| 1 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\clearpage
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
\section{Data vs. MC Comparison in Preselection Region}
|
| 4 |
|
|
\label{sec:yields}
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
In this section we compare the data and MC samples passing the selection described in Sec.~\ref{sec:eventSelection}
|
| 7 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
In the following, the MC is reweighted to match the data distribution of number of reconstructed primary vertices.
|
| 8 |
|
|
%{\bf FIXME: UPDATE TO 5.1/fb VTX-REWEIGHTING, CURRENTLY USING OUTDATED FUNCTION}.
|
| 9 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
The trigger efficiencies of Sec.~\ref{sec:datasets} are applied. In all plots, the last bin contains the overflow.
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
We begin by counting the inclusive Z yields. Here we require the presence of two selected leptons without
|
| 12 |
|
|
any additional requirements on jets or \MET. In Fig.~\ref{fig:dilmass} the distribution of dilepton invariant
|
| 13 |
|
|
mass in the ee and $\mu\mu$ channels is displayed. In Table~\ref{table:zyields} the yields for selected dilepton
|
| 14 |
|
|
events in the Z mass window are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed, within the systematic uncertainties
|
| 15 |
|
|
of integrated luminosity (4.5\%), trigger efficiency (3\%), \zjets\ and \ttbar\ cross sections.
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 18 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 19 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 20 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
| 21 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass}\protect
|
| 22 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events with two selected leptons
|
| 23 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
| 24 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 25 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 26 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0)
|
| 27 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 28 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
| 29 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 30 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 46.80
|
| 31 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield ttV 110.19
|
| 32 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 3487.10
|
| 33 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 1798.02
|
| 34 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield ttbar 18784.90
|
| 35 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 5335.59
|
| 36 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%MC yield WZ 5014.99
|
| 37 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield zjets 5412155.17
|
| 38 |
|
|
%MC total yield 5446733.00
|
| 39 |
|
|
%data yield 5.60839e+06
|
| 40 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
| 41 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 42 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
| 43 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 55.66
|
| 44 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 130.83
|
| 45 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 4360.91
|
| 46 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 2219.78
|
| 47 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 22376.46
|
| 48 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 6658.82
|
| 49 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 6187.59
|
| 50 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 7012986.51
|
| 51 |
|
|
%MC total yield 7054976.50
|
| 52 |
|
|
%data yield 7.44544e+06
|
| 53 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 54 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
| 55 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 56 |
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 59 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 60 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields} Data and Monte Carlo yields for events with two selected leptons in the Z mass window. }
|
| 61 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
| 62 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
| 63 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 64 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
| 65 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 66 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
|
| 67 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 68 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 69 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
| 70 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 71 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
\zjets &4776593 $\pm$ 3391 &6227613 $\pm$ 3627 &2328 $\pm$ 73.9 &11006533 $\pm$ 4966 \\
|
| 72 |
|
|
\ttbar &3321.1 $\pm$ 45.8 &4014.4 $\pm$ 47.6 &7621.3 $\pm$ 68.7 &14956.8 $\pm$ 95.3 \\
|
| 73 |
|
|
WW &614.8 $\pm$ 6.0 &773.7 $\pm$ 6.3 &1433.1 $\pm$ 9.0 &2821.7 $\pm$ 12.6 \\
|
| 74 |
|
|
WZ &4342.7 $\pm$ 7.3 &5411.7 $\pm$ 7.7 &115.3 $\pm$ 1.1 &9869.7 $\pm$ 10.6 \\
|
| 75 |
|
|
ZZ &4712.8 $\pm$ 9.9 &5906.1 $\pm$ 10.5 & 21.0 $\pm$ 0.3 &10639.8 $\pm$ 14.4 \\
|
| 76 |
|
|
single top &315.3 $\pm$ 11.9 &388.4 $\pm$ 12.4 &709.5 $\pm$ 17.6 &1413.2 $\pm$ 24.6 \\
|
| 77 |
|
|
\ttV & 57.4 $\pm$ 1.1 & 68.1 $\pm$ 1.1 & 21.8 $\pm$ 0.7 &147.3 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
| 78 |
|
|
VVV & 30.1 $\pm$ 0.3 & 36.4 $\pm$ 0.4 & 6.9 $\pm$ 0.2 & 73.5 $\pm$ 0.5 \\
|
| 79 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
\hline
|
| 80 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
total SM MC &4789987.0 $\pm$ 3391.1 &6244211.0 $\pm$ 3627.1 &12256.7 $\pm$ 102.8 &11046454.7 $\pm$ 4966.5 \\
|
| 81 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 82 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
data & 4906970 & 6552612 & 13141 & 11472723 \\
|
| 83 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 84 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 85 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
|
| 86 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 87 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 88 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 89 |
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
| 91 |
|
|
|
| 92 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the inclusive search using the following requirements:
|
| 93 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\begin{itemize}
|
| 94 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\item Number of jets $\geq$ 2;
|
| 95 |
|
|
\item Same flavor dileptons (opposite flavor yields will be shown since they are used in data for the FS background estimation);
|
| 96 |
|
|
\item Dilepton invariant mass $81<m_{\ell\ell}<101$ GeV.
|
| 97 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 98 |
|
|
|
| 99 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the inclusive search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
| 100 |
benhoob |
1.5 |
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j} the data and MC yields
|
| 101 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
in the inclusive preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
| 102 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 103 |
|
|
|
| 104 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 105 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 106 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_2jets_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 107 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\caption{
|
| 108 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j}\protect
|
| 109 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the inclusive search
|
| 110 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
| 111 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 112 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 113 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 114 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
| 115 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 116 |
|
|
|
| 117 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2)
|
| 118 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 119 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
| 120 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 121 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 31.28
|
| 122 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 103.46
|
| 123 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 366.01
|
| 124 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 722.28
|
| 125 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 14229.66
|
| 126 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 2258.35
|
| 127 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1956.41
|
| 128 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 196280.15
|
| 129 |
|
|
%MC total yield 215947.61
|
| 130 |
|
|
%data yield 224358
|
| 131 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
| 132 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 133 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
| 134 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 37.07
|
| 135 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 123.73
|
| 136 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 444.00
|
| 137 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 881.50
|
| 138 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 16957.57
|
| 139 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 2782.22
|
| 140 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 2384.37
|
| 141 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 246103.06
|
| 142 |
|
|
%MC total yield 269713.53
|
| 143 |
|
|
%data yield 281148
|
| 144 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 145 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{center}
|
| 146 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 147 |
|
|
|
| 148 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 149 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 150 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the inclusive search.
|
| 151 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
}
|
| 152 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
| 153 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 154 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 155 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 156 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
| 157 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 158 |
|
|
|
| 159 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
| 160 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 161 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 162 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 163 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 164 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
| 165 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 166 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
\zjets &174022.4 $\pm$ 645.0 &218277.0 $\pm$ 678.9 &86.9 $\pm$ 14.4 &392386.4 $\pm$ 936.5 \\
|
| 167 |
|
|
\ttbar &2536.3 $\pm$ 40.1 &3058.7 $\pm$ 41.6 &5824.7 $\pm$ 60.1 &11419.7 $\pm$ 83.3 \\
|
| 168 |
|
|
WW & 59.5 $\pm$ 1.9 & 73.2 $\pm$ 1.9 &134.2 $\pm$ 2.8 &266.9 $\pm$ 3.9 \\
|
| 169 |
|
|
WZ &1709.7 $\pm$ 4.7 &2098.1 $\pm$ 4.9 & 20.0 $\pm$ 0.4 &3827.8 $\pm$ 6.8 \\
|
| 170 |
|
|
ZZ &2002.4 $\pm$ 6.9 &2477.2 $\pm$ 7.2 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.2 &4483.8 $\pm$ 9.9 \\
|
| 171 |
|
|
single top &121.2 $\pm$ 7.4 &137.7 $\pm$ 7.4 &263.7 $\pm$ 10.7 &522.6 $\pm$ 15.0 \\
|
| 172 |
|
|
\ttV & 54.9 $\pm$ 1.0 & 65.6 $\pm$ 1.1 & 20.0 $\pm$ 0.6 &140.5 $\pm$ 1.6 \\
|
| 173 |
|
|
VVV & 21.7 $\pm$ 0.3 & 26.2 $\pm$ 0.3 & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 51.3 $\pm$ 0.4 \\
|
| 174 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
| 175 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
total SM MC &180528.1 $\pm$ 646.4 &226213.8 $\pm$ 680.2 &6357.1 $\pm$ 62.7 &413098.9 $\pm$ 940.4 \\
|
| 176 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
| 177 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
data & 185555 & 234132 & 6231 & 425918 \\
|
| 178 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\hline
|
| 179 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 180 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 181 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
\end{tabular}
|
| 182 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 183 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 184 |
|
|
|
| 185 |
|
|
|
| 186 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
| 187 |
|
|
|
| 188 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
We next define the preselection region for the targeted search by adding the following requirements:
|
| 189 |
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
| 190 |
|
|
\item Veto events containing a b-tagged jet;
|
| 191 |
|
|
\item Dijet invariant mass $70<m_{jj}<110$ GeV;
|
| 192 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\item Veto events containing a third selected lepton (electron or muon) with \pt $>$ 10 GeV;
|
| 193 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
\end{itemize}
|
| 194 |
|
|
|
| 195 |
|
|
The rejection of events with a b-tagged jet strongly suppresses the \ttbar\ background, which is the dominant background in the inclusive search
|
| 196 |
|
|
after requiring large \MET. The requirement that the jet pair is consistent with originating from W/Z decay is motivated by the fact that we are
|
| 197 |
|
|
searching for signatures producing V(jj)Z($\ell\ell$)+\MET; this requirement suppresses the \zjets\ and \ttbar\ backgrounds. The veto of events
|
| 198 |
|
|
containting a third electron or muon suppresses the WZ background, and also serves to make this analyis exclusive with respect to searches in
|
| 199 |
|
|
the trilepton final state.
|
| 200 |
|
|
|
| 201 |
|
|
The dilepton mass distributions in the preselection region of the targeted search (without the dilepton mass requirement applied)
|
| 202 |
|
|
for the ee and $\mu\mu$ final states are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}. In Table~\ref{table:zyields_2j_targeted}
|
| 203 |
|
|
the data and MC yields in the preselection region are indicated. Good data vs. MC agreement is observed.
|
| 204 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
We also show the distribution of dijet mass in the targeted preselection (with the requirement on this quantity removed) in Fig.~\ref{fig:mjj},
|
| 205 |
|
|
which demonstrates that the MC does a reasonable job of modeling this quantity.
|
| 206 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
| 207 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 208 |
|
|
% veto b-jets with CSV MEDIUM
|
| 209 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 210 |
|
|
|
| 211 |
|
|
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 212 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 213 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/dilmass_targeted_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 214 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\caption{
|
| 215 |
|
|
\label{fig:dilmass_2j_targeted}\protect
|
| 216 |
|
|
Dilepton mass distribution for events in the preselection region of the targeted search
|
| 217 |
|
|
in the ee (left) and $\mu\mu$ (right) final states.}
|
| 218 |
|
|
|
| 219 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 220 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 221 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
| 222 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 223 |
|
|
|
| 224 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2)
|
| 225 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 226 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor ee
|
| 227 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 228 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 5.81
|
| 229 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.52
|
| 230 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 65.58
|
| 231 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 39.09
|
| 232 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 515.71
|
| 233 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 876.67
|
| 234 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 597.84
|
| 235 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 47170.90
|
| 236 |
|
|
%MC total yield 49275.13
|
| 237 |
|
|
%data yield 50069
|
| 238 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%Plotting var dilmass flavor mm
|
| 239 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 240 |
|
|
%Warning in <TROOT::Append>: Replacing existing TH1: htemp (Potential memory leak).
|
| 241 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 6.89
|
| 242 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.44
|
| 243 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 80.43
|
| 244 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 51.21
|
| 245 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 561.84
|
| 246 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1074.99
|
| 247 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 735.13
|
| 248 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 59467.12
|
| 249 |
|
|
%MC total yield 61981.05
|
| 250 |
|
|
%data yield 62950
|
| 251 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 252 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 253 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 254 |
|
|
|
| 255 |
|
|
\begin{table}[htb]
|
| 256 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 257 |
|
|
\caption{\label{table:zyields_2j_targeted} Data and MC yields in the preselection region of the targeted search.
|
| 258 |
|
|
}
|
| 259 |
|
|
\begin{tabular}{lccccc}
|
| 260 |
|
|
|
| 261 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 262 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 263 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
| 264 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 265 |
|
|
|
| 266 |
benhoob |
1.8 |
%Using selection : ((((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(mjj>70.0 && mjj<110.0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
| 267 |
benhoob |
1.9 |
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 268 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
|
| 269 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 270 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 271 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
Sample & ee & $\mu\mu$ & e$\mu$ & total \\
|
| 272 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 273 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
\zjets &41811.7 $\pm$ 316.2 &52620.2 $\pm$ 333.3 & 19.4 $\pm$ 6.9 &94451.2 $\pm$ 459.4 \\
|
| 274 |
|
|
\ttbar & 99.9 $\pm$ 8.0 & 95.8 $\pm$ 7.3 &215.1 $\pm$ 11.5 &410.8 $\pm$ 15.8 \\
|
| 275 |
|
|
WW & 11.0 $\pm$ 0.8 & 14.1 $\pm$ 0.8 & 25.8 $\pm$ 1.2 & 50.9 $\pm$ 1.7 \\
|
| 276 |
|
|
WZ &525.4 $\pm$ 2.6 &648.5 $\pm$ 2.7 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.2 &1177.0 $\pm$ 3.8 \\
|
| 277 |
|
|
ZZ &779.2 $\pm$ 4.3 &957.9 $\pm$ 4.5 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 &1737.9 $\pm$ 6.3 \\
|
| 278 |
|
|
single top & 9.1 $\pm$ 2.1 & 8.7 $\pm$ 1.8 & 14.0 $\pm$ 2.4 & 31.9 $\pm$ 3.7 \\
|
| 279 |
|
|
\ttV & 1.6 $\pm$ 0.2 & 1.7 $\pm$ 0.2 & 0.8 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.1 $\pm$ 0.3 \\
|
| 280 |
|
|
VVV & 3.4 $\pm$ 0.1 & 4.2 $\pm$ 0.1 & 0.9 $\pm$ 0.1 & 8.5 $\pm$ 0.2 \\
|
| 281 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
| 282 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
total SM MC &43241.2 $\pm$ 316.3 &54351.0 $\pm$ 333.4 &280.0 $\pm$ 13.7 &97872.2 $\pm$ 459.8 \\
|
| 283 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
\hline
|
| 284 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
data & 43444 & 54851 & 275 & 98570 \\
|
| 285 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
\hline
|
| 286 |
|
|
\hline
|
| 287 |
|
|
|
| 288 |
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
| 289 |
|
|
\end{center}
|
| 290 |
|
|
\end{table}
|
| 291 |
|
|
|
| 292 |
|
|
|
| 293 |
|
|
|
| 294 |
benhoob |
1.2 |
|
| 295 |
|
|
\clearpage
|
| 296 |
|
|
|
| 297 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\begin{figure}[hbt]
|
| 298 |
|
|
\begin{center}
|
| 299 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{plots/mjj_targeted_19p5fb.pdf}
|
| 300 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\caption{
|
| 301 |
|
|
\label{fig:mjj}\protect
|
| 302 |
benhoob |
1.6 |
Distributions of dijet mass for the targeted preselection in the ee (left), $\mu\mu$ (middle) and e$\mu$ (right) final state.
|
| 303 |
|
|
}
|
| 304 |
benhoob |
1.4 |
\end{center}
|
| 305 |
|
|
\end{figure}
|
| 306 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 307 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Loading babies at : ../output/V00-02-13
|
| 308 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%-------------------------------------
|
| 309 |
|
|
%USING SKIMMED SAMPLES WITH NJETS >= 2
|
| 310 |
|
|
%-------------------------------------
|
| 311 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
| 312 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%Using selection : (((((((((leptype==0 && (ee==1 || isdata==0))||(leptype==1 && (mm==1 || isdata==0)))||(leptype==2 && (em==1||me==1||isdata==0)))&&(csc==0 && hbhe==1 && hcallaser==1 && ecaltp==1 && trkfail==1 && eebadsc==1 && hbhenew==1))&&(lep1.pt()>20.0 && lep2.pt()>20.0))&&(dilmass>15.0))&&(njets>=2))&&(nbcsvm==0))&&(nlep==2))&&(dilmass>81 && dilmass<101)
|
| 313 |
|
|
%Using weight : weight * 19.5 * trgeff * vtxweight
|
| 314 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Plotting var mjj flavor ee
|
| 315 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 316 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 13.74
|
| 317 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 7.88
|
| 318 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 54.58
|
| 319 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 31.79
|
| 320 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 430.86
|
| 321 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1525.36
|
| 322 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1454.36
|
| 323 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 156740.32
|
| 324 |
|
|
%MC total yield 160258.89
|
| 325 |
|
|
%data yield 162621
|
| 326 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Plotting var mjj flavor mm
|
| 327 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 328 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 16.73
|
| 329 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 9.35
|
| 330 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 66.32
|
| 331 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 37.51
|
| 332 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 503.49
|
| 333 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 1878.14
|
| 334 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 1778.58
|
| 335 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 196225.75
|
| 336 |
|
|
%MC total yield 200515.88
|
| 337 |
|
|
%data yield 204531
|
| 338 |
benhoob |
1.7 |
%Plotting var mjj flavor em
|
| 339 |
|
|
%compareDataMC : apply trigeff 1
|
| 340 |
benhoob |
1.10 |
%MC yield VVV 2.57
|
| 341 |
|
|
%MC yield ttV 3.16
|
| 342 |
|
|
%MC yield WW 121.17
|
| 343 |
|
|
%MC yield single top 68.54
|
| 344 |
|
|
%MC yield ttbar 1055.70
|
| 345 |
|
|
%MC yield ZZ 2.24
|
| 346 |
|
|
%MC yield WZ 13.62
|
| 347 |
|
|
%MC yield zjets 74.64
|
| 348 |
|
|
%MC total yield 1341.64
|
| 349 |
|
|
%data yield 1363
|
| 350 |
|
|
|
| 351 |
benhoob |
1.1 |
|
