1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
\section{Results}
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
In this section we provide the results of the inclusive and targeted searches.
|
6 |
|
|
The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the inclusive analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl}.
|
7 |
|
|
A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_incl}.
|
8 |
|
|
Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
|
9 |
benhoob |
1.12 |
The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
|
10 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
11 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
12 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
13 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
14 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_19p5fb.pdf}
|
15 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
16 |
|
|
\caption{Results of the inclusive analysis. The observed \MET\ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted \MET\
|
17 |
|
|
distributions from \zjets, flavor-symmetric backgrounds, and WZ+ZZ backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
|
18 |
|
|
indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
|
19 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_incl}
|
20 |
|
|
}
|
21 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
22 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
27 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
28 |
|
|
\footnotesize
|
29 |
|
|
\caption{\label{tab:results_incl} Summary of results in the inclusive analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
|
30 |
|
|
the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
|
31 |
|
|
(WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
|
32 |
|
|
and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
|
33 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c}
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
36 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%Using pfmet out-of-the-box
|
37 |
|
|
%DON'T Apply mjj cut in templates
|
38 |
|
|
%WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0)
|
39 |
|
|
%WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
|
40 |
|
|
%Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet.root
|
41 |
|
|
%B-veto? 0
|
42 |
|
|
%K 0.14
|
43 |
|
|
%ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
|
44 |
|
|
%Yields in 0-60 GeV region
|
45 |
|
|
%data : 410573
|
46 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
%gjets : 414439
|
47 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%OF : 2861.58
|
48 |
|
|
%WZ : 295.321
|
49 |
|
|
%ZZ : 38.722
|
50 |
|
|
%Rare : 31.0719
|
51 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
%Scaling gjets by : 0.982887
|
52 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%SF events 419687
|
53 |
|
|
%OF events 43832
|
54 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
55 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%ee/#mu#mu events
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
\hline
|
58 |
|
|
\hline
|
59 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
60 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
& \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--100 GeV &\MET\ 100--200 GeV &\MET\ 200--300 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 300 GeV \\
|
61 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
\hline
|
62 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
\zjets\ bkg &309185 $\pm$ 92757 & 98161 $\pm$ 29449 & 4971 $\pm$ 1492 & 222 $\pm$ 67 & 11.3 $\pm$ 3.5 & 2.6 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
|
63 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 972 $\pm$ 151 & 1889 $\pm$ 293 & 2022 $\pm$ 314 & 1011 $\pm$ 157 & 50.7 $\pm$ 15.0 & 7.2 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
|
64 |
|
|
WZ bkg & 108.9 $\pm$ 54.5 & 186.4 $\pm$ 93.2 & 137.7 $\pm$ 68.9 & 78.7 $\pm$ 39.3 & 11.1 $\pm$ 5.6 & 3.1 $\pm$ 3.1 \\
|
65 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 12.1 $\pm$ 6.1 & 26.6 $\pm$ 13.3 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 6.2 $\pm$ 3.1 & 2.0 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
66 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
rare SM bkg & 10.1 $\pm$ 5.1 & 21.0 $\pm$ 10.5 & 20.6 $\pm$ 10.3 & 17.9 $\pm$ 9.0 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.1 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
|
67 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
68 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
total bkg &310289 $\pm$ 92757 &100284 $\pm$ 29451 & 7180 $\pm$ 1526 & 1360 $\pm$ 176 & 82.5 $\pm$ 16.8 & 16.0 $\pm$ 5.8 \\
|
69 |
|
|
data & 311030 & 99543 & 7578 & 1450 & 79 & 7 \\
|
70 |
|
|
% significance & 0.0$\sigma$ & -0.0$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.5$\sigma$ & -0.2$\sigma$ & -1.4$\sigma$ \\
|
71 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
72 |
|
|
\hline
|
73 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
|
74 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
75 |
|
|
%float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 222.4 , 11.3 , 2.6 };
|
76 |
|
|
%float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 67.3 , 3.5 , 1.0 };
|
77 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 1011.4 , 50.7 , 7.2 };
|
78 |
|
|
%float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 157.2 , 15.0 , 4.3 };
|
79 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 78.7 , 11.1 , 3.1 };
|
80 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 39.3 , 5.6 , 3.1 };
|
81 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 29.8 , 6.2 , 2.0 };
|
82 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 14.9 , 3.1 , 2.0 };
|
83 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 17.9 , 3.2 , 1.1 };
|
84 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 9.0 , 1.6 , 1.1 };
|
85 |
|
|
%int data_yield[nbins] = { 1450 , 79 , 7 };
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
88 |
|
|
|
89 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
90 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
91 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
92 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
94 |
|
|
|
95 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the targeted analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ}.
