ViewVC Help

View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing

root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.10 by benhoob, Tue Oct 2 09:27:42 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.17 by benhoob, Thu Jan 17 13:26:49 2013 UTC

#	Line 78 | Line 78 | Thus we calculate the quantity:
78
79		\begin{equation}
80		R_{\mu e} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{offline}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{offline}}}} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}}}
81	<	= \sqrt{\frac{144122/0.88}{110325/0.95}} = 1.19\pm0.07.
81	>	= \sqrt{\frac{304953/0.88}{239661/0.95}} = 1.17\pm0.07.
82		\end{equation}
83
84		Here we have used the Z$\to\mu\mu$ and Z$\to$ee yields from Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} and the trigger efficiencies quoted in Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets}.
#	Line 87 | Line 87 | The predicted yields in the ee and $\mu\
87
88		\begin{itemize}
89		\item $N_{ee}^{\rm{predicted}}    = \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {\epsilon_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} \frac {\epsilon_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}} {2 R_{\mu e}}
90	<	= \frac{N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{0.92}\frac{0.95}{2\times1.26} = (0.43\pm0.05) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$ ,
90	>	= \frac{N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{0.92}\frac{0.95}{2\times1.17} = (0.44\pm0.05) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$ ,
91		\item $N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {\epsilon_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} \frac {\epsilon_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}} R_{\mu e}}  {2}
92	<	= \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {0.95} \frac {0.88 \times 1.26}{2} = (0.55\pm0.07) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$,
92	>	= \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {0.95} \frac {0.88 \times 1.17}{2} = (0.54\pm0.07) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$,
93		\end{itemize}
94
95		and the predicted yield in the combined ee and $\mu\mu$ channel is simply the sum of these two predictions:
96
97		\begin{itemize}
98	<	\item $N_{ee+\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = (0.99\pm0.06)\times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$.
98	>	\item $N_{ee+\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = (0.98\pm0.06)\times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$.
99		\end{itemize}
100
101		Note that the relative uncertainty in the combined ee and $\mu\mu$ prediction is smaller than those for the individual ee and $\mu\mu$ predictions
#	Line 113 | Line 113 | for all \MET\ regions up to  \MET\ $>$ 1
113		\begin{figure}[!ht]
114		\begin{center}
115		\begin{tabular}{cc}
116	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_92fb.pdf} &
117	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_92fb.pdf} \\
116	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_19fb.pdf} &
117	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_19fb.pdf} \\
118		\end{tabular}
119		\caption{\label{fig:K_incl}
120		The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the dilepton mass requirement, $K$, in data and simulation for inclusive \MET\ intervals (left) and
#	Line 127 | Line 127 | exclusive \MET\ intervals (right) for th
127		EXCLUSIVE RESULTS
128		----------------------------------------
129
130	–	root [3] extractK(true,false,false)
130		Using selection : ((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20)
131		Using weight    : vtxweight * weight
132	<	OF entries (total)  21691
133	<	OF entries (Z mass) 2934
134	<	K                   0.135263
132	>	OF entries (total)  44537
133	>	OF entries (Z mass) 6051
134	>	K                   0.135865
135		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
136		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
137
#	Line 140 | Line 139 | Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
139		pfmet>0   && pfmet<30
140
141		data  :
142	<	total : 3650
143	<	Z     : 461
144	<	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.006
142	>	total : 7563
143	>	Z     : 957
144	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.004
