| 1 |
|
%\section{Systematics Uncertainties on the Background Prediction} |
| 2 |
|
%\label{sec:systematics} |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
< |
[ADD INTRODUCTORY BLURB ON UNCERTAINTIES \\ |
| 5 |
< |
ADD COMPARISONS OF ALL THE ALTERNATIVE SAMPLES FOR ALL THE SIGNAL |
| 6 |
< |
REGIONS \\ |
| 7 |
< |
LIST ALL THE UNCERTAINTIES INCLUDED AND THEIR VALUES] |
| 4 |
> |
[DESCRIBE HERE ONE BY ONE THE UNCERTAINTIES THAT ARE PRESENT IN THE SPREADSHHET |
| 5 |
> |
FROM WHICH WE CALCULATE THE TOTAL UNCERTAINTY. WE KNOW HOW TO DO THIS |
| 6 |
> |
AND |
| 7 |
> |
WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY FROM THE 7 TEV ANALYSIS TO PROPAGATE ALL |
| 8 |
> |
UNCERTAINTIES |
| 9 |
> |
CORRECTLY THROUGH. WE WILL DO IT ONCE WE HAVE SETTLED ON THE |
| 10 |
> |
INDIVIDUAL PIECES WHICH ARE STILL IN FLUX] |
| 11 |
> |
|
| 12 |
> |
In this Section we discuss the systematic uncertainty on the BG |
| 13 |
> |
prediction. This prediction is assembled from the event |
| 14 |
> |
counts in the peak region of the transverse mass distribution as |
| 15 |
> |
well as Monte Carlo |
| 16 |
> |
with a number of correction factors, as described previously. |
| 17 |
> |
The |
| 18 |
> |
final uncertainty on the prediction is built up from the uncertainties in these |
| 19 |
> |
individual |
| 20 |
> |
components. |
| 21 |
> |
The calculation is done for each signal |
| 22 |
> |
region, |
| 23 |
> |
for electrons and muons separately. |
| 24 |
> |
|
| 25 |
> |
The choice to normalizing to the peak region of $M_T$ has the |
| 26 |
> |
advantage that some uncertainties, e.g., luminosity, cancel. |
| 27 |
> |
It does however introduce complications because it couples |
| 28 |
> |
some of the uncertainties in non-trivial ways. For example, |
| 29 |
> |
the primary effect of an uncertainty on the rare MC cross-section |
| 30 |
> |
is to introduce an uncertainty in the rare MC background estimate |
| 31 |
> |
which comes entirely from MC. But this uncertainty also affects, |
| 32 |
> |
for example, |
| 33 |
> |
the $t\bar{t} \to$ dilepton BG estimate because it changes the |
| 34 |
> |
$t\bar{t}$ normalization to the peak region (because some of the |
| 35 |
> |
events in the peak region are from rare processes). These effects |
| 36 |
> |
are carefully accounted for. The contribution to the overall |
| 37 |
> |
uncertainty from each BG source is tabulated in |
| 38 |
> |
Section~\ref{sec:bgunc-bottomline}. |
| 39 |
> |
First, however, we discuss the uncertainties one-by-one and we comment |
| 40 |
> |
on their impact on the overall result, at least to first order. |
| 41 |
> |
Second order effects, such as the one described, are also included. |
| 42 |
> |
|
| 43 |
> |
\subsection{Statistical uncertainties on the event counts in the $M_T$ |
| 44 |
> |
peak regions} |
| 45 |
> |
These vary between XX and XX \%, depending on the signal region |
| 46 |
> |
(different |
| 47 |
> |
signal regions have different \met\ requirements, thus they also have |
| 48 |
> |
different $M_T$ regions used as control. |
| 49 |
> |
Since |
| 50 |
> |
the major BG, eg, $t\bar{t}$ are normalized to the peak regions, this |
| 51 |
> |
fractional uncertainty is pretty much carried through all the way to |
| 52 |
> |
the end. There is also an uncertainty from the finite MC event counts |
| 53 |
> |
in the $M_T$ peak regions. This is also included, but it is smaller. |
| 54 |
> |
|
| 55 |
> |
\subsection{Uncertainty from the choice of $M_T$ peak region} |
| 56 |
> |
IN 7 TEV DATA WE HAD SOME SHAPE DIFFERENCES IN THE MTRANS REGION THAT |
| 57 |
> |
LED US TO CONSERVATIVELY INCLUDE THIS UNCERTAINTY. WE NEED TO LOOK |
| 58 |
> |
INTO THIS AGAIN |
| 59 |
> |
|
| 60 |
> |
\subsection{Uncertainty on the Wjets cross-section and the rare MC cross-sections} |
| 61 |
> |
These are taken as 50\%, uncorrelated. |
| 62 |
> |
The primary effect is to introduce a 50\% |
| 63 |
> |
uncertainty |
| 64 |
> |
on the $W +$ jets and rare BG |
| 65 |
> |
background predictions, respectively. However they also |
| 66 |
> |
have an effect on the other BGs via the $M_T$ peak normalization |
| 67 |
> |
in a way that tends to reduce the uncertainty. This is easy |
