \\
|
| 589 |
40 - 50 & 0.9973 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.9965 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\
|
| 590 |
50 - 60 & 0.9957 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.9963 $\pm$ 0.0008 \\
|
| 591 |
60 - 80 & 0.9962 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.9952 $\pm$ 0.0017 \\
|
| 592 |
80 - 100 & 0.9992 $\pm$ 0.0035 & 1.0013 $\pm$ 0.0055 \\
|
| 593 |
100 - 150 & 0.9964 $\pm$ 0.0052 & 0.9882 $\pm$ 0.0077 \\
|
| 594 |
150 - 200 & 0.9861 $\pm$ 0.0117 & 1.0068 $\pm$ 0.0196 \\
|
| 595 |
200 - 300 & 1.0025 $\pm$ 0.0256 & 1.0076 $\pm$ 0.0344 \\
|
| 596 |
300 - 10000 & 1.1525 $\pm$ 0.0944 & 1.0084 $\pm$ 0.0926 \\
|
| 597 |
\hline
|
| 598 |
\hline
|
| 599 |
|
| 600 |
%Using xmax 350
|
| 601 |
%data all 1.02393e+06
|
| 602 |
%data pass 987762
|
| 603 |
%data eff 0.964679
|
| 604 |
%data eff2 0.964679
|
| 605 |
%MC all 590742
|
| 606 |
%MC pass 571835
|
| 607 |
%MC eff 0.967994
|
| 608 |
%MC eff2 0.967994
|
| 609 |
%Using xmax 350
|
| 610 |
%data all 1.17606e+06
|
| 611 |
%data pass 987762
|
| 612 |
%data eff 0.839889
|
| 613 |
%data eff2 0.839889
|
| 614 |
%MC all 668187
|
| 615 |
%MC pass 571835
|
| 616 |
%MC eff 0.855801
|
| 617 |
%MC eff2 0.855801
|
| 618 |
|
| 619 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 620 |
\end{center}
|
| 621 |
\end{table}
|
| 622 |
|
| 623 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 624 |
\begin{center}
|
| 625 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_id_njets0.pdf}%
|
| 626 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_iso_njets0.pdf}
|
| 627 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_id_njets1.pdf}%
|
| 628 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_iso_njets1.pdf}
|
| 629 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_id_njets2.pdf}%
|
| 630 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_iso_njets2.pdf}
|
| 631 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_id_njets3.pdf}%
|
| 632 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_iso_njets3.pdf}
|
| 633 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_id_njets4.pdf}%
|
| 634 |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_iso_njets4.pdf}
|
| 635 |
\caption{
|
| 636 |
\label{fig:eltnpeff} Comparison of the electron identification and isolation efficiencies in data and MC for various jet multiplicity requirements. }
|
| 637 |
\end{center}
|
| 638 |
\end{figure}
|
| 639 |
|
| 640 |
\clearpage
|
| 641 |
|
| 642 |
|
| 643 |
\subsection{Trigger Efficiency Measurements}
|
| 644 |
\label{sec:trg}
|
| 645 |
|
| 646 |
In this section we measure the efficiencies of the single lepton triggers, HLT\_IsoMu24(\_eta2p1) for muons and HLT\_Ele27\_WP80 for electrons, using a tag-and-probe
|
| 647 |
approach. The tag is required to pass the full offline analysis selection and have \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV, $|\eta|<2.1$, and be matched to the single
|
| 648 |
lepton trigger. The probe is also required to pass the full offline analysis selection and have $|\eta|<2.1$, but the \pt\ requirement is relaxed to 20 GeV
|
| 649 |
in order to measure the \pt\ turn-on curve. The tag-probe pair is
|
| 650 |
required to have opposite-sign and an invariant mass in the range
|
| 651 |
76--106 GeV.
|
| 652 |
|
| 653 |
The measured trigger efficiencies are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:trigeff} and summarized in Table~\ref{tab:mutriggeff} (muons) and Table~\ref{tab:eltriggeff} (electrons).
|
| 654 |
These trigger efficiencies are applied to the MC when used to predict data yields selected by single lepton triggers.
|
| 655 |
|
| 656 |
|
| 657 |
\begin{figure}[!ht]
|
| 658 |
\begin{center}
|
| 659 |
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
| 660 |
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/mutrig_20fb.pdf} &
|
| 661 |
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/eltrig_20fb.pdf} \\
|
| 662 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 663 |
\caption{\label{fig:trigeff}
|
| 664 |
Efficiency for the single muon trigger HLT\_IsoMu24(\_eta2p1) (left) and single electron trigger HLT\_Ele27\_WP80 (right) as a function of lepton \pt,
|
| 665 |
for several bins in lepton $|\eta|$.
|
| 666 |
}
|
| 667 |
\end{center}
|
| 668 |
\end{figure}
|
| 669 |
|
| 670 |
\clearpage
|
| 671 |
|
| 672 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 673 |
\begin{center}
|
| 674 |
\footnotesize
|
| 675 |
\caption{\label{tab:mutriggeff}
|
| 676 |
Summary of the single muon trigger efficiency HLT\_IsoMu24(\_eta2p1). Uncertainties are statistical.}
|
| 677 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
|
| 678 |
|
| 679 |
%%% UPDATED WITH FULL 2012 DATA
|
| 680 |
|
| 681 |
%-------------------
|
| 682 |
%Doing muons
|
| 683 |
%-------------------
|
| 684 |
%USING MUON ETA BINS
|
| 685 |
|
| 686 |
%----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 687 |
% Selection : (((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&((eventSelection&2)==2))&&(HLT_IsoMu24_tag > 0))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(abs(tag->eta())<2.1))&&(probe->pt()>20))&&(abs(probe->eta())<2.1))&&((leptonSelection&65536)==65536))&&((leptonSelection&131072)==131072)
|
| 688 |
% Probe trigger : HLT_IsoMu24_probe > 0
|
| 689 |
% Total data yield : 15561350
|
| 690 |
%----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 691 |
|
| 692 |
\hline
|
| 693 |
\hline
|
| 694 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<0.8$ & $0.8<|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 695 |
\hline
|
| 696 |
20 - 22 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 \\
|
| 697 |
22 - 24 & 0.02 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.05 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.10 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 698 |
24 - 26 & 0.87 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.78 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.76 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 699 |
26 - 28 & 0.90 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.80 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.78 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 700 |
28 - 30 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.81 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.79 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 701 |
30 - 32 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.80 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 702 |
32 - 34 & 0.92 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.81 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 703 |
34 - 36 & 0.93 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.81 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 704 |
36 - 38 & 0.93 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 705 |
38 - 40 & 0.93 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 706 |
40 - 50 & 0.94 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.000 \\
|
| 707 |
50 - 60 & 0.95 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 708 |
60 - 80 & 0.95 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 709 |
80 - 100 & 0.94 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.002 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.003 \\
|
| 710 |
100 - 150 & 0.94 $\pm$ 0.002 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.003 & 0.84 $\pm$ 0.004 \\
|
| 711 |
150 - 200 & 0.93 $\pm$ 0.004 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.007 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.010 \\
|
| 712 |
$>$200 & 0.92 $\pm$ 0.005 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.010 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.018 \\
|
| 713 |
\hline
|
| 714 |
\hline
|
| 715 |
|
| 716 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 717 |
\end{center}
|
| 718 |
\end{table}
|
| 719 |
|
| 720 |
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 721 |
\begin{center}
|
| 722 |
\footnotesize
|
| 723 |
\caption{\label{tab:eltriggeff}
|
| 724 |
Summary of the single electron trigger efficiency HLT\_Ele27\_WP80. Uncertainties are statistical.}
|
| 725 |
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c}
|
| 726 |
|
| 727 |
%%% UPDATED WITH FULL 2012 DATA
|
| 728 |
|
| 729 |
%-------------------
|
| 730 |
%Doing electrons
|
| 731 |
%-------------------
|
| 732 |
%USING ELECTRON ETA BINS
|
| 733 |
|
| 734 |
%----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 735 |
% Selection : (((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&((eventSelection&1)==1))&&(HLT_Ele27_WP80_tag > 0))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(abs(tag->eta())<2.1))&&(probe->pt()>20))&&(abs(probe->eta())<2.1))&&((leptonSelection&8)==8))&&((leptonSelection&16)==16)
|
| 736 |
% Probe trigger : HLT_Ele27_WP80_probe > 0
|
| 737 |
% Total data yield : 9620002
|
| 738 |
%----------------------------------------------------------
|
| 739 |
|
| 740 |
\hline
|
| 741 |
\hline
|
| 742 |
\pt\ range [GeV] & $|\eta|<1.5$ & $1.5<|\eta|<2.1$ \\
|
| 743 |
\hline
|
| 744 |
20 - 22 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 \\
|
| 745 |
22 - 24 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 \\
|
| 746 |
24 - 26 & 0.00 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.03 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 747 |
26 - 28 & 0.07 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.22 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 748 |
28 - 30 & 0.57 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.52 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 749 |
30 - 32 & 0.85 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.65 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 750 |
32 - 34 & 0.88 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.70 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 751 |
34 - 36 & 0.89 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.72 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 752 |
36 - 38 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.74 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 753 |
38 - 40 & 0.92 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.75 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 754 |
40 - 50 & 0.94 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.77 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 755 |
50 - 60 & 0.95 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.79 $\pm$ 0.001 \\
|
| 756 |
60 - 80 & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.000 & 0.79 $\pm$ 0.002 \\
|
| 757 |
80 - 100 & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.80 $\pm$ 0.005 \\
|
| 758 |
100 - 150 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.001 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.006 \\
|
| 759 |
150 - 200 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.002 & 0.83 $\pm$ 0.014 \\
|
| 760 |
$>$200 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.003 & 0.85 $\pm$ 0.020 \\
|
| 761 |
\hline
|
| 762 |
\hline
|
| 763 |
|
| 764 |
|
| 765 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 766 |
\end{center}
|
| 767 |
\end{table}
|
| 768 |
|
| 769 |
\clearpage
|
