| 1 |
|
\section{Interpretation} |
| 2 |
+ |
\label{sec:interpretation} |
| 3 |
|
|
| 4 |
+ |
{\bf All results in this section correspond to 9.2 fb$^{-1}$ results and will be updated later.} |
| 5 |
|
In this section, we interpret the results of the targeted search in the context of the \wzmet\ model depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams} (right) |
| 6 |
|
and a gauge-mediated SUSY breaking (GMSB) model that produces a signature of \zzmet\ will be added. The results of the targeted search presented here |
| 7 |
|
will be combined with those of the trilepton ewkino search for the final \wzmet\ interpretation, and with the quadlepton ewkino search |
| 8 |
|
for the final GMSB \zzmet\ interpretation. |
| 9 |
|
|
| 10 |
< |
The exclusion is performed using the results of simultaneous counting experiments in the exclusive \MET\ signal regions defined by \MET\ $>$ 80 GeV, |
| 10 |
> |
The exclusion is performed using the results of simultaneous counting experiments in the five exclusive \MET\ signal regions defined by \MET\ $>$ 80 GeV, |
| 11 |
|
as summarized in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ} (commonly referred to as a ``shape analysis''). |
| 12 |
+ |
The upper limit calculation is performed with the LandS software using the LHC-type CLs criterion. |
| 13 |
+ |
The signal efficiency uncertainties include the luminosity (4.4\%), acceptance for the b-jet veto (4\%), lepton ID and isolation efficiency (2\% per lepton), |
| 14 |
+ |
and trigger efficiency (3\%). The uncertainty from JES is determined following the POG-recommended procedure, by varying the jet energies by the |
| 15 |
+ |
\pt- and $\eta$-dependent uncertainties and propagating this to the jet multiplicity, dijet mass, and \MET. |
| 16 |
+ |
The background uncertainties are quoted in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}. For each background contribution, the uncertainty is assumed to be 100\% |
| 17 |
+ |
correlated across all signal regions. |
| 18 |
+ |
|
| 19 |
|
For the \wzmet\ model, the signal efficiency times acceptance and cross section upper limits are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_wzmet}, |
| 20 |
|
along with the observed and expected exclusion contours, which are compared to the 2011 observed exclusion contour. |
| 21 |
|
Figure~\ref{fig:results_wzmetpoints} shows the excluded points used to derive the exclusion contours. We note that the map of exclusion |
| 32 |
|
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{plots/wzsms_xsec.pdf} |
| 33 |
|
\end{tabular} |
| 34 |
|
\caption{ Interpretation of the targeted analysis in the \wzmet\ model. The acceptance times efficiency (left) and cross section |
| 35 |
< |
upper limit (right) and displayed. The observed and expected exclusion contours are indicated and compared to the observed |
| 36 |
< |
exclusion from the 2011 analysis. |
| 35 |
> |
upper limit (right) are displayed. The observed and expected exclusion contours are indicated and compared to the observed |
| 36 |
> |
exclusion from the 2011 analysis. |
| 37 |
> |
%\newline |
| 38 |
> |
%Interpretation of the $\rm{Z}+\rm{dijet}$ analysis in the \wzmet\ model of Fig.~2(a). |
| 39 |
> |
