ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.3 by benhoob, Wed Jun 27 20:41:25 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.4 by benhoob, Fri Jun 29 19:41:46 2012 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \clearpage
1 > %\clearpage
2   \section{Background Estimation Techniques}
3   \label{sec:bkg}
4  
5   In this section we describe the techniques used to estimate the SM backgrounds in our signal regions defined by requirements of large \MET.
6 < The SM backgrounds fall into four categories:
6 > The SM backgrounds fall into three categories:
7  
8   \begin{itemize}
9   \item \zjets: this is the dominant background after the preselection. The \MET\ in \zjets\ events is estimated with the
# Line 13 | Line 13 | by \ttbar\ but also contains Z$\to\tau\t
13   is estimated using a data control sample of e$\mu$ events as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:bkg_fs};
14   \item WZ and ZZ backgrounds: this background is estimated from MC, after validating the MC modeling of these processes using data control
15   samples with jets and exactly 3 leptons (WZ control sample) and exactly 4 leptons (ZZ control sample) as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:bkg_vz};
16 < \item Rare SM backgrounds: this background contains rare processes such as $t\bar{t}$V and triple vector boson processes VVV (V=W,Z).
17 < This background is estimated from MC as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:bkg_raresm}. {\bf TODO: add rare MC}
16 > %\item Rare SM backgrounds: this background contains rare processes such as $t\bar{t}$V and triple vector boson processes VVV (V=W,Z).
17 > %This background is estimated from MC as described in Sec.~\ref{sec:bkg_raresm}. {\bf FIXME: add rare MC}
18   \end{itemize}
19  
20   \subsection{Estimating the \zjets\ Background with \MET\ Templates}
# Line 82 | Line 82 | R_{\mu e} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{
82   \end{equation}
83  
84   Here we have used the Z$\to\mu\mu$ and Z$\to$ee yields from Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} and the trigger efficiencies quoted in Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets}.
85 < The indicated uncertainty is due to the 3\% uncertainties in the trigger efficiencies. {\bf TODO: check for variation w.r.t. lepton \pt}.
85 > The indicated uncertainty is due to the 3\% uncertainties in the trigger efficiencies. %{\bf FIXME: check for variation w.r.t. lepton \pt}.
86   The predicted yields in the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are calculated from the observed e$\mu$ yield as
87  
88   \begin{itemize}
# Line 99 | Line 99 | and the predicted yield in the combined
99   \end{itemize}
100  
101   Note that the relative uncertainty in the combined ee and $\mu\mu$ prediction is smaller than those for the individual ee and $\mu\mu$ predictions
102 < because the uncertainty in $R_{\mu e}$ cancels when summing the ee and $\mu\mu$ predictions. {\bf N.B. these uncertainties are preliminary}.
102 > because the uncertainty in $R_{\mu e}$ cancels when summing the ee and $\mu\mu$ predictions. %{\bf N.B. these uncertainties are preliminary}.
103  
104   To improve the statistical precision of the FS background estimate, we remove the requirement that the e$\mu$ lepton pair falls in the Z mass window.
105   Instead we scale the e$\mu$ yield by $K$, the efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the Z mass requirement, extracted from simulation. In Fig.~\ref{fig:K_incl}
# Line 120 | Line 120 | so that we inflate the uncertainty and c
120   The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the dilepton mass requirement, $K$, in data and simulation for inclusive \MET\ intervals (left) and
121   exclusive \MET\ intervals (right) for the inclusive analysis. Based on this we chose $K=0.14\pm0.02$ for all \MET\ regions except \MET\ $>$ 300 GeV,
122   where we chose $K=0.14\pm0.08$.
123 < {\bf plots made with 10\% of \zjets\ MC statistics, to be remade with full statistics}
123 > %{\bf FIXME plots made with 10\% of \zjets\ MC statistics, to be remade with full statistics}
124   \label{fig:K_incl}
125   }
126   \end{center}
# Line 137 | Line 137 | The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to sati
137   exclusive \MET\ intervals (right) for the targeted analysis, including the b-veto.
138   Based on this we chose $K=0.13\pm0.02$ for the \MET\ regions up to \MET\ $>$ 100 GeV.
139   For higher \MET\ regions we chose $K=0.13\pm0.07$.
140 < {\bf plots made with 10\% of \zjets\ MC statistics, to be remade with full statistics}
140 > %{\bf FIXME plots made with 10\% of \zjets\ MC statistics, to be remade with full statistics}
141   \label{fig:K_targeted}
142   }
143   \end{center}
# Line 190 | Line 190 | as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}. We
190   yield passing a \MET $>$ 50 GeV requirement is under-estimated in MC and second, because the fake
191   rate is typically under-estimated in the MC. To get a rough idea for how much the excess depends
192   on the \zjets\ yield, if the \zjets\ yield is doubled then the excess is reduced from 78\% to 55\%.
193 < {\bf currently using 10\% of \zjets\ MC, and there is 1 event with a weight of about 5, plots and tables to be remade with full \zjets\ stats}.
193 > Also note that we are currently using 10\% of the \zjets\ MC sample and there is 1 event with a weight
194 > of about 5, so the plots and tables will be remade with full \zjets\ sample.
195  
196   \item The \ttbar\ contribution is under-estimated here because the fake
197   rate is typically under-estimated in the MC. To get a rough idea for how much the excess depends
# Line 279 | Line 280 | A pure ZZ sample can be selected in data
280   The data and MC yields passing the above selection are in Table~\ref{tab:zz}. Again we observe an
281   excess in data with respect to the MC prediction (29 observed vs. $17.3\pm0.1$~(stat) MC predicted).
282   After requiring at least 2 jets, we observe 2 events and the MC predicts $1.5\pm0.1$~(stat).
283 < Based on this we apply an uncertainty of 80\% to the ZZ background.
283 > However, we have recently discovered that we may be using the wrong (too small) cross section for the ZZ sample,
284 > and we are in contact with the MC generator group to determine the correct cross section.
285 > Based on this we currently apply an uncertainty of 80\% to the ZZ background.
286  
287   \begin{table}[htb]
288   \begin{center}
# Line 317 | Line 320 | The number of jets, missing transverse e
320  
321  
322  
323 < \subsection{Estimating the Rare SM Backgrounds with MC}
324 < \label{sec:bkg_raresm}
323 > %\subsection{Estimating the Rare SM Backgrounds with MC}
324 > %\label{sec:bkg_raresm}
325  
326 < {\bf TODO: list samples, yields in preselection region, and show \MET\ distribution}
326 > %{\bf TODO: list samples, yields in preselection region, and show \MET\ distribution}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines