ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/results.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/results.tex (file contents):
Revision 1.3 by benhoob, Fri Sep 14 19:59:13 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.13 by benhoob, Fri Jan 25 18:07:22 2013 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2  
3   \section{Results}
4  
5 < In this section we provide the results of the inclusive and targeted searches. The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the
6 < inclusive analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl}. A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in
7 < Table~\ref{tab:results_incl}. Currently we blind the observed data yields for the signal regions, defined by \MET\ $>$ 100 GeV.
8 < These yields will be presented when the decision is made to unblind the Z region for the Aachen/ETH low-mass opposite-sign same-flavor
9 < dilepton analysis (``edge analysis''). In the low \MET\ region, we observe good agreement between the data and the predicted background,
10 < which validates the background estimation methodology.
5 > In this section we provide the results of the inclusive and targeted searches.
6 > The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the inclusive analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl}.
7 > A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_incl}.
8 > Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
9   The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
10  
11   \begin{figure}[!h]
12   \begin{center}
13   \begin{tabular}{cc}
14 < \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_92fb.pdf}
14 > \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_19p5fb.pdf}
15   \end{tabular}
16   \caption{Results of the inclusive analysis. The observed \MET\ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted \MET\
17   distributions from \zjets, flavor-symmetric backgrounds, and WZ+ZZ backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
# Line 36 | Line 34 | and total background is indicated for si
34  
35   \hline
36   \hline
37 +
38 + %Using pfmet out-of-the-box
39 + %DON'T Apply mjj cut in templates
40 + %WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0)
41 + %WZ/ZZ weight    : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
42 + %Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet.root
43 + %B-veto?   0
44 + %K         0.14
45 + %ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
46 + %Yields in 0-60 GeV region
47 + %data   : 410573
48 + %gjets  : 414209
49 + %OF     : 2861.58
50 + %WZ     : 295.321
51 + %ZZ     : 38.722
52 + %Rare   : 31.0719
53 + %Scaling gjets by : 0.983432
54 + %SF events 419687
55 + %OF events 43832
56 +
57 + %ee/#mu#mu events
58 +
59 + \hline
60 + \hline
61                        &   \MET\ 0--30 GeV   &  \MET\ 30--60 GeV   & \MET\ 60--100 GeV   &\MET\ 100--200 GeV   &\MET\ 200--300 GeV   & \MET\ $>$ 300 GeV  \\
62   \hline
63 <        \zjets\ bkg   &190124 $\pm$ 57038   & 57993 $\pm$ 17399   &    2744 $\pm$ 824   &      123 $\pm$ 37   &     7.4 $\pm$ 2.4   &     1.3 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
64 <             FS bkg   &      492 $\pm$ 77   &     947 $\pm$ 147   &     981 $\pm$ 152   &      503 $\pm$ 78   &    23.6 $\pm$ 7.1   &     3.0 $\pm$ 1.9  \\
65 <             WZ bkg   &   61.5 $\pm$ 43.0   &  104.8 $\pm$ 73.4   &   75.4 $\pm$ 52.8   &   41.2 $\pm$ 28.8   &     5.6 $\pm$ 3.9   &     1.6 $\pm$ 1.6  \\
66 <             ZZ bkg   &     7.6 $\pm$ 3.8   &    16.2 $\pm$ 8.1   &    17.4 $\pm$ 8.7   &    16.1 $\pm$ 8.1   &     3.2 $\pm$ 1.6   &     1.0 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
67 < \hline
68 <          total bkg   &190685 $\pm$ 57038   & 59061 $\pm$ 17400   &    3818 $\pm$ 840   &      683 $\pm$ 92   &    39.9 $\pm$ 8.6   &     6.9 $\pm$ 2.7  \\
69 <               data   &            190793   &             58953   &              3921   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?  \\
70 <       significance   &               0.0   &              -0.0   &               0.1   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?  \\
63 >        \zjets\ bkg   &308067 $\pm$ 92421   & 99280 $\pm$ 29785   &   5155 $\pm$ 1547   &      238 $\pm$ 72   &    11.6 $\pm$ 3.6   &     2.8 $\pm$ 1.0  \\
64 >             FS bkg   &     972 $\pm$ 151   &    1889 $\pm$ 293   &    2022 $\pm$ 314   &    1011 $\pm$ 157   &   50.7 $\pm$ 15.0   &     7.2 $\pm$ 4.3  \\
65 >             WZ bkg   &  108.9 $\pm$ 54.5   &  186.4 $\pm$ 93.2   &  137.7 $\pm$ 68.9   &   78.7 $\pm$ 39.3   &    11.1 $\pm$ 5.6   &     3.1 $\pm$ 3.1  \\
66 >             ZZ bkg   &    12.1 $\pm$ 6.1   &   26.6 $\pm$ 13.3   &   29.8 $\pm$ 14.9   &   29.8 $\pm$ 14.9   &     6.2 $\pm$ 3.1   &     2.0 $\pm$ 2.0  \\
67 >        Rare SM bkg   &    10.1 $\pm$ 5.1   &   21.0 $\pm$ 10.5   &   20.6 $\pm$ 10.3   &    17.9 $\pm$ 9.0   &     3.2 $\pm$ 1.6   &     1.1 $\pm$ 1.1  \\
68 > \hline
69 >   Total background   &309170 $\pm$ 92421   &101403 $\pm$ 29786   &   7365 $\pm$ 1580   &    1375 $\pm$ 178   &   82.8 $\pm$ 16.8   &    16.2 $\pm$ 5.8  \\
70 >               Data   &            311030   &             99543   &              7578   &              1450   &                79   &                 7  \\
71 > %       Significance   &       0.0$\sigma$   &      -0.1$\sigma$   &       0.1$\sigma$   &       0.4$\sigma$   &      -0.2$\sigma$   &      -1.4$\sigma$  \\
72   \hline
73   \hline
74 +
75 + %float Zbkg_yield[nbins]    = { 237.6 , 11.6 ,     2.8  };
76 + %float Zbkg_err[nbins]      = { 71.7 ,  3.6 ,     1.0  };
77 + %float OFbkg_yield[nbins]   = { 1011.4 , 50.7 ,     7.2  };
78 + %float OFbkg_err[nbins]     = { 157.2 , 15.0 ,     4.3  };
79 + %float WZbkg_yield[nbins]   = { 78.7 , 11.1 ,     3.1  };
80 + %float WZbkg_err[nbins]     = { 39.3 ,  5.6 ,     3.1  };
81 + %float ZZbkg_yield[nbins]   = { 29.8 ,  6.2 ,     2.0  };
82 + %float ZZbkg_err[nbins]     = { 14.9 ,  3.1 ,     2.0  };
83 + %float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 17.9 ,  3.2 ,     1.1  };
84 + %float rarebkg_err[nbins]   = {  9.0 ,  1.6 ,     1.1  };
85 + %int   data_yield[nbins]    = { 1450 ,   79 ,       7  };
86 +
87   \end{tabular}
88   \end{center}
89   \end{table}
90  
91   \clearpage
92  
93 < The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the targeted analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ}. A summary of the
94 < results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}.
95 < Here the results in the signal regions with \MET $>$ 100 GeV region are also blinded, pending completion of signal optimization studies
96 < (see Sec.~\ref{sec:optimization}).
61 < The observed yields are in good agreement with the predicted background the low \MET\ region, validating the background estimation
62 < methodology.
93 > The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the targeted analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ}.
94 > A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}.
95 > Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
96 > The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
97  
98   \begin{figure}[!h]
99   \begin{center}
100   \begin{tabular}{cc}
101 < \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_bvetoMedium_all_92fb.pdf}
101 > \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_bveto_all_19p5fb.pdf}
102   \end{tabular}
103 < \caption{Results of the targeted analysis. The observed \MET\ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted \MET\
104 < distributions from \zjets, flavor-symmetric backgrounds, and WZ+ZZ backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
103 > \caption{Results of the $\rm{Z}+{dijet}$ analysis. The observed $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$