%The shading indicates the cross section upper limit. The observed and expected exclusion contours are indicated and compared to the observed |
| 40 |
> |
%exclusion from the 2011 analysis. The region below the contours is excluded at 95\% confidence level. |
| 41 |
|
\label{fig:results_wzmet}} |
| 42 |
|
\end{center} |
| 43 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 61 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 62 |
|
|
| 63 |
|
The results of the interpretation in the GMSB \zzmet\ model are displayed in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_gmsb}, |
| 64 |
< |
as a function of the chargino and neutralino mass parameter $\mu$. These results exclude the range $X < \mu < Y$~GeV. |
| 64 |
> |
as a function of the chargino and neutralino mass parameter $\mu$. These results exclude the range $196 < \mu < 316$~GeV. |
| 65 |
|
|
| 66 |
|
\begin{figure}[!hb] |
| 67 |
|
\begin{center} |
| 68 |
< |
\includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{plots/ZDIJET_GMSB.pdf} |
| 69 |
< |
\caption{ Interpretation of the targeted analysis in the GMSB \zzmet\ model. |
| 68 |
> |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{plots/ZDIJET_GMSB.pdf} |
| 69 |
> |
\caption{ Interpretation of the targeted analysis in the GMSB \zzmet\ model. |
| 70 |
> |
%\newline |
| 71 |
> |
%Interpretation of the $\rm{Z}+\rm{dijet}$ analysis in the GMSB model discussed in the text. |
| 72 |
> |
%The observed and expected cross section upper limits are indicated as a function of the mass parameter $\mu$, and are compared to the theory |
| 73 |
> |
%cross section. The region $196 < \mu < 316$~GeV is excluded at 95\% confidence level. |
| 74 |
|
\label{fig:results_gmsb}} |
| 75 |
|
\end{center} |
| 76 |
|
\end{figure} |
| 77 |
+ |
|
| 78 |
+ |
|
| 79 |
+ |
|
| 80 |
+ |
\begin{table}[htb] |
| 81 |
+ |
\begin{center} |
| 82 |
+ |
\footnotesize |
| 83 |
+ |
\caption{\label{tab:gmsb} Summary of the parameters for the GMSB model used for the \zzmet\ interpretation. |
| 84 |
+ |
The masses of the lightest and second light neutralino, lightest chargino, and total next-to-leading order |
| 85 |
+ |
cross section, are indicated.} |
| 86 |
+ |
\begin{tabular}{l|cccc} |
| 87 |
+ |
\hline |
| 88 |
+ |
\hline |
| 89 |
+ |
$\mu$ [GeV] & $m_{\chizi}$ [GeV] & $m_{\chizii}$ [GeV] & $m_{\chipm}$ [GeV] & $\sigma_{\mathrm{NLO}}$ [pb] \\ |
| 90 |
+ |
%$\mu$ [GeV] & $m_{\chizi}$ [GeV] & & & \\ |
| 91 |
+ |
\hline |
| 92 |
+ |
%110 & 102 & 111 & 104 & 7.3 \\ |
| 93 |
+ |
130 & 122 & 131 & 124 & 3.8 \\ |
| 94 |
+ |
150 & 141 & 151 & 144 & 2.1 \\ |
| 95 |
+ |
170 & 161 & 171 & 164 & 1.3 \\ |
| 96 |
+ |
190 & 181 & 191 & 184 & 0.84 \\ |
| 97 |
+ |
210 & 201 & 211 & 203 & 0.56 \\ |
| 98 |
+ |
230 & 221 & 231 & 223 & 0.38 \\ |
| 99 |
+ |
250 & 240 & 251 & 243 & 0.27 \\ |
| 100 |
+ |
270 & 260 & 271 & 263 & 0.20 \\ |
| 101 |
+ |
290 & 280 & 291 & 283 & 0.14 \\ |
| 102 |
+ |
310 & 299 & 311 & 302 & 0.11 \\ |
| 103 |
+ |
330 & 319 & 331 & 322 & 0.080 \\ |
| 104 |
+ |
350 & 339 & 351 & 342 & 0.061 \\ |
| 105 |
+ |
370 & 358 & 371 & 362 & 0.047 \\ |
| 106 |
+ |
390 & 378 & 391 & 381 & 0.037 \\ |
| 107 |
+ |
410 & 398 & 411 & 401 & 0.029 \\ |
| 108 |
+ |
\hline |
| 109 |
+ |
\hline |
| 110 |
+ |
\end{tabular} |
| 111 |
+ |
\end{center} |
| 112 |
+ |
\end{table} |
