| 1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
\section{Results}
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
In this section we provide the results of the inclusive and targeted searches.
|
| 6 |
|
|
The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the inclusive analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl}.
|
| 7 |
|
|
A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_incl}.
|
| 8 |
|
|
Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
|
| 9 |
benhoob |
1.12 |
The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
|
| 10 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 11 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
| 12 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 13 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
| 14 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 15 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 16 |
|
|
\caption{Results of the inclusive analysis. The observed \MET\ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted \MET\
|
| 17 |
|
|
distributions from \zjets, flavor-symmetric backgrounds, and WZ+ZZ backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
|
| 18 |
|
|
indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
|
| 19 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_incl}
|
| 20 |
|
|
}
|
| 21 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 22 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 27 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 28 |
|
|
\footnotesize
|
| 29 |
|
|
\caption{\label{tab:results_incl} Summary of results in the inclusive analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
|
| 30 |
|
|
the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
|
| 31 |
|
|
(WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
|
| 32 |
|
|
and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
|
| 33 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c}
|
| 34 |
|
|
|
| 35 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
| 36 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%Using pfmet out-of-the-box
|
| 37 |
|
|
%DON'T Apply mjj cut in templates
|
| 38 |
|
|
%WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0)
|
| 39 |
|
|
%WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
|
| 40 |
|
|
%Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet.root
|
| 41 |
|
|
%B-veto? 0
|
| 42 |
|
|
%K 0.14
|
| 43 |
|
|
%ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
|
| 44 |
|
|
%Yields in 0-60 GeV region
|
| 45 |
|
|
%data : 410573
|
| 46 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
%gjets : 414439
|
| 47 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%OF : 2861.58
|
| 48 |
|
|
%WZ : 295.321
|
| 49 |
|
|
%ZZ : 38.722
|
| 50 |
|
|
%Rare : 31.0719
|
| 51 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
%Scaling gjets by : 0.982887
|
| 52 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%SF events 419687
|
| 53 |
|
|
%OF events 43832
|
| 54 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
| 55 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%ee/#mu#mu events
|
| 56 |
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 58 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 59 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
| 60 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
& \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--100 GeV &\MET\ 100--200 GeV &\MET\ 200--300 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 300 GeV \\
|
| 61 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
\hline
|
| 62 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
\zjets\ bkg &309185 $\pm$ 92757 & 98161 $\pm$ 29449 & 4971 $\pm$ 1492 & 222 $\pm$ 67 & 11.3 $\pm$ 3.5 & 2.6 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
|
| 63 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 972 $\pm$ 151 & 1889 $\pm$ 293 & 2022 $\pm$ 314 & 1011 $\pm$ 157 & 50.7 $\pm$ 15.0 & 7.2 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
|
| 64 |
|
|
WZ bkg & 108.9 $\pm$ 54.5 & 186.4 $\pm$ 93.2 & 137.7 $\pm$ 68.9 & 78.7 $\pm$ 39.3 & 11.1 $\pm$ 5.6 & 3.1 $\pm$ 3.1 \\
|
| 65 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 12.1 $\pm$ 6.1 & 26.6 $\pm$ 13.3 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 6.2 $\pm$ 3.1 & 2.0 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
|
| 66 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
rare SM bkg & 10.1 $\pm$ 5.1 & 21.0 $\pm$ 10.5 & 20.6 $\pm$ 10.3 & 17.9 $\pm$ 9.0 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.1 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
|
| 67 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
| 68 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
total bkg &310289 $\pm$ 92757 &100284 $\pm$ 29451 & 7180 $\pm$ 1526 & 1360 $\pm$ 176 & 82.5 $\pm$ 16.8 & 16.0 $\pm$ 5.8 \\
|
| 69 |
|
|
data & 311030 & 99543 & 7578 & 1450 & 79 & 7 \\
|
| 70 |
|
|
% significance & 0.0$\sigma$ & -0.0$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.5$\sigma$ & -0.2$\sigma$ & -1.4$\sigma$ \\
|
| 71 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 72 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 73 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
|
| 74 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
| 75 |
|
|
%float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 222.4 , 11.3 , 2.6 };
|
| 76 |
|
|
%float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 67.3 , 3.5 , 1.0 };
|
| 77 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 1011.4 , 50.7 , 7.2 };
|
| 78 |
|
|
%float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 157.2 , 15.0 , 4.3 };
|
| 79 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 78.7 , 11.1 , 3.1 };
|
| 80 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 39.3 , 5.6 , 3.1 };
|
| 81 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 29.8 , 6.2 , 2.0 };
|
| 82 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 14.9 , 3.1 , 2.0 };
|
| 83 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 17.9 , 3.2 , 1.1 };
|
| 84 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 9.0 , 1.6 , 1.1 };
|
| 85 |
|
|
%int data_yield[nbins] = { 1450 , 79 , 7 };
|
| 86 |
|
|
|
| 87 |
benhoob |
1.15 |
|
| 88 |
|
|
|
| 89 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 90 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 91 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 92 |
|
|
|
| 93 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
| 94 |
|
|
|
| 95 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the targeted analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ}.
|
| 96 |
|
|
A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}.
|
| 97 |
|
|
Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
|
| 98 |
benhoob |
1.12 |
The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
|
| 99 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 100 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[!h]
|
| 101 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 102 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{cc}
|
| 103 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_bveto_all_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 104 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 105 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{Results of the $\rm{Z}+{dijet}$ analysis. The observed $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$
|
| 106 |
|
|
distributions from $\rm{Z}+\rm{jets}$, flavor-symmetric (FS), sum of WZ and ZZ (WZ+ZZ), and rare SM backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
|
| 107 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
|
| 108 |
|
|
\label{fig:results_targ}
|
| 109 |
|
|
}
|
| 110 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 111 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 112 |
|
|
|
| 113 |
|
|
|
| 114 |
|
|
|
| 115 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 116 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 117 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\footnotesize
|
| 118 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{\label{tab:results_targ}\footnotesize Summary of results in the targeted analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
|
| 119 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
|
| 120 |
|
|
(WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
|
| 121 |
|
|
and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
|
| 122 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
|
| 123 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 124 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using pfmet out-of-the-box
|
| 125 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Apply mjj cut in templates
|
| 126 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0)
|
| 127 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
|
| 128 |
|
|
%Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet_bveto_mjjcut.root
|
| 129 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%B-veto? 1
|
| 130 |
|
|
%K 0.13
|
| 131 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
|
| 132 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Yields in 0-60 GeV region
|
| 133 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%data : 97293
|
| 134 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
%gjets : 97526.9
|
| 135 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%OF : 166.578
|
| 136 |
|
|
%WZ : 47.4321
|
| 137 |
|
|
%ZZ : 9.52458
|
| 138 |
|
|
%Rare : 2.79426
|
| 139 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
%Scaling gjets by : 0.995281
|
| 140 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%SF events 98295
|
| 141 |
|
|
%OF events 2313
|
| 142 |
|
|
|
| 143 |
|
|
%ee/#mu#mu events
|
| 144 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
|
| 145 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\hline
|
| 146 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 147 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
& \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--80 GeV & \MET\ 80--100 GeV \\
|
| 148 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 149 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
\zjets\ bkg & 75834 $\pm$ 22751 & 21232 $\pm$ 6371 & 690 $\pm$ 208 & 64.5 $\pm$ 20.0 \\
|
| 150 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 69.9 $\pm$ 11.9 & 96.7 $\pm$ 16.3 & 48.3 $\pm$ 8.3 & 35.2 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
|
| 151 |
|
|
WZ bkg & 17.7 $\pm$ 8.8 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 13.0 $\pm$ 6.5 & 7.4 $\pm$ 3.7 \\
|
| 152 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 3.1 $\pm$ 1.5 & 6.4 $\pm$ 3.2 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.8 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
| 153 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
rare SM bkg & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 2.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
|
| 154 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
| 155 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
total bkg & 75926 $\pm$ 22751 & 21367 $\pm$ 6371 & 756 $\pm$ 208 & 111 $\pm$ 21 \\
|
| 156 |
|
|
data & 76302 & 20991 & 809 & 115 \\
|
| 157 |
|
|
% significance & 0.0$\sigma$ & -0.1$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.2$\sigma$ \\
|
| 158 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
\hline
|
| 159 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 160 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
&\MET\ 100--120 GeV &\MET\ 120--150 GeV &\MET\ 150--200 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV \\
|
| 161 |
benhoob |
1.13 |
\hline
|
| 162 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
\zjets\ bkg & 7.8 $\pm$ 2.7 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.4 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
|
| 163 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
FS bkg & 21.9 $\pm$ 4.0 & 13.2 $\pm$ 2.5 & 5.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
|
| 164 |
|
|
WZ bkg & 4.0 $\pm$ 2.0 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.6 & 2.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
|
| 165 |
|
|
ZZ bkg & 1.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 2.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 1.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 1.4 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
|
| 166 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
rare SM bkg & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
|
| 167 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
\hline
|
| 168 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
total bkg & 36.1 $\pm$ 5.3 & 23.2 $\pm$ 3.5 & 11.8 $\pm$ 2.2 & 3.9 $\pm$ 1.8 \\
|
| 169 |
|
|
data & 36 & 25 & 13 & 4 \\
|
| 170 |
|
|
% significance & -0.0$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.0$\sigma$ \\
|
| 171 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 172 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 173 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
|
| 174 |
benhoob |
1.14 |
%float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 64.5 , 7.8 , 3.7 , 2.0 , 0.4 };
|
| 175 |
|
|
%float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 20.0 , 2.7 , 1.4 , 0.6 , 0.1 };
|
| 176 |
benhoob |
1.11 |
%float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 35.2 , 21.9 , 13.2 , 5.7 , 0.8 };
|
| 177 |
|
|
%float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 6.2 , 4.0 , 2.5 , 1.6 , 0.4 };
|
| 178 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 7.4 , 4.0 , 3.3 , 2.0 , 0.9 };
|
| 179 |
|
|
%float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 3.7 , 2.0 , 1.6 , 1.0 , 0.9 };
|
| 180 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 3.2 , 1.9 , 2.1 , 1.5 , 1.4 };
|
| 181 |
|
|
%float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 1.6 , 1.0 , 1.1 , 0.8 , 1.4 };
|
| 182 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 0.9 , 0.4 , 0.9 , 0.6 , 0.4 };
|
| 183 |
|
|
%float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 0.5 , 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.3 , 0.4 };
|
| 184 |
|
|
%int data_yield[nbins] = { 115 , 36 , 25 , 13 , 4 };
|
| 185 |
|
|
|
| 186 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
|
| 187 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 188 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 189 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 190 |
|
|
|
| 191 |
benhoob |
1.3 |
\clearpage
|