|
96 |
benhoob |
1.18 |
The dilepton mass distribution in data is also presented. In this plot, the \zjets\ dilepton mass shape is taken from MC
|
97 |
|
|
and normalized to match the data-driven prediction in the dilepton mass window 81--101~GeV. The flavor-symmetric background
|
98 |
|
|
is estimated from e$\mu$ events, and the WZ, ZZ, and rare backgrounds are from MC.
|
99 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}.
|
100 |
|
|
Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
|
101 |
benhoob |
1.12 |
The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
|
102 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
103 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
104 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
105 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
106 |
benhoob |
1.20 |
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{plots/ZDIJET_metDistribution.pdf} %
|
107 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{plots/ZDIJET_mllDistribution.pdf}
|
108 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
109 |
benhoob |
1.18 |
\caption{The \MET\ distribution after the dilepton mass requirement (left) and the dilepton mass distribution after the signal region requirement \MET\ $>$ 80 GeV,
|
110 |
|
|
for the $\rm{Z}+{dijet}$ analysis. The observed distribution in data
|
111 |
|
|
(black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted distributions from $\rm{Z}+\rm{jets}$, flavor-symmetric, sum of WZ and ZZ, and rare SM backgrounds.
|
112 |
|
|
The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
|
113 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
|
114 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_targ}
|
115 |
|
|
}
|
116 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
117 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
118 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
122 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
123 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\footnotesize
|
124 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{\label{tab:results_targ}\footnotesize Summary of results in the targeted analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
|
125 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
|
126 |
|
|
(WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
|
127 |
|
|
and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
|
128 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
|
129 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
130 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
|
131 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using pfmet out-of-the-box
|
132 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Apply mjj cut in templates
|
133 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
%WZ/ZZ selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0)
|
134 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
|
135 |
|
|
%Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet_bveto_mjjcut.root
|
136 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%B-veto? 1
|
137 |
|
|
%K 0.13
|
138 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
|
139 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Yields in 0-60 GeV region
|
140 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%data : 97293
|
141 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
%gjets : 97526.9
|
142 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%OF : 166.578
|
143 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
%WZ : 43.225
|
144 |
|
|
%ZZ : 8.81897
|
145 |
|
|
%Rare : 1.45917
|
146 |
|
|
%Scaling gjets by : 0.995345
|
147 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%SF events 98295
|
148 |
|
|
%OF events 2313
|
149 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
%ee/#mu#mu events
|
151 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
|
152 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\hline
|
153 |
|
|
\hline
|
154 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
& \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--80 GeV & \MET\ 80--100 GeV \\
|
155 |
|
|
\hline
|
156 |
benhoob |
1.17 |
\hline
|
157 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
\zjets\ bkg & 75839 $\pm$ 3042 & 21234 $\pm$ 859 & 690 $\pm$ 154 & 64.5 $\pm$ 22.2 \\
|
158 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 69.9 $\pm$ 11.9 & 96.7 $\pm$ 16.3 & 48.3 $\pm$ 8.3 & 35.2 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
|
159 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
WZ bkg & 16.1 $\pm$ 8.1 & 27.1 $\pm$ 13.5 & 11.8 $\pm$ 5.9 & 6.8 $\pm$ 3.4 \\
|
160 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 2.9 $\pm$ 1.4 & 6.0 $\pm$ 3.0 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.7 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
161 |
|
|
Rare SM bkg & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
|
162 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
163 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
Total bkg & 75929 $\pm$ 3042 & 21364 $\pm$ 859 & 754 $\pm$ 154 & 110 $\pm$ 23 \\
|
164 |
benhoob |
1.16 |
Data & 76302 & 20991 & 809 & 115 \\
|
165 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
%significance & 0.1$\sigma$ & -0.4$\sigma$ & 0.4$\sigma$ & 0.2$\sigma$ \\
|
166 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
\hline
|
167 |
|
|
\hline
|
168 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
&\MET\ 100--120 GeV &\MET\ 120--150 GeV &\MET\ 150--200 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV \\
|
169 |
benhoob |
1.13 |
\hline
|
170 |
benhoob |
1.17 |
\hline
|
171 |
|
|
\zjets\ bkg & 7.8 $\pm$ 3.1 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & 2.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
|
172 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 21.9 $\pm$ 4.0 & 13.2 $\pm$ 2.5 & 5.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
|
173 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
WZ bkg & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.9 & 2.9 $\pm$ 1.5 & 1.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
|
174 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 1.8 $\pm$ 0.9 & 1.9 $\pm$ 0.9 & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.7 \\
|
175 |
|
|
Rare SM bkg & 0.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
176 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
177 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
Total bkg & 35.4 $\pm$ 5.5 & 22.2 $\pm$ 3.5 & 11.3 $\pm$ 2.2 & 3.6 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
|
178 |
benhoob |
1.16 |
Data & 36 & 25 & 13 & 4 \\
|
179 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
%significance & 0.1$\sigma$ & 0.5$\sigma$ & 0.4$\sigma$ & 0.2$\sigma$ \\
|
180 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
181 |
|
|
\hline
|
182 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
|
183 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
|
184 |
|
|
|
185 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
%float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 64.5 , 7.8 , 3.7 , 2.0 , 0.4 };
|
186 |
benhoob |
1.17 |
%float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 22.2 , 3.1 , 1.6 , 1.0 , 0.3 };
|
187 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 35.2 , 21.9 , 13.2 , 5.7 , 0.8 };
|
188 |
|
|
%float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 6.2 , 4.0 , 2.5 , 1.6 , 0.4 };
|
189 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
%float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 6.8 , 3.7 , 2.9 , 1.9 , 0.9 };
|
190 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 3.4 , 1.9 , 1.5 , 0.9 , 0.4 };
|
191 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 2.8 , 1.8 , 1.9 , 1.4 , 1.3 };
|
192 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 1.4 , 0.9 , 0.9 , 0.7 , 0.7 };
|
193 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 0.5 , 0.2 , 0.4 , 0.4 , 0.3 };
|
194 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 0.2 , 0.1 , 0.2 , 0.2 , 0.1 };
|
195 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%int data_yield[nbins] = { 115 , 36 , 25 , 13 , 4 };
|
196 |
|
|
|
197 |
benhoob |
1.22 |
|
198 |
|
|
|
199 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
200 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
201 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
202 |
|
|
|
203 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\clearpage
|
204 |
benhoob |
1.16 |
|
205 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
206 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
207 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
208 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{plots/met_metall.pdf}
|
209 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
210 |
|
|
\caption{The \MET\ distribution after the dilepton mass requirement in the high dijet mass control region. The observed distribution in data
|
211 |
|
|
(black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted distributions from $\rm{Z}+\rm{jets}$, flavor-symmetric, sum of WZ and ZZ, and rare SM backgrounds.
|
212 |
|
|
The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
|
213 |
|
|
indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
|
214 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_targ_control}
|
215 |
|
|
}
|
216 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
217 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
218 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
220 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
221 |
|
|
\footnotesize
|
222 |
|
|
\caption{\label{tab:results_targ_control}\footnotesize Summary of results in the targeted analysis, in the high dijet mass control region.
|
223 |
|
|
The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
|
224 |
|
|
the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
|
225 |
|
|
(WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
|
226 |
|
|
and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
|
227 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
|
228 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
\hline
|
231 |
|
|
\hline
|
232 |
|
|
& \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--80 GeV & \MET\ 80--100 GeV \\
|
233 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
\hline
|
235 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
\hline
|
237 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
\zjets\ bkg & 157408.0 $\pm$ 6301.0 & 53665.9 $\pm$ 2151.3 & 2701.0 $\pm$ 595.0 & 358.6 $\pm$ 118.8 \\
|
238 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
FS bkg & 180.2 $\pm$ 30.1 & 290.8 $\pm$ 48.4 & 167.2 $\pm$ 28.0 & 123.8 $\pm$ 20.8 \\
|
239 |
|
|
WZ bkg & 41.6 $\pm$ 20.8 & 69.9 $\pm$ 35.0 & 33.4 $\pm$ 16.7 & 21.0 $\pm$ 10.5 \\
|
240 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 6.6 $\pm$ 3.3 & 14.8 $\pm$ 7.4 & 9.4 $\pm$ 4.7 & 7.8 $\pm$ 3.9 \\
|
241 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
Rare SM bkg & 1.4 $\pm$ 0.7 & 2.8 $\pm$ 1.4 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.9 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.7 \\
|
242 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
\hline
|
243 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
Total bkg & 157637.7 $\pm$ 6301.1 & 54044.1 $\pm$ 2152.2 & 2912.7 $\pm$ 595.9 & 512.6 $\pm$ 121.1 \\
|
244 |
|
|
Data & 158074 & 53608 & 2983 & 562 \\
|
245 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
|
246 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
\hline
|
248 |
|
|
\hline
|
249 |
|
|
&\MET\ 100--120 GeV &\MET\ 120--150 GeV &\MET\ 150--200 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV \\
|
250 |
|
|
\hline
|
251 |
|
|
\hline
|
252 |
|
|
|
253 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
\zjets\ bkg & 81.7 $\pm$ 27.3 & 52.0 $\pm$ 17.9 & 20.0 $\pm$ 6.9 & 9.5 $\pm$ 3.4 \\
|
254 |
|
|
FS bkg & 72.5 $\pm$ 12.3 & 55.1 $\pm$ 9.5 & 31.4 $\pm$ 7.7 & 15.9 $\pm$ 6.3 \\
|
255 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
WZ bkg & 13.6 $\pm$ 6.8 & 11.6 $\pm$ 5.8 & 9.7 $\pm$ 4.9 & 7.2 $\pm$ 3.6 \\
|
256 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 6.0 $\pm$ 3.0 & 6.2 $\pm$ 3.1 & 5.9 $\pm$ 3.0 & 5.6 $\pm$ 2.8 \\
|
257 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
Rare SM bkg & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
|
258 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
\hline
|
259 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
Total bkg & 174.8 $\pm$ 30.9 & 126.0 $\pm$ 21.3 & 67.9 $\pm$ 11.8 & 39.2 $\pm$ 8.5 \\
|
260 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
Data & 214 & 107 & 62 & 38 \\
|
261 |
benhoob |
1.21 |
|
262 |
benhoob |
1.19 |
\hline
|
263 |
|
|
\hline
|
264 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
266 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
267 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
270 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
272 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
273 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
274 |
benhoob |
1.16 |
\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_19p5fb_zoom100.pdf}
|
275 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
276 |
|
|
\caption{ Results for the inclusive analysis, the same as Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl} but zoomed in on the signal region \MET\ $>$ 100 GeV and on linear scale.
|
277 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_incl_zoom}
|
278 |
|
|
}
|
279 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
280 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
281 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
283 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
284 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
285 |
|
|
\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_bveto_all_19p5fb_zoom80.pdf}
|
286 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
287 |
|
|
\caption{ Results for the targeted analysis, the same as Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ} but zoomed in on the signal region \MET\ $>$ 80 GeV and on linear scale.
|
288 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_targ_zoom}
|
289 |
|
|
}
|
290 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
291 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
292 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
\clearpage
|