| 68 |
> |
to understand: if the $W$ cross-section is increased by 50\%, then |
| 69 |
> |
the $W$ background goes up. But the number of $M_T$ peak events |
| 70 |
> |
attributed to $t\bar{t}$ goes down, and since the $t\bar{t}$ BG is |
| 71 |
> |
scaled to the number of $t\bar{t}$ events in the peak, the $t\bar{t}$ |
| 72 |
> |
BG goes down. |
| 73 |
> |
|
| 74 |
> |
\subsection{Scale factors for the tail-to-peak ratios for lepton + |
| 75 |
> |
jets top and W events} |
| 76 |
> |
These tail-to-peak ratios are described in Section~\ref{sec:ttp}. |
| 77 |
> |
They are studied in CR1 and CR2. The studies are described |
| 78 |
> |
in Sections~\ref{sec:cr1} and~\ref{sec:cr2}), respectively, where |
| 79 |
> |
we also give the uncertainty on the scale factors. |
| 80 |
> |
|
| 81 |
> |
\subsection{Uncertainty on extra jet radiation for dilepton |
| 82 |
> |
background} |
| 83 |
> |
As discussed in Section~\ref{sec:jetmultiplicity}, the |
| 84 |
> |
jet distribution in |
| 85 |
> |
$t\bar{t} \to$ |
| 86 |
> |
dilepton MC is rescaled by the factors $K_3$ and $K_4$ to make |
| 87 |
> |
it agree with the data. The XX\% uncertainties on $K_3$ and $K_4$ |
| 88 |
> |
comes from data/MC statistics. This |
| 89 |
> |
result directly in a XX\% uncertainty on the dilepton BG, which is by far |
| 90 |
> |
the most important one. |
| 91 |
> |
|
| 92 |
|
|
| 93 |
|
\subsection{Uncertainty on the \ttll\ Acceptance} |
| 94 |
|
|
| 133 |
|
\end{itemize} |
| 134 |
|
|
| 135 |
|
|
| 136 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 137 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 138 |
+ |
{\footnotesize |
| 139 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 140 |
+ |
\hline |
| 141 |
+ |
Sample & Powheg & Madgraph & Mass Up & Mass Down & Scale Up & Scale Down & |
| 142 |
+ |
Match Up & Match Down \\ |
| 143 |
+ |
\hline |
| 144 |
+ |
\hline |
| 145 |
+ |
SRA & $579 \pm 10$ & $569 \pm 16$ & $591 \pm 18$ & $610 \pm 22$ & $651 \pm 22$ & $537 \pm 16$ & $578 \pm 18$ & $570 \pm 17$ \\ |
| 146 |
+ |
\hline |
| 147 |
+ |
SRB & $328 \pm 7$ & $307 \pm 11$ & $329 \pm 13$ & $348 \pm 15$ & $344 \pm 15$ & $287 \pm 10$ & $313 \pm 13$ & $307 \pm 12$ \\ |
| 148 |
+ |
\hline |
| 149 |
+ |
SRC & $111 \pm 4$ & $99 \pm 5$ & $107 \pm 7$ & $113 \pm 8$ & $124 \pm 8$ & $95 \pm 6$ & $93 \pm 6$ & $106 \pm 6$ \\ |
| 150 |
+ |
\hline |
| 151 |
+ |
SRD & $39 \pm 2$ & $35 \pm 3$ & $41 \pm 4$ & $41 \pm 5$ & $47 \pm 5$ & $33 \pm 3$ & $31 \pm 3$ & $39 \pm 4$ \\ |
| 152 |
+ |
\hline |
| 153 |
+ |
SRE & $14 \pm 1$ & $15 \pm 2$ & $17 \pm 3$ & $12 \pm 3$ & $15 \pm 3$ & $13 \pm 2$ & $12 \pm 2$ & $16 \pm 2$ \\ |
| 154 |
+ |
\hline |
| 155 |
+ |
\end{tabular}} |
| 156 |
+ |
\caption{ \ttdl\ predictions for alternative MC samples. The uncertainties are statistical only. |
| 157 |
+ |
\label{tab:ttdlalt}} |
| 158 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 159 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 160 |
+ |
|
| 161 |
+ |
|
| 162 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 163 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 164 |
+ |
{\footnotesize |
| 165 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 166 |
+ |
\hline |
| 167 |
+ |
$\Delta/N$ [\%] & Madgraph & Mass Up & Mass Down & Scale Up & Scale Down & |
| 168 |
+ |
Match Up & Match Down \\ |
| 169 |
+ |
\hline |
| 170 |
+ |
\hline |
| 171 |
+ |
SRA & $2$ & $2$ & $5$ & $12$ & $7$ & $0$ & $2$ \\ |
| 172 |
+ |
\hline |
| 173 |
+ |
SRB & $6$ & $0$ & $6$ & $5$ & $12$ & $5$ & $6$ \\ |
| 174 |
+ |
\hline |
| 175 |
+ |
SRC & $10$ & $3$ & $2$ & $12$ & $14$ & $16$ & $4$ \\ |
| 176 |
+ |
\hline |
| 177 |
+ |
SRD & $10$ & $6$ & $6$ & $21$ & $15$ & $19$ & $0$ \\ |
| 178 |
+ |
\hline |
| 179 |
+ |
SRE & $6$ & $17$ & $15$ & $2$ & $12$ & $17$ & $8$ \\ |
| 180 |
+ |
\hline |
| 181 |
+ |
\end{tabular}} |
| 182 |
+ |
\caption{ Relative difference in \ttdl\ predictions for alternative MC samples. |
| 183 |
+ |
\label{tab:fracdiff}} |
| 184 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 185 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 186 |
+ |
|
| 187 |
+ |
|
| 188 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 189 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 190 |
