| 871 |
|
in our preselection. We observe 106 events in data while the MC predicts $62\pm1.5$~(stat), representing an excess of 71\%, |
| 872 |
|
as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}. |
| 873 |
|
This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 70\% on the WZ yield. |
| 874 |
+ |
A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}. |
| 875 |
|
|
| 876 |
|
\begin{comment} |
| 877 |
|
We note some possible contributions to this discrepancy: |
| 936 |
|
|
| 937 |
|
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 938 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 939 |
< |
\caption{\label{tab:wz2j} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection and \njets\ $>$ 2. } |
| 939 |
> |
\caption{\label{tab:wz2j} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection and \njets\ $\geq$ 2. } |
| 940 |
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc} |
| 941 |
|
\hline |
| 942 |
|
\hline |
| 968 |
|
|
| 969 |
|
\begin{figure}[tbh] |
| 970 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 971 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_92fb.pdf} |
| 971 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_eemm_92fb.pdf} |
| 972 |
|
\caption{\label{fig:wz}\protect |
| 973 |
|
Data vs. MC comparisons for the WZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi. |
| 974 |
|
The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed. |
| 1032 |
|
|
| 1033 |
|
\begin{figure}[tbh] |
| 1034 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 1035 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_92fb.pdf} |
| 1035 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_eemm_92fb.pdf} |
| 1036 |
|
\caption{\label{fig:zz}\protect |
| 1037 |
|
Data vs. MC comparisons for the ZZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi. |
| 1038 |
|
The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed. |