145
146		MC    :
147		total : 399.019
#	Line 155 | Line 154 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.007
154		pfmet>30  && pfmet<60
155
156		data  :
157	<	total : 6951
158	<	Z     : 904
159	<	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.004
157	>	total : 14185
158	>	Z     : 1893
159	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.003
160
161		MC    :
162		total : 755.309
#	Line 170 | Line 169 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.003
169		pfmet>60  && pfmet<100
170
171		data  :
172	<	total : 7206
173	<	Z     : 1037
174	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.004
172	>	total : 14928
173	>	Z     : 2122
174	>	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.003
175
176		MC    :
177		total : 838.418
#	Line 185 | Line 184 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.003
184		pfmet>100 && pfmet<200
185
186		data  :
187	<	total : 3690
188	<	Z     : 512
189	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.006
187	>	total : 7437
188	>	Z     : 1029
189	>	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.004
190
191		MC    :
192		total : 451.624
#	Line 200 | Line 199 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.004
199		pfmet>200 && pfmet<300
200
201		data  :
202	<	total : 172
203	<	Z     : 17
204	<	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.024
202	>	total : 371
203	>	Z     : 44
204	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.018
205
206		MC    :
207		total : 24.2441
#	Line 215 | Line 214 | K     : 0.11 +/- 0.013
214		pfmet>300
215
216		data  :
217	<	total : 22
218	<	Z     : 3
219	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.079
217	>	total : 53
218	>	Z     : 6
219	>	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.046
220
221		MC    :
222		total : 4.53108
#	Line 226 | Line 225 | K     : 0.05 +/- 0.022
225		--------------------------------------------------------------
226
227
229	–
228		----------------------------------------
229		INCLUSIVE RESULTS
230		----------------------------------------
231
234	–	root [4] extractK(false,false,false)
232		Using selection : ((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20)
233		Using weight    : vtxweight * weight
234	<	OF entries (total)  21691
235	<	OF entries (Z mass) 2934
236	<	K                   0.135263
234	>	OF entries (total)  44537
235	>	OF entries (Z mass) 6051
236	>	K                   0.135865
237		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
238		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
239
#	Line 244 | Line 241 | Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
241		pfmet>0
242
243		data  :
244	<	total : 21691
245	<	Z     : 2934
244	>	total : 44537
245	>	Z     : 6051
246		K     : 0.14 +/- 0.002
247
248		MC    :
#	Line 259 | Line 256 | K     : 0.14 +/- 0.002
256		pfmet>30
257
258		data  :
259	<	total : 18041
260	<	Z     : 2473
261	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.003
259	>	total : 36974
260	>	Z     : 5094
261	>	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.002
262
263		MC    :
264		total : 2074.05
#	Line 274 | Line 271 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.002
271		pfmet>60
272
273		data  :
274	<	total : 11090
275	<	Z     : 1569
276	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.004
274	>	total : 22789
275	>	Z     : 3201
276	>	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.002
277
278		MC    :
279		total : 1318.79
#	Line 289 | Line 286 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.002
286		pfmet>100
287
288		data  :
289	<	total : 3884
290	<	Z     : 532
291	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.006
289	>	total : 7861
290	>	Z     : 1079
291	>	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.004
292
293		MC    :
294		total : 480.402
#	Line 304 | Line 301 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.004
301		pfmet>200
302
303		data  :
304	<	total : 194
305	<	Z     : 20
306	<	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.023
304	>	total : 424
305	>	Z     : 50
306	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.017
307
308		MC    :
309		total : 28.7751
#	Line 319 | Line 316 | K     : 0.10 +/- 0.012
316		pfmet>300
317
318		data  :
319	<	total : 22
320	<	Z     : 3
321	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.079
319	>	total : 53
320	>	Z     : 6
321	>	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.046
322
323		MC    :
324		total : 4.53108
#	Line 337 | Line 334 | K     : 0.05 +/- 0.022
334		\begin{figure}[!hb]
335		\begin{center}
336		\begin{tabular}{cc}
337	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf} &
338	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf} \\
337	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_bveto_19fb.pdf} &
338	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_bveto_19fb.pdf} \\
339		\end{tabular}
340		\caption{
341		The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the dilepton mass requirement, $K$, in data and simulation for inclusive \MET\ intervals (left) and
#	Line 350 | Line 347 | For higher \MET\ regions we chose $K=0.1
347		}
348		\begin{comment}
349
353	–	root [2] extractK(true,false,true)
350		Using selection : (((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20))&&(nbcsvm==0)
351		Using weight    : vtxweight * weight
352	<	OF entries (total)  5756
353	<	OF entries (Z mass) 654
354	<	K                   0.113621
355	<	Warning in <TStreamerInfo::Compile>: Counter fNClusterRange should not be skipped from class TTree
356	<	Info in <TCanvas::MakeDefCanvas>:  created default TCanvas with name c1
352	>	OF entries (total)  12006
353	>	OF entries (Z mass) 1407
354	>	K                   0.117191
355	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
356	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
357
358		--------------------------------------------------------------
359		pfmet>0   && pfmet<30
360
361		data  :
362	<	total : 1303
363	<	Z     : 126
364	<	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.009
362	>	total : 2719
363	>	Z     : 273
364	>	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.006
365
366		MC    :
367		total : 131.974
#	Line 378 | Line 374 | K     : 0.12 +/- 0.020
374		pfmet>30  && pfmet<60
375
376		data  :
377	<	total : 1818
378	<	Z     : 190
379	<	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.008
377	>	total : 3842
378	>	Z     : 435
379	>	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.005
380
381		MC    :
382		total : 172.956
#	Line 393 | Line 389 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.007
389		pfmet>60  && pfmet<80
390
391		data  :
392	<	total : 994
393	<	Z     : 122
394	<	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.011
392	>	total : 2029
393	>	Z     : 269
394	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.008
395
396		MC    :
397		total : 109.789
#	Line 408 | Line 404 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.008
404		pfmet>80  && pfmet<100
405
406		data  :
407	<	total : 699
408	<	Z     : 99
409	<	K     : 0.14 +/- 0.014
407	>	total : 1490
408	>	Z     : 194
409	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.009
410
411		MC    :
412		total : 73.3643
#	Line 423 | Line 419 | K     : 0.16 +/- 0.010
419		pfmet>100 && pfmet<150
420
421		data  :
422	<	total : 722
423	<	Z     : 93
424	<	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.013
422	>	total : 1467
423	>	Z     : 189
424	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.009
425
426		MC    :
427		total : 86.7947
#	Line 438 | Line 434 | K     : 0.14 +/- 0.009
434		pfmet>150 && pfmet<200
435
436		data  :
437	<	total : 163
438	<	Z     : 18
439	<	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.026
437	>	total : 320
438	>	Z     : 31
439	>	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.017
440
441		MC    :
442		total : 19.4473
#	Line 453 | Line 449 | K     : 0.15 +/- 0.017
449		pfmet>200
450
451		data  :
452	<	total : 57
453	<	Z     : 6
454	<	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.043
452	>	total : 139
453	>	Z     : 16
454	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.029
455
456		MC    :
457		total : 8.99801
#	Line 463 | Line 459 | Z     : 0.794136
459		K     : 0.09 +/- 0.021
460		--------------------------------------------------------------
461
462	<	root [3] Info in <TCanvas::Print>: pdf file /Users/benhoob/tas/ZMet2012/plots/extractK_exclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf has been created
463	<
464	<	root [3]
469	<	root [3] extractK(false,false,true)
462	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hdummy (Potential memory leak).
463	>	Info in <TCanvas::Print>: pdf file ../plots/extractK_exclusive_bveto.pdf has been created
464	>	root [3] extractK(false,true,true)
465		Using selection : (((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20))&&(nbcsvm==0)
466		Using weight    : vtxweight * weight
467	<	OF entries (total)  5756
468	<	OF entries (Z mass) 654
469	<	K                   0.113621
467	>	OF entries (total)  12006
468	>	OF entries (Z mass) 1407
469	>	K                   0.117191
470		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
471		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
472
#	Line 479 | Line 474 | Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
474		pfmet>0
475
476		data  :
477	<	total : 5756
478	<	Z     : 654
479	<	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.004
477	>	total : 12006
478	>	Z     : 1407
479	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.003
480
481		MC    :
482		total : 603.333
#	Line 494 | Line 489 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.005
489		pfmet>30
490
491		data  :
492	<	total : 4453
493	<	Z     : 528
494	<	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.005
492	>	total : 9287
493	>	Z     : 1134
494	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.004
495
496		MC    :
497		total : 471.396
#	Line 509 | Line 504 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.004
504		pfmet>60
505
506		data  :
507	<	total : 2635
508	<	Z     : 338
509	<	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.007
507	>	total : 5445
508	>	Z     : 699
509	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.005
510
511		MC    :
512		total : 298.41
#	Line 524 | Line 519 | K     : 0.14 +/- 0.005
519		pfmet>80
520
521		data  :
522	<	total : 1641
523	<	Z     : 216
524	<	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.009
522	>	total : 3416
523	>	Z     : 430
524	>	K     : 0.13 +/- 0.006
525
526		MC    :
527		total : 188.602
#	Line 539 | Line 534 | K     : 0.14 +/- 0.006
534		pfmet>100
535
536		data  :
537	<	total : 942
538	<	Z     : 117
539	<	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.011
537	>	total : 1926
538	>	Z     : 236
539	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.008
540
541		MC    :
542		total : 115.24
#	Line 554 | Line 549 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.008
549		pfmet>150
550
551		data  :
552	<	total : 220
553	<	Z     : 24
554	<	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.022
552	>	total : 459
553	>	Z     : 47
554	>	K     : 0.10 +/- 0.015
555
556		MC    :
557		total : 28.4454
#	Line 569 | Line 564 | K     : 0.13 +/- 0.014
564		pfmet>200
565
566		data  :
567	<	total : 57
568	<	Z     : 6
569	<	K     : 0.11 +/- 0.043
567	>	total : 139
568	>	Z     : 16
569	>	K     : 0.12 +/- 0.029
570
571		MC    :
572		total : 8.99801
#	Line 861 | Line 856 | A pure WZ sample can be selected in data
856		\end{itemize}
857
858		The data and MC yields passing the above selection are in Table~\ref{tab:wz}.
859	<	The inclusive yields (without any jet requirements) agree within 13\%, which is consistent within
860	<	the uncertainty in the CMS measured WZ cross section (17\%). A data vs. MC comparison of kinematic
859	>	The inclusive yields (without any jet requirements) agree within 16\%, which is consistent within
860	>	the $\approx$15\% uncertainty in the theory prediction for the WZ cross section. A data vs. MC comparison of kinematic
861		distributions (jet multiplicity, \MET, Z \pt) is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:wz}. High \MET\
862		values in WZ and ZZ events arise from highly boosted W or Z bosons that decay leptonically,
863		and we therefore check that the MC does a reasonable job of reproducing the \pt distributions of the
864		leptonically decaying \Z. While the inclusive WZ yields are in reasonable agreement, we observe
865		an excess in data in events with at least 2 jets, corresponding to the jet multiplicity requirement
866	<	in our preselection. We observe 106 events in data while the MC predicts $62\pm1.5$~(stat), representing an excess of 71\%,
867	<	as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}.
868	<	This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 70\% on the WZ yield.
869	<	A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}.
866	>	in our preselection. We observe 200 events in data while the MC predicts $130\pm3.1$~(stat), representing an excess of 53\%,
867	>	as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}, and we therefore assess an uncertainty of 50\% on the WZ background.
868	>	%We note that the contributions from fake leptons and from \zjets\ with mismeasured \MET\
869	>	%is underestimated in the MC.
870	>	%This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 50\% on the WZ yield.
871	>	%A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}.
872
873		\begin{comment}
874		We note some possible contributions to this discrepancy:
#	Line 906 | Line 903 | requiring the jets to be consistent with
903		\begin{center}
904		\caption{\label{tab:wz} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection. }
905		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
906	+
907	+	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
908	+	%Using selection         : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
909	+	%Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
910	+
911		\hline
912		\hline
913	<	Sample   &            ee    &        $\mu\mu$   &        e$\mu$   &          total  \\
913	>	Sample   &             ee   &       $\mu\mu$   &         e$\mu$   &          total  \\
914		\hline
915	<
916	<	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-01-04
917	<	%Using selection         : ((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
918	<	%Using weight            : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
919	<
920	<	WZ   &116.7 $\pm$ 0.8   &151.5 $\pm$ 0.8   &  8.1 $\pm$ 0.2   &276.3 $\pm$ 1.2  \\
921	<	ttV   &  4.1 $\pm$ 0.2   &  4.9 $\pm$ 0.2   &  1.2 $\pm$ 0.1   & 10.2 $\pm$ 0.3  \\
922	<	\ttbar   &  1.2 $\pm$ 0.6   &  3.2 $\pm$ 0.9   &  3.6 $\pm$ 1.0   &  7.9 $\pm$ 1.5  \\
923	<	ZZ   &  2.5 $\pm$ 0.0   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.0   &  6.1 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
922	<	\zjets   &  1.2 $\pm$ 0.9   &  3.0 $\pm$ 1.8   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  4.2 $\pm$ 2.1  \\
923	<	vvv   &  1.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  2.1 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.3 $\pm$ 0.0   &  4.0 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
924	<	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.2   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
925	<	WW   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
915	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
916	>	WZ   &244.9 $\pm$ 1.6   &317.9 $\pm$ 1.8   & 17.0 $\pm$ 0.4   &579.7 $\pm$ 2.4  \\
917	>	\zjets   &  2.5 $\pm$ 2.0   &  6.4 $\pm$ 3.9   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  8.9 $\pm$ 4.3  \\
918	>	ZZ   &  5.3 $\pm$ 0.0   &  7.1 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0   & 12.8 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
919	>	\ttbar   &  2.5 $\pm$ 1.3   &  6.7 $\pm$ 2.0   &  7.5 $\pm$ 2.1   & 16.7 $\pm$ 3.2  \\
920	>	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.5 $\pm$ 0.5   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.5 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
921	>	WW   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.3 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
922	>	ttV   &  8.6 $\pm$ 0.4   & 10.3 $\pm$ 0.4   &  2.5 $\pm$ 0.2   & 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7  \\
923	>	VVV   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.1   &  4.3 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  8.3 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
924		\hline
925	<	tot SM MC   &127.3 $\pm$ 1.4   &168.4 $\pm$ 2.3   & 13.5 $\pm$ 1.0   &309.2 $\pm$ 2.8  \\
925	>	tot SM MC   &267.1 $\pm$ 2.9   &353.3 $\pm$ 4.7   & 28.2 $\pm$ 2.2   &648.6 $\pm$ 6.0  \\
926		\hline
927	<	data   &            156   &            178   &             16   &            350  \\
927	>	data   &            312   &            391   &             50   &            753  \\
928		\hline
929		\hline
930
#	Line 938 | Line 936 | requiring the jets to be consistent with
936		\begin{center}
937		\caption{\label{tab:wz2j} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection and \njets\ $\geq$ 2. }
938		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
939	+
940	+	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
941	+	%-------------------------------------
942	+	%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
943	+	%-------------------------------------
944	+
945	+	%Using selection         : ((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2)
946	+	%Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
947	+
948		\hline
949		\hline
950	<	Sample   &            ee    &        $\mu\mu$   &        e$\mu$   &          total  \\
950	>	Sample   &             ee   &       $\mu\mu$   &         e$\mu$   &          total  \\
951		\hline
952	<
953	<	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-01-04
954	<	%Using selection         : (((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2)
955	<	%Using weight            : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
956	<
957	<	WZ   & 19.1 $\pm$ 0.3   & 24.6 $\pm$ 0.3   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.1   & 44.9 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
951	<	ttV   &  3.8 $\pm$ 0.2   &  4.5 $\pm$ 0.2   &  1.0 $\pm$ 0.1   &  9.3 $\pm$ 0.3  \\
952	<	\ttbar   &  0.8 $\pm$ 0.5   &  1.6 $\pm$ 0.7   &  0.9 $\pm$ 0.5   &  3.3 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
953	<	ZZ   &  0.5 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.7 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.2 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
954	<	\zjets   &  0.9 $\pm$ 0.9   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.9 $\pm$ 0.9  \\
955	<	vvv   &  0.9 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.2 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  2.2 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
956	<	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.2   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
952	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
953	>	\ttbar   &  1.6 $\pm$ 0.9   &  3.4 $\pm$ 1.5   &  1.8 $\pm$ 1.1   &  6.9 $\pm$ 2.0  \\
954	>	\zjets   &  1.9 $\pm$ 1.9   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.9 $\pm$ 1.9  \\
955	>	WZ   & 40.0 $\pm$ 0.7   & 51.5 $\pm$ 0.7   &  2.7 $\pm$ 0.2   & 94.3 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
956	>	ZZ   &  1.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  2.6 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
957	>	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.5 $\pm$ 0.5   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.5 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
958		WW   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
959	+	ttV   &  8.0 $\pm$ 0.4   &  9.5 $\pm$ 0.4   &  2.2 $\pm$ 0.2   & 19.6 $\pm$ 0.6  \\
960	+	VVV   &  1.9 $\pm$ 0.1   &  2.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.0   &  4.6 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
961		\hline
962	<	tot SM MC   & 25.9 $\pm$ 1.1   & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.8   &  3.3 $\pm$ 0.5   & 62.1 $\pm$ 1.5  \\
962	>	tot SM MC   & 54.4 $\pm$ 2.2   & 69.0 $\pm$ 1.8   &  6.9 $\pm$ 1.1   &130.4 $\pm$ 3.1  \\
963		\hline
964	<	data   &             47   &             51   &              8   &            106  \\
964	>	data   &             87   &             91   &             22   &            200  \\
965		\hline
966		\hline
967
#	Line 968 | Line 971 | requiring the jets to be consistent with
971
972		\begin{figure}[tbh]
973		\begin{center}
974	<	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_eemm_92fb.pdf}
974	>	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_19fb.pdf}
975		\caption{\label{fig:wz}\protect
976		Data vs. MC comparisons for the WZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi.
977		The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed.
975	–	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-01-04
976	–	%Using selection         : ((((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
977	–	%Using weight            : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
978		}
979	+	\begin{comment}
980	+	Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
981	+	Using selection         : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
982	+	Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
983	+	Plotting var njets flavor sf
984	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
985	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
986	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
987	+	MC yield single top 0.51
988	+	MC yield WW 0.09
989	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
990	+	MC yield WZ 562.71
991	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
992	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
993	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
994	+	MC total yield 620.39
995	+	data yield 703
996	+	Plotting var pfmet flavor sf
997	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
998	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
999	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
1000	+	MC yield single top 0.51
1001	+	MC yield WW 0.09
1002	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
1003	+	MC yield WZ 562.72
1004	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
1005	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1006	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
1007	+	MC total yield 620.40
1008	+	data yield 703
1009	+	Plotting var dileppt flavor sf
1010	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1011	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
1012	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
1013	+	MC yield single top 0.51
1014	+	MC yield WW 0.09
1015	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
1016	+	MC yield WZ 562.71
1017	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
1018	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1019	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
1020	+	MC total yield 620.38
1021	+	data yield 703
1022	+	\end{comment}
1023	+
1024		\end{center}
1025		\end{figure}
1026
#	Line 993 | Line 1038 | A pure ZZ sample can be selected in data
1038
1039		The data and MC yields passing the above selection are in Table~\ref{tab:zz}.
1040		In this ZZ-dominated sample we observe good agreement between the data yield and the MC prediction.
1041	<	After requiring 2 jets (corresponding to the requirement in the analysis selection), we observe 4 events
1042	<	in data and the MC predicts $6.6\pm0.1$ events. Due to the limited statistical precision we assign an uncertainty
1043	<	fo 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1041	>	After requiring 2 jets (corresponding to the requirement in the analysis selection), we observe 14 events
1042	>	in data and the MC predicts $13.2\pm0.2$ events. Due to the limited statistical precision we assign an uncertainty
1043	>	of 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1044
1045		\begin{table}[htb]
1046		\begin{center}
1047		\caption{\label{tab:zz} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the ZZ preselection. }
1048		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1049	+
1050	+	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
1051	+	%Using selection         : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1052	+	%Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
1053	+
1054		\hline
1055		\hline
1056		Sample   &             ee   &       $\mu\mu$   &         e$\mu$   &          total  \\
1057		\hline
1008	–
1009	–	%Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-01-04
1010	–	%Using selection         : (((((isdata==0 || (run<197556 || run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1011	–	%Using weight            : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
1012	–	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1058		%SCALING ZZ BY 1.92
1059	<
1060	<	ZZ   & 25.1 $\pm$ 0.1   & 34.9 $\pm$ 0.1   &  1.6 $\pm$ 0.0   & 61.7 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
1061	<	ttV   &  0.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.2 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.4 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
1017	<	VVV   &  0.3 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.7 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1018	<	WZ   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1059	>	ZZ   & 52.7 $\pm$ 0.2   & 73.3 $\pm$ 0.2   &  3.4 $\pm$ 0.0   &129.4 $\pm$ 0.3  \\
1060	>	WZ   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.1 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.3 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
1061	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1062		\zjets   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1063		\ttbar   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1021	–	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1064		WW   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1065	+	single top   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0  \\
1066	+	ttV   &  1.3 $\pm$ 0.2   &  1.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &  0.3 $\pm$ 0.1   &  3.0 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
1067	+	VVV   &  0.6 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.8 $\pm$ 0.1   &  0.0 $\pm$ 0.0   &  1.4 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
1068		\hline
1069	<	tot SM MC   & 26.1 $\pm$ 0.1   & 36.1 $\pm$ 0.1   &  1.8 $\pm$ 0.0   & 63.9 $\pm$ 0.2  \\
1069	>	tot SM MC   & 54.7 $\pm$ 0.3   & 75.6 $\pm$ 0.3   &  3.8 $\pm$ 0.1   &134.1 $\pm$ 0.4  \\
1070		\hline
1071	<	data   &             24   &             36   &              0   &             60  \\
1071	>	data   &             56   &             80   &              5   &            141  \\
1072		\hline
1073		\hline
1074	+
1075		\end{tabular}
1076		\end{center}
1077		\end{table}
1078
1079		\begin{figure}[tbh]
1080		\begin{center}
1081	<	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_eemm_92fb.pdf}
1081	>	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/ZZ_19fb.pdf}
1082		\caption{\label{fig:zz}\protect
1083		Data vs. MC comparisons for the ZZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi.
1084		The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed.
#	Line 1040 | Line 1086 | The number of jets, missing transverse e
1086		\end{center}
1087		\end{figure}
1088
1089	+	\begin{comment}
1090	+	Loading babies at       : ../output/V00-02-00
1091	+	Using selection         : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1092	+	Using weight            : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
1093	+	Plotting var njets flavor sf
1094	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1095	+
1096	+	MC yield VVV 1.40
1097	+	MC yield ttV 2.64
1098	+	MC yield single top 0.00
1099	+	MC yield WW 0.00
1100	+	MC yield ttbar 0.00
1101	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1102	+	MC yield zjets 0.00
1103	+	MC yield WZ 0.27
1104	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1105	+	MC yield ZZ 125.99
1106	+	MC total yield 130.31
1107	+	data yield 136
1108	+	Plotting var pfmet flavor sf
1109	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1110	+	MC yield VVV 1.40
1111	+	MC yield ttV 2.64
1112	+	MC yield single top 0.00
1113	+	MC yield WW 0.00
1114	+	MC yield ttbar 0.00
1115	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1116	+	MC yield zjets 0.00
1117	+	MC yield WZ 0.27
1118	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1119	+	MC yield ZZ 126.00
1120	+	MC total yield 130.32
1121	+	data yield 136
1122	+	Plotting var dileppt flavor sf
1123	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1124	+	MC yield VVV 1.40
1125	+	MC yield ttV 2.64
1126	+	MC yield single top 0.00
1127	+	MC yield WW 0.00
1128	+	MC yield ttbar 0.00
1129	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1130	+	MC yield zjets 0.00
1131	+	MC yield WZ 0.27
1132	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 1.92
1133	+	MC yield ZZ 126.00
1134	+	MC total yield 130.33
1135	+	data yield 136
1136	+	\end{comment}
1137
1138
1139

Diff Legend

–	Removed lines
+	Added lines
<	Changed lines
>	Changed lines