104 > distributions from $\rm{Z}+\rm{jets}$, flavor-symmetric (FS), sum of WZ and ZZ (WZ+ZZ), and rare SM backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
105   indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
106   \label{fig:results_targ}
107   }
# Line 79 | Line 113 | indicated. The error bars indicate the s
113   \begin{table}[htb]
114   \begin{center}
115   \footnotesize
116 < \caption{\label{tab:results_targ} Summary of results in the targeted analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
116 > \caption{\label{tab:results_targ}\footnotesize Summary of results in the targeted analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
117   the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
118   (WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
119   and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
120 < \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c}
120 > \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
121  
122 < \hline
123 < \hline
124 <                      &   \MET\ 0--30 GeV   &  \MET\ 30--60 GeV   &  \MET\ 60--80 GeV   & \MET\ 80--100 GeV   &\MET\ 100--120 GeV  \\
125 < \hline
126 <        \zjets\ bkg   & 52823 $\pm$ 15847   &  14015 $\pm$ 4205   &     433 $\pm$ 130   &   40.9 $\pm$ 12.4   &     7.0 $\pm$ 2.2  \\
127 <             FS bkg   &    41.3 $\pm$ 7.2   &    49.5 $\pm$ 8.6   &    26.4 $\pm$ 4.7   &    17.9 $\pm$ 3.3   &    11.3 $\pm$ 2.2  \\
128 <             WZ bkg   &     9.5 $\pm$ 6.6   &   15.9 $\pm$ 11.2   &     6.6 $\pm$ 4.7   &     3.9 $\pm$ 2.7   &     2.1 $\pm$ 1.5  \\
129 <             ZZ bkg   &     2.1 $\pm$ 1.0   &     4.1 $\pm$ 2.1   &     2.2 $\pm$ 1.1   &     1.8 $\pm$ 0.9   &     1.0 $\pm$ 0.5  \\
130 < \hline
131 <          total bkg   & 52876 $\pm$ 15847   &  14085 $\pm$ 4205   &     468 $\pm$ 130   &   64.4 $\pm$ 13.2   &    21.5 $\pm$ 3.5  \\  
132 <               data   &             52485   &             14476   &               510   &                56   &                 ?  \\
133 <       significance   &              -0.0   &               0.1   &               0.3   &              -0.6   &                 ?  \\  
122 > %Using pfmet out-of-the-box
123 > %Apply mjj cut in templates
124 > %WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0)
125 > %WZ/ZZ weight    : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
126 > %Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet_bveto_mjjcut.root
127 > %B-veto?   1
128 > %K         0.13
129 > %ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
130 > %Yields in 0-60 GeV region
131 > %data   : 97293
132 > %gjets  : 97486.1
133 > %OF     : 166.578
134 > %WZ     : 47.4321
135 > %ZZ     : 9.52458
136 > %Rare   : 2.79426
137 > %Scaling gjets by : 0.995697
138 > %SF events 98295
139 > %OF events 2313
140 >
141 > %ee/#mu#mu events
142 >
143 > \hline
144 > \hline
145 >                      &   \MET\ 0--30 GeV   &  \MET\ 30--60 GeV   &  \MET\ 60--80 GeV   & \MET\ 80--100 GeV     \\
146 > \hline
147 >        \zjets\ bkg   & 75652 $\pm$ 22696   &  21414 $\pm$ 6425   &     722 $\pm$ 217   &   68.9 $\pm$ 21.2     \\
148 >             FS bkg   &   69.9 $\pm$ 11.9   &   96.7 $\pm$ 16.3   &    48.3 $\pm$ 8.3   &    35.2 $\pm$ 6.2     \\
149 >             WZ bkg   &    17.7 $\pm$ 8.8   &   29.8 $\pm$ 14.9   &    13.0 $\pm$ 6.5   &     7.4 $\pm$ 3.7     \\
150 >             ZZ bkg   &     3.1 $\pm$ 1.5   &     6.4 $\pm$ 3.2   &     3.5 $\pm$ 1.8   &     3.2 $\pm$ 1.6     \\
151 >        Rare SM bkg   &     0.8 $\pm$ 0.4   &     2.0 $\pm$ 1.0   &     1.1 $\pm$ 0.6   &     0.9 $\pm$ 0.5     \\
152 > \hline
153 >   Total background   & 75744 $\pm$ 22696   &  21549 $\pm$ 6425   &     788 $\pm$ 218   &      116 $\pm$ 22     \\
154 >               Data   &             76302   &             20991   &               809   &               115     \\
155 > %       Significance   &       0.0$\sigma$   &      -0.1$\sigma$   &       0.1$\sigma$   &      -0.0$\sigma$     \\
156 > \hline
157 > \hline
158 >                      &\MET\ 100--120 GeV   &\MET\ 120--150 GeV   &\MET\ 150--200 GeV   & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV  \\
159 > \hline
160 >        \zjets\ bkg   &     7.8 $\pm$ 2.5   &     4.8 $\pm$ 1.5   &     2.1 $\pm$ 0.7   &     0.5 $\pm$ 0.1  \\
161 >             FS bkg   &    21.9 $\pm$ 4.0   &    13.2 $\pm$ 2.5   &     5.7 $\pm$ 1.6   &     0.8 $\pm$ 0.4  \\
162 >             WZ bkg   &     4.0 $\pm$ 2.0   &     3.3 $\pm$ 1.6   &     2.0 $\pm$ 1.0   &     0.9 $\pm$ 0.9  \\
163 >             ZZ bkg   &     1.9 $\pm$ 1.0   &     2.1 $\pm$ 1.1   &     1.5 $\pm$ 0.8   &     1.4 $\pm$ 1.4  \\
164 >        Rare SM bkg   &     0.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &     0.9 $\pm$ 0.5   &     0.6 $\pm$ 0.3   &     0.4 $\pm$ 0.4  \\
165 > \hline
166 >   Total background   &    36.1 $\pm$ 5.2   &    24.3 $\pm$ 3.6   &    11.8 $\pm$ 2.2   &     3.9 $\pm$ 1.8  \\
167 >               Data   &                36   &                25   &                13   &                 4  \\
168 > %       Significance   &      -0.0$\sigma$   &       0.1$\sigma$   &       0.3$\sigma$   &       0.0$\sigma$  \\
169 > \hline
170 > \hline
171 >
172 >
173 > %float Zbkg_yield[nbins]    = { 68.9 ,  7.8 ,  4.8 ,  2.1 ,     0.5  };
174 > %float Zbkg_err[nbins]      = { 21.2 ,  2.5 ,  1.5 ,  0.7 ,     0.1  };
175 > %float OFbkg_yield[nbins]   = { 35.2 , 21.9 , 13.2 ,  5.7 ,     0.8  };
176 > %float OFbkg_err[nbins]     = {  6.2 ,  4.0 ,  2.5 ,  1.6 ,     0.4  };
177 > %float WZbkg_yield[nbins]   = {  7.4 ,  4.0 ,  3.3 ,  2.0 ,     0.9  };
178 > %float WZbkg_err[nbins]     = {  3.7 ,  2.0 ,  1.6 ,  1.0 ,     0.9  };
179 > %float ZZbkg_yield[nbins]   = {  3.2 ,  1.9 ,  2.1 ,  1.5 ,     1.4  };
180 > %float ZZbkg_err[nbins]     = {  1.6 ,  1.0 ,  1.1 ,  0.8 ,     1.4  };
181 > %float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = {  0.9 ,  0.4 ,  0.9 ,  0.6 ,     0.4  };
182 > %float rarebkg_err[nbins]   = {  0.5 ,  0.2 ,  0.5 ,  0.3 ,     0.4  };
183 > %int   data_yield[nbins]    = {  115 ,   36 ,   25 ,   13 ,       4  };
184  
101 \hline
102 \hline
103
104                      &\MET\ 120--140 GeV   &\MET\ 140--160 GeV   &\MET\ 160--180 GeV   &\MET\ 180--200 GeV   & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV  \\                                      
105 \hline                                                                                                                                                                    
106        \zjets\ bkg   &     2.6 $\pm$ 0.8   &     0.9 $\pm$ 0.3   &     0.6 $\pm$ 0.2   &     0.7 $\pm$ 0.3   &     0.8 $\pm$ 0.3  \\                                      
107             FS bkg   &     5.1 $\pm$ 1.2   &     3.1 $\pm$ 0.8   &     0.9 $\pm$ 0.5   &     0.3 $\pm$ 0.2   &     0.4 $\pm$ 0.3  \\                                      
108             WZ bkg   &     1.1 $\pm$ 0.8   &     0.8 $\pm$ 0.6   &     0.4 $\pm$ 0.3   &     0.3 $\pm$ 0.2   &     0.5 $\pm$ 0.5  \\                                      
109             ZZ bkg   &     0.8 $\pm$ 0.4   &     0.5 $\pm$ 0.3   &     0.4 $\pm$ 0.2   &     0.2 $\pm$ 0.1   &     0.7 $\pm$ 0.7  \\                                      
110 \hline                                                                                                                                                                    
111          total bkg   &     9.7 $\pm$ 1.7   &     5.2 $\pm$ 1.1   &     2.2 $\pm$ 0.6   &     1.4 $\pm$ 0.4   &     2.3 $\pm$ 0.9  \\                                      
112               data   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?  \\                                      
113       significance   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?   &                 ?  \\                                              
185  
115 \hline
116 \hline
186   \end{tabular}
187   \end{center}
188   \end{table}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines