[ViewVC] Diff of: cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.9 by benhoob, Mon Sep 24 20:26:21 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.13 by benhoob, Wed Dec 19 22:38:55 2012 UTC

#	Line 78 \| Line 78 \| Thus we calculate the quantity:
78
79		\begin{equation}
80		R_{\mu e} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{offline}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{offline}}}} = \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{N_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}/\epsilon_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}}}
81	<	= \sqrt{\frac{144122/0.88}{110325/0.95}} = 1.19\pm0.07.
81	>	= \sqrt{\frac{297240/0.88}{233805/0.95}} = 1.17\pm0.07.
82		\end{equation}
83
84		Here we have used the Z$\to\mu\mu$ and Z$\to$ee yields from Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} and the trigger efficiencies quoted in Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets}.
#	Line 87 \| Line 87 \| The predicted yields in the ee and $\mu\
87
88		\begin{itemize}
89		\item $N_{ee}^{\rm{predicted}} = \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {\epsilon_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} \frac {\epsilon_{ee}^{\rm{trig}}} {2 R_{\mu e}}
90	<	= \frac{N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{0.92}\frac{0.95}{2\times1.26} = (0.43\pm0.05) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$ ,
90	>	= \frac{N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}}{0.92}\frac{0.95}{2\times1.17} = (0.44\pm0.05) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$ ,
91		\item $N_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {\epsilon_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} \frac {\epsilon_{\mu\mu}^{\rm{trig}} R_{\mu e}} {2}
92	<	= \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {0.95} \frac {0.88 \times 1.26}{2} = (0.55\pm0.07) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$,
92	>	= \frac {N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}} {0.95} \frac {0.88 \times 1.17}{2} = (0.54\pm0.07) \times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$,
93		\end{itemize}
94
95		and the predicted yield in the combined ee and $\mu\mu$ channel is simply the sum of these two predictions:
96
97		\begin{itemize}
98	<	\item $N_{ee+\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = (0.99\pm0.06)\times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$.
98	>	\item $N_{ee+\mu\mu}^{\rm{predicted}} = (0.98\pm0.06)\times N_{e\mu}^{\rm{trig}}$.
99		\end{itemize}
100
101		Note that the relative uncertainty in the combined ee and $\mu\mu$ prediction is smaller than those for the individual ee and $\mu\mu$ predictions
#	Line 113 \| Line 113 \| for all \MET\ regions up to \MET\ $>$ 1
113		\begin{figure}[!ht]
114		\begin{center}
115		\begin{tabular}{cc}
116	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_92fb.pdf} &
117	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_92fb.pdf} \\
116	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_19fb.pdf} &
117	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_19fb.pdf} \\
118		\end{tabular}
119		\caption{\label{fig:K_incl}
120		The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the dilepton mass requirement, $K$, in data and simulation for inclusive \MET\ intervals (left) and
#	Line 127 \| Line 127 \| exclusive \MET\ intervals (right) for th
127		EXCLUSIVE RESULTS
128		----------------------------------------
129
130	–	root [3] extractK(true,false,false)
130		Using selection : ((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20)
131		Using weight : vtxweight * weight
132	<	OF entries (total) 21691
133	<	OF entries (Z mass) 2934
134	<	K 0.135263
132	>	OF entries (total) 44537
133	>	OF entries (Z mass) 6051
134	>	K 0.135865
135		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
136		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
137
#	Line 140 \| Line 139 \| Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
139		pfmet>0 && pfmet<30
140
141		data :
142	<	total : 3650
143	<	Z : 461
144	<	K : 0.13 +/- 0.006
142	>	total : 7563
143	>	Z : 957
144	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.004
145
146		MC :
147		total : 399.019
#	Line 155 \| Line 154 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.007
154		pfmet>30 && pfmet<60
155
156		data :
157	<	total : 6951
158	<	Z : 904
159	<	K : 0.13 +/- 0.004
157	>	total : 14185
158	>	Z : 1893
159	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.003
160
161		MC :
162		total : 755.309
#	Line 170 \| Line 169 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.003
169		pfmet>60 && pfmet<100
170
171		data :
172	<	total : 7206
173	<	Z : 1037
174	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.004
172	>	total : 14928
173	>	Z : 2122
174	>	K : 0.14 +/- 0.003
175
176		MC :
177		total : 838.418
#	Line 185 \| Line 184 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.003
184		pfmet>100 && pfmet<200
185
186		data :
187	<	total : 3690
188	<	Z : 512
189	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.006
187	>	total : 7437
188	>	Z : 1029
189	>	K : 0.14 +/- 0.004
190
191		MC :
192		total : 451.624
#	Line 200 \| Line 199 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.004
199		pfmet>200 && pfmet<300
200
201		data :
202	<	total : 172
203	<	Z : 17
204	<	K : 0.10 +/- 0.024
202	>	total : 371
203	>	Z : 44
204	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.018
205
206		MC :
207		total : 24.2441
#	Line 215 \| Line 214 \| K : 0.11 +/- 0.013
214		pfmet>300
215
216		data :
217	<	total : 22
218	<	Z : 3
219	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.079
217	>	total : 53
218	>	Z : 6
219	>	K : 0.11 +/- 0.046
220
221		MC :
222		total : 4.53108
#	Line 226 \| Line 225 \| K : 0.05 +/- 0.022
225		--------------------------------------------------------------
226
227
229	–
228		----------------------------------------
229		INCLUSIVE RESULTS
230		----------------------------------------
231
234	–	root [4] extractK(false,false,false)
232		Using selection : ((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20)
233		Using weight : vtxweight * weight
234	<	OF entries (total) 21691
235	<	OF entries (Z mass) 2934
236	<	K 0.135263
234	>	OF entries (total) 44537
235	>	OF entries (Z mass) 6051
236	>	K 0.135865
237		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
238		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
239
#	Line 244 \| Line 241 \| Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
241		pfmet>0
242
243		data :
244	<	total : 21691
245	<	Z : 2934
244	>	total : 44537
245	>	Z : 6051
246		K : 0.14 +/- 0.002
247
248		MC :
#	Line 259 \| Line 256 \| K : 0.14 +/- 0.002
256		pfmet>30
257
258		data :
259	<	total : 18041
260	<	Z : 2473
261	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.003
259	>	total : 36974
260	>	Z : 5094
261	>	K : 0.14 +/- 0.002
262
263		MC :
264		total : 2074.05
#	Line 274 \| Line 271 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.002
271		pfmet>60
272
273		data :
274	<	total : 11090
275	<	Z : 1569
276	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.004
274	>	total : 22789
275	>	Z : 3201
276	>	K : 0.14 +/- 0.002
277
278		MC :
279		total : 1318.79
#	Line 289 \| Line 286 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.002
286		pfmet>100
287
288		data :
289	<	total : 3884
290	<	Z : 532
291	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.006
289	>	total : 7861
290	>	Z : 1079
291	>	K : 0.14 +/- 0.004
292
293		MC :
294		total : 480.402
#	Line 304 \| Line 301 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.004
301		pfmet>200
302
303		data :
304	<	total : 194
305	<	Z : 20
306	<	K : 0.10 +/- 0.023
304	>	total : 424
305	>	Z : 50
306	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.017
307
308		MC :
309		total : 28.7751
#	Line 319 \| Line 316 \| K : 0.10 +/- 0.012
316		pfmet>300
317
318		data :
319	<	total : 22
320	<	Z : 3
321	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.079
319	>	total : 53
320	>	Z : 6
321	>	K : 0.11 +/- 0.046
322
323		MC :
324		total : 4.53108
#	Line 337 \| Line 334 \| K : 0.05 +/- 0.022
334		\begin{figure}[!hb]
335		\begin{center}
336		\begin{tabular}{cc}
337	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf} &
338	<	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf} \\
337	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_inclusive_bveto_19fb.pdf} &
338	>	\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{plots/extractK_exclusive_bveto_19fb.pdf} \\
339		\end{tabular}
340		\caption{
341		The efficiency for e$\mu$ events to satisfy the dilepton mass requirement, $K$, in data and simulation for inclusive \MET\ intervals (left) and
#	Line 350 \| Line 347 \| For higher \MET\ regions we chose $K=0.1
347		}
348		\begin{comment}
349
353	–	root [2] extractK(true,false,true)
350		Using selection : (((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20))&&(nbcsvm==0)
351		Using weight : vtxweight * weight
352	<	OF entries (total) 5756
353	<	OF entries (Z mass) 654
354	<	K 0.113621
355	<	Warning in <TStreamerInfo::Compile>: Counter fNClusterRange should not be skipped from class TTree
356	<	Info in <TCanvas::MakeDefCanvas>: created default TCanvas with name c1
352	>	OF entries (total) 12006
353	>	OF entries (Z mass) 1407
354	>	K 0.117191
355	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
356	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
357
358		--------------------------------------------------------------
359		pfmet>0 && pfmet<30
360
361		data :
362	<	total : 1303
363	<	Z : 126
364	<	K : 0.10 +/- 0.009
362	>	total : 2719
363	>	Z : 273
364	>	K : 0.10 +/- 0.006
365
366		MC :
367		total : 131.974
#	Line 378 \| Line 374 \| K : 0.12 +/- 0.020
374		pfmet>30 && pfmet<60
375
376		data :
377	<	total : 1818
378	<	Z : 190
379	<	K : 0.10 +/- 0.008
377	>	total : 3842
378	>	Z : 435
379	>	K : 0.11 +/- 0.005
380
381		MC :
382		total : 172.956
#	Line 393 \| Line 389 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.007
389		pfmet>60 && pfmet<80
390
391		data :
392	<	total : 994
393	<	Z : 122
394	<	K : 0.12 +/- 0.011
392	>	total : 2029
393	>	Z : 269
394	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.008
395
396		MC :
397		total : 109.789
#	Line 408 \| Line 404 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.008
404		pfmet>80 && pfmet<100
405
406		data :
407	<	total : 699
408	<	Z : 99
409	<	K : 0.14 +/- 0.014
407	>	total : 1490
408	>	Z : 194
409	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.009
410
411		MC :
412		total : 73.3643
#	Line 423 \| Line 419 \| K : 0.16 +/- 0.010
419		pfmet>100 && pfmet<150
420
421		data :
422	<	total : 722
423	<	Z : 93
424	<	K : 0.13 +/- 0.013
422	>	total : 1467
423	>	Z : 189
424	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.009
425
426		MC :
427		total : 86.7947
#	Line 438 \| Line 434 \| K : 0.14 +/- 0.009
434		pfmet>150 && pfmet<200
435
436		data :
437	<	total : 163
438	<	Z : 18
439	<	K : 0.11 +/- 0.026
437	>	total : 320
438	>	Z : 31
439	>	K : 0.10 +/- 0.017
440
441		MC :
442		total : 19.4473
#	Line 453 \| Line 449 \| K : 0.15 +/- 0.017
449		pfmet>200
450
451		data :
452	<	total : 57
453	<	Z : 6
454	<	K : 0.11 +/- 0.043
452	>	total : 139
453	>	Z : 16
454	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.029
455
456		MC :
457		total : 8.99801
#	Line 463 \| Line 459 \| Z : 0.794136
459		K : 0.09 +/- 0.021
460		--------------------------------------------------------------
461
462	<	root [3] Info in <TCanvas::Print>: pdf file /Users/benhoob/tas/ZMet2012/plots/extractK_exclusive_bvetoMedium_92fb.pdf has been created
463	<
464	<	root [3]
469	<	root [3] extractK(false,false,true)
462	>	Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hdummy (Potential memory leak).
463	>	Info in <TCanvas::Print>: pdf file ../plots/extractK_exclusive_bveto.pdf has been created
464	>	root [3] extractK(false,true,true)
465		Using selection : (((((leptype==2)&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913)))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20 && lep2.pt()>20))&&(nbcsvm==0)
466		Using weight : vtxweight * weight
467	<	OF entries (total) 5756
468	<	OF entries (Z mass) 654
469	<	K 0.113621
467	>	OF entries (total) 12006
468	>	OF entries (Z mass) 1407
469	>	K 0.117191
470		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htot (Potential memory leak).
471		Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: hZ (Potential memory leak).
472
#	Line 479 \| Line 474 \| Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing ex
474		pfmet>0
475
476		data :
477	<	total : 5756
478	<	Z : 654
479	<	K : 0.11 +/- 0.004
477	>	total : 12006
478	>	Z : 1407
479	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.003
480
481		MC :
482		total : 603.333
#	Line 494 \| Line 489 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.005
489		pfmet>30
490
491		data :
492	<	total : 4453
493	<	Z : 528
494	<	K : 0.12 +/- 0.005
492	>	total : 9287
493	>	Z : 1134
494	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.004
495
496		MC :
497		total : 471.396
#	Line 509 \| Line 504 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.004
504		pfmet>60
505
506		data :
507	<	total : 2635
508	<	Z : 338
509	<	K : 0.13 +/- 0.007
507	>	total : 5445
508	>	Z : 699
509	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.005
510
511		MC :
512		total : 298.41
#	Line 524 \| Line 519 \| K : 0.14 +/- 0.005
519		pfmet>80
520
521		data :
522	<	total : 1641
523	<	Z : 216
524	<	K : 0.13 +/- 0.009
522	>	total : 3416
523	>	Z : 430
524	>	K : 0.13 +/- 0.006
525
526		MC :
527		total : 188.602
#	Line 539 \| Line 534 \| K : 0.14 +/- 0.006
534		pfmet>100
535
536		data :
537	<	total : 942
538	<	Z : 117
539	<	K : 0.12 +/- 0.011
537	>	total : 1926
538	>	Z : 236
539	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.008
540
541		MC :
542		total : 115.24
#	Line 554 \| Line 549 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.008
549		pfmet>150
550
551		data :
552	<	total : 220
553	<	Z : 24
554	<	K : 0.11 +/- 0.022
552	>	total : 459
553	>	Z : 47
554	>	K : 0.10 +/- 0.015
555
556		MC :
557		total : 28.4454
#	Line 569 \| Line 564 \| K : 0.13 +/- 0.014
564		pfmet>200
565
566		data :
567	<	total : 57
568	<	Z : 6
569	<	K : 0.11 +/- 0.043
567	>	total : 139
568	>	Z : 16
569	>	K : 0.12 +/- 0.029
570
571		MC :
572		total : 8.99801
#	Line 871 \| Line 866 \| an excess in data in events with at leas
866		in our preselection. We observe 106 events in data while the MC predicts $62\pm1.5$~(stat), representing an excess of 71\%,
867		as indicated in Table~\ref{tab:wz2j}.
868		This excess will be studied further. For the time being, based on these studies we currently assess an uncertainty of 70\% on the WZ yield.
869	+	A data vs. MC comparison of several kinematic quantities in the sample with 3 leptons and at least 2 jets can be found in App.~\ref{app:WZ}.
870
871		\begin{comment}
872		We note some possible contributions to this discrepancy:
#	Line 905 \| Line 901 \| requiring the jets to be consistent with
901		\begin{center}
902		\caption{\label{tab:wz} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection. }
903		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
904	+
905	+	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
906	+	%Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
907	+	%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
908	+
909		\hline
910		\hline
911	<	Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
911	>	Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
912		\hline
913	<
914	<	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
915	<	%Using selection : ((((((isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
916	<	%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
917	<
918	<	WZ &116.7 $\pm$ 0.8 &151.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 8.1 $\pm$ 0.2 &276.3 $\pm$ 1.2 \\
919	<	ttV & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.2 & 4.9 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 10.2 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
920	<	\ttbar & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.6 & 3.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 3.6 $\pm$ 1.0 & 7.9 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
921	<	ZZ & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.0 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 6.1 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
921	<	\zjets & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.9 & 3.0 $\pm$ 1.8 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 4.2 $\pm$ 2.1 \\
922	<	vvv & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 4.0 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
923	<	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
924	<	WW & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
913	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
914	>	WZ &244.9 $\pm$ 1.6 &317.9 $\pm$ 1.8 & 17.0 $\pm$ 0.4 &579.7 $\pm$ 2.4 \\
915	>	\zjets & 2.5 $\pm$ 2.0 & 6.4 $\pm$ 3.9 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 8.9 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
916	>	ZZ & 5.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 7.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 12.8 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
917	>	\ttbar & 2.5 $\pm$ 1.3 & 6.7 $\pm$ 2.0 & 7.5 $\pm$ 2.1 & 16.7 $\pm$ 3.2 \\
918	>	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
919	>	WW & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
920	>	ttV & 8.6 $\pm$ 0.4 & 10.3 $\pm$ 0.4 & 2.5 $\pm$ 0.2 & 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7 \\
921	>	VVV & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 8.3 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
922		\hline
923	<	tot SM MC &127.3 $\pm$ 1.4 &168.4 $\pm$ 2.3 & 13.5 $\pm$ 1.0 &309.2 $\pm$ 2.8 \\
923	>	tot SM MC &267.1 $\pm$ 2.9 &353.3 $\pm$ 4.7 & 28.2 $\pm$ 2.2 &648.6 $\pm$ 6.0 \\
924		\hline
925	<	data & 156 & 178 & 16 & 350 \\
925	>	data & 312 & 391 & 50 & 753 \\
926		\hline
927		\hline
928
#	Line 937 \| Line 934 \| requiring the jets to be consistent with
934		\begin{center}
935		\caption{\label{tab:wz2j} Data and Monte Carlo yields passing the WZ preselection and \njets\ $\geq$ 2. }
936		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
937	+
938	+	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
939	+	%-------------------------------------
940	+	%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
941	+	%-------------------------------------
942	+
943	+	%Using selection : ((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2)
944	+	%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
945	+
946		\hline
947		\hline
948	<	Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
948	>	Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
949		\hline
950	<
951	<	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
952	<	%Using selection : (((((((isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2)
953	<	%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
954	<
955	<	WZ & 19.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 24.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 44.9 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
950	<	ttV & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.2 & 4.5 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.1 & 9.3 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
951	<	\ttbar & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.7 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
952	<	ZZ & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
953	<	\zjets & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
954	<	vvv & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
955	<	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
950	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
951	>	\ttbar & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.9 & 3.4 $\pm$ 1.5 & 1.8 $\pm$ 1.1 & 6.9 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
952	>	\zjets & 1.9 $\pm$ 1.9 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.9 $\pm$ 1.9 \\
953	>	WZ & 40.0 $\pm$ 0.7 & 51.5 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 94.3 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
954	>	ZZ & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
955	>	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
956		WW & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
957	+	ttV & 8.0 $\pm$ 0.4 & 9.5 $\pm$ 0.4 & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.2 & 19.6 $\pm$ 0.6 \\
958	+	VVV & 1.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 2.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
959		\hline
960	<	tot SM MC & 25.9 $\pm$ 1.1 & 32.9 $\pm$ 0.8 & 3.3 $\pm$ 0.5 & 62.1 $\pm$ 1.5 \\
960	>	tot SM MC & 54.4 $\pm$ 2.2 & 69.0 $\pm$ 1.8 & 6.9 $\pm$ 1.1 &130.4 $\pm$ 3.1 \\
961		\hline
962	<	data & 47 & 51 & 8 & 106 \\
962	>	data & 87 & 91 & 22 & 200 \\
963		\hline
964		\hline
965
#	Line 967 \| Line 969 \| requiring the jets to be consistent with
969
970		\begin{figure}[tbh]
971		\begin{center}
972	<	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_eemm_92fb.pdf}
972	>	\includegraphics[width=1\linewidth]{plots/WZ_19fb.pdf}
973		\caption{\label{fig:wz}\protect
974		Data vs. MC comparisons for the WZ selection discussed in the text for \lumi.
975		The number of jets, missing transverse energy, and Z boson transverse momentum are displayed.
974	–	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
975	–	%Using selection : ((((((isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
976	–	%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
976		}
977	+	\begin{comment}
978	+	Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
979	+	Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==3 && lep3.pt()>20.0))&&(pfmet>50))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
980	+	Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
981	+	Plotting var njets flavor sf
982	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
983	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
984	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
985	+	MC yield single top 0.51
986	+	MC yield WW 0.09
987	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
988	+	MC yield WZ 562.71
989	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
990	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
991	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
992	+	MC total yield 620.39
993	+	data yield 703
994	+	Plotting var pfmet flavor sf
995	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
996	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
997	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
998	+	MC yield single top 0.51
999	+	MC yield WW 0.09
1000	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
1001	+	MC yield WZ 562.72
1002	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
1003	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1004	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
1005	+	MC total yield 620.40
1006	+	data yield 703
1007	+	Plotting var dileppt flavor sf
1008	+	compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
1009	+	MC yield VVV 7.73
1010	+	MC yield ttV 18.95
1011	+	MC yield single top 0.51
1012	+	MC yield WW 0.09
1013	+	MC yield ZZ 12.38
1014	+	MC yield WZ 562.71
1015	+	MC yield ttbar 9.18
1016	+	SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1017	+	MC yield zjets 8.85
1018	+	MC total yield 620.38
1019	+	data yield 703
1020	+	\end{comment}
1021	+
1022		\end{center}
1023		\end{figure}
1024
#	Line 1000 \| Line 1044 \| fo 50\% on the ZZ yield.
1044		\begin{center}
1045		\caption{\label{tab:zz} Data and Monte Carlo yields for the ZZ preselection. }
1046		\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
1047	+
1048	+	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-00
1049	+	%Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1050	+	%Using weight : weight * 19.3 * trgeff * vtxweight
1051	+
1052		\hline
1053		\hline
1054		Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
1055		\hline
1007	–
1008	–	%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-01-04
1009	–	%Using selection : (((((isdata==0 \|\| (run<197556 \|\| run>198913))&&(((leptype==0 && (ee==1 \|\| isdata==0))\|\|(leptype==1 && (mm==1 \|\| isdata==0)))\|\|(leptype==2 && (em==1\|\|me==1\|\|isdata==0))))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==4 && lep3.pt()>20.0 && lep4.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
1010	–	%Using weight : weight * 9.2 * trgeff * vtxweight
1011	–	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1056		%SCALING ZZ BY 1.92
1057	<
1058	<	ZZ & 25.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 34.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.0 & 61.7 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
1059	<	ttV & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
1016	<	VVV & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1017	<	WZ & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1057	>	ZZ & 52.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 73.3 $\pm$ 0.2 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.0 &129.4 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
1058	>	WZ & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.1 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
1059	>	%SCALING ZJETS BY 111/946
1060		\zjets & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1061		\ttbar & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1020	–	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1062		WW & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1063	+	single top & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 \\
1064	+	ttV & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 & 3.0 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
1065	+	VVV & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.0 $\pm$ 0.0 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
1066		\hline
1067	<	tot SM MC & 26.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 36.1 $\pm$ 0.1 & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.0 & 63.9 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
1067	>	tot SM MC & 54.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 75.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.8 $\pm$ 0.1 &134.1 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
1068		\hline
1069	<	data & 24 & 36 & 0 & 60 \\
1069	>	data & 56 & 80 & 5 & 141 \\
1070		\hline
1071		\hline
1072	+
1073		\end{tabular}
1074		\end{center}
1075		\end{table}

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents): Revision 1.9 by benhoob, Mon Sep 24 20:26:21 2012 UTC vs. Revision 1.13 by benhoob, Wed Dec 19 22:38:55 2012 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/bkg.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.9 by benhoob, Mon Sep 24 20:26:21 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.13 by benhoob, Wed Dec 19 22:38:55 2012 UTC