+ |
{\footnotesize |
| 191 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 192 |
+ |
\hline |
| 193 |
+ |
$N \sigma$ & Madgraph & Mass Up & Mass Down & Scale Up & Scale Down & |
| 194 |
+ |
Match Up & Match Down \\ |
| 195 |
+ |
\hline |
| 196 |
+ |
\hline |
| 197 |
+ |
SRA & $0.38$ & $0.42$ & $1.02$ & $2.34$ & $1.58$ & $0.01$ & $0.33$ \\ |
| 198 |
+ |
\hline |
| 199 |
+ |
SRB & $1.17$ & $0.07$ & $0.98$ & $0.76$ & $2.29$ & $0.78$ & $1.11$ \\ |
| 200 |
+ |
\hline |
| 201 |
+ |
SRC & $1.33$ & $0.37$ & $0.26$ & $1.24$ & $1.82$ & $1.97$ & $0.54$ \\ |
| 202 |
+ |
\hline |
| 203 |
+ |
SRD & $0.82$ & $0.46$ & $0.38$ & $1.32$ & $1.27$ & $1.47$ & $0.00$ \\ |
| 204 |
+ |
\hline |
| 205 |
+ |
SRE & $0.32$ & $0.75$ & $0.66$ & $0.07$ & $0.66$ & $0.83$ & $0.38$ \\ |
| 206 |
+ |
\hline |
| 207 |
+ |
\end{tabular}} |
| 208 |
+ |
\caption{ N $\sigma$ difference in \ttdl\ predictions for alternative MC samples. |
| 209 |
+ |
\label{tab:nsig}} |
| 210 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 211 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 212 |
+ |
|
| 213 |
+ |
|
| 214 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 215 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 216 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c|c|c} |
| 217 |
+ |
\hline |
| 218 |
+ |
Av. $\Delta$ Evt. & Alt. Gen. & $\Delta$ Mass & $\Delta$ Scale |
| 219 |
+ |
& $\Delta$ Match \\ |
| 220 |
+ |
\hline |
| 221 |
+ |
\hline |
| 222 |
+ |
SRA & $5.0$ ($1\%$) & $9.6$ ($2\%$) & $56.8$ ($10\%$) & $4.4$ ($1\%$) \\ |
| 223 |
+ |
\hline |
| 224 |
+ |
SRB & $10.4$ ($3\%$) & $9.6$ ($3\%$) & $28.2$ ($9\%$) & $2.8$ ($1\%$) \\ |
| 225 |
+ |
\hline |
| 226 |
+ |
SRC & $5.7$ ($5\%$) & $3.1$ ($3\%$) & $14.5$ ($13\%$) & $6.4$ ($6\%$) \\ |
| 227 |
+ |
\hline |
| 228 |
+ |
SRD & $1.9$ ($5\%$) & $0.1$ ($0\%$) & $6.9$ ($18\%$) & $3.6$ ($9\%$) \\ |
| 229 |
+ |
\hline |
| 230 |
+ |
SRE & $0.5$ ($3\%$) & $2.3$ ($16\%$) & $1.0$ ($7\%$) & $1.8$ ($12\%$) \\ |
| 231 |
+ |
\hline |
| 232 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
| 233 |
+ |
\caption{ Av. difference in \ttdl\ events for alternative sample pairs. |
| 234 |
+ |
\label{tab:devt}} |
| 235 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 236 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 237 |
+ |
|
| 238 |
+ |
|
| 239 |
|
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
| 240 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 241 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_syst_comp.png} |
| 241 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_comp_SRA.pdf}% |
| 242 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_comp_SRB.pdf} |
| 243 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_comp_SRC.pdf}% |
| 244 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_comp_SRD.pdf} |
| 245 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{plots/n_dl_comp_SRE.pdf} |
| 246 |
|
\caption{ |
| 247 |
< |
\label{fig:ttllsyst}%\protect |
| 247 |
> |
\label{fig:ttllsyst}\protect |
| 248 |
|
Comparison of the \ttll\ central prediction with those using |
| 249 |
|
alternative MC samples. The blue band corresponds to the |
| 250 |
|
total statistical error for all data and MC samples. The |
| 251 |
|
alternative sample predictions are indicated by the |
| 252 |
|
datapoints. The uncertainties on the alternative predictions |
| 253 |
|
correspond to the uncorrelated statistical uncertainty from |
| 254 |
< |
the size of the alternative sample only.} |
| 254 |
> |
the size of the alternative sample only. |
| 255 |
> |
[TO BE UPDATED WITH THE LATEST SELECTION AND SFS]} |
| 256 |
|
\end{center} |
| 257 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 258 |
|
|
| 259 |
< |
|
| 259 |
> |
\clearpage |
| 260 |
|
|
| 261 |
|
% |
| 262 |
|
% |
| 392 |
|
%\end{center} |
| 393 |
|
%\end{table} |
| 394 |
|
|
| 395 |
+ |
\subsection{Uncertainty from the isolated track veto} |
| 396 |
+ |
This is the uncertainty associated with how well the isolated track |
| 397 |
+ |
veto performance is modeled by the Monte Carlo. This uncertainty |
| 398 |
+ |
only applies to the fraction of dilepton BG events that have |
| 399 |
+ |
a second e/$\mu$ or a one prong $\tau \to h$, with |
| 400 |
+ |
$P_T > 10$ GeV in $|\eta| < 2.4$. This fraction is 1/3 (THIS WAS THE |
| 401 |
+ |
7 TEV NUMBER, CHECK). The uncertainty for these events |
| 402 |
+ |
is XX\% and is obtained from Tag and Probe studies of Section~\ref{sec:trkveto} |
| 403 |
|
|
| 404 |
< |
\subsection{Isolated Track Veto: Tag and Probe Studies} |
| 404 |
> |
\subsubsection{Isolated Track Veto: Tag and Probe Studies} |
| 405 |
> |
\label{sec:trkveto} |
| 406 |
|
|
| 407 |
|
[EVERYTHING IS 7TEV HERE, UPDATE WITH NEW RESULTS \\ |
| 408 |
|
ADD TABLE WITH FRACTION OF EVENTS THAT HAVE A TRUE ISOLATED TRACK] |
| 409 |
|
|
| 410 |
+ |
\begin{table}[!h] |
| 411 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 412 |
+ |
{\footnotesize |
| 413 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l||c|c|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 414 |
+ |
\hline |
| 415 |
+ |
Sample & SRA & SRB & SRC & SRD & SRE & SRF & SRG \\ |
| 416 |
+ |
\hline |
| 417 |
+ |
\hline |
| 418 |
+ |
$\mu$ Frac. \ttdl\ with true iso. trk. & $0.32 \pm 0.03$ & $0.30 \pm 0.03$ & $0.32 \pm 0.06$ & $0.34 \pm 0.10$ & $0.35 \pm 0.16$ & $0.40 \pm 0.24$ & $0.50 \pm 0.32$ \\ |
| 419 |
+ |
\hline |
| 420 |
+ |
\hline |
| 421 |
+ |
e Frac. \ttdl\ with true iso. trk. & $0.32 \pm 0.03$ & $0.31 \pm 0.04$ & $0.33 \pm 0.06$ & $0.38 \pm 0.11$ & $0.38 \pm 0.19$ & $0.60 \pm 0.31$ & $0.61 \pm 0.45$ \\ |
| 422 |
+ |
\hline |
| 423 |
+ |
\end{tabular}} |
| 424 |
+ |
\caption{ Fraction of \ttdl\ events with a true isolated track. |
| 425 |
+ |
\label{tab:trueisotrk}} |
| 426 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 427 |
+ |
\end{table} |
| 428 |
+ |
|
| 429 |
+ |
|
| 430 |
|
In this section we compare the performance of the isolated track veto in data and MC using tag-and-probe studies |
| 431 |
|
with samples of Z$\to$ee and Z$\to\mu\mu$. The purpose of these studies is to demonstrate that the efficiency |
| 432 |
|
to satisfy the isolated track veto requirements is well-reproduced in the MC, since if this were not the case |
| 471 |
|
|
| 472 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
| 473 |
|
\item Electron passes full analysis ID/iso selection |
| 474 |
< |
\item \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV, $|\eta|<2.5$ |
| 475 |
< |
|
| 255 |
< |
\item Matched to 1 of the 2 electron tag-and-probe triggers |
| 256 |
< |
\begin{itemize} |
| 257 |
< |
\item \verb=HLT_Ele17_CaloIdVT_CaloIsoVT_TrkIdT_TrkIsoVT_SC8_Mass30_v*= |
| 258 |
< |
\item \verb=HLT_Ele17_CaloIdVT_CaloIsoVT_TrkIdT_TrkIsoVT_Ele8_Mass30_v*= |
| 259 |
< |
\end{itemize} |
| 474 |
> |
\item \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV, $|\eta|<2.1$ |
| 475 |
> |
\item Matched to the single electron trigger \verb=HLT_Ele27_WP80_v*= |
| 476 |
|
\end{itemize} |
| 477 |
|
|
| 478 |
|
\item{Probe criteria} |
| 487 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
| 488 |
|
\item Muon passes full analysis ID/iso selection |
| 489 |
|
\item \pt\ $>$ 30 GeV, $|\eta|<2.1$ |
| 490 |
< |
\item Matched to 1 of the 2 electron tag-and-probe triggers |
| 490 |
> |
\item Matched to 1 of the 2 single muon triggers |
| 491 |
|
\begin{itemize} |
| 492 |
|
\item \verb=HLT_IsoMu30_v*= |
| 493 |
|
\item \verb=HLT_IsoMu30_eta2p1_v*= |
| 505 |
|
good agreement between data and MC. To be more quantitative, we compare the data vs. MC efficiencies to satisfy |
| 506 |
|
absolute track isolation requirements varying from $>$ 1 GeV to $>$ 5 GeV, as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:isotrk}. |
| 507 |
|
In the $\geq$0 and $\geq$1 jet bins where the efficiencies can be tested with statistical precision, the data and MC |
| 508 |
< |
efficiencies agree within 7\%, and we apply this as a systematic uncertainty on the isolated track veto efficiency. |
| 508 |
> |
efficiencies agree within 6\%, and we apply this as a systematic uncertainty on the isolated track veto efficiency. |
| 509 |
|
For the higher jet multiplicity bins the statistical precision decreases, but we do not observe any evidence for |
| 510 |
|
a data vs. MC discrepancy in the isolated track veto efficiency. |
| 511 |
|
|
| 516 |
|
|
| 517 |
|
\begin{figure}[hbt] |
| 518 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 519 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_0j.pdf}% |
| 520 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_0j.pdf} |
| 521 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_1j.pdf}% |
| 522 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_1j.pdf} |
| 523 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_2j.pdf}% |
| 524 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_2j.pdf} |
| 525 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_3j.pdf}% |
| 526 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_3j.pdf} |
| 527 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_4j.pdf}% |
| 528 |
< |
%\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_4j.pdf} |
| 519 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_0j.pdf}% |
| 520 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_0j.pdf} |
| 521 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_1j.pdf}% |
| 522 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_1j.pdf} |
| 523 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_2j.pdf}% |
| 524 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_2j.pdf} |
| 525 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_3j.pdf}% |
| 526 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_3j.pdf} |
| 527 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/el_tkiso_4j.pdf}% |
| 528 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{plots/mu_tkiso_4j.pdf} |
| 529 |
|
\caption{ |
| 530 |
|
\label{fig:tnp} Comparison of the absolute track isolation in data vs. MC for electrons (left) and muons (right) |
| 531 |
|
for events with the \njets\ requirement varied from \njets\ $\geq$ 0 to \njets\ $\geq$ 4. |
| 540 |
|
\caption{\label{tab:isotrk} Comparison of the data vs. MC efficiencies to satisfy the indicated requirements |
| 541 |
|
on the absolute track isolation, and the ratio of these two efficiencies. Results are indicated separately for electrons and muons and for various |
| 542 |
|
jet multiplicity requirements.} |
| 543 |
< |
\begin{tabular}{l|l|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 543 |
> |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c} |
| 544 |
> |
|
| 545 |
> |
%Electrons: |
| 546 |
> |
%Selection : ((((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&((eventSelection&1)==1))&&(abs(tag->eta())<2.1))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(HLT_Ele27_WP80_tag > 0))&&(met<30))&&(nbl==0))&&((leptonSelection&8)==8))&&(probe->pt()>30))&&(drprobe<0.05) |
| 547 |
> |
%Total MC yields : 2497277 |
| 548 |
> |
%Total DATA yields : 2649453 |
| 549 |
> |
%Muons: |
| 550 |
> |
%Selection : ((((((((((abs(tagAndProbeMass-91)<15)&&(qProbe*qTag<0))&&((eventSelection&2)==2))&&(abs(tag->eta())<2.1))&&(tag->pt()>30.0))&&(HLT_IsoMu24_tag > 0))&&(met<30))&&(nbl==0))&&((leptonSelection&65536)==65536))&&(probe->pt()>30))&&(drprobe<0.05) |
| 551 |
> |
%Total MC yields : 3749863 |
| 552 |
> |
%Total DATA yields : 4210022 |
| 553 |
> |
%Info in <TCanvas::MakeDefCanvas>: created default TCanvas with name c1 |
| 554 |
> |
%Info in <TCanvas::Print>: pdf file plots/nvtx.pdf has been created |
| 555 |
> |
|
| 556 |
|
\hline |
| 557 |
|
\hline |
| 558 |
< |
e + $\geq$0 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 558 |
> |
e + $\geq$0 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 559 |
|
\hline |
| 560 |
< |
data & 0.088 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.007 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.005 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 561 |
< |
mc & 0.087 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.008 $\pm$ 0.0000 & 0.005 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 562 |
< |
data/mc & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.00 & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.95 $\pm$ 0.01 & 0.93 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| 560 |
> |
data & 0.098 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.036 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.006 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 561 |
> |
mc & 0.097 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.034 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.005 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 562 |
> |
data/mc & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| 563 |
> |
|
| 564 |
|
\hline |
| 565 |
|
\hline |
| 566 |
< |
$\mu$ + $\geq$0 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 566 |
> |
$\mu$ + $\geq$0 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 567 |
|
\hline |
| 568 |
< |
data & 0.087 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.031 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.008 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.005 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 569 |
< |
mc & 0.085 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0000 & 0.008 $\pm$ 0.0000 & 0.005 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 570 |
< |
data/mc & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| 568 |
> |
data & 0.094 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.034 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0000 & 0.006 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 569 |
> |
mc & 0.093 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.033 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0000 & 0.006 $\pm$ 0.0000 \\ |
| 570 |
> |
data/mc & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.00 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.02 $\pm$ 0.01 \\ |
| 571 |
> |
|
| 572 |
|
\hline |
| 343 |
– |
\hline |
| 344 |
– |
e + $\geq$1 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 573 |
|
\hline |
| 574 |
< |
data & 0.099 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.038 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.011 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.008 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\ |
| 347 |
< |
mc & 0.100 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.038 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.012 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.008 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 348 |
< |
data/mc & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.03 \\ |
| 574 |
> |
e + $\geq$1 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 575 |
|
\hline |
| 576 |
+ |
data & 0.110 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.044 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.022 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\ |
| 577 |
+ |
mc & 0.110 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.042 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 578 |
+ |
data/mc & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.03 \\ |
| 579 |
+ |
|
| 580 |
|
\hline |
| 351 |
– |
$\mu$ + $\geq$1 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 581 |
|
\hline |
| 582 |
< |
data & 0.100 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.041 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.022 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.010 $\pm$ 0.0002 \\ |
| 354 |
< |
mc & 0.099 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.039 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.020 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0001 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 355 |
< |
data/mc & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.05 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.03 \\ |
| 582 |
> |
$\mu$ + $\geq$1 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 583 |
|
\hline |
| 584 |
+ |
data & 0.106 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.043 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.023 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.010 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 585 |
+ |
mc & 0.106 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.042 $\pm$ 0.0003 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0002 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0001 \\ |
| 586 |
+ |
data/mc & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.07 $\pm$ 0.02 \\ |
| 587 |
+ |
|
| 588 |
