ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/eventsel.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/eventsel.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.1 by benhoob, Mon Jun 25 11:45:56 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.5 by benhoob, Mon Sep 24 20:26:21 2012 UTC

# Line 13 | Line 13 | vertex is not fake, $\rm{ndf}\geq4$, $\r
13  
14   \subsection{Lepton Selection}
15  
16 < Because Z $\rightarrow\ell\ell$ ($\ell=e,\mu$) is a final state with very little
17 < background after a Z mass requirement is applied to the leptons,
16 > Because Z $\rightarrow\ell\ell$ ($\ell=e,\mu$) is a final state with very little background,
17   we restrict ourselves to events in which the Z boson decays to electrons or muons only.
18 < Therefore two same flavor, opposite sign leptons passing the ID described below are required in each event.
18 > Therefore opposite sign leptons passing the identification and isolation requirements described below are required in each event.
19  
20   \begin{itemize}
21   \item \pt $> 20$~GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$;
22 < \item Opposite-sign SF lepton pairs (OF e$\mu$ events are retained in a control
22 > \item Opposite-sign same-flavor (SF) ee and $\mu\mu$ lepton pairs (opposite-flavor (OF) e$\mu$ lepton pairs are retained in a control
23    sample used to estimate the FS contribution);
24   \item For SF events, the dilepton invariant mass is required to be consistent with the Z mass; namely $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
25   \end{itemize}
# Line 28 | Line 27 | Therefore two same flavor, opposite sign
27   \subsubsection{Electron Selection}
28  
29   The electron selection is the loose working point recommended by the E/gamma POG, as documented at~\cite{ref:Egamma}.
30 + Electrons with \pt $>$ 20 GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$ are considered.
31   We use PF-based isolation with a cone size of $\Delta R<0.3$, using the effective area rho corrections documented at~\cite{ref:Egammaiso},
32   and we require a relative isolation $<$ 0.15.
33   Electrons in the transition region defined by $1.4442 < |\eta_{SC}| < 1.566$ are rejected.
34 + Electrons with a selected muon with \pt $>$ 10 GeV within $\Delta R<0.1$ are rejected.
35   The electron selection requirements are listed in Table~\ref{table:electrons} for completeness.
36  
37   \begin{table}[htb]
# Line 57 | Line 58 | conversion rejection: missing hits     &
58  
59   \subsubsection{Muon Selection}
60  
61 < We use the tight muon selection recommended by the muon POG, as documented at~\cite{ref:muon}. We use PF-based isolation with a cone size
61 > We use the tight muon selection recommended by the muon POG, as documented at~\cite{ref:muon}.
62 > Muons with \pt $>$ 20 GeV and $|\eta|<2.4$ are considered. We use PF-based isolation with a cone size
63   of $\Delta R<0.3$, using the $\Delta\beta$ PU correction scheme, and we require a relative isolation of $<$ 0.15.
64   The muon selection requirements are listed in Table~\ref{table:muons} for completeness.
65  
# Line 100 | Line 102 | The matched jet is required to have a ne
102    This removes a few rare cases in which ``overcleaning" of a
103    %ECAL recHit
104    pfjet
105 <  generated fake MET.
105 >  generates fake MET.
106  
107   \item We also match photons to calojets and require (calojet \pt - photon \pt) $>$ -5~GeV
108    (the same requirement used for pfjets). This is to remove other rare cases in which fake
# Line 123 | Line 125 | We use pfmet, henceforth referred to sim
125   \label{sec:jetsel}
126  
127   \begin{itemize}
128 < \item PF jets with L1FastL2L3 corrections (MC), L1FastL2L3residual corrections (data)
128 > \item PF jets with L1FastL2L3 corrections (MC), L1FastL2L3residual corrections (data), using the 52X jet energy corrections
129   \item $|\eta| < 2.5$
130   \item Passes loose PFJet ID
131   \item \pt $ > 30$ GeV for determining the jet multiplicity, \pt $ > 15$ GeV for calculation of \Ht

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines