ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.13 by benhoob, Wed Dec 19 22:38:55 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.17 by benhoob, Thu Jan 17 13:26:49 2013 UTC

# Line 78 | Line 78 | Thus we calculate the quantity:
78  
79   \begin{equation}
80   R_{\mu e} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{offline}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{offline}}}} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}}}
81 < = \sqrt{\frac{297240/0.88}{233805/0.95}} = 1.17\pm0.07.
81 > = \sqrt{\frac{304953/0.88}{239661/0.95}} = 1.17\pm0.07.
82   \end{equation}
83  
84   Here we have used the Z$\to\mu\mu$ and Z$\to$ee yields from Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} and the trigger efficiencies quoted in Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets}.
# Line 856 | Line 856 | A pure WZ sample can be selected in data
856   \end{itemize}
857  
858   The data and MC yields passing the above selection are in Table~\ref{tab:wz}.
859 < The inclusive yields (without any jet requirements) agree within 13\%, which is consistent within
860 < the uncertainty in the CMS measured WZ cross section (17\%). A data vs. MC comparison of kinematic
859 > The inclusive yields (without any jet requirements) agree within 16\%, which is consistent within
860 > the $\approx$15\% uncertainty in the theory prediction for the WZ cross section. A data vs. MC comparison of kinematic
861   distributions (jet multiplicity, \MET, Z \pt) is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:wz}. High \MET\
862   values in WZ and ZZ events arise from highly boosted W or Z bosons that decay leptonically,
863   and we therefore check that the MC does a reasonable job of reproducing the \pt distributions of the
864   leptonically decaying \Z. While the inclusive WZ yields are in reasonable agreement, we observe
865   an excess in data in events with at least 2 jets, corresponding to the jet multiplicity requirement
866 < in our preselection. We observe 106 events in data while the MC predicts $62\pm1.5$~(stat), representing an excess of 71\%,
867 < as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}.
868 < This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 70\% on the WZ yield.
869 < A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}.
866 > in our preselection. We observe 200 events in data while the MC predicts $130\pm3.1$~(stat), representing an excess of 53\%,
867 > as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}, and we therefore assess an uncertainty of 50\% on the WZ background.
868 > %We note that the contributions from fake leptons and from \zjets\ with mismeasured \MET\
869 > %is underestimated in the MC.
870 > %This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 50\% on the WZ yield.
871 > %A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}.
872  
873   \begin{comment}
874   We note some possible contributions to this discrepancy:
# Line 1036 | Line 1038 | A pure ZZ sample can be selected in data
1038  
1039   The data and MC yields passing the above selection are in Table~\ref{tab:zz}.
1040   In this ZZ-dominated sample we observe good agreement between the data yield and the MC prediction.
1041 < After requiring 2 jets (corresponding to the requirement in the analysis selection), we observe 4 events
1042 < in data and the MC predicts $6.6\pm0.1$ events. Due to the limited statistical precision we assign an uncertainty
1043 < fo 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1041 > After requiring 2 jets (corresponding to the requirement in the analysis selection), we observe 14 events
1042 > in data and the MC predicts $13.2\pm0.2$ events. Due to the limited statistical precision we assign an uncertainty
1043 > of 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1044  
1045   \begin{table}[htb]
1046   \begin{center}
# Line 1076 | Line 1078 | fo 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1078  
1079   \begin{figure}[tbh]
1080   \begin{center}
1081 < \includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_eemm_92fb.pdf}
1081 > \includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_19fb.pdf}
1082   \caption{\label{fig:zz}\protect
1083   Data vs. MC comparisons for the ZZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi.
1084   The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed.
# Line 1084 | Line 1086 | The number of jets, missing transverse e
1086   \end{center}
1087   \end{figure}
1088  
1089 + \begin{comment}
1090 + Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
1091 + Using selection         : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1092 + Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
1093 + Plotting var njets flavor sf
1094 + compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1095 +
1096 + MC yield VVV 1.40
1097 + MC yield ttV 2.64
1098 + MC yield single top 0.00
1099 + MC yield WW 0.00
1100 + MC yield ttbar 0.00
1101 + SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1102 + MC yield zjets 0.00
1103 + MC yield WZ 0.27
1104 + SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1105 + MC yield ZZ 125.99
1106 + MC total yield 130.31
1107 + data yield 136
1108 + Plotting var pfmet flavor sf
1109 + compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1110 + MC yield VVV 1.40
1111 + MC yield ttV 2.64
1112 + MC yield single top 0.00
1113 + MC yield WW 0.00
1114 + MC yield ttbar 0.00
1115 + SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1116 + MC yield zjets 0.00
1117 + MC yield WZ 0.27
1118 + SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1119 + MC yield ZZ 126.00
1120 + MC total yield 130.32
1121 + data yield 136
1122 + Plotting var dileppt flavor sf
1123 + compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1124 + MC yield VVV 1.40
1125 + MC yield ttV 2.64
1126 + MC yield single top 0.00
1127 + MC yield WW 0.00
1128 + MC yield ttbar 0.00
1129 + SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1130 + MC yield zjets 0.00
1131 + MC yield WZ 0.27
1132 + SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1133 + MC yield ZZ 126.00
1134 + MC total yield 130.33
1135 + data yield 136
1136 + \end{comment}
1137  
1138  
1139  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines