1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\section{Selection}
|
4 |
|
|
\label{sec:eventSelection}
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
In this section, we list the event selection, electron and muon objects selections, jets, \MET, and b-tagging selections
|
7 |
|
|
used in this analysis. These selections are based on those recommended by the relevant POG's.
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
\subsection{Event Selection}
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
We require the presence of at least one primary vertex satisfying the standard quality criteria; namely,
|
12 |
|
|
vertex is not fake, $\rm{ndf}\geq4$, $\rho<2$ cm, and $|z|<24$ cm.
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
\subsection{Lepton Selection}
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Because Z $\rightarrow\ell\ell$ ($\ell=e,\mu$) is a final state with very little background,
|
17 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
we restrict ourselves to events in which the Z boson decays to electrons or muons only.
|
18 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Therefore opposite sign leptons passing the identification and isolation requirements described below are required in each event.
|
19 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
20 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
21 |
|
|
\item \pt $> 20$~GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$;
|
22 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item Opposite-sign same-flavor (SF) ee and $\mu\mu$ lepton pairs (opposite-flavor (OF) e$\mu$ lepton pairs are retained in a control
|
23 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
sample used to estimate the FS contribution);
|
24 |
|
|
\item For SF events, the dilepton invariant mass is required to be consistent with the Z mass; namely $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
25 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
\subsubsection{Electron Selection}
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
The electron selection is the loose working point recommended by the E/gamma POG, as documented at~\cite{ref:Egamma}.
|
30 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Electrons with \pt $>$ 20 GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$ are considered.
|
31 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
We use PF-based isolation with a cone size of $\Delta R<0.3$, using the effective area rho corrections documented at~\cite{ref:Egammaiso},
|
32 |
|
|
and we require a relative isolation $<$ 0.15.
|
33 |
|
|
Electrons in the transition region defined by $1.4442 < |\eta_{SC}| < 1.566$ are rejected.
|
34 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
Electrons with a selected muon with \pt $>$ 10 GeV within $\DeltaR<0.1$ are rejected.
|
35 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
The electron selection requirements are listed in Table~\ref{table:electrons} for completeness.
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
38 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
39 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:electrons} Summary of the electron selection requirements.}
|
40 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|cc}
|
41 |
|
|
\hline
|
42 |
|
|
Quantity & Barrel & Endcap \\
|
43 |
|
|
\hline
|
44 |
|
|
$\delta\eta$ & $<0.007$ & $<0.009$ \\
|
45 |
|
|
$\delta\phi$ & $<0.15$ & $<0.10$ \\
|
46 |
|
|
$\sigma_{i\eta i\eta}$ & $<0.01$ & $<0.03$ \\
|
47 |
|
|
H/E & $<0.12$ & $<0.10$ \\
|
48 |
|
|
$d_{0}$ (w.r.t. 1st good PV) & $<0.02$ cm & $<0.02$ cm \\
|
49 |
|
|
$d_{z}$ (w.r.t. 1st good PV) & $<0.2$ cm & $<0.2$ cm \\
|
50 |
|
|
$|1/E-1/P|$ & $<0.05~\rm{GeV}^{-1}$ & $<0.05~\rm{GeV}^{-1}$ \\
|
51 |
|
|
PF isolation / \pt & $<0.15$ & $<0.15$ \\
|
52 |
|
|
conversion rejection: fit probability & $<10^{-6}$ & $<10^{-6}$ \\
|
53 |
|
|
conversion rejection: missing hits & $\leq1$ & $\leq1$ \\
|
54 |
|
|
\hline
|
55 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
56 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
57 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
58 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
\subsubsection{Muon Selection}
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We use the tight muon selection recommended by the muon POG, as documented at~\cite{ref:muon}.
|
62 |
|
|
Muons with \pt $>$ 20 GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$ are considered. We use PF-based isolation with a cone size
|
63 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
of $\Delta R<0.3$, using the $\Delta\beta$ PU correction scheme, and we require a relative isolation of $<$ 0.15.
|
64 |
|
|
The muon selection requirements are listed in Table~\ref{table:muons} for completeness.
