ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Root Listing
root/cvsroot/UserCode/benhoob/cmsnotes/ZMet2012/results.tex
Revision: 1.15
Committed: Wed Jan 30 10:03:12 2013 UTC (12 years, 3 months ago) by benhoob
Content type: application/x-tex
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: v8
Changes since 1.14: +13 -11 lines
Log Message:
update inclusive results with offline photon pt template binning

File Contents

# Content
1 \clearpage
2
3 \section{Results}
4
5 In this section we provide the results of the inclusive and targeted searches.
6 The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the inclusive analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_incl}.
7 A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_incl}.
8 Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
9 The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
10
11 \begin{figure}[!h]
12 \begin{center}
13 \begin{tabular}{cc}
14 \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_all_19p5fb.pdf}
15 \end{tabular}
16 \caption{Results of the inclusive analysis. The observed \MET\ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted \MET\
17 distributions from \zjets, flavor-symmetric backgrounds, and WZ+ZZ backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
18 indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
19 \label{fig:results_incl}
20 }
21 \end{center}
22 \end{figure}
23
24
25
26 \begin{table}[htb]
27 \begin{center}
28 \footnotesize
29 \caption{\label{tab:results_incl} Summary of results in the inclusive analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
30 the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
31 (WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
32 and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
33 \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c}
34
35
36 %Using pfmet out-of-the-box
37 %DON'T Apply mjj cut in templates
38 %WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0)
39 %WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
40 %Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet.root
41 %B-veto? 0
42 %K 0.14
43 %ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
44 %Yields in 0-60 GeV region
45 %data : 410573
46 %gjets : 414439
47 %OF : 2861.58
48 %WZ : 295.321
49 %ZZ : 38.722
50 %Rare : 31.0719
51 %Scaling gjets by : 0.982887
52 %SF events 419687
53 %OF events 43832
54
55 %ee/#mu#mu events
56
57 \hline
58 \hline
59
60 & \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--100 GeV &\MET\ 100--200 GeV &\MET\ 200--300 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 300 GeV \\
61 \hline
62 \zjets\ bkg &309185 $\pm$ 92757 & 98161 $\pm$ 29449 & 4971 $\pm$ 1492 & 222 $\pm$ 67 & 11.3 $\pm$ 3.5 & 2.6 $\pm$ 1.0 \\
63 FS bkg & 972 $\pm$ 151 & 1889 $\pm$ 293 & 2022 $\pm$ 314 & 1011 $\pm$ 157 & 50.7 $\pm$ 15.0 & 7.2 $\pm$ 4.3 \\
64 WZ bkg & 108.9 $\pm$ 54.5 & 186.4 $\pm$ 93.2 & 137.7 $\pm$ 68.9 & 78.7 $\pm$ 39.3 & 11.1 $\pm$ 5.6 & 3.1 $\pm$ 3.1 \\
65 ZZ bkg & 12.1 $\pm$ 6.1 & 26.6 $\pm$ 13.3 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 6.2 $\pm$ 3.1 & 2.0 $\pm$ 2.0 \\
66 rare SM bkg & 10.1 $\pm$ 5.1 & 21.0 $\pm$ 10.5 & 20.6 $\pm$ 10.3 & 17.9 $\pm$ 9.0 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.6 & 1.1 $\pm$ 1.1 \\
67 \hline
68 total bkg &310289 $\pm$ 92757 &100284 $\pm$ 29451 & 7180 $\pm$ 1526 & 1360 $\pm$ 176 & 82.5 $\pm$ 16.8 & 16.0 $\pm$ 5.8 \\
69 data & 311030 & 99543 & 7578 & 1450 & 79 & 7 \\
70 % significance & 0.0$\sigma$ & -0.0$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.5$\sigma$ & -0.2$\sigma$ & -1.4$\sigma$ \\
71 \hline
72 \hline
73
74
75 %float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 222.4 , 11.3 , 2.6 };
76 %float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 67.3 , 3.5 , 1.0 };
77 %float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 1011.4 , 50.7 , 7.2 };
78 %float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 157.2 , 15.0 , 4.3 };
79 %float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 78.7 , 11.1 , 3.1 };
80 %float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 39.3 , 5.6 , 3.1 };
81 %float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 29.8 , 6.2 , 2.0 };
82 %float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 14.9 , 3.1 , 2.0 };
83 %float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 17.9 , 3.2 , 1.1 };
84 %float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 9.0 , 1.6 , 1.1 };
85 %int data_yield[nbins] = { 1450 , 79 , 7 };
86
87
88
89 \end{tabular}
90 \end{center}
91 \end{table}
92
93 \clearpage
94
95 The observed and predicted \MET\ distributions for the targeted analysis are indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_targ}.
96 A summary of the results in the signal regions is provided in Table~\ref{tab:results_targ}.
97 Good agreement is observed between the data and the predicted background over the full \MET\ range.
98 The separate results for the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels are presented in App.~\ref{app:results}.
99
100 \begin{figure}[!h]
101 \begin{center}
102 \begin{tabular}{cc}
103 \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{plots/pfmet_bveto_all_19p5fb.pdf}
104 \end{tabular}
105 \caption{Results of the $\rm{Z}+{dijet}$ analysis. The observed $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$ distribution (black points) is compared with the sum of the predicted $\rm{E_{T}^{miss}}$
106 distributions from $\rm{Z}+\rm{jets}$, flavor-symmetric (FS), sum of WZ and ZZ (WZ+ZZ), and rare SM backgrounds. The ratio of observed to predicted yields in each bin is
107 indicated. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainty in the data and the shaded band indicates the total background uncertainty.
108 \label{fig:results_targ}
109 }
110 \end{center}
111 \end{figure}
112
113
114
115 \begin{table}[htb]
116 \begin{center}
117 \footnotesize
118 \caption{\label{tab:results_targ}\footnotesize Summary of results in the targeted analysis. The total background is the sum of the \zjets\ background predicted from
119 the \MET\ templates method (\zjets\ bkg), the flavor-symmetric background predicted from e$\mu$ events (FS bkg), and the WZ and ZZ backgrounds predicted from MC
120 (WZ bkg and ZZ bkg). All uncertainties include both the statistical and systematic components. The Gaussian significance of the deviation between the data
121 and total background is indicated for signal regions with at least 20 observed events. }
122 \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
123
124 %Using pfmet out-of-the-box
125 %Apply mjj cut in templates
126 %WZ/ZZ selection : ((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))&&(ngennu>0))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101))&&(njets>=2))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0)
127 %WZ/ZZ weight : weight * 19.5 * vtxweight * trgeff
128 %Opening ../output/V00-02-13/babylooper_data_53X_2012ALL_PhotonStitchedTemplate_pfmet_bveto_mjjcut.root
129 %B-veto? 1
130 %K 0.13
131 %ee+mm channels: scale em yield by 0.97
132 %Yields in 0-60 GeV region
133 %data : 97293
134 %gjets : 97526.9
135 %OF : 166.578
136 %WZ : 47.4321
137 %ZZ : 9.52458
138 %Rare : 2.79426
139 %Scaling gjets by : 0.995281
140 %SF events 98295
141 %OF events 2313
142
143 %ee/#mu#mu events
144
145 \hline
146 \hline
147 & \MET\ 0--30 GeV & \MET\ 30--60 GeV & \MET\ 60--80 GeV & \MET\ 80--100 GeV \\
148 \hline
149 \zjets\ bkg & 75834 $\pm$ 22751 & 21232 $\pm$ 6371 & 690 $\pm$ 208 & 64.5 $\pm$ 20.0 \\
150 FS bkg & 69.9 $\pm$ 11.9 & 96.7 $\pm$ 16.3 & 48.3 $\pm$ 8.3 & 35.2 $\pm$ 6.2 \\
151 WZ bkg & 17.7 $\pm$ 8.8 & 29.8 $\pm$ 14.9 & 13.0 $\pm$ 6.5 & 7.4 $\pm$ 3.7 \\
152 ZZ bkg & 3.1 $\pm$ 1.5 & 6.4 $\pm$ 3.2 & 3.5 $\pm$ 1.8 & 3.2 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
153 rare SM bkg & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 & 2.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
154 \hline
155 total bkg & 75926 $\pm$ 22751 & 21367 $\pm$ 6371 & 756 $\pm$ 208 & 111 $\pm$ 21 \\
156 data & 76302 & 20991 & 809 & 115 \\
157 % significance & 0.0$\sigma$ & -0.1$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.2$\sigma$ \\
158 \hline
159 \hline
160 &\MET\ 100--120 GeV &\MET\ 120--150 GeV &\MET\ 150--200 GeV & \MET\ $>$ 200 GeV \\
161 \hline
162 \zjets\ bkg & 7.8 $\pm$ 2.7 & 3.7 $\pm$ 1.4 & 2.0 $\pm$ 0.6 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.1 \\
163 FS bkg & 21.9 $\pm$ 4.0 & 13.2 $\pm$ 2.5 & 5.7 $\pm$ 1.6 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
164 WZ bkg & 4.0 $\pm$ 2.0 & 3.3 $\pm$ 1.6 & 2.0 $\pm$ 1.0 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.9 \\
165 ZZ bkg & 1.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 2.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 1.5 $\pm$ 0.8 & 1.4 $\pm$ 1.4 \\
166 rare SM bkg & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.5 & 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3 & 0.4 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
167 \hline
168 total bkg & 36.1 $\pm$ 5.3 & 23.2 $\pm$ 3.5 & 11.8 $\pm$ 2.2 & 3.9 $\pm$ 1.8 \\
169 data & 36 & 25 & 13 & 4 \\
170 % significance & -0.0$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.3$\sigma$ & 0.0$\sigma$ \\
171 \hline
172 \hline
173
174 %float Zbkg_yield[nbins] = { 64.5 , 7.8 , 3.7 , 2.0 , 0.4 };
175 %float Zbkg_err[nbins] = { 20.0 , 2.7 , 1.4 , 0.6 , 0.1 };
176 %float OFbkg_yield[nbins] = { 35.2 , 21.9 , 13.2 , 5.7 , 0.8 };
177 %float OFbkg_err[nbins] = { 6.2 , 4.0 , 2.5 , 1.6 , 0.4 };
178 %float WZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 7.4 , 4.0 , 3.3 , 2.0 , 0.9 };
179 %float WZbkg_err[nbins] = { 3.7 , 2.0 , 1.6 , 1.0 , 0.9 };
180 %float ZZbkg_yield[nbins] = { 3.2 , 1.9 , 2.1 , 1.5 , 1.4 };
181 %float ZZbkg_err[nbins] = { 1.6 , 1.0 , 1.1 , 0.8 , 1.4 };
182 %float rarebkg_yield[nbins] = { 0.9 , 0.4 , 0.9 , 0.6 , 0.4 };
183 %float rarebkg_err[nbins] = { 0.5 , 0.2 , 0.5 , 0.3 , 0.4 };
184 %int data_yield[nbins] = { 115 , 36 , 25 , 13 , 4 };
185
186
187 \end{tabular}
188 \end{center}
189 \end{table}
190
191 \clearpage