| 1 |
|
|
| 2 |
< |
The results of the search, still blinded are shown in Table~\ref{tab':result}. |
| 3 |
< |
The $M_T$ distributions, still blinded, for increasing values of \met\ |
| 4 |
< |
are shown in Fig~\ref{fig:mtsig1},\ref{fig:mtsig2},\ref{fig:mtsig3}. |
| 2 |
> |
The results of the search are shown in |
| 3 |
> |
Table~\ref{tab:result}, including both statistical and systematic |
| 4 |
> |
uncertainties. Agreement is observed between the data and the |
| 5 |
> |
predicted background for all signal regions. |
| 6 |
> |
The predicted and observed \met\ distribution for $\met>150$ GeV and |
| 7 |
> |
$\mt>120$ GeV are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:resultsummary}, obtained |
| 8 |
> |
from the yields for SRB to SRG. Two signal points are shown for comparison, |
| 9 |
> |
corresponding to the low and high stop mass sensitivity |
| 10 |
> |
boundaries for this search. This shows that the lower \met\ region is |
| 11 |
> |
more sensitive to lighter stop signals, while the higher \met\ |
| 12 |
> |
region is more sensitive to heavier stops, for the T2tt signal model |
| 13 |
> |
shown. The $M_T$ distributions for increasing values of \met\ |
| 14 |
> |
are shown in Fig~\ref{fig:mtsig1} and \ref{fig:mtsig2}. |
| 15 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
\input{results_table.tex} |
| 17 |
|
|
| 18 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 19 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 20 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 21 |
+ |
\hline |
| 22 |
+ |
\hline |
| 23 |
+ |
& SRA & SRB & SRC & SRD & SRE & SRF & SRG \\ |
| 24 |
+ |
\hline |
| 25 |
+ |
Minimum \mt\ [GeV] & 150 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 & 120 \\ |
| 26 |
+ |
Minimum \met\ [GeV] & 100 & 150 & 200 & 250 & 300 & 350 & 400 \\ |
| 27 |
+ |
\hline |
| 28 |
+ |
Total background & $927\pm138$ & $504\pm65$ & $161\pm26$ & $56\pm12$ & $22\pm7$ & $10\pm3.0$ & $5.7\pm2.2$ \\ |
| 29 |
+ |
Data & 861 & 456 & 150 & 61 & 23 & 9 & 3 \\ |
| 30 |
+ |
\hline |
| 31 |
+ |
\hline |
| 32 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
| 33 |
+ |
\caption{ Condensed version of the results presented in Table~\ref{tab:result} |
| 34 |
+ |
\label{tab:result_small}} |
| 35 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 36 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 37 |
+ |
|
| 38 |
|
|
| 39 |
|
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
| 40 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 41 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met50_ele.pdf}% |
| 42 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met50_muo.pdf} |
| 43 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met100_ele.pdf}% |
| 44 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met100_muo.pdf} |
| 45 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met150_ele.pdf}% |
| 46 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met150_muo.pdf} |
| 47 |
< |
|
| 48 |
< |
\caption{$M_T$ in the data compared to SM Monte Carlo, for |
| 19 |
< |
increasing values of \met\. Note that the MC tails have not |
| 20 |
< |
been rescaled at this point. |
| 21 |
< |
\label{fig:mtsig1} |
| 41 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.75\linewidth]{plots/summaryPlot.pdf} |
| 42 |
> |
\caption{Predicted and observed \met\ for $\mt>120$ GeV, obtained |
| 43 |
> |
from the yields for SRB to SRG. Note SRB corresponds to the integral |
| 44 |
> |
of the distribution, while subsequent signal regions SRC to SRG |
| 45 |
> |
correspond to integrals from subsequent bins. The band on the |
| 46 |
> |
ratio (above) corresponds to the full relative background |
| 47 |
> |
uncertainty. |
| 48 |
> |
\label{fig:resultsummary} |
| 49 |
|
} |
| 50 |
|
\end{center} |
| 51 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 52 |
|
|
| 53 |
+ |
|
| 54 |
|
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
| 55 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 56 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met200_ele.pdf}% |
| 57 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met200_muo.pdf} |
| 58 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met250_ele.pdf}% |
| 59 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met250_muo.pdf} |
| 32 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met300_ele.pdf}% |
| 33 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met300_muo.pdf} |
| 34 |
< |
|
| 56 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met100_emucomb.pdf}% |
| 57 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met150_emucomb.pdf} |
| 58 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met200_emucomb.pdf}% |
| 59 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met250_emucomb.pdf} |
| 60 |
|
\caption{$M_T$ in the data compared to SM Monte Carlo, for |
| 61 |
< |
increasing values of \met\. Note that the MC tails have not |
| 61 |
> |
increasing values of \met. Only statistical uncertainties are |
| 62 |
> |
shown. Note that the MC tails have not |
| 63 |
|
been rescaled at this point. |
| 64 |
< |
\label{fig:mtsig2} |
| 64 |
> |
\label{fig:mtsig1} |
| 65 |
|
} |
| 66 |
|
\end{center} |
| 67 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 68 |
|
|
| 43 |
– |
|
| 69 |
|
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
| 70 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 71 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met350_ele.pdf}% |
| 72 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met350_muo.pdf} |
| 73 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met400_ele.pdf}% |
| 49 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met400_muo.pdf} |
| 50 |
< |
|
| 71 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met300_emucomb.pdf}% |
| 72 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met350_emucomb.pdf} |
| 73 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/mt_met400_emucomb.pdf} |
| 74 |
|
\caption{$M_T$ in the data compared to SM Monte Carlo, for |
| 75 |
< |
increasing values of \met\. Note that the MC tails have not |
| 75 |
> |
increasing values of \met. Only statistical uncertainties are |
| 76 |
> |
shown. Note that the MC tails have not |
| 77 |
|
been rescaled at this point. |
| 78 |
< |
\label{fig:mtsig3} |
| 78 |
> |
\label{fig:mtsig2} |
| 79 |
|
} |
| 80 |
|
\end{center} |
| 81 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 82 |
|
|
| 83 |
< |
\clearpage |
| 83 |
> |
|
| 84 |
> |
\clearpage |