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
67 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
68 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:muons} Summary of the muons selection requirements.}
|
69 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|c}
|
70 |
|
|
\hline
|
71 |
|
|
Quantity & Requirement \\
|
72 |
|
|
\hline
|
73 |
|
|
muon type & global muon and PF muon \\
|
74 |
|
|
$\chi^2/\rm{ndf}$ & $<10$ \\
|
75 |
|
|
muon chamber hits & $\geq1$ \\
|
76 |
|
|
matched stations & $\geq2$ \\
|
77 |
|
|
$d_{0}$ (w.r.t. 1st good PV) & $<0.02$ cm \\
|
78 |
|
|
$d_{z}$ (w.r.t. 1st good PV) & $<0.5$ cm \\
|
79 |
|
|
pixel hits & $\geq1$ \\
|
80 |
|
|
tracker layers & $\geq5$ \\
|
81 |
|
|
\hline
|
82 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
83 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
84 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
85 |
|
|
|
86 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\subsubsection{PF Leptons}
|
87 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
For consistency with pfmet, both electrons and muons are required to be reconstructed as PF electrons and PF muons, respectively,
|
89 |
|
|
with \pt $>$ 20 GeV. For defining the dilepton invariant mass, the 4-momenta of the PF leptons are used.
|
90 |
|
|
|
91 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\subsection{Photons}
|
92 |
|
|
\label{sec:phosel}
|
93 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
As will be explained later, it is not essential that we select real photons.
|
95 |
|
|
What is needed are jets that are predominantly electromagnetic, well measured in the ECAL, and hence less likely to contribute to fake MET. We select photons with:
|
96 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
98 |
|
|
\item \pt $ > 22$ GeV
|
99 |
|
|
\item $|\eta| < 2$
|
100 |
|
|
\item $H/E < 0.1$
|
101 |
|
|
\item No matching pixel track (pixel veto)
|
102 |
|
|
\item There must be a pfjet of \pt $ >$ 10 GeV matched to the photon within $dR < 0.3$.
|
103 |
|
|
The matched jet is required to have a neutral electromagnetic energy fraction of at least 70\%.
|
104 |
|
|
\item
|
105 |
|
|
We require that the pfjet \pt matched to the photon satisfy
|
106 |
|
|
(pfjet \pt - photon \pt) $>$ -5~GeV.
|
107 |
|
|
This removes a few rare cases in which ``overcleaning" of a
|
108 |
|
|
%ECAL recHit
|
109 |
|
|
pfjet
|
110 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
generates fake MET.
|
111 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
112 |
|
|
\item We also match photons to calojets and require (calojet \pt - photon \pt) $>$ -5~GeV
|
113 |
|
|
(the same requirement used for pfjets). This is to remove other rare cases in which fake
|
114 |
|
|
energy is added to the photon object but not the calojet.
|
115 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
\item We reject photons which have an electron of at least \pt $>$ 10 GeV
|
117 |
|
|
within $dR < 0.2$
|
118 |
|
|
in order to reject
|
119 |
|
|
conversions from electrons from W decays which are accompanied by real MET.
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
\item We reject photons which are aligned with the MET to within 0.14 radians in phi.
|
122 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
124 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
\subsection{MET}
|
126 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
We use pfmet, henceforth referred to simply as \MET.
|
128 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
\subsection{Jets}
|
130 |
|
|
\label{sec:jetsel}
|
131 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
133 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item PF jets with L1FastL2L3 corrections (MC), L1FastL2L3residual corrections (data), using the 52X jet energy corrections
|
134 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\item $|\eta| < 2.5$
|
135 |
|
|
\item Passes loose PFJet ID
|
136 |
|
|
\item \pt $ > 30$ GeV for determining the jet multiplicity, \pt $ > 15$ GeV for calculation of \Ht
|
137 |
|
|
\item For the creation of photon templates, the jet matched to the photon passing the photon selection described above is vetoed
|
138 |
|
|
\item For the dilepton sample, jets are vetoed if they are within $\Delta R < 0.4$ from any lepton \pt $ > 20$~GeV passing analysis selection
|
139 |
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
140 |
|
|
|