| 1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\section{Conclusion}
|
| 2 |
|
|
\label{sec:conclusion}
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
warren |
1.2 |
We have performed a search for BSM physics in the Z plus jets plus MET final state.
|
| 5 |
|
|
Backgrounds from SM \Z production were estimated using the data-driven
|
| 6 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
MET templates method, and backgrounds from $t\bar{t}$ were estimated using
|
| 7 |
|
|
the data-driven opposite-flavor subtraction technique. We found no evidence
|
| 8 |
|
|
for anomalous yield beyond SM expectations and placed Bayesian 95\% CL upper limits
|
| 9 |
warren |
1.2 |
on the non SM yields in the loose (MET$>$\signalmetl~GeV) and tight signal regions (MET$>$\signalmett~GeV)
|
| 10 |
|
|
of \ulloose~and \ultight~events, respectively.
|
| 11 |
warren |
1.3 |
%We also quoted expected yields for the
|
| 12 |
|
|
We also quote upper limits on the quantity
|
| 13 |
|
|
%$\sigma \times BF \times A$,
|
| 14 |
|
|
\sta\ for the
|
| 15 |
|
|
%assuming efficiencies and uncertainties from the
|
| 16 |
warren |
1.2 |
benchmark SUSY processes LM4 and LM8
|
| 17 |
warren |
1.3 |
including estimated signal efficiencies and systematics,
|
| 18 |
|
|
and conclude that LM4 is not compatible with the data and therefore ruled out.
|