|
\hline |
| 358 |
– |
e + $\geq$2 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 589 |
|
\hline |
| 590 |
< |
data & 0.105 $\pm$ 0.0020 & 0.042 $\pm$ 0.0013 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\ |
| 361 |
< |
mc & 0.109 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.043 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.009 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\ |
| 362 |
< |
data/mc & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.00 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.06 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.08 \\ |
| 590 |
> |
e + $\geq$2 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 591 |
|
\hline |
| 592 |
+ |
data & 0.117 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.050 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.026 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.017 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.012 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\ |
| 593 |
+ |
mc & 0.120 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.048 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.025 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.011 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\ |
| 594 |
+ |
data/mc & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.05 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.05 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.07 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.07 $\pm$ 0.05 \\ |
| 595 |
+ |
|
| 596 |
|
\hline |
| 365 |
– |
$\mu$ + $\geq$2 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 597 |
|
\hline |
| 598 |
< |
data & 0.106 $\pm$ 0.0016 & 0.045 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.025 $\pm$ 0.0008 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.012 $\pm$ 0.0006 \\ |
| 368 |
< |
mc & 0.108 $\pm$ 0.0009 & 0.044 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.024 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.011 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\ |
| 369 |
< |
data/mc & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.06 \\ |
| 598 |
> |
$\mu$ + $\geq$2 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 599 |
|
\hline |
| 600 |
+ |
data & 0.111 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.048 $\pm$ 0.0007 & 0.026 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.018 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0004 \\ |
| 601 |
+ |
mc & 0.115 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.048 $\pm$ 0.0006 & 0.025 $\pm$ 0.0005 & 0.016 $\pm$ 0.0004 & 0.012 $\pm$ 0.0003 \\ |
| 602 |
+ |
data/mc & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.01 & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.04 \\ |
| 603 |
+ |
|
| 604 |
|
\hline |
| 372 |
– |
e + $\geq$3 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 605 |
|
\hline |
| 606 |
< |
data & 0.117 $\pm$ 0.0055 & 0.051 $\pm$ 0.0038 & 0.029 $\pm$ 0.0029 & 0.018 $\pm$ 0.0023 & 0.012 $\pm$ 0.0019 \\ |
| 607 |
< |
mc & 0.120 $\pm$ 0.0031 & 0.052 $\pm$ 0.0021 & 0.027 $\pm$ 0.0015 & 0.018 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\ |
| 608 |
< |
data/mc & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.05 & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.10 $\pm$ 0.13 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.15 & 0.91 $\pm$ 0.16 \\ |
| 606 |
> |
e + $\geq$3 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 607 |
> |
\hline |
| 608 |
> |
data & 0.123 $\pm$ 0.0031 & 0.058 $\pm$ 0.0022 & 0.034 $\pm$ 0.0017 & 0.023 $\pm$ 0.0014 & 0.017 $\pm$ 0.0012 \\ |
| 609 |
> |
mc & 0.131 $\pm$ 0.0030 & 0.055 $\pm$ 0.0020 & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0015 & 0.020 $\pm$ 0.0013 & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.0011 \\ |
| 610 |
> |
data/mc & 0.94 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.14 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.16 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1.17 $\pm$ 0.12 \\ |
| 611 |
> |
|
| 612 |
|
\hline |
| 613 |
|
\hline |
| 614 |
< |
$\mu$ + $\geq$3 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 614 |
> |
$\mu$ + $\geq$3 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 615 |
|
\hline |
| 616 |
< |
data & 0.111 $\pm$ 0.0044 & 0.050 $\pm$ 0.0030 & 0.029 $\pm$ 0.0024 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0019 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0017 \\ |
| 617 |
< |
mc & 0.115 $\pm$ 0.0025 & 0.051 $\pm$ 0.0017 & 0.030 $\pm$ 0.0013 & 0.020 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.015 $\pm$ 0.0009 \\ |
| 618 |
< |
data/mc & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.04 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.95 $\pm$ 0.09 & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.11 & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.13 \\ |
| 616 |
> |
data & 0.121 $\pm$ 0.0025 & 0.055 $\pm$ 0.0018 & 0.033 $\pm$ 0.0014 & 0.022 $\pm$ 0.0011 & 0.017 $\pm$ 0.0010 \\ |
| 617 |
> |
mc & 0.120 $\pm$ 0.0024 & 0.052 $\pm$ 0.0016 & 0.029 $\pm$ 0.0012 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0010 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0009 \\ |
| 618 |
> |
data/mc & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.06 $\pm$ 0.05 & 1.14 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1.14 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.16 $\pm$ 0.10 \\ |
| 619 |
> |
|
| 620 |
|
\hline |
| 621 |
|
\hline |
| 622 |
< |
e + $\geq$4 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 622 |
> |
e + $\geq$4 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 623 |
|
\hline |
| 624 |
< |
data & 0.113 $\pm$ 0.0148 & 0.048 $\pm$ 0.0100 & 0.033 $\pm$ 0.0083 & 0.020 $\pm$ 0.0065 & 0.017 $\pm$ 0.0062 \\ |
| 625 |
< |
mc & 0.146 $\pm$ 0.0092 & 0.064 $\pm$ 0.0064 & 0.034 $\pm$ 0.0048 & 0.024 $\pm$ 0.0040 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0037 \\ |
| 626 |
< |
data/mc & 0.78 $\pm$ 0.11 & 0.74 $\pm$ 0.17 & 0.96 $\pm$ 0.28 & 0.82 $\pm$ 0.30 & 0.85 $\pm$ 0.34 \\ |
| 624 |
> |
data & 0.129 $\pm$ 0.0080 & 0.070 $\pm$ 0.0061 & 0.044 $\pm$ 0.0049 & 0.031 $\pm$ 0.0042 & 0.021 $\pm$ 0.0034 \\ |
| 625 |
> |
mc & 0.132 $\pm$ 0.0075 & 0.059 $\pm$ 0.0053 & 0.035 $\pm$ 0.0041 & 0.025 $\pm$ 0.0035 & 0.017 $\pm$ 0.0029 \\ |
| 626 |
> |
data/mc & 0.98 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.15 & 1.26 $\pm$ 0.20 & 1.24 $\pm$ 0.24 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.28 \\ |
| 627 |
> |
|
| 628 |
|
\hline |
| 629 |
|
\hline |
| 630 |
< |
$\mu$ + $\geq$4 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 630 |
> |
$\mu$ + $\geq$4 jets & $>$ 1 GeV & $>$ 2 GeV & $>$ 3 GeV & $>$ 4 GeV & $>$ 5 GeV \\ |
| 631 |
|
\hline |
| 632 |
< |
data & 0.130 $\pm$ 0.0128 & 0.052 $\pm$ 0.0085 & 0.028 $\pm$ 0.0063 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0052 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0052 \\ |
| 633 |
< |
mc & 0.105 $\pm$ 0.0064 & 0.045 $\pm$ 0.0043 & 0.027 $\pm$ 0.0034 & 0.019 $\pm$ 0.0028 & 0.014 $\pm$ 0.0024 \\ |
| 634 |
< |
data/mc & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.14 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.22 & 1.03 $\pm$ 0.27 & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.32 & 1.37 $\pm$ 0.45 \\ |
| 632 |
> |
data & 0.136 $\pm$ 0.0067 & 0.064 $\pm$ 0.0048 & 0.041 $\pm$ 0.0039 & 0.029 $\pm$ 0.0033 & 0.024 $\pm$ 0.0030 \\ |
| 633 |
> |
mc & 0.130 $\pm$ 0.0063 & 0.065 $\pm$ 0.0046 & 0.035 $\pm$ 0.0034 & 0.020 $\pm$ 0.0026 & 0.013 $\pm$ 0.0022 \\ |
| 634 |
> |
data/mc & 1.04 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.99 $\pm$ 0.10 & 1.19 $\pm$ 0.16 & 1.47 $\pm$ 0.25 & 1.81 $\pm$ 0.37 \\ |
| 635 |
> |
|
| 636 |
|
\hline |
| 637 |
|
\hline |
| 638 |
|
|
| 641 |
|
\end{table} |
| 642 |
|
|
| 643 |
|
|
| 406 |
– |
|
| 644 |
|
%Figure.~\ref{fig:reliso} compares the relative track isolation |
| 645 |
|
%for events with a track with $\pt > 10~\GeV$ in addition to a selected |
| 646 |
|
%muon for $\Z+4$ jet events and various \ttll\ components. The |
| 720 |
|
% \end{center} |
| 721 |
|
%\end{figure} |
| 722 |
|
|
| 723 |
+ |
\subsection{Summary of uncertainties} |
| 724 |
+ |
\label{sec:bgunc-bottomline}. |
| 725 |
+ |
|
| 726 |
+ |
THIS NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